Autonomic thermoregulatory dysfunction in neurofibromatosis type 1.

OBJECTIVE: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) causes neural and cutaneous disorders and reduced exercise capacity. Exercise/heat exposure increasing internal temperature must be compensated by eccrine sweat function and warmed skin vasodilation. We suspected NF1 could adversely affect eccrine sweat function and/or vascular thermoregulatory responses (VTR). METHODS: The eccrine sweat function and VTR of 25 NF1 volunteers (14 males, 11 females; 16-57 years old) were compared with 23 non-NF1 controls matched by sex, age, height and weight (CG). Sweating was induced by 1) pilocarpine 1% iontophoresis (PILO); and 2) by passive heating (HEAT) via the lower third of the legs being immersed in 42°C water for one hour. Previously established eccrine sweat function and VTR protocols were used. RESULTS: The NF1 group showed: a) lower sweat rate than the CG group during PILO; b) a smaller diastolic pressure decrease; and c) higher tympanic temperatures than controls during HEAT (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Reduced sweating and vascular thermoregulatory responses suggest autonomic dysfunction in NF1 individuals.

Autonomic thermoregulatory dysfunction in neurofibromatosis type 1 / Disfunção autonômica termorregulatória na neurofibromatose do tipo 1

ABSTRACT Objective Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) causes neural and cutaneous disorders and reduced exercise capacity. Exercise/heat exposure increasing internal temperature must be compensated by eccrine sweat function and warmed skin vasodilation. We suspected NF1 could adversely affect eccrine sweat function and/or vascular thermoregulatory responses (VTR). Methods The eccrine sweat function and VTR of 25 NF1 volunteers (14 males, 11 females; 16–57 years old) were compared with 23 non-NF1 controls matched by sex, age, height and weight (CG). Sweating was induced by 1) pilocarpine 1% iontophoresis (PILO); and 2) by passive heating (HEAT) via the lower third of the legs being immersed in 42°C water for one hour. Previously established eccrine sweat function and VTR protocols were used. Results The NF1 group showed: a) lower sweat rate than the CG group during PILO; b) a smaller diastolic pressure decrease; and c) higher tympanic temperatures than controls during HEAT (p < 0.05). Conclusion Reduced sweating and vascular thermoregulatory responses suggest autonomic dysfunction in NF1 individuals.

RESUMO Objetivo Neurofibromatose do tipo 1 (NF1) causa problemas neurais e cutâneos e diminuição da capacidade física. O aumento da temperatura interna durante exercício e exposição ao calor precisa ser compensada pela função sudorípara écrina (FSE) e aquecimento cutâneo por vasodilatação (RVT). Suspeitou-se clinicamente que a NF1 poderia prejudicar a FSE e a RVT. Métodos A FSE e RVT de 25 voluntários com NF1 (14 homens, 11 mulheres; 16–57 anos) e de 23 sem-NF1, emparelhados por sexo, idade, estatura e peso corporal, foram medidas com protocolos validados anteriormente. A sudorese foi induzida por iontoforese com pilocarpina (PILO) e aquecimento passivo por imersão das pernas em água a 42°C durante uma hora (HEAT). Resultados O grupo NF1 apresentou menor taxa de sudorese na situação PILO, menor redução da pressão diastólica e maior temperatura timpânica na situação HEAT (p < 0.05). Conclusão As respostas sudorípara e vascular reduzidas sugerem disfunção autonômica nas pessoas com NF1.

Neurofibromatoses: part 1 - diagnosis and differential diagnosis.

Neurofibromatoses (NF) are a group of genetic multiple tumor growing predisposition diseases: neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and schwannomatosis (SCH), which have in common the neural origin of tumors and cutaneous signs. They affect nearly 80 thousand of Brazilians. In recent years, the increased scientific knowledge on NF has allowed better clinical management and reduced complication morbidity, resulting in higher quality of life for NF patients. In most cases, neurology, psychiatry, dermatology, clinical geneticists, oncology and internal medicine specialists are able to make the differential diagnosis between NF and other diseases and to identify major NF complications. Nevertheless, due to its great variability in phenotype expression, progressive course, multiple organs involvement and unpredictable natural evolution, NF often requires the support of neurofibromatoses specialists for proper treatment and genetic counseling. This Part 1 offers step-by-step guidelines for NF differential diagnosis. Part 2 will present the NF clinical management.

Neurofibromatoses: part 1 diagnosis and differential diagnosis / Das neurofibromatoses: parte 1 diagnostico e diagnostico diferencial

Neurofibromatoses (NF) are a group of genetic multiple tumor growing predisposition diseases: neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and schwannomatosis (SCH), which have in common the neural origin of tumors and cutaneous signs. They affect nearly 80 thousand of Brazilians. In recent years, the increased scientific knowledge on NF has allowed better clinical management and reduced complication morbidity, resulting in higher quality of life for NF patients. In most cases, neurology, psychiatry, dermatology, clinical geneticists, oncology and internal medicine specialists are able to make the differential diagnosis between NF and other diseases and to identify major NF complications. Nevertheless, due to its great variability in phenotype expression, progressive course, multiple organs involvement and unpredictable natural evolution, NF often requires the support of neurofibromatoses specialists for proper treatment and genetic counseling. This Part 1 offers step-by-step guidelines for NF differential diagnosis. Part 2 will present the NF clinical management.

Neurofibromatoses (NF) constituem um grupo de doenças genéticas com predisposição ao crescimento de múltiplos tumores: tipo 1 (NF1), tipo 2 (NF2) e schwannomatose (SCH). Estas doenças têm em comum a origem neural dos tumores e os sinais cutâneos. Afetam cerca de 80 mil brasileiros. O maior conhecimento científico sobre as NF tem permitido melhor manejo clínico, redução da morbidade das complicações e melhor qualidade de vida. Na maioria dos casos, os especialistas em neurologia, dermatologia, genética clínica, oncologia e medicina interna estão capacitados a realizar o diagnóstico diferencial e identificar suas principais complicações. Devido à sua variabilidade fenotípica, curso progressivo, multiplicidade de órgãos acometidos e evolução imprevisível, as NF frequentemente necessitam de especialistas em NF para o acompanhamento. A Parte 1 deste texto oferece orientações para o diagnóstico de cada tipo de NF e discute os diagnósticos diferenciais com outras doenças. A Parte 2 oferecerá orientações em relação ao manejo clínico das NF.

Non-invasive endothelial function assessment in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a multi-systemic disease caused by neurofibromin deficiency. The reduced life expectancy of patients with NF1 has been attributed to NF1-associated malignant neoplasms. However, an analysis of death certificates in the USA suggests that vascular disease could be an important cause of early death among these patients. Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is related to vasculopathy and is an early marker of subclinical atherosclerosis. Since neurofibromin has already been demonstrated to affect endothelial cell function, ED may be associated with NF1. The purpose of this study was to assess endothelial function in patients with NF1 using a non-invasive method. METHODS: NF1 patients and healthy control subjects, aged 18 to 35 years, were included. Subjects were excluded if they had any risk factor for vascular disease or any other condition known to affect endothelial function. Endothelial function was assessed using reactive hyperemia-peripheral arterial tone (RH-PAT) technology. ED was defined as a reactive hyperemia index (RHI) lower than 1.35. RESULTS: Four of the 29 (13.8%) NF1 patients and 1 of the 30 (3.3%) healthy volunteers had ED (p=0.153). RHI medians and interquartile intervals were 1.8 (1.58-2.43) for the NF1 group and 2.02 (1.74-2.49) for the control group (p=0.361). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of ED was similar in NF1 patients and healthy controls.

Risk factors for methicillin-resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia at the time of hospital admission.

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) seem to be increasing. Characteristics permitting recognition of patients with such strains would aid infection control efforts and choice of empiric therapy pending culture and susceptibility results. METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records for all adults seen in the Emergency Care Center at Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, whose blood cultures taken within 24 hours of entry yielded S. aureus. Risk factors for the presence of methicillin resistance in S. aureus isolates recovered from patients with staphylococcal bacteremia were assessed. RESULTS: S. aureus isolates from 118 (40%) of 297 study patients with bacteremia at the time of admission were methicillin-resistant. Multivariate analysis identified hospitalization in the 6 months preceding admission [odds ratio (OR) = 4.4; 95% CI, 2.0-9.8], receipt of antimicrobial agents in the past 3 months (OR = 5.6; 95% CI, 2.6-11.9], presence of indwelling urinary catheter (OR = 7.3; CI, 2.5-20.9), and nursing home residence (OR = 9.9; 95% CI, 3.9-25.6) to be independently associated with the presence of methicillin resistance. All but 4 of the 118 patients with methicillin-resistant strains had at least 1 of these factors and the proportion of resistant isolates progressively increased as more of these features were present. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of these risk factors should be considered when making decisions about isolation and other infection control procedures as well as empiric antimicrobial therapy with vancomycin for patients with suspected staphylococcal infection at the time of hospital admission. Similar studies could guide practices for dealing with such patients in other centers, because the occurrence of MRSA infections at the time of admission may vary widely by geographic area.