Segmental reproducibility of retinal blood flow velocity measurements using retinal function imager.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the reproducibility of blood flow velocity measurements of individual retinal blood vessel segments using retinal function imager (RFI). METHODS: Eighteen eyes of 15 healthy subjects were enrolled prospectively at three centers. All subjects underwent RFI imaging in two separate sessions 15 min apart by a single experienced photographer at each center. An average of five to seven serial RFI images were obtained. All images were transferred electronically to one center, and were analyzed by a single observer. Multiple blood vessel segments (each shorter than 100 µm) were co-localized on first and second session images taken at different times of the same fundus using built-in software. Velocities of corresponding segments were determined, and then the inter-session reproducibility of flow velocity was assessed by the concordance correlation co-efficient (CCC), coefficient of reproducibility (CR), and coefficient of variance (CV). RESULTS: Inter-session CCC for flow velocity was 0.97 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.966 to 0.9797). The CR was 1.49 mm/sec (95% CI, 1.39 to 1.59 mm/sec), and CV was 10.9%. The average arterial blood flow velocity was 3.16 mm/sec, and average venous blood flow velocity was 3.15 mm/sec. The CR for arterial and venous blood flow velocity was 1.61 mm/sec and 1.27 mm/sec respectively. CONCLUSION: RFI provides reproducible measurements for retinal blood flow velocity for individual blood vessel segments, with 10.9% variability.

Comparative analysis of the retinal microvasculature visualized with fluorescein angiography and the retinal function imager.

PURPOSE: To assess the visualization of the retinal microvasculature with intravenous fluorescein angiography (IVFA) compared to the Retinal Function Imager (RFI). DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective, observational case series. METHODS: Seven normal eyes and 26 eyes with various ocular diseases were imaged with both IVFA and the RFI. The ability to assess vessel loops, vertical collateral vessels, the size of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ), and degree of vessel branching were compared between IVFA and RFI images. RESULTS: The RFI visualized a greater number of vessel loops (1.3 vs 0.4 per eye) and vertical collateral vessels (4.42 vs 0.97 per eye) than IVFA. On average, higher order of vessel branching was seen with the RFI compared to IVFA (5.2 vs 4.6). The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was more clearly delineated using the RFI and was significantly smaller when measured on RFI (0.35 vs 0.75 mm(2)). CONCLUSIONS: RFI, a noninvasive retinal imaging instrument, revealed vessel loops, vertical collateral vessels, the area of the FAZ, and order of vessel branching in greater detail than IVFA. This instrument may be helpful in understanding dynamic retinal vascular changes in a number of common ocular diseases, as well as in normal eyes.