Continued risk behaviour among HIV positive drug injectors in London: implications for intervention.

Findings are reported on the risk behaviour of 104 confirmed HIV-1 antibody positive drug injectors in London. Findings indicate that 41.3% of respondents had never received treatment or help for their drug use, and that 52.0% had never received a named test for HIV antibodies. The majority of confirmed HIV positive respondents (70.1%) were unaware of their HIV positive status. Respondents unaware of their HIV positive status were less likely to use condoms with primary sexual partners than respondents aware of their HIV status, and were marginally (though not significantly) more likely to report borrowing and lending used injecting equipment. Overall levels of risk-taking were similar to those reported in UK studies of injecting drug use as a whole. The paper concludes by emphasising the high potential for HIV transmission among the equipment sharing and sexual partners of HIV positive drug injectors and by stressing the importance of low-threshold HIV testing, education and treatment interventions in the community. If significant proportions of HIV positive drug injectors remain unaware of their antibody status, and if they also continue to engage in behaviours of risk to others, the spread of HIV among drug injectors and their partners may escape current efforts of prevention and prevalence control.

HIV testing and unreported HIV positivity among injecting drug users in London.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the importance of community-recruited drug injectors with no treatment experience and no previous testing history when estimating HIV prevalence among drug injectors. DESIGN: HIV testing behaviour and prevalence were measured in a serial point prevalence study of drug injectors recruited in community-based non-treatment and treatment settings. METHODS: Pearson's chi 2 and Fisher's exact tests were used to measure differences between treatment groups and non-treatment groups in demographic characteristics, including age and length of injecting career, recent drug use, recent syringe sharing, uptake of previous HIV testing, confirmed HIV-antibody status by saliva and self-reported HIV status. RESULTS: Rates of HIV-antibody testing were significantly lower in community-recruited drug injectors with no experience of treatment than those previously or currently in treatment. Confirmed HIV prevalence by saliva was highest in drug injectors with no experience of treatment. HIV-antibody-positive drug injectors with no treatment experience were less likely to be aware of their antibody status than injectors who were, or who had been, in treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Previous studies of HIV prevalence among drug injectors may be biased by drawing on samples primarily from treatment settings. Drug injectors with no treatment experience and no previous history of HIV testing should be included in HIV prevalence studies. Regular and repeat HIV testing in low-threshold community-based programmes should be considered a necessary part of interventions which seek to provide better access to treatment and other HIV prevention services.

HIV prevalence and HIV risk behaviour among injecting drug users in London and Glasgow.

This paper reports on the British findings from a cross-national study of HIV prevalence and HIV risk behaviour among 1,037 injecting drug users (IDUs) recruited from a variety of treatment- and community-based settings during 1990. Confirmed HIV saliva test results show 12.8% (63) of London respondents and 1.8% (8) of Glasgow respondents to be HIV antibody positive. Among London respondents, a higher rate of prevalence was found in those with no experience of drug treatment. A greater proportion of Glasgow respondents (68%) than London respondents (47%) reported sharing used injecting equipment in the 6 months prior to interview. The majority (88% in both cities) attempted cleaning borrowed equipment, although less than a third (31% in London and 30% in Glasgow) usually used bleach. The majority of respondents (71% in London and 82% in Glasgow) were sexually active with partners of the opposite sex in the last 6 months, and respondents had a mean number of 2.4 non-commercial sexual partners in London and 2.1 in Glasgow. Levels of reported condom use were comparable with reports in the heterosexual population as a whole, with 70% of London respondents and 75% of Glasgow respondents never using condoms with primary partners, and 34% of London and 52% of Glasgow respondents never using condoms with casual partners. Half (48%) of London respondents and 42% of Glasgow respondents reported sexual intercourse with non-injecting private sexual partners, while 14% of female respondents in London and 22% in Glasgow had engaged in prostitution. Levels of risk-taking in each of the two cities indicate the potential for further transmission of HIV among drug injectors, and their sexual and sharing partners.

HIV infection and community midwives: knowledge and attitudes.

Findings from two sample surveys of community midwives in Scotland and England (N = 907) during 1988 reveal that there is limited knowledge about many aspects of HIV infection. Respondents were themselves concerned about their lack of experience and knowledge as well as the availability of resources for HIV infection. There were also substantial educational concerns. More than a quarter of respondents felt that they should have the right to refuse to care for HIV-infected patients and the majority felt that health professional who are most at risk of contact with HIV-infected materials should be informed of patients' HIV-antibody status without patient consent. Recommendations are made regarding ways of increasing community midwives' knowledge and confidence.

HIV infection and community midwives: experience and practice.

To assess the effects of HIV infection on the work of community midwives, a postal survey of 1 in 5 in Scotland and England was carried out. The 907 respondents represent an 83% response rate. While only 1% of respondents had experience of patients with AIDS, 8% had been involved with known asymptomatic HIV infection and 32% had encountered those that they considered to be 'at high risk'. While the workload generated by HIV-infected patients for individual midwives at this time was small, almost all midwives themselves considered that they had a role to play in the prevention of HIV infection through health education and in counselling. While less than a quarter of those who had encountered HIV-positive patients had provided health education, more than half had done so to those worried about HIV infection and almost a quarter had counselled them. However, confidence to provide these aspects of practice was low, even among those who had received in-service education, although higher than among those who had not done so. A minority of community midwives had read policies or guidelines about aspects of practice and service provision, except for infection control where two thirds had read what they considered an adequate policy.

HIV infection and Scottish general practice: knowledge and attitudes.

To assess the knowledge and attitudes of general practitioners about HIV infection, a postal survey was undertaken of one in three of all principals in Scotland; 834 (77.6%) responded. Respondents' knowledge about HIV was often limited, and they found the discussion of sexual behaviour difficult. Most were in favour of routine HIV testing being offered to patients, but against testing without consent. Most general practitioners considered consent unnecessary for the passing of information about HIV status between medical colleagues, but necessary for informing others, in particular the patient's family and sexual partners. Most general practitioners would accept high-risk and HIV-positive patients onto their lists but less than half would accept intravenous drug users. Most respondents did not feel at significant personal risk of HIV infection, but expressed reservations about many other aspects of HIV infection in general practice. If practitioners are to fulfil their potential for tackling the problems of HIV infection, they need increased resources and a policy for education and training that is responsive to local needs.

HIV infection and Scottish general practice: workload and current practice.

To estimate the effect of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection on general practice, a postal survey was undertaken of one in three of all principals in Scotland. Of the 834 general practitioners who responded (78% response rate), 31% were working in practices with patients known to be infected with HIV. The estimated prevalence of known HIV infection in general practice was 19 per 100,000 population, and the estimated annual consultation rate for HIV related problems (including consultations by the 'worried well') was seven per 1000 population. Both statistics showed considerable variation between health boards, with peaks in Lothian and Tayside. Few practices had drawn up policies relevant to HIV infection, and the use of procedures for controlling infection was variable. Policies about HIV and for infection control tended to be more common in areas where the prevalence of HIV infection was higher. Most respondents were offering both opportunistic health education and counselling about HIV infection, especially to patients at high risk. Although general practitioners are responding positively to the increasing demands of HIV infection, there is an urgent need for policies, both national and local, to guide specific aspects of practice.