National Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Associated With Cirrhotic Blunt Trauma Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy Versus Non-operative Management: A Propensity Case-Matched Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes among severely injured trauma patients presenting with isolated blunt abdominal solid organ injuries with a pre-diagnosis of liver cirrhosis (LC) undergoing emergency laparotomy vs nonoperative management (NOM). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program Participant Use File (ACS-TQIP-PUF) dataset from 2017 to 2021. Adults (≥18 years) with a pre-existing diagnosis of LC who presented with severe blunt (ISS ≥ 16) isolated solid organ abdominal injuries and underwent laparotomy or NOM were included. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), and in-hospital complications such as acute renal failure and deep vein thrombosis. RESULTS: 929 patients were included in this analysis, with 355 undergoing laparotomy and 574 managed nonoperatively. Laparotomy patients suffered greater in-hospital mortality (n = 186, 52.3% vs n = 115, 20.0%; P < .01), required significantly more blood within 4 hours (8.9 units vs 4.3 units, P < .01), and had a significantly longer ICU-LOS (10.2 days vs 6.7 days, P < .01). In the 1:1 propensity score matched analysis of 556 matched patients, in-hospital mortality was greater for laparotomy patients (52.3% vs 20.0%, P < .01). CONCLUSION: Laparotomy was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality in propensity-matched trauma patients, longer ICU-LOS, and more blood products given at 4 hours compared to NOM. These findings illustrate that NOM may be a safe approach in managing severely injured trauma patients with isolated blunt abdominal solid organ injuries and a pre-diagnosis of LC.

Racial Distribution and Associated Outcomes for Patients With and Without Severe-Isolated Traumatic Brain Injuries Following Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: Disparities in venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence and prophylaxis have been observed across racial groups. This study investigates the relationship between race, injury type, and the timing of VTE prophylaxis in severe trauma patients, both with and without isolated traumatic brain injuries. The primary goal is to analyze how these factors interact and their potential impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program Participant Use File (ACS-TQIP-PUF) from 2018 to 2021. Patient demographics, injury categories, VTE prophylaxis timing, injury severity, and in-hospital complications were collected. Multivariable regression models explored associations between race, injury type, VTE prophylaxis, and in-hospital mortality. Groups were analyzed by injury profile (isolated TBI vs non-TBI) and then by VTE prophylaxis timing (early ≤24 hours, late >24 hours). RESULTS: Of 68,504 trauma patients analyzed, the majority were non-Hispanic or Latino (83.3%), White (71.2%), and male (69.6%). Patients receiving late VTE prophylaxis had higher rates of DVT and PE across race groups than patients with early prophylaxis. Logistic regression showed Asian patients with TBI receiving early prophylaxis were significantly more likely to have in-hospital mortality (OR 16.27, CI = 1.11-237.43, P = .04) than other races. CONCLUSION: Patients who received late prophylaxis had higher VTE rates than early prophylaxis, independent of injury pattern or race. Additionally, assessing the implications of race in early VTE prophylaxis for isolated TBI showed that adult Asian patients had 16 times higher odds of in-hospital mortality compared to other races.