What effect has the major trauma network had on perceptions of trauma care delivery amongst trauma teams in major trauma centres and neighbouring trauma units?

INTRODUCTION: The Trauma network was established in April 2012 in England to improve the care of patients with trauma. The care of major trauma was centralised to major trauma centres. This article aims to survey trauma team members (TTM) to compare perceptions of trauma care delivery in major trauma centres (MTC) and trauma units (TU) from where major trauma care has been diverted. METHODS: Trauma team members (TTM) from six hospitals were interviewed between June and July 2016. This included three MTCs and their neighbouring TU. Data were also gathered to determine appropriate trauma qualifications of TTMs. RESULTS: TTMs in MTCs perceived the standard of trauma service improved (90% increased, 10% same) since April 2012 in comparison to TUs (10% increased, 63% same, 27% decreased) (p ≤ 0.001). In MTCs, TTMs felt their skills improved more (66% improved, 34% unchanged) compared to TU's (24% improved, 64% unchanged, 12% regressed) (p ≤ 0.001). TTM's in MTCs were more satisfied with their trauma teams training (p ≤ 0.001), leader's communication (p ≤ 0.001) and handover process (p ≤ 0.01) in comparison to TTMs in TUs. 69% of doctors in MTCs held valid trauma qualifications as compared to only 37% in TUs (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: The centralisation of major trauma care to MTCs allows care for severely injured patients in specialised hospitals with allocated resources. This survey shows the effect of this reorganisation where diversion of major trauma from TUs may have led to their TTMs perceiving their standard of care to be less than TTMs in MTCs. This study recommends training support for TUs using modalities such as simulation-based training and regular audits to ensure improved perceptions and adequate qualifications. Multidisciplinary meetings between MTCs and TUs can allow information to be exchanged and shared to ensure reciprocal support and engagement to improve perception of trauma care delivery.

The 2nd Metacarpal Cortical Index as a Simple Screening Tool for Osteopenia.

BACKGROUND: Osteopenia is a known risk factor for sustaining skeletal fractures. Prevention of fragility fractures has obvious clinical and economic advantages, however screening all patients using a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is controversial not only because of the cost implications but also because it would potentially involve exposing a percentage of normal patients to unnecessary radiation. We wished to assess whether a simple hand X-ray measuring the 2nd metacarpal cortical index (2MCI) could be used as a simple screening tool for identifying patients with osteopenia. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the radiographic data of 206 patients who had a simple radiograph of the hand and a DXA scan within one year of each other from our picture archiving and communication system database. The 2MCI was calculated for all patients. As data was parametric, a Pearson's correlation was performed to assess association between Tscores and 2MCI. Further analysis involved the construction of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to identify a 2MCI index, which would give the most appropriate sensitivity and specificity values for identifying the presence of osteopenia. RESULTS: A statistically significant and moderate correlation between DXA T-scores and 2MCI values was found (r=0.54, n=206, P<0.001). Further ROC curve analysis of normal and osteopenic subjects identified that a 2MCI of 41.5 had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 53% for detecting osteopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use of the 2MCI as a simple screening tool for identifying patients with osteopenia.

Improving patient and staff safety by minimising radiation exposure during trauma surgery: A simple and validated predictive model.

INTRODUCTION: Minimising radiation exposure, from fluoroscopic equipment during trauma surgery is crucial to safe-guarding patients and staff. This aim of this study was to identify variables associated with increased radiation exposure for 3 of the most common trauma procedures. Secondly, we aimed to derive an internally and externally validated mathematical model for predicting radiation exposure for these procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively recorded radiation exposure from 270 sliding hip screw (SHS), ankle and wrist fixation procedures. Patient demographics, fracture severity, surgeon and radiographer grade were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. A mathematical model was then created and externally assessed for validity from another unit. RESULTS: With regards to the analysis of radiation exposure when fixing wrist fractures, a significant regression equation was found (F (3, 86) = 62.2, p < 0.001), with an adjusted R2 of 0.69. Patients' predicted radiation exposure (cGY/cm2) was therefore equal to the positive result of: 81.916(Fracture severity) + 43.426(Surgical grade) + 23.490 (radiographer grade)-203.89.With regards to the analysis of radiation exposure when fixing ankle fractures, a significant regression equation was found, (F (3, 83) = 15.49, p < 0.001), with an adjusted R2 of 0.34. Patients' predicted radiation exposure (cGY/cm2) was therefore equal to the positive result of: 39.541(Fracture severity) + 51.937(Surgical grade) + 37.702 (radiographer grade)-124.558 SHS (F (3, 89) = 25.29, p < 0.001), R2 of 0.44.61.338(Fracture severity) + 60.945(Surgical grade) + 35.491 (radiographer grade)-105.501. These predictive models were successfully externally validated. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated a workable and externally validated model for accurately predicting the likely radiation exposure using common and easily collectable variables. These models could be used to modify practuce and minimise the radiation exposure to patients and staff.

Epsilon-aminocaproic acid versus tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis study.

INTRODUCTION: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery can be associated with significant blood loss. Among the problems associated with such blood loss is the need for transfusions of banked blood [1]. Transfusions not only have a financial consequence but also carry a small risk of disease transmission to the patient. Antifibrinolytics have been successfully used to reduce transfusion requirements in elective arthroplasty patients. The objective of this meta-analysis is to determine which of tranexamic acid (TXA) and epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) is more effective for reducing peri-operative blood loss, and lessening the need for blood transfusion following knee arthroplasty surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched for relevant articles published between January 1980 to January 2018 for the purpose of identifying studies comparing TXA and EACA for TKA surgery. A double-extraction technique was used, and included studies were assessed regarding their methodological quality prior to analysis. Outcomes analysed included blood loss, pre- and post-operative haemoglobin, number of patients requiring transfusion, number of units transfused, operative and tourniquet time, and complications associated with antifibrinolytics. RESULTS: Three studies contributed to the quantitative analysis of 1691 patients, with 743 patients included in the TXA group and 948 in the EACA group. Estimated blood loss was similar between the two groups [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.50, 0.04; Z = 1.69; P = 0.09]. There were no differences between the two groups regarding the percentage of patients requiring transfusion (95% CI 0.14, 4.13; Z = 0.31; P = 0.76). There was no difference in the pre- and post-operative haemoglobin difference between the two groups (95% CI -0.36, 0.24; Z = 0.38; P = 0.70). There was no difference in the average number of transfused units (95% CI -0.53, 0.25; Z = 0.71; P = 0.48). There was no difference in the operative (95% CI -0.35, 0.36; Z = 0.04; P = 0.97) or tourniquet time (95% CI -0.16, 0.34; Z = 0.72; P = 0.47). Similarly, there was no difference in the percentage of venous thromboembolism between the two groups (95% CI 0.17, 2.80; Z = 0.51; P = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: This study did not demonstrate TXA to be superior to EACA. In fact, both antifibrinolytic therapies demonstrated similar efficacy in terms of intra-operative blood loss, transfusion requirements and complication rates. Currently EACA has a lower cost, which makes it an appealing alternative to TXA for TKA surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Predictors of Intraoperative Fractures during Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Fragility Hip Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to determine the rate and preoperative predictors of intraoperative fracture (IOF) during hip hemiarthroplasty (HA) in patients who have sustained a fragility hip fracture injury. METHODS: We reviewed 626 patients who underwent HA at our institution using the National Hip Fracture Database. Various patient- and surgery-related data including demographic information, cement usage, surgeon grade, time to surgery, and operative duration were collected. The metaphyseal diaphyseal index and modified canal bone ratio were measured on preoperative radiographs. We compared patients with and without IOF with respect to all variables collected. Multivariate regression modeling was used to identify significant preoperative risk factors for IOF. RESULTS: There was a 7% incidence of IOF in our cohort exclusively comprising of Vancouver A fractures. The majority of these complications were treated nonoperatively (52%). There was no statistically significant difference with respect to cement usage, surgeon grade, operative duration, time to surgery, and radiographic parameters collected. Increasing age was found to be the most significant preoperative risk factor for predicting IOF (p = 0.024, overall relative risk = 1.06). CONCLUSIONS: Our identified predictor of increasing age is nonmodifiable and illustrates the importance of meticulous surgical technique in older patients. Furthermore, its independence from fixation methods or prosthesis design as a predictor of IOF may support using an uncemented prosthesis in patients at risk from cement implantation.

Quadriceps Tendon-Bone or Patellar Tendon-Bone Autografts When Reconstructing the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantitatively assess the outcomes of studies, comparing the use of Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and the quadriceps tendon-bone (QTB) autografts when reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched for relevant articles published between January 1980 and January 2015 for the purpose of identifying studies comparing BPTB and QTB autografts for ACL reconstruction. Included studies were assessed regarding their methodological quality before analysis. Outcomes analyzed were graft failure rates, objective and subjective stability assessments, as well as the presence and severity of donor site morbidity. MAIN RESULTS: Five studies contributed to the quantitative analysis of 806 patients with 452 patients included in the BPTB group and 354 patients in the QTB group. Graft failure rates were similar between the 2 groups [odds ratio (OR) = 0.61; confidence interval (CI) = 0.17-2.15; Z = 0.78, P = 0.44]. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups when testing anteroposterior stability using an arthrometer (standardized mean difference = 0.07; CI = -0.12-0.25; Z = 0.70, P = 0.48). At 1 year postoperatively, there was no difference in the percentage of patients with a positive pivot shift test between the 2 groups (OR = 1.0; CI = 0.85-1.18; Z = 0.01, P = 0.99). However, significantly less patients had graft site pain 1 year after surgery in the QTB group (OR = 0.10; CI = 0.02-0.43; Z = 3.12, P = 0.002). Similarly, fewer patients reported moderate to severe pain while kneeling, in the QTB group (OR = 0.16; CI = 0.07-0.37; Z = 4.26, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates comparable survival rates and joint stability when BPTB and QTB grafts are used. However, fewer adverse donor site symptoms are evident with QTB grafts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Predicting intertrochanteric extension of greater trochanter fractures of the hip on plain radiographs.

INTRODUCTION: It is important to distinct between isolated greater trochanter (GT) fractures and complete intertrochanteric (IT) extension to prevent unwanted morbidities. Aim of this study was to determine if there was any particular fracture pattern, of GT fractures on a plain radiograph of the hip which could predict IT extension. METHOD: Retrospective review of radiographs of 49 patients with a GT fracture who presented in the last 10 years (January 2005-December 2015). All images were reviewed by a consultant musculoskeletal radiologist and an orthopaedic surgeon. The AP plain radiographs were assessed to look for fracture angle and length of the fracture. The fracture length was taken as a percentage and was measured as the length of the fracture crossing the intertrochanteric line/the total length of the intertrochanteric line. The fracture angle was measured as the angle between a line drawn from the most superior point of the fracture on the lateral cortex of the GT, to a perpendicular line along the medial cortex of the femoral shaft. The subsequent MRI and CT scans were assessed to see if there was true intertrochanteric extension. RESULTS: 32 patient were female and 17 male. 27 CT scans of which 8 showed complete IT extension. 22 had MRI scan of which 6 showed complete extension. The mean fracture length of patients with complete extension was 56% with a range of 50%-63%. The mean fracture length of patients with incomplete extension was 33% with a range of 12%-55%. The mean fracture angle for patients with complete extension was 39° with a range of 35-42°. The mean fracture angle for patients with incomplete extension was 58° with a range of 44-124°. CONCLUSION: For greater trochanter fractures that do not cross >50% of the IT line and do not have a fracture angle between 35 and 42° do not require further imaging as they will not have complete intertrochanteric extension.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Modified CT Severity Index in Assessing Severity of Acute Pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of modified CT severity index in assessing the severe acute pancreatitis keeping APACHE II as gold standard. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional (validation) study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Department of Radiology, Allied Hospital, Faisalabad, from February to August 2014. METHODOLOGY: A total of 120 patients of either gender aged 20-60 years with epigastric pain radiating to back and having sonographic findings (decreased or heterogeneous pancreatic echogenicity, pancreatic enlargement, peripancreatic fluid collection), supportive of acute pancreatitis were taken. CT with intravenous contrast was performed on 128-slice scanner within 24 hours of presentation. Slice thickness was 3 mm in region of pancreas. Modified CT severity index was calculated. Score above 5 was graded as severe pancreatitis. APACHE II score of >11 considered as gold standard was also calculated within 24 hours of admission. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 39.03 ±8.71 years. Most of the patients were females 73 (60.8%). Out of 120 patients, 43 (35.83%) patients had severe acute pancreatitis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of modified CT severity index in assessing the severe acute pancreatitis were 100%, 87%, 81.13% and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was yielded as 91.67% considered APACHE II as gold standard. CONCLUSION: Modified CT severity index had high diagnostic accuracy in assessment of severe acute pancreatitis and can be used reliably in early prediction of complications of severe acute pancreatitis.

Lateral X-ray for proximal femoral fractures - Is it really necessary?

INTRODUCTION: Historically routine work up of a patient with a proximal femoral fracture always included anterior-posterior (AP) and a lateral film of the hip. The aim was to define the role of the lateral X-ray in the assessment and surgical planning of proximal femur fractures. METHODS: Radiographs of 320 consecutive patients with proximal femoral fractures who were admitted over a 12 months period were divided into lateral and AP views. Two blinded reviewers independently assessed the AP view alone and then the AP plus the lateral view. Fracture classification was noted for each X-ray and then compared with intraoperative diagnosis which was our study's gold standard. A 2 × 2 contingency square table and Pearson's x(2) test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The rate of correct classification by the reviewers enhanced by the assessment of the lateral X-ray in addition to the AP view for intracapsular fractures (p = 0.018) but not for extracapsular fractures (p = 0.29). Operative management did not change for intracapsular fractures which appeared displaced on initial AP view after reviewing the lateral X-ray. The only advantage of obtaining a lateral view in intracapsular fracture was the detection of displacement were the fracture appeared to be undisplaced on initial AP view. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides statistical evidence that one view is adequate and safe for majority of proximal femoral fractures. The lateral radiograph should not be performed on a routine basis thus making considerable saving in time and money, and avoiding unnecessary radiation exposure and discomfort to the patient.

Quantifying the problem of kneeling after a two incision bone tendon bone arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: the aims of this study was to investigate the post-operative incidence of anterior knee pain and quantify the problem of kneeling in patients who have underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a bone tendon bone (BTB) graft. METHODS: prospective study of 71 male patients who participated in competitive sports and underwent BTB ACL reconstruction using a two incision approach between August 2008 and May 2011. The patella defect was packed with bone graft, and the peritenon was preserved and repaired. A questionnaire was used to evaluate pain and kneeling capability. All patients had pre and post operative Lysholm/Tegner scores, KT1000 evaluation and hop tests to assess knee stability and function. RESULTS: 71 patients were operated and had a follow up of 42 months, mean age 29.8. 22 patients had anterior knee pain on kneeling, paraesthesia of anterior knee was found in 23 patients. 65 patients were still able to kneel and 6 found they were unable. 36 were able to kneel for unrestricted periods, 9 for 5-15 minutes, 15 kneel for 1-5 minutes and 5 for >1 minute. Anterior knee pain was compared to kneeling time (P=0.001). Paraesthesia and kneeling time, (P=0.001). Anterior knee pain when compared with Lysholm score (P=0.540), hop test (P=0.277), and Lachman's (P=0.254). CONCLUSIONS: two incision BTB grafting of the patella and repair of the paritenon minimises the length of scar at the front of the knee. This reduces any palpable defects which could be causation factor for pain whilst kneeling. We have quantified kneeling and pain, thus aiding patients and surgeons in making the right decision for graft choice for ACL reconstruction.

An osteochondral lesion in the distal fibula: a case report.

UNLABELLED: Osteochondral lesions of the talus are well-recognized clinical entities; however, this report illustrates a rare case of an osteochondral defect in the distal fibula. A 15-year-old male was referred to the orthopaedic services with a 9-month history of persistent ankle pain following an initial inversion injury. Plain X-ray was unremarkable but magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography revealed an osteochondral lesion at the level of the fibular physeal scar. The patient underwent an ankle arthroscopy where an unstable chondral flap was debrided and the associated fissure decompressed. The patient made an uneventful recovery and returned to normal sporting activities, symptom free. This diagnosis should be considered in patients presenting with chronic ankle pain particularly with a history of an inversion injury. The purpose of this report is to raise awareness of this condition. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level IV, Case study.