Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Contemp Dent Pract ; 17(12): 969-972, 2016 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27965481

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the cervical fit of cemented metal-ceramic and In-Ceram implant-supported crowns, before and after the cementing procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty crowns cemented on implant abutments are divided into two groups (n = 10): Group 1 -cemented metal-ceramic crowns and group 2 - cemented In-Ceram crowns. The marginal adaptations before and after cementation were evaluated in a comparison microscope with an error of 1 µm. All crowns were cemented with zinc phosphate cement. RESULTS: The cervical misalignment of cemented crowns before cementation (52.65 ± 11.83 and 85.73 ± 14.06 µm) was lower than that after cementation (66.80 ± 15.86 and 89.36 ± 22.66 µm). CONCLUSION: The cementing procedure interferes with the marginal fit of cemented crowns on implant abutments, with the prosthesis having better adaptation before cementation. Cemented metal-ceramic crowns exhibited better cervical adaptation than In-Ceram crowns cemented before and after the cementing procedure. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The maintenance of gum health and the longevity of prosthetic restorations are closely related to the restoration's marginal integrity.


Subject(s)
Aluminum Oxide , Cementation/methods , Crowns , Dental Cements , Dental Porcelain , Metal Ceramic Alloys , Dental Prosthesis Design , Dental Restoration Failure , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...