Pain during pars plana vitrectomy following sub-Tenon versus peribulbar anesthesia: A randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To compare pain during pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) following topical lidocaine jelly and sub-Tenon anesthesia versus peribulbar anesthesia. METHODS: Prospective, single-center, randomized study. Patients scheduled for PPV for macular hole (MH) or epiretinal membrane (ERM) at the Retina and Vitreous Section of the Department of Ophthalmology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo were randomly assigned to one of two groups in a 1:1 allocation ratio. Patients assigned to Group ST received topical anesthesia with 2% lidocaine jelly followed by sub-Tenon anesthesia with 2-4 ml of 1% ropivacaine. Patients assigned to PB received peribulbar anesthesia with 4-6 ml of 1% ropivacaine. After PPV, patients in both groups were asked to rate the level of pain they felt during the entire procedure (including anesthesia administration and PPV) by pointing at a 0-100 Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS). Data regarding demographics, patient characteristics and surgical features were also collected. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were enrolled in the study (26 in Group ST and 28 in Group PB). Baseline characteristics, including age, gender, and presence of comorbidities, were similar in both groups. The surgery performed was PPV alone in 10 and 14 patients in the ST and PB groups, respectively, and combined phacoemulsification and PPV in 16 and 14 patients in the ST and PB groups, respectively (p = 0.39, Pearson). Surgery duration (mean ± SD minutes) was similar in the two groups (62 ± 12 for ST and 70 ± 20 for PB, p = 0.09, t-Test). No patients needed supplemental topical or intravenous anesthesia during surgery. No sight- or life-threatening complication was observed in either group. VAS score was significantly lower in the ST compared to the PB group (median (interquartile range) was 1 (2.25-0) in the ST group compared to 11.5 (29.75-5) in the PB group, p< 0.0001, Wilcoxon). CONCLUSION: In this study of patients who underwent PPV for MH or ERM, topical followed by sub-Tenon anesthesia was more effective in controlling pain during the whole vitrectomy procedure than peribulbar anesthesia. Compared to peribulbar anesthesia which is administered with a sharp needle, sub-Tenon anesthesia administered with a blunt cannula may be associated with a reduced risk of such adverse events as globe perforation, retrobulbar hemorrhage, and inadvertent injection of anesthesia into the optic nerve sheath.

Spontaneous scleral rupture associated with retinochoroidal coloboma / Ruptura espontânea de esclera associada a coloboma coriorretiniano

Abstract We reported a case of ocular hypotony due to spontaneous scleral rupture in retinochoroidal coloboma and the treatment which was performed. This is a prospective case report in which a 21-year-old woman complained of abrupt vision loss in her left eye. Ocular hypotony due to spontaneous scleral rupture in retinochoroidal coloboma was identified through tests. An ultrassonography confirmed the scleral lesion but magnetic resonance imaging and fluorescein angiography have also proven to be useful. Due to the posterior location of the perforation, we opted for a sub-tenon injection of autologous blood and intraocular gas tamponade, which were successful, resulting in improved visual acuity and intraocular pressure. In this case, an alternative to invasive surgical procedure in the treatment of spontaneous scleral perforation and retinochoroidal coloboma was presented.

Resumo Relatamos um caso de hipotensão ocular secundária a ruptura escleral espontânea em coloboma coriorretiniano e o tratamento realizado. Trata-se de estudo de caso prospectivo de uma mulher de 21 anos de idade que se apresentou queixando perda súbita de visão no olho esquerdo. Ao exame, foi evidenciado hipotensão ocular em virtude de ruptura espontânea de esclera em coloboma coriorretiniano. Ultrassonografia confirmou a lesão da esclera embora ressonância magnética e angiofluoresceinografia também tenham sido úteis. Em virtude da localização posterior da perfuração, optamos por injeção sub-tenoniana de sangue autólogo e tamponamento intraocular com gás, que demonstraram ser úteis, resultando em melhora da acuidade visual e da pressão intraocular. Neste caso, apresentamos uma alternativa a procediemnto cirúrgico invasivo para tratamento de perfuração espontânea de esclera em coloboma coriorretiniano.

Pain in the treatment of vitreoretinal diseases

Treatment of vitreoretinal diseases comprises a range of options that has increased in the past several years, allowing more individuals to benefit from new therapeutic approaches. The use of lasers in the retina, new surgical techniques, and intravitreal drug administration constitute common treatment options. These retinal and vitreal procedures have both benefits and drawbacks. Among the drawbacks is discomfort associated with the procedure, constituting a relevant issue because it can compromise adherence to treatment. We reviewed aspects of pain associated with vitreoretinal procedures and the available options for its control. With regard to vitreoretinal procedures, laser photocoagulation is associated with a higher pain score compared with vitrectomy and intravitreal injection using traditional anesthesia methods, suggesting that laser photocoagulation still needs to be improved with regard to comfort during the procedure. In some cases, a combination of analgesic options may be the best choice for pain-sensitive individuals. Individual differences and the specific condition that is treated should be considered when deciding the best treatment option.

Pain in the treatment of vitreoretinal diseases

Treatment of vitreoretinal diseases comprises a range of options that has increased in the past several years, allowing more individuals to benefit from new therapeutic approaches. The use of lasers in the retina, new surgical techniques, and intravitreal drug administration constitute common treatment options. These retinal and vitreal procedures have both benefits and drawbacks. Among the drawbacks is discomfort associated with the procedure, constituting a relevant issue because it can compromise adherence to treatment. We reviewed aspects of pain associated with vitreoretinal procedures and the available options for its control. With regard to vitreoretinal procedures, laser photocoagulation is associated with a higher pain score compared with vitrectomy and intravitreal injection using traditional anesthesia methods, suggesting that laser photocoagulation still needs to be improved with regard to comfort during the procedure. In some cases, a combination of analgesic options may be the best choice for pain-sensitive individuals. Individual differences and the specific condition that is treated should be considered when deciding the best treatment option.(AU)

Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for persistent new vessels in diabetic retinopathy (IBEPE study): 1-year results.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab on area of fluorescein leakage from active new vessels (NVs) and on best-corrected visual acuity in patients with actively leaking NV associated with diabetic retinopathy unresponsive to panretinal photocoagulation. METHODS: A prospective open-label study of diabetic patients with actively leaking NV refractory to panretinal photocoagulation and best-corrected visual acuity worse than 20/40. Ophthalmic evaluation, including fluorescein angiography, was performed at baseline and at Weeks 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 after intravitreal bevacizumab (1.5 mg/0.06 mL) injection. After Week 12, patients could receive additional intravitreal bevacizumab injections pro re nata, per the discretion of the treating ophthalmologist. Main outcome measures include change from baseline (at each study visit) in total area of fluorescein leakage from active NV and change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity. RESULTS: Fifteen consecutive patients were included, and 12 completed the study. Mean ± SEM fluorescein leakage was 27.7 ± 6.2 mm at baseline and was significantly lower at all visits post injection; at Week 6, no leakage was observed (P = 0.0001). The mean ± SEM logarithm of minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.90 ± 0.11 at baseline to 0.70 ± 0.12 at Week 48 (P = 0.0449). Throughout the 48-week study period, patients received a mean of 2.16 injections. CONCLUSION: With 1-year follow-up, treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab was associated with reduced fluorescein leakage from persistent NV and improved visual acuity in patients with diabetic retinopathy unresponsive to panretinal photocoagulation.

Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab during cataract surgery in patients with diabetic macular edema.

PURPOSE: To investigate macular thickness and visual acuity changes after 1 intravitreal injection of 0.5-mg ranibizumab during phacoemulsification cataract surgery in eyes with diabetic macular edema refractory to laser treatment. METHODS: Eleven eyes of 11 patients with diabetic macular edema refractory to modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study laser therapy received intravitreal during phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation was performed preoperatively and at 1, 4, 8 ± 1, and 12 ± 2 weeks postoperatively. Main outcome measures included central subfield thickness and best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity. RESULTS: Eleven patients completed the 12-week study visit. Mean central subfield thickness (± SEM) was 399.82 ± 29.50 µm at baseline and did not change significantly at any postoperative study visit (P > 0.05). Mean (± SEM) best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity was 0.95 ± 0.13 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (20/200) at baseline and was significantly improved at Weeks 1 (0.38 ± 0.13), 4 (0.38 ± 0.11), 8 (0.35 ± 0.08), and 12 (0.46 ± 0.12) after treatment (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this case series of patients with diabetic macular edema refractory to laser therapy, intravitreal ranibizumab administered during cataract surgery was associated with no significant change in central subfield thickness postoperatively. Significant improvement in best-corrected Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity was observed after treatment, likely because of cataract removal.

Vitreous pharmacokinetics and retinal safety of intravitreal preserved versus non-preserved triamcinolone acetonide in rabbit eyes.

PURPOSE: To compare the intravitreal pharmacokinetic profile of a triamcinolone acetonide formulation containing the preservative benzyl alcohol (TA-BA) versus a preservative-free triamcinolone acetonide formulation (TA-PF), and evaluate potential signs of toxicity to the retina. METHODS: A total of 60 New Zealand male white rabbits, divided into two groups, were studied. In the TA-BA group, 30 rabbits received an intravitreal injection of TA-BA (4 mg/0.1 ml) into the right eye. In the TA-PF group, 30 rabbits received an intravitreal injection of TA-PF (4 mg/0.1 ml) into the right eye. The intravitreal drug levels were determined in 25 animals from each group by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The potential for toxicity associated with the intravitreal triamcinolone injections was evaluated in five randomly selected animals from each group by electroretinography (ERG) and by light microscopy. RESULTS: Median intravitreal concentrations of TA-BA (µg/ml) were 1903.1, 1213.0, 857.8, 442.0, 248.6 at 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after injection. Intravitreal concentrations of TA-PF (µg/ml) were 1032.9, 570.1, 516.6, 347.9, 102.8 at 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after injection. The median intravitreal triamcinolone concentration was significantly higher in the TA-BA compared to the TA-PF group at 7 days post-injection (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in median triamcinolone concentration at the other time points evaluated. There was no evidence of toxic effects on the retina in either group based on ERG or histological analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Following a single intravitreal injection, the median concentration of triamcinolone acetonide is significantly higher in the TA-BA compared to the TA-PF group at 7 days post-injection. No toxic reactions in the retina were observed in either group.

Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) versus PRP plus intravitreal ranibizumab for high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) compared with PRP plus intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab (IVR) in patients with high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). METHODS: Prospective study included patients with high-risk PDR and no prior laser treatment randomly assigned to receive PRP (PRP group) or PRP plus IVR (PRPplus group). PRP was administered in two sessions (weeks 0 and 2), and IVR was administered at the end of the first laser session in the PRPplus group. Standardized ophthalmic evaluations including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured according to the methods used in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (BCVA), fluorescein angiography to measure area of fluorescein leakage (FLA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for the assessment of central subfield macular thickness (CSMT), were performed at baseline and at weeks 16 (± 2), 32 (± 2) and 48 (± 2). RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 40 patients (n = 29 eyes) completed the 48-week study follow-up period. At baseline, mean ± SE FLA (mm(2)) was 9.0 ± 1.3 and 11.7 ± 1.3 (p = 0.1502); BCVA (logMAR) was 0.31 ± 0.05 and 0.27 ± 0.06 (p = 0.6645); and CSMT (µm) was 216.3 ± 10.7 and 249.4 ± 36.1 (p = 0.3925), in the PRP and PRPplus groups, respectively. There was a significant (p < 0.05) FLA reduction at all study visits in both groups, with the reduction observed in the PRPplus group significantly larger than that in the PRP group at week 48 (PRP = 2.9 ± 1.3 mm(2) ; PRPplus = 5.8 ± 1.3 mm(2) ; p = 0.0291). Best-corrected visual acuity worsening was observed at 16, 32 and 48 weeks after treatment in the PRP group (p < 0.05), while no significant BCVA changes were observed in the PRPplus group. A significant CSMT increase was observed in the PRP group at all study visits, while a significant decrease in CSMT was observed in the PRPplus group at week 16, and no significant difference in CSMT from baseline was observed at weeks 32 and 48. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal ranibizumab after PRP was associated with a larger reduction in FLA at week 48 compared with PRP alone in eyes with high-risk PDR, and the adjunctive use of IVR appears to protect against the modest visual acuity loss and macular swelling observed in eyes treated with PRP alone.