ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHP) is a common and serious complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD), with a negative impact on morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in the clinical management of SHP, treatment failure still occurs in a significant number of patients. In such cases, parathyroidectomy (PTx) is indicated. OBJECTIVE: To have an overview of the prevalence of severe SHP and of its surgical treatment in hemodialysis (HD) patients in Brazil. METHODS: This was an observational and descriptive study. Data were obtained from questionnaires posted to 660 dialysis units (DU). RESULTS: Results are expressed in absolute values and percentages, or means and standard deviation, as appropriate. 226 (34%) DU answered the questionnaire, providing data about 32,264 HD patients. The prevalence rate of severe SHP (PTH > 1,000 pg/mL) was 10.7 % (n = 3,463). 68 hospitals countrywide perform PTX. Around 40% of them are university centers. 49 (21.7%) DU reported not to have a specialized medical center to refer their patients with severe SHP. 74 (33%) DU reported that the time interval between surgery indication and its performance was over 6 months. The main recognized obstacles to surgery performance were: difficulty to perform the preoperative exams, lack of head and neck surgeons and the long waiting time. CONCLUSIONS: Although severe SHP is highly prevalent in Brazil, a significant number of patients do not have access to PTx. Better public health policies and liaison between nephrologists and head and neck surgeons are urgently required to change this reality.
Subject(s)
Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary/surgery , Parathyroidectomy/statistics & numerical data , Renal Dialysis , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary/epidemiology , Prevalence , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
INTRODUÇÃO: O hiperparatireoidismo secundário (HPS) é uma complicação comum e grave no curso da doença renal crônica (DRC), com impacto direto sobre a morbidade e mortalidade desses pacientes. Apesar dos avanços no tratamento clínico do HPS a falência terapêutica ocorre em parcela significativa dos pacientes. Nesses casos, a paratireoidectomia (PTx) é indicada. OBJETIVO: Este trabalho visa abordar a situação atual no Brasil de pacientes com HPS em hemodiálise com indicação de PTx. MÉTODOS: Estudo observacional, descritivo, com dados obtidos de questionário enviado a 660 centros de diálise (CD). RESULTADOS: Os resultados estão expressos em valores absolutos, médias e desvio padrão; 226 (34 por cento) CD responderam ao questionário, representando 32.264 pacientes em hemodiálise (HD). A prevalência de pacientes com paratormônio (PTH) > 1.000pg/mL foi de 3.463 (10,7 por cento). Em 49 (21,7 por cento) CD não é possível encaminhar os pacientes para PTx. Cerca de 40 por cento dos serviços que realizam PTx são ligados a centros universitários. Em 74 (33 por cento) CD o tempo de espera para que um paciente seja operado é superior a 6 meses. Foram contabilizados 68 serviços que realizam PTx. Os principais problemas relacionados para a realização de PTx foram: dificuldades com a realização dos exames pré-operatórios, escassez de cirurgiões de cabeça e pescoço, e longa fila de espera. CONCLUSÕES: a prevalência de HPS grave é elevada em nosso meio. Uma parcela significativa de pacientes não tem acesso ao tratamento cirúrgico. Uma melhor organização das políticas de saúde pública, além de um maior entrosamento entre nefrologistas e cirurgiões de cabeça e pescoço, em torno dessa questão, são necessários para a mudança dessa realidade.
INTRODUCTION: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHP) is a common and serious complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD), with a negative impact on morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in the clinical management of SHP, treatment failure still occurs in a significant number of patients. In such cases, parathyroidectomy (PTx) is indicated. OBJECTIVE: To have an overview of the prevalence of severe SHP and of its surgical treatment in hemodialysis (HD) patients in Brazil. METHODS: This was an observational and descriptive study. Data were obtained from questionnaires posted to 660 dialysis units (DU). RESULTS: Results are expressed in absolute values and percentages, or means and standard deviation, as appropriate. 226 (34 percent) DU answered the questionnaire, providing data about 32,264 HD patients. The prevalence rate of severe SHP (PTH > 1,000 pg/mL) was 10.7 percent (n = 3,463). 68 hospitals countrywide perform PTX. Around 40 percent of them are university centers. 49 (21.7 percent) DU reported not to have a specialized medical center to refer their patients with severe SHP. 74 (33 percent) DU reported that the time interval between surgery indication and its performance was over 6 months. The main recognized obstacles to surgery performance were: difficulty to perform the preoperative exams, lack of head and neck surgeons and the long waiting time. CONCLUSIONS: Although severe SHP is highly prevalent in Brazil, a significant number of patients do not have access to PTx. Better public health policies and liaison between nephrologists and head and neck surgeons are urgently required to change this reality.
Subject(s)
Humans , Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary/surgery , Parathyroidectomy/statistics & numerical data , Renal Dialysis , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary/epidemiology , Prevalence , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (2HPT) develops in chronic renal failure due to disturbances of calcium, phosphorus and vitamin D metabolism. It is characterized by high turnover bone disease and an altered calcium-parathyroid hormone (PTH) relationship. Calcitriol has been widely used for the treatment of 2HPT. However, it remains controversial whether calcitriol is capable of inducing changes of the calcium-PTH curve. The aim of the present study was to examine this issue and to determine the effect of calcitriol on bone remodelling in patients with severe 2HPT. METHODS: We evaluated 16 chronic haemodialysis patients with severe 2HPT (PTH 899+/-342 pg/ml). Each patient underwent a dynamic parathyroid function test (by infusion of calcium gluconate and sodium citrate) and a bone biopsy before and after a 6 month period of i.v. calcitriol therapy (CTx). RESULTS: After treatment, eight patients were identified as calcitriol responders and the other eight as non-responders, based on plasma PTH level (<300 pg/ml for responders and >300 pg/ml for non-responders). The first group had higher plasma 25OHD(3) levels (39+/-8 vs 24+/-7 ng/ml, P<0.005). As to the calcium-PTH curve, we found differences in slope (-12.7+/-5.2 vs -21.7+/-11.4, P=0.05), basal/maximum PTH ratio (48.8+/-14.9 vs 71.05+/-20.1%, P=0.01) and time to achieve hypocalcaemia (79.0+/-13.5 vs 94.3+/-13.7 min, P<0.001). Initial histomorphometric parameters did not allow identification of the different groups. After the 6-month CTx, alterations in the calcium-PTH curve were clearly seen in responders [a drop in maximum PTH (from 1651+/-616 to 938+/-744 pg/ml, P<0.05) and minimum PTH (from 163+/-75.4 to 102.2+/-56.7 pg/ml, P<0.005)], associated with an increase in minimum/basal PTH ratio (from 23.3+/-11.6 to 34.5+/-20.4%, P<0.05) and maximum calcium (from 0.99+/-0.07 to 1.1+/-0.09 mmol/l, P<0.05). Set point and slope were not altered after calcitriol treatment, in responders (set point=1.17+/-0.08 vs 1.15+/-0.1 mmol/l, ns; slope=-12.7+/-5.2 vs -12.9+/-9.3, ns) or non-responders (set point=1.21+/-0.05 vs 1.21+/-0.2 mmol/l, ns; slope=-21.7+/-11.4 vs -17.3+/-8.4, ns). Bone formation parameters were reduced in all patients [osteoid surface (OS/BS)=from 57.1+/-21.6 to 41.6+/-26%, P<0.05 for responders, and from 76.7+/-12 to 47.1+/-15%, P<0.001 in non-responders], but non-responders had increased bone resorption [eroded surface (ES/BS)=7.1+/-3.4 vs 16.6+/-4.9, P<0.05]. CONCLUSION: Calcitriol had non-uniform effects on parathyroid function and bone remodelling in uraemic patients. Non-responders exhibited a decoupled remodelling process that could further influence mineral balance or possibly also bone structure. To avoid such undesirable effects, early identification of non-responder patients is crucial when using calcitriol for the treatment of 2HPT.
