Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Anim Nutr ; 78(1): 16-29, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38230440

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to evaluate intake, energy and nitrogen balance as well as methane emission in Holstein and ½ Holstein ½ Gyr (Girolando-F1) cows during the transition period. Twenty-four cows (12 Holstein and 12 Girolando-F1) were used to evaluate feed intake, apparent digestibility, heat production and methane emission, carried out in two periods: from 28 to 19 days pre-calving and from 15 to 23 days post-calving. A completely randomised design was used and data were analysed by ANOVA within periods (pre- and post-calving) considering the main effect of genetic groups. Girolando-F1cows presented greater body condition score (BCS) compared with Holstein. During pre-calving, there were no differences between genetic groups, except for highest heat production per kilogram of metabolic body weight for Holstein cows. After calving, Holstein cows had greater intake of DM, nitrogen, NDF per kg of BW and produced more heat per kg of metabolic body weight. Holstein cows yielded more milk and fat-corrected milk (FCM4%) compared with Girolando-F1 cows. Holstein cows presented higher methane emission per unit of BW and of metabolic weight. Emissions of enteric methane per kilogram of milk and per kilogram of FCM4% tended to be lower for Holstein compared with Girolando-F1 cows. Nitrogen and energy retention were similar for both Holstein and Girolando-F1 at pre- and post-calving. Despite differences in BCS, DMI, and milk yield, Girolando-F1 and Holstein cows present overall similar energy efficiency, albeit Holstein cows tended to present less methane emission per kg of eligible product (milk).


Subject(s)
Diet , Digestion , Methane , Nitrogen , Animals , Cattle/physiology , Cattle/metabolism , Female , Methane/metabolism , Nitrogen/metabolism , Digestion/physiology , Diet/veterinary , Energy Metabolism , Lactation/physiology , Animal Feed/analysis , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Eating , Random Allocation
2.
J Sci Food Agric ; 102(12): 5132-5140, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35279834

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ionophore antibiotics improve the efficiency of energy metabolism, which has driven their use as a feed additive in ruminants for decades. Currently, they have not been approved in many countries, generating a challenge for the immediate search for plant extracts with a similar mode of action on rumen metabolism. This study evaluated the effects of enriched Prosopis juliflora (mesquite) piperidine alkaloid extract (MPA) levels as an alternative phytoadditive to sodium monensin (MON) in sheep. RESULTS: The MPA diet did not differ from MON with regard to nutrient intake. A quadratic effect (P < 0.05) was observed for organic matter and neutral detergent fibre digestibility, with respective maximum point at 25.40 and minimum point at 0.95 mg kg-1 MPA. The MPA levels linearly decreased (P < 0.05) faecal nitrogen loss. MPA did not differ from MON with regard to nutrient digestibility, and MPA levels increased (P < 0.05) the proportion of digestible energy and metabolizability from dietary gross energy. The MPA levels linearly decreased (P < 0.05) enteric CH4 production, the yield showing lower (P < 0.05) energy loss as CH4 than MON. CONCLUSION: The results show that MPA levels of 17.3 and 27.8 mg kg-1 are enteric CH4 inhibitors and enhance energy and protein utilization, indicating a promising alternative to MON for ruminants. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry.


Subject(s)
Alkaloids , Prosopis , Alkaloids/metabolism , Animals , Diet/veterinary , Digestion , Female , Fermentation , Lactation , Methane/metabolism , Milk/metabolism , Monensin/metabolism , Monensin/pharmacology , Nitrogen/metabolism , Piperidines/metabolism , Piperidines/pharmacology , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Prosopis/metabolism , Rumen/metabolism , Sheep
3.
PLoS One ; 15(9): e0238419, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32915803

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this study were: i) to classify animals into groups of high and low feed efficiency (FE) using three FE indexes (Residual feed intake (RFI), Residual weight gain (RG) and Feed conversion efficiency (FCE)), and ii) to evaluate whether crossbreed Holstein x Gyr heifers divergent for FE indexes exhibit differences in nutrient intake and digestibility, energy partitioning, heat production, methane emissions, nitrogen partitioning and blood parameters. Thirty-five heifers were housed in a tie-stall, received ad libitum TMR (75:25, corn silage: concentrate) and were ranked and classified into high (HE) or low efficiency (LE) for RFI, RG and FCE. The number of animals for each HE group were 13 (< 0.5 standard deviation (SD) for RFI, 11 for RG and 11 for FCE (> 0.5 SD) and for the LE were 10 (> 0.5 SD) for RFI, 11 for RG and 12 for FCE (< 0.5 SD). Gas exchanges (O2 consumption, CO2 and CH4 production) in open-circuit respiratory chambers and whole tract digestibility trial was performed. A completely randomized experimental design was used and the data were analyzed by ANOVA and correlation study. High efficiency animals for RFI produced less CO2, consumed less O2 and had lower heat production (HP). Methane production was positively correlated with RFI. High efficiency RG had higher O2 consumption and CO2 production in relation to LE-RG. High efficiency FCE had greater NFC digestibility, higher positive energy balance (EB) and excreted (11.4 g/d) less nitrogen in urine. High efficiency RG and FCE groups emitted less CH4 per kg of weight gain than LE animals. Animals HE for RFI and FCE had lower ß-hydroxybutyrate and higher glucose concentrations, respectively. The differences in intake, digestibility, energy and nitrogen partition, CH4 emission, blood metabolic variables and heat production between the HE and LE groups varied according to the efficiency indexes adopted. The HP (kcal/d/BW0.75) was lower for HE animals for RFI and FCE indexes.


Subject(s)
Cattle/physiology , Animal Feed , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Cattle/blood , Cattle/classification , Digestion , Eating , Energy Metabolism , Female , Hybridization, Genetic , Methane/metabolism , Nitrogen/metabolism , Pulmonary Gas Exchange
4.
PLoS One ; 14(10): e0223368, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31600254

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this study were: 1) to classify animals into groups of high and low feed efficiency using two feed efficiency indexes (Residual feed intake (RFI) and residual feed intake and body weight gain (RIG)), and 2) to evaluate if pre-weaning heifer calves divergent for feed efficiency indexes exhibit differences in performance, body measurements, digestibility, energy partitioning, and nitrogen partitioning. A total of 32 Gyr heifer calves were enrolled in a 63-d trial and classified into two feed efficiency (FE) groups based on RFI and RIG (mean ± 0.5 SD). The groups were classified as high efficiency (HE) RFI (HE RFI, n = 9; HE RIG, n = 10), and low efficiency (LE) RFI (LE RFI, n = 10; LE RIG, n = 11). The remaining animals were classified as intermediate (n = 13 (RFI) and n = 11 (RIG)). HE and LE calves had RFI values of-0.052 and 0.049 kg/d (P < 0.05), respectively. The HE RFI group consumed 8.9% less solid diet than the LE RFI group. HE RFI animals exhibited an increased digestibility of crude protein and ether extract and tended to have greater total dry and organic matter digestibility. LE RFI animals had greater gross energy and nitrogen intake, though greater fecal losses resulted in a tendency to reduce energy and nitrogen use efficiency. HE and LE calves had RIG values of 0.080 and -0.077kg/d (P ≤ 0.01), respectively. HE RIG animals exhibited greater average daily gain (9.4%), body weight (BW), and heart girth, though HE RIG group exhibited narrower hip width. HE RIG animals tended to have greater ether extract digestibility but greater methane losses (% of gross energy). HE RFI in pre-weaning heifers seems to be related to differences in digestibility. Divergent animals for RIG during the assessed phase appear to differ in body measurements, which may be related to differences in the composition of the gain.


Subject(s)
Digestion/physiology , Energy Metabolism , Feeding Behavior , Nitrogen/metabolism , Weaning , Animals , Cattle , Diet/veterinary , Hot Temperature , Methane/metabolism , Milk , Weight Gain
5.
Rev. colomb. cienc. pecu ; 28(2): 124-143, ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-751719

ABSTRACT

Livestock farming in Latin America has been criticized because of its large greenhouse gas (GHG) production resulting from the use of degraded forage and low-efficiency production performance. Agriculture contributes a significant amount of the three main greenhouse gases: methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2), and nitrous oxide (N2O). Methane has a global warming potential 25 times greater than CO2. Enteric methane is an important greenhouse gas responsible for approximately 15% of global warming. The trend and legal obligation of mitigating greenhouse gas emissions will likely directly influence improved efficiency of livestock systems, including animal nutrition and handling. The development of mitigation strategies and the viability of their practical applications have been researched around the world. Various nutritional strategies to mitigate enteric methane have been studied and developed. All of them differ in terms of viability, cost, and acceptance by the producers. Their adoption should be based on the capacity to reduce methane emissions in association with economic viability and animal performance. Animal performance improvement will be achieved in production systems (mainly those related to efficient forage use) associated with good management of nutrition, health and reproduction. These are important strategies to consolidate Brazil as a food producer to the world, respecting the demands regarding land, water, biodiversity conservation and emission of greenhouse gases.


La industria pecuaria latinoamericana ha sido criticada por la emisión significativa de gases con efecto invernadero (GHG). Dicha crítica se fundamenta en los bajos indicadores zootécnicos observados en los sistemas de producción animal basados en pasturas degradadas o que se encuentran por debajo de su potencial de producción. La industria agropecuaria contribuye de manera significativa con la emisión de los tres principales GHG: metano (CH4), dióxido de carbono (CO2) y óxido nitroso (NO2). El gas metano tiene un potencial de calentamiento global 25 veces mayor que el de CO2. El metano entérico es un importante gas de efecto invernadero, que es responsable de aproximadamente el 15% del calentamiento global. La tendencia o la obligación legal de mitigar las emisiones de GHG tendrá una influencia directa sobre la necesidad del aumento de la eficiencia zootécnica en los sistemas pecuarios relacionado con el manejo nutricional de los animales que deberá ser adoptado. El desarrollo de estrategias de mitigación y la viabilidad de su aplicación práctica representan áreas de investigación alrededor del mundo. Existen diversas estrategias nutricionales que se han estudiado y desarrollado con el fin de mitigar el metano entérico. Dichas estrategias presentan diferentes viabilidades, costos y posibilidades para que sean aceptadas por los productores. La elección de la estrategia de mitigación a ser adoptada deberá estar centrada en la capacidad de reducción de las emisiones de metano asociada con la viabilidad económica y el mantenimiento del desempeño animal. El aumento de los indicadores zootécnicos que se obtendrán en los sistemas de producción (principalmente aquellos que utilicen de manera eficiente el forraje) asociado a una buena nutrición, salud y manejo reproductivo, son estrategias importantes para la consolidación de Brasil como un importante productor de alimentos para el mundo, teniendo en cuenta las demandas relacionadas con el uso del suelo, del agua, la conservación de la biodiversidad y de la emisión de gases con efecto invernadero.


A pecuária da América Latina tem sido criticada por emitir quantidades significativas de gases de efeito estufa (GHG). Tal crítica tem sido fundamentada nos baixos índices zootécnicos verificados em sistemas de exploração animal baseados em pastagens degradadas ou que se encontram abaixo do seu potencial de produção. A agropecuária contribui de forma significativa com a emissão dos três principais GHG: metano (CH4), dióxido de carbono (CO2) e óxido nitroso (NO2). O gás metano apresenta potencial de aquecimento global 25 vezes maior que o CO2. O metano entérico é um importante gás de efeito estufa, que é responsável por aproximadamente 15% do aquecimento global. A tendência ou obrigação legal de mitigar as emissões de GHG influenciará diretamente a necessidade de aumento da eficiência zootécnica nos sistemas pecuários, atrelado ao manejo nutricional dos animais a ser adotado. O desenvolvimento de estratégias de mitigação e a viabilidade da aplicação prática dessas estratégias são áreas atuais de pesquisa em todo o mundo. Existem várias estratégias de nutrição para mitigar metano entérico que têm sido estudados e desenvolvidos. Todos estes têm diferentes viabilidades, custos e possibilidades de serem adotadas pelos produtores. A escolha de qual vai ser utilizado deve basear-se na capacidade de reduzir as emissões de metano associadas com viabilidade econômica e a manutenção do desempenho do animal. O aumento nos índices zootécnicos que serão obtidos em sistemas de produção (principalmente os relacionados ao uso de forragem eficiente) associada a uma boa nutrição, saúde e manejo reprodutivo são estratégias importantes para consolidar o Brasil como um importante produtor de alimentos para o mundo, respeitando as demandas relacionadas ao uso da terra, da água, da conservação da biodiversidade e da emissão de gases de efeito estufa.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL