Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Dent Res ; 96(3): 285-291, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27856968

ABSTRACT

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are a set of conditions characterized by pain and dysfunction in the temporomandibular joint and muscles of mastication. These pain conditions are associated with considerable morbidity, societal costs, and reduced quality of life. The prevalence varies between 4% and 10%, with females at higher risk, and a higher prevalence occurs during reproductive years. The increased prevalence of TMD in females and low prevalence in childhood reinforce that sex hormones, like estrogen, play an important, complex role in the pathophysiology of these disorders. The goal of this study was to determine whether women with TMD exhibit a monocytic hyperinflammatory response compared with control women, and to examine associations of monocytic inflammatory responses with clinical pain. Eighteen women, aged 18 to 35 y, were seen during their follicular menstrual phase. A blood sample was collected, a clinical questionnaire about pain history was administered, and a Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) exam was performed. Extracted monocytes were stimulated with the toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 ligand, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), in the presence and absence of estrogen, and the levels of IL6 expression evaluated. Women with TMD showed a systemic hyperinflammatory phenotype, manifested by an increased monocytic release of cytokines after an inflammatory insult, and this was further increased by estrogen. In addition, monocytes from participants who self-reported more pain on the VAS scale produced higher levels of IL6 compared with those from participants who self-reported lower pain sensitivity. These data suggest that an estrogen-induced hyperinflammatory phenotype in women with TMD may at least in part contribute to heightened clinical pain, perhaps via central sensitization.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia/immunology , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Estrogens/pharmacology , Facial Pain/immunology , Facial Pain/physiopathology , Monocytes/immunology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/immunology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Follicular Phase , Humans , Interleukin-6/blood , Lipopolysaccharides , Pain Measurement , Phenotype , Surveys and Questionnaires , Toll-Like Receptor 4/blood
2.
Eur J Pain ; 16(7): 983-93, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22344627

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to examine differences in heat pain threshold (HPTh) and heat pain tolerance (HPTo) between temporomandibular joint disorder (TMJD) patients and healthy controls. Using suprathreshold heat pain, this study also examined between-group (i.e. TMJD vs. healthy controls) differences in hyperalgesia and temporal summation (TS) of heat pain. Lastly, whether between-group differences in these heat pain outcomes were mediated by self-reported sleep quality was also tested. A total of 119 participants (41% TMJD) completed the current study. HPTh and HPTo responses were assessed at the ventral forearm with an ascending method of limits, while hyperalgesia and TS responses were assessed at the dorsal forearm at temperatures of 46, 48 and 50 °C. Prior to completion of heat pain procedures, participants completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Significant between-group differences in HPTh and HPTo were not observed. TMJD patients demonstrated significantly greater hyperalgesia than healthy controls at 46 °C only, but there were no differences for TS. Furthermore, TMJD patients reported significantly poorer sleep quality compared with healthy controls. Data analysis revealed a significant simple mediation effect whereby the presence of TMJD was strongly associated with poorer self-reported sleep quality, which, in turn, was related to enhanced hyperalgesia at 46 °C. These findings support the hypothesis that the thermal hyperalgesia demonstrated by TMJD patients may be related to poor quality of their self-reported sleep. The ability of interventions that improve sleep quality to also affect pain sensitivity is currently the topic of ongoing investigation.


Subject(s)
Hyperalgesia/physiopathology , Pain Threshold/physiology , Sleep/physiology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/physiopathology , Adult , Female , Hot Temperature , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Self Report , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Pain ; 152(3): 614-622, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21239109

ABSTRACT

Studies have demonstrated menstrual cycle influences on basal pain perception, but direct evidence of menstrual cycle influences on analgesic responses has not been reported in humans. Our aim was to determine whether the magnitude of morphine and pentazocine analgesia varied across the menstrual cycle. Sixty-five healthy women, 35 taking oral contraceptives (OC) and 30 normally cycling (NOC), underwent experimental pain assessment both before and after intravenous administration morphine (0.08mg/kg) or pentazocine (0.5mg/kg) compared to saline placebo. Both active drug and placebo were administered once during the follicular phase and once during the luteal phase. Measures of heat, ischemic, and pressure pain sensitivity were obtained before and after drug administration. Change scores in pain responses were computed to determine morphine and pentazocine analgesic responses, and medication side effects were recorded. The data were analyzed using mixed-model analyses of variance. NOC women showed slightly greater heat pain sensitivity in the follicular vs luteal phase, while the reverse pattern emerged for OC women (P=0.046). Also, OC women showed lower pressure pain thresholds compared to NOC women (P<0.05). Regarding analgesic responses, NOC women showed greater morphine analgesia for ischemic pain during the follicular vs the luteal phase (P=0.004). Likewise, side effects for morphine were significantly higher in NOC women in the follicular phase than in the luteal phase (P=0.02). These findings suggest that sex hormones may influence opioid responses; however, the effects vary across medications and pain modalities and are likely to be modest in magnitude. Limited menstrual cycle effects on baseline pain responses were observed; however, morphine analgesia and side effects were greater during the follicular phase.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Hyperalgesia/drug therapy , Menstrual Cycle/drug effects , Morphine/therapeutic use , Pain Threshold/drug effects , Pentazocine/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Gonadal Steroid Hormones/blood , Humans , Hyperalgesia/physiopathology , Pain Measurement/methods , Statistics as Topic , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL