Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 44(9): 20150108, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26090934

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of tube current-exposure time (mAs) reduction on clinical and technical image quality for different CBCT scanners, and to determine preliminary minimally acceptable values for the mAs and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in CBCT. METHODS: A polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom and an anthropomorphic skull phantom, containing a human skeleton embedded in polyurethane, were scanned using four CBCT devices, including seven exposure protocols. For all protocols, the mAs was varied within the selectable range. Using the PMMA phantom, the CNRAIR was measured and corrected for voxel size. Eight axial slices and one coronal slice showing various anatomical landmarks were selected for each CBCT scan of the skull phantom. The slices were presented to six dentomaxillofacial radiologists, providing scores for various anatomical and diagnostic parameters. RESULTS: A hyperbolic relationship was seen between CNRAIR and mAs. Similarly, a gradual reduction in clinical image quality was seen at lower mAs values; however, for several protocols, image quality remained acceptable for a moderate or large mAs reduction compared with the standard exposure setting, depending on the clinical application. The relationship between mAs, CNRAIR and observer scores was different for each CBCT device. Minimally acceptable values for mAs were between 9 and 70, depending on the criterion and clinical application. CONCLUSIONS: Although noise increased at a lower mAs, clinical image quality often remained acceptable at exposure levels below the manufacturer's recommended setting, for certain patient groups. Currently, it is not possible to determine minimally acceptable values for image quality that are applicable to multiple CBCT models.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiography, Dental, Digital/methods , Adult , Anatomic Landmarks/diagnostic imaging , Artifacts , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/instrumentation , Humans , Male , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Phantoms, Imaging , Polymethyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Radiation Dosage , Radiography, Dental, Digital/instrumentation , Skull/diagnostic imaging , Time Factors
2.
J Oral Rehabil ; 38(2): 120-35, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20678103

ABSTRACT

A question frequently asked in the clinical practice of the professional who treats temporomandibular joint disorders (TMJD) is 'To make the cost/benefit ratio worthwhile for the patient, when should I request a temporomandibular joint (TMJ) computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)?' To evaluate the evidence of the efficacy of CT and MRI in the diagnosis of disc displacement, local inflammatory disorders, and arthrosis of the TMJ at therapeutic efficacy level, PubMed and Cochrane literature searches with specific indexing terms and a hand search were made. From the retrieved titles and abstracts, three examiners selected publications on the basis of predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted from the selected publications using a previously established protocol. Publications considered relevant were interpreted with the aid of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool and publications that critically evaluate systematic reviews. The literature search yielded 584 titles and abstracts, of which 257 were selected and read in full text. One study was judged relevant. This study evaluated evidence of the efficacy of MRI in the diagnosis of disc position and configuration, disc perforation, joint effusion, and osseous and bone marrow changes in the temporomandibular joint, but no publication reported diagnostic thinking efficacy or therapeutic efficacy. In conclusion, the absence of studies on the therapeutic efficacy of MRI and CT on TMJD reinforces the need for investment in decision-making studies; meanwhile, sectional imaging tests should be prescribed with caution, especially when health budgets are limited.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnosis , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/therapy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Support Techniques , Humans , Quality Assurance, Health Care
3.
J Oral Rehabil ; 37(9): 698-703, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20492434

ABSTRACT

Bone quality (BQ) has been described as an important predictor for the outcome of dental implant treatment. It is, however, unclear how this factor is assessed in the dental practice routine. The aim of this study was to investigate what Brazilian dental implant specialists know and understand about BQ, if they include BQ assessments in their treatment planning and which methods they use to assess BQ. A questionnaire was posted to Brazilian dental implant specialists, containing open and closed questions about their knowledge and understanding of BQ assessment, and 221 answered the questionnaire. Data were gathered and methods for BQ assessment were grouped using hierarchical cluster analysis. Answers about BQ knowledge and understanding were categorized into quantity of cortical and marrow bone (n = 72), density (n = 55), type of bone (n = 35), bone height (n = 30), bone thickness (n = 27), primary stability (n = 24) and other less common categories. BQ assessment was judged relevant to be considered a selection criterion for implant treatment. Overall frequency analysis showed that methods were roughly divided into usual (n > 170) and unusual methods (n < 9). Cluster analysis grouped BQ assessment methods into four clusters: unusual methods (DEXA, resonance frequency, Periotest and occlusal radiography), perioperative methods (peak insertion torque and tactile perception), sectional imaging (computed tomography) and plain films (periapical and panoramic radiographs). No consensus on BQ understanding or the clinical application of methods to assess BQ was found in this survey. The selection of methods shows a clear natural grouping from basic to advanced strategies for BQ assessment by Brazilian specialists in dental implants.


Subject(s)
Bone Density/physiology , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Dentists , Education, Dental , Absorptiometry, Photon , Bone Marrow/pathology , Brazil , Cluster Analysis , Dental Prosthesis Retention , Elasticity Imaging Techniques , Female , Humans , Jaw/pathology , Male , Patient Care Planning , Periodontics/instrumentation , Professional Practice , Radiography, Bitewing , Radiography, Panoramic , Specialties, Dental , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Torque , Touch Perception/physiology
4.
J Oral Pathol Med ; 33(10): 637-40, 2004 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15482332

ABSTRACT

Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus (LSA) is a chronic, benign, depigmenting disease of the skin and mucous membranes most frequently affecting the female genitalia. Involvement of the oral mucosa without concurrent genital or skin lesions has been reported only occasionally in the literature. In view of the rarity of reported cases, one lesion affecting only the labial mucocutaneous area is presented along with a description of the disease's clinical and histopathological findings.


Subject(s)
Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus/pathology , Lip Diseases/pathology , Mouth Mucosa/pathology , Adult , Female , Humans
5.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 30(4): 209-13, 2001 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11681482

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of the medial depression of mandibular ramus (MDMR) in dry human mandibles and in clinical panoramic radiographs and to compare the prevalence in dentoskeletal deformities with Angle Class I occlusion. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-one dry skulls and three groups of patients were used for this study: Group 1 consisted of 1358 panoramic radiographs from a general population, Group 2, 426 radiographs from individuals with Angle class I occlusion and Group 3283 individuals with dentoskeletal deformities. The prevalence of MDMR was determined in the skulls and each group and the shape from the radiographs alone. RESULTS: The prevalence of MDMR in dry mandibles was 33.9% (bilateral in 13.1% and unilateral in 20.8%). MDMR was found in 276 radiographs (20.3% - Group 1 - bilateral in 40% and unilateral in 59.5%). MDMR was more common in Group 3 compared with Group 2 (chi(2)=35.98 P<0.01). A triangular MDMR was the most frequent (39.7%). CONCLUSION: MDMR is a relatively common finding in panoramic radiographs. Patients with dentoskeletal deformities have a higher prevalence of MDMR and this should be taken into consideration if orthognathic surgery is proposed.


Subject(s)
Malocclusion/diagnostic imaging , Mandible/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Ankylosis/diagnostic imaging , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , Facial Asymmetry/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Male , Malocclusion, Angle Class I/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/diagnostic imaging , Malocclusion, Angle Class III/diagnostic imaging , Mandible/pathology , Radiography, Panoramic , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...