[Paediatric emergency triage in Spanish primary care using mobile phones. Analysis of a model in a health area]. / Triaje de las urgencias pediátricas en Atención Primaria en España mediante telefonía móvil. Análisis de un modelo en una zona de salud.

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a pilot study of telephone consultation in the paediatric population of an urban health centre. To evaluate the telephone consultation as an effective tool when it comes to exercising prior triage of patients requiring urgent attention. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted in two phases. In the first, data were collected from all calls received for six months. In a second phase, we conducted a telephone intervention study to analyse what a random sample of users remembered of the care provided. All those who requested a telephone consultation were included in the study. Demographic, social-welfare, epidemiological, and clinical features, of each patient were recorded. Data were processed using a statistical package SPSS version 17.0 for Windows. RESULTS: There were 439 telephone inquiries in our pilot project, of which 35.1% were attended by residents, 36% by paediatricians, and 28.9% by paediatric nurses. There were more telephone calls in the afternoons and on weekends. Patients less than or equal to 2 years accounted for 57.9% of cases handled, and there were no differences between sexes. The most frequent reasons for consultation were gastrointestinal symptoms, fever and respiratory problems. The health problem was resolved in 85.8% of cases, requiring only home care instructions, and only 13.3% of children were referred to emergency services. We obtained a mean score of satisfaction of 9.2. CONCLUSIONS: The pilot project had a high level of satisfaction and resolution, demonstrating cost savings by reducing 55% of face to face visits, with a saving of 35.2 euros per telephone consultation. A teleconsultation model for dealing with emergencies in primary care by telephone would be comparable to a practice staffed by trained paediatric nurses.

Screening for sight threatening diabetic retinopathy using non-mydriatic retinal camera in a primary care setting: to dilate or not to dilate?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate three different strategies (without or with mydriasis) for community based screening for sight threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR). DESIGN: A masked cross-sectional comparative study. SETTING: Primary care centre. PARTICIPANTS: 216 type-1 and type-2 diabetic patients (432 eyes). INTERVENTIONS: Screening for STDR was performed with the Topcon CRW6S non-mydriatic camera (NMC), compared with the grading of the seven-field standard stereoscopic photographs, 30 degrees field photographs with mydriasis as the gold standard method. Three fields were studied: Field 1 centred on the macula; field 2 centred on the disc and the macula and field 3 centred on the disc, on the macula and temporal upper to the macula all without and with mydriasis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity and specificity of screening method and prevalence of STDR. Strategies: field 1 (macular), addition of field 2 (nasal), addition of field 3 (superior temporal) all without and with mydriasis. RESULTS: The prevalence of STDR was 14.3%. When screening without mydriasis is performed, the percentage of referred patients increases from 14% (STDR) to almost 33% because of ungradable photographs. Sensitivity of detection of STDR by NMC using single field with mydriasis was 82% (95% confidence interval 72-92%) and without mydriasis 67% (54-80%). Specificity was 99% (97-100%) for single field with mydriasis and 99% (98-100%) without mydriasis. Sensitivity of detection using two fields with mydriasis was 95% (89-100%); without mydriasis (54-80%), slightly better than single field with mydriasis (72-92%). Specificity was similar. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for STDR with NMC can be performed effectively with one non-stereoscopic retinal photograph per eye with mydriasis using tropicamide 0.5%. Screening without mydriasis increases the number of patients to be referred.

Incidence and risk factors associated with urinary tract infection in diabetic patients with and without asymptomatic bacteriuria.

In order to compare the incidence of symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) in diabetic patients with and without asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB), and to identify other risk factors for these infections, 289 females and 168 males were studied over a 12-month period. Symptomatic UTI occurred in 69.2% of patients with ASB (67.6% female and 76.5% male) versus 9.8% without ASB (14.9% female and 2.6% male). ASB and urinary incontinence were associated with symptomatic UTI in both women and men. Other risk factors included previous antimicrobial treatment and macrovascular complications in women and obesity and prostatic syndrome in men. The presence of ASB was found to be the major risk factor for developing symptomatic urinary tract infection. Further prospective randomized clinical trials of diabetic patients with risk factors for UTI who are receiving or not receiving treatment may be considered.

Lack of alloimmunization to D antigen in D-negative immunosuppressed liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) sometimes requires large amounts of blood. An adequate supply of Rh-negative blood for Rh-negative patients is not always available. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Seventeen Rh-negative patients, out of 327 receiving OLT in this hospital, received from 5 to 41 units of Rh-positive red cells during surgery. Each of the 17 patients was followed for 7 weeks to 70 months after OLT for detection of unexpected antibodies. Cyclosporin A and prednisone, azathioprine, and adjunctive rabbit antilymphocyte globulin or monoclonal OKT3 antibody were used to prevent graft rejection. RESULTS: Evidence of immunization, either to D or to antigens in the rest of the red cell antigen systems, did not appear in any patients. CONCLUSION: It is hypothesized that cyclosporin A affects the immune humoral response, inhibiting lymphocyte activation and the primary immune response; consequently, Rh-positive blood may be transfused to Rh-negative OLT recipients so treated with little or no risk of alloimmunization.