Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Brain Behav Immun Health ; 13: 100212, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33527097

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clozapine is among the most effective antipsychotics used for treatment resistant schizophrenia. Adverse reactions to clozapine include neutropenia. In March 2020, at the start of the Coronavirus -19 pandemic, clinicians raised concerns regarding continuation of antipsychotic treatment, and specifically of clozapine, in patients with coronavirus disease. We aimed here at providing a short report focusing on the association between neutropenia and clozapine in a case series of psychiatric inpatients diagnosed with COVID-19. PATIENTS & METHODS: We retrospectively inspected data of 10 patients on clozapine, admitted to Highgate Mental Health Centre, Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, between March and July 2020; selection was based on their COVID-19 positive PCR test. We used a linear regression model to estimate whether there was a significant drop in the neutrophil count during SARS-CoV-2 infection.The analysis was done in R using a linear regression to the origin. RESULTS: Data were collected on 10 patients, of which 7 were males. During COVID-19 infection, neutrophils' count (ANC) was 4.13 â€‹× â€‹109/l (SD â€‹= â€‹2.70) which constituted a significant drop from a baseline value of 5.2 â€‹× â€‹109/l (SD â€‹= â€‹2.24). The mean relative reduction in ANC was -0.2729 (SD â€‹= â€‹0.1666). The beta value of 0.8377 obtained with the linear regression showed that ANC values during SARS-CoV-2 infection were 83.77% of the baseline ANC showing that within the two time points there was a decrease of 16.23%. The linear regression had a pvalue â€‹= â€‹8.96 â€‹× â€‹10-8 and an adjusted R2 of 95.94% which shows that the variability of the data is very well explained by the model. We also compared baseline ANC with ANC values approximately a month after resolution of the infection and results indicate that ANC values return to a 95% of baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should bear in mind that a significant drop in neutrophils' count may occur in patients taking clozapine and affected from a SARS-CoV-2 infectionand that this drop is only transitory.

2.
Neurotoxicology ; 74: 282-298, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31412258

ABSTRACT

Cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) are the most represented phytocannabinoids in Cannabis sativa plants. However, CBD may present with a different activity compared with the psychotomimetic THC. Most typically, CBD is reported to be used in some medical conditions, including chronic pain. Conversely, the main aim of this systematic review is to assess and summarise the available body of evidence relating to both efficacy and safety of CBD as a treatment for psychiatric disorders, alone and/or in combination with other treatments. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCT) assessing the effect of CBD in a range of psychopathological conditions, such as substance use; psychosis, anxiety, mood disturbances, and other psychiatric (e.g., cognitive impairment; sleep; personality; eating; obsessive-compulsive; post-traumatic stress/PTSD; dissociative; and somatic) disorders. For data gathering purposes, the PRISMA guidelines were followed. The initial search strategy identified some n = 1301 papers; n = 190 studies were included after the abstract's screening and n = 27 articles met the inclusion criteria. There is currently limited evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of CBD for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. However, available trials reported potential therapeutic effects for specific psychopathological conditions, such as substance use disorders, chronic psychosis, and anxiety. Further large-scale RCTs are required to better evaluate the efficacy of CBD in both acute and chronic illnesses, special categories, as well as to exclude any possible abuse liability.


Subject(s)
Cannabidiol/therapeutic use , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Anxiety/drug therapy , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
3.
Brain Sci ; 8(7)2018 Jul 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30011896

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Novel Psychoactive Substances (NPS) are a heterogeneous class of synthetic molecules including synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs). Psychosis is associated with SCRAs use. There is limited knowledge regarding the structured assessment and psychometric evaluation of clinical presentations, analytical toxicology and clinical management plans of patients presenting with psychosis and SCRAs misuse. METHODS: We gathered information regarding the clinical presentations, toxicology and care plans of patients with psychosis and SCRAs misuse admitted to inpatients services. Clinical presentations were assessed using the PANSS scale. Vital signs data were collected using the National Early Warning Signs tool. Analytic chemistry data were collected using urine drug screening tests for traditional psychoactive substances and NPS. RESULTS: We described the clinical presentation and management plan of four patients with psychosis and misuse of SCRAs. CONCLUSION: The formulation of an informed clinical management plan requires a structured assessment, identification of the index NPS, pharmacological interventions, increases in nursing observations, changes to leave status and monitoring of the vital signs. The objective from using these interventions is to maintain stable physical health whilst rapidly improving the altered mental state.

4.
J Psychiatr Res ; 43(3): 247-54, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18511076

ABSTRACT

Recent studies have implicated brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the pathophysiology of depression and the activity of antidepressant drugs. Serum BDNF levels are lower in depressed patients, and increase in response to antidepressant medication. However, how BDNF responds to different classes of antidepressant drugs is unknown. We assessed serum BDNF levels in 21 patients with major depressive episode treated with sertraline, escitalopram, or venlafaxine and 20 healthy controls. Serum samples were collected between 10 a.m. and 12 p.m. at baseline, 5 weeks, and 6 months of treatment. BDNF levels were measured via immunoassay. The severity of symptoms and response to treatment were assessed by the Hamilton rating scales for depression (HRSD). Baseline serum BDNF levels were significantly lower in depressed patients compared to controls. Sertraline increased BDNF levels after 5 weeks and 6 months of treatment. Venlafaxine increased BDNF levels only after 6 months. Escitalopram did not affect BDNF levels at either time point. A significant negative association was found between percentage increase in BDNF levels and percentage decreased in HRSD scores after 6 months of treatment. In conclusion, these results suggest that different antidepressant drugs have variable effects on serum BDNF levels. This is true even though the three different drugs were equally effective in relieving symptoms of depression and anxiety.


Subject(s)
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/blood , Citalopram/therapeutic use , Cyclohexanols/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Sertraline/therapeutic use , Adult , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major/blood , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
5.
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc ; 17(3): 227-35, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18924562

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Psychosis is a traumatic experience for both sufferers and their families. The morbidity and mortality associated with psychosis may be improved by an assertive, specialised, multidisciplinary approach to care, provided at the earliest opportunity. Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) uses such approach to improve the individual's short and long-term symptomatic and functional outcome, as well as quality of life. However, there is still controversy about whether this type of intervention is effective enough to justify its associated costs. METHODS: We reviewed evidence from the literature on EIP for schizophrenia spectrum and non-affective psychoses, with particular attention to evidence on its effectiveness in reducing the duration of untreated symptoms, preventing relapses and reducing admission rates, reducing suicide rates, and reducing treatment costs. RESULTS: There is preliminary evidence that EIP may be effective in delaying transition to psychosis, reducing DUP, preventing relapses, reducing admission and suicidal rates, and reducing treatment costs. DISCUSSION: EIP remains a stimulating multidisciplinary approach to psychosis and a demanding commitment for mental health professionals and service developers.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/economics , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Disease Progression , Humans , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...