Efficacy of intraoperative neurologic monitoring in surgery involving a vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib for early-onset spinal deformity.

BACKGROUND: The vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) device is used in the treatment of thoracic insufficiency syndrome and certain types of early-onset spinal deformity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of neurologic injury during surgical procedures involving use of the VEPTR and to determine the efficacy of intraoperative spinal cord neuromonitoring. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively during a multicenter study. Surgical procedures were divided into three categories: primary device implantation, device exchange, and device lengthening. Further retrospective evaluation was undertaken in cases of neurologic injury or changes detected with neuromonitoring. RESULTS: There were 1736 consecutive VEPTR procedures at six centers: 327 (in 299 patients) consisted of a primary device implantation, 224 were a device exchange, and 1185 were a device lengthening. Perioperative clinical neurologic injury was noted in eight (0.5%) of the 1736 cases: these injuries were identified after five (1.5%) of the 327 procedures for primary device implantation, three (1.3%) of the 224 device exchanges, and none of the 1185 device-lengthening procedures. Of the eight cases of neurologic injury, six involved the upper extremity and two involved the lower extremity. The neurologic deficit was temporary in seven patients and permanent in one patient, who had persistent neurogenic arm and hand pain. Intraoperative neuromonitoring demonstrated changes during six (0.3%) of the 1736 procedures: five (1.5%) of the 327 procedures for primary device implantation and one (0.08%) of the 1185 device-lengthening procedures. The surgery was altered in all six cases, with resolution of the monitoring changes in five cases and persistent signal changes and a neurologic deficit (upper-extremity brachial plexopathy) in one. Two patients had false-negative results of monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials, and one had false-negative results of monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials during implant surgery; two had a brachial plexopathy and one had monoplegia postoperatively, with all three recovering. CONCLUSIONS: Neurologic injury during VEPTR surgery occurs much more frequently in the upper extremities than in the lower extremities. The rates of potential neurologic injuries (neurologic injuries plus instances of changes detected by monitoring) during primary implantation of the VEPTR (2.8%) and during exchange of the VEPTR (1.3%) justify the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring of the upper and lower extremities during those procedures. As neuromonitoring did not demonstrate any changes in children without a previous VEPTR-related monitoring change and there were no neurologic injuries during more than 1000 VEPTR-lengthening procedures, intraoperative neuromonitoring may not be necessary during those procedures in children without a history of a neurologic deficit during VEPTR surgery.

Insurance status and delay in orthotic treatment in children.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the type of health insurance is associated with a delay in children obtaining orthoses. METHODS: The medical records of 60 children who were prescribed an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) or thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) were retrospectively reviewed. Ten children were randomly chosen with either of 3 types of insurance (government, health maintenance organizations [HMOs], and preferred provider organizations [PPOs]) with an orthosis provided by a single supplier. The time interval between prescription and insurance company authorization was recorded, as well as the interval between prescription and procurement of the orthosis. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the time from prescription to authorization of orthoses between insurance types (P = 0.001) and time from authorization until brace procurement between insurance types (P = 0.01). Children with PPO insurance received authorization for an AFO faster than children with government insurance or an HMO (P < 0.05). Children with government insurance received authorization for a TLSO significantly later than children with PPO insurance (P = 0.004) or HMO insurance (P = 0.03). The difference in time between authorization and procurement of a TLSO in children with PPO insurance (36 days) was strikingly different from that of children with government insurance (123 days) (P = 0.003). DISCUSSION: This study documents that children with government insurance face delays in obtaining orthotic treatment compared with children with PPO insurance. The delay in the procurement of the more expensive brace (TLSO is approximately 4 times the cost of an AFO) correlated to more striking delays in the government-insured population.

Access to orthopaedic care for children with medicaid versus private insurance: results of a national survey.

BACKGROUND: It has been documented that children insured by Medicaid in California have significantly less access to orthopedic care than children with private insurance. Low Medicaid physician reimbursement rates have been hypothesized to be a major factor. The first objective of this study was to examine whether children insured by Medicaid have limited access to orthopedic care in a national sample. The second objective was to determine if state variations in Medicaid physician reimbursement rates correlate with access to orthopedic care. METHODS: Two-hundred fifty orthopedic surgeon's offices, 5 randomly chosen in each of 50 states, were telephoned. Each office called was asked to answer questions to an anonymous, disclosed survey. The survey asked whether the office accepted pediatric patients, whether they accepted children with Medicaid, and whether they limited the number of children that they accepted with Medicaid, and if so why. Each state sets its own rate of physician reimbursement rates that were collected from individual state Medicaid agencies for 3 different CPT codes. The relationship between acceptance of patients with Medicaid and the individual state's Medicaid reimbursement rate was examined. RESULTS: Children with Medicaid insurance had limited access to orthopedic care in 88 of 230 (38%) offices that treat children, and 18% (41/230) of offices would not see a child with Medicaid under any circumstances. Reimbursement rates for CPT codes widely varied by state: 99243 for an outpatient consultation (range, $20-$176.38), 99213 for an established follow-up outpatient visit (range, $6-$77.76), and 25560 for global treatment of a nondisplaced radius and ulna shaft fracture without manipulation (range, $50-$403.94). There was a statistically significant relationship between access to medical care for Medicaid patients and physician reimbursement rates for all 3 CPT codes. CONCLUSIONS: Children insured with Medicaid have limited access to orthopedic care in this nationwide sample. Medicaid physician reimbursement significantly correlates with patient access to medical care. These data may be of value in the ongoing efforts to improve access to medical care for children on Medicaid. The logical inference from this study is that increasing physician reimbursement rates will improve access. In the authors' opinion, reimbursement rates should be made higher than office overhead to effect meaningful change.