Development, reliability, and validity assessment of a fall concerns scale for people who use wheelchairs and scooters (FCS-WC/S).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of a Fall Concerns Scale for people who use Wheelchairs and Scooters (FCS-WC/S). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Developed by fall prevention experts, FCS-WC/S underwent refinement through interdisciplinary reviews and focus groups with researchers, clinicians, and individuals who use WC/S full-time. The psychometric evaluation involved adults who used WC/S for ≥1 year and had ≥1 fall in the previous 3 years, recruited between April and September 2022. RESULTS: The FCS-WC/S evaluates fall concerns among people with various health conditions who use WC/S full-time across 33 daily activities. One hundred and twenty-four participants responded to the baseline survey. A subgroup of 63 people repeated the FCS-WC/S a week later. The FCS-WC/S demonstrated excellent internal and good test-retest reliability (α ≥ 0.90, ICC = 0.86-0.9), as well as concurrent validity (Spearman's rho = 0.72) with the Spinal Cord Injury Falls Concern Scale (SCI-FCS). It effectively differentiated fear of falling levels from an established measure (ORs 4.1, 25.8, 46.7). Factor and parallel analysis revealed three factors, two of which were retained for further analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings support FCS-WC/S validity and reliability for assessing fall concerns among individuals with various conditions who use WC/S. Further scale construction analysis is recommended.

Measuring concerns about falling among full-time wheelchair and scooter users is crucial due to its potential negative impact on activity curtailment, which in turn may affect community participation and quality of life.Most validated tools, except for the Spinal Cord Injury-Falls Concern Scale, designed for manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury, are primarily tailored for individuals who ambulate, highlighting the need for assessment tools specifically designed for full-time wheelchair and scooter users.Using the Spinal Cord Injury-Falls Concern Scale as a foundation, the Fall Concerns Scale for people who use Wheelchairs and Scooters was developed to measure fall concerns among full-time wheelchair and scooter users, irrespective of their specific health conditions.The Fall Concerns Scale for people who use Wheelchairs and Scooters has a good potential to offer clinicians a valid and reliable tool to systematically screen fall concerns across various health conditions, with further large-scale studies needed to validate the tool across a wider range of health conditions.

mHealth learning strategies to support behaviour change in individuals using wheelchairs and/or scooters: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review of the literature is to build understanding of the key elements and recommendations for the design of mHealth technology for individuals using wheelchairs and/or scooters and identify key features associated with the use of mHealth to support healthy behaviour changes for this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight major electronic databases were systematically searched to identify mobile health (mHealth) interventions, which targeted adult WC/S users. Independent reviewers used Endnote and Covidence to manage articles meeting review criteria and to exclude duplicates. A quality assessment was conducted on each included article. RESULTS: Nine articles describing studies with diverse study designs met criteria to be included in this review. Several interactive application intervention features, such as participant collaboration and goal setting, and key technical features to support mHealth app development and utilisation were identified. Results found intuitive and simple designs of mHealth apps, with the ability to customise to support learning styles and preferences, support usability and acceptability by participants. CONCLUSIONS: More research is needed to evaluate best practices to support initial training of end-users, mHealth apps' ability to support long-term behaviour change and maintenance, and the understanding of active ingredients in complex interventions that include mHealth apps. Both interactive mHealth application intervention and technical features support healthy behaviour change among individuals using wheelchairs and scooters.

Utilizing evidence to develop mHealth applications (apps) support best practices, participant satisfaction, and usability.mHealth apps are feasible to support health behavior change for wheelchair and/or scooter users, with considerations for customization to support diverse learning preferences and needs.Active learning strategies (e.g., goal setting, self-assessment, collaborative learning), within or in conjunction with the app, support behavior change.

Factors associated with fear of falling and fall-related injuries among people who use wheelchairs and motorized mobility scooters: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: To identify the factors associated with the fear of falling (FOF) and fall-related injuries (FRI) among full-time wheelchair and motorized mobility scooter (WC/S) users with various health conditions. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included participants (≥18 years old) who used WC/S for at least one year for ≥ 75% of mobility and had a history of ≥ 1 fall in the past three years. Logistic regression models identified factors associated with FOF (yes/no) and FRI (yes/no) during the past year. Data on demographics, prior falls, mental health, environmental accessibility, and WC/S usage were used as independent variables. RESULTS: Among 156 participants, 96% reported at least one fall within the past year, among whom 94.6% reported FOF, and 74% reported FRI within the same period. FOF was associated with fall incidence in the past year (OR = 17.75, p = 0.001). FRI was associated with higher levels of anxiety (OR = 1.15, p = 0.003) and fewer hours of WC/S use per week (OR = 0.98, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the high prevalence of FOF and FRI among WC/S users who had falls. The findings emphasized the relation between prior fall experiences and FOF and underscored the significance of addressing anxiety symptoms and WC/S usage in relation to FRI.

Among individuals with a variety of health conditions who use wheelchairs and motorized mobility scooters full-time for most of their mobility and have experienced at least one fall incident within the past year, the prevalence of psychosocial and physical consequences of falls (fear of falling and fall-related injuries) is relatively high.Given the significant association between an individual's previous fall experiences and the likelihood of fear of falling, continuous screening for falls is a crucial step toward fall prevention for people who use wheelchairs and motorized mobility scooters full-time.Recognizing the importance of the unique needs of individuals who use wheelchairs and motorized mobility scooters and tailoring interventions like wheelchair skills and anxiety management education may enhance overall rehabilitation outcomes.

A mixed-methods study examining perceptions of fear of falling among community-dwelling people who use wheelchairs full-time.

Objective: There is growing evidence that fear of falling (FOF) is common in people who use wheelchairs full-time and negatively influence their performance of daily activities and quality of life. The purpose of this study was to gain an in-depth understanding of perceptions related to FOF among people who use wheelchairs full-time.Methods: Mixed-method analysis was conducted using semi-structured interviews and surveys to gain insight into FOF. Surveys included demographic information; Spinal Cord Injury-Fall Concerns Scale (SCI-FCS); a questionnaire that directly assesses FOF and associated activity curtailment; and Fall Control Scale (FCS).Results: Among 39 participants (age = 43.1 ± 15.6 years, disability duration = 21.2 ± 11.1 years), 27 participants (69%) reported FOF. Participants with less perceived ability to control falls indexed by FCS reported higher SCI-FCS scores, indicating greater FOF (rs = -0.384, p = 0.016). Qualitative findings revealed that participants felt that FOF developed due to sustaining fall-related injuries or limited ability to recover from a fall. Some participants perceived falling as a part of their lives. They believed that it was not the cause of developing FOF.Conclusions: Among people who use wheelchairs full-time, FOF is prevalent and may develop due to fears of sustaining injuries or being unable to get up after falling. Developing an evidenced-based education protocol aimed at managing falls (e.g., establishing a fall recovery strategy and education on techniques to reduce injury during falls) is needed to minimize FOF people who use wheelchairs full-time.

Fear of falling and associated activity curtailment are prevalent among people who use wheelchairs full-time.Fear of falling often develops as a result of prior fall-related injuries or the inability to recover from a fall independently.Evidence-based education protocols to reduce fear of falling among people who use wheelchairs full-time should contain content related to fall recovery and injury prevention.

Understanding Wheelchair Use in Older Adults From the National Health and Aging Trends Study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the trends of wheelchair use and physical characteristics among older people who used wheelchairs relative to those who did not. DESIGN: Cohort and survey. SETTING: General community. PARTICIPANTS: 7026 participants (N=7026) were selected from the 2011 cohort of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), which is made up of Medicare beneficiaries over the age of 65. Repeated observations among participants in the 2011 cohort were analyzed in the 4 following rounds: 2013 (N=4454), 2015 (N=3327), 2017 (N=2623), and 2019 (N=2091). Participants were divided into 2 groups: those who used and did not use wheelchairs. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Physical characteristics, including pain, strength limitation, balance problems, mobility disability, as well as the frequency of going outside. RESULTS: The number of older adults who use wheelchairs had increased significantly from 4.7 per 100 people in 2011 to 7.1 in 2019 (P<.001). The logistic regression analysis indicated that participants who reported less frequently going out were at least 4.27 times more likely to be wheelchair users than non-wheelchair users (P<.01). Participants who reported health and physical problems were at least 2.48 times more likely to be wheelchair users than non-wheelchair users from 2011 to 2017 (P<.0001). Balance or coordination problems increased (24%-38%) significantly among non-wheelchair users from 2011 to 2019 (all P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Current wheelchair users reported more physical difficulties and were much less likely to go outside. This lower outdoor mobility could be due to physical difficulties or potential barriers in physical and socio-cultural environments. In addition, older adults who do not use wheelchairs showed increasing physical problems over time (including balance or coordination problems). Clinicians should consider older wheelchair users' health and physical limitations when prescribing wheelchairs.

Best practices associated with residential fire preparedness among individuals who use a wheelchair or scooter full time: A scoping review.

CONTEXT: During the evacuation of a residence during a fire event, individuals must often climb over objects or navigate stairs, which may be challenging or impossible for an individual who uses a wheelchair or scooter for mobility. Consequently, fire preparedness is critical to enhancing this population's safety and well-being. OBJECTIVE: This study examines best practices associated with fire preparedness among individuals who use a wheelchair or scooter to inform and facilitate fire preparedness education. METHODS: A scoping literature review was conducted based on the framework established by Arksey and O'Malley. A total of 386 peer-reviewed articles and sources based on non-academic organizations, including the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America (RESNA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), United Spinal Association, American Red Cross, and United States Fire Administration (USFA) were evaluated, and 14 of the 386 peer-reviewed publications were retained after determining predefined inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Findings emphasize the need to prevent fires from occurring through dedication to safe home practices and the use of early detection systems, and the utilization of easy-to-use or automated fire management equipment, such as a home sprinkler system, was encouraged. The need to develop highly detailed evacuation plans with the use of appropriate equipment is highly emphasized. CONCLUSION: Due to the high-risk nature of the population, increased attention, and awareness of fire preparedness among individuals who use a wheelchair or scooter is critical.

Community Partners' Perspectives on Partnering With an Academic Research Team to Promote Disability-inclusive Fitness Programming.

BACKGROUND: Community-based fitness programs can support public health by providing access to physical activity opportunities for a vulnerable population with significant barriers. Unfortunately, programs specifically designed for people with disabilities (PWD) and staff training to promote inclusion for PWD in general population programs is limited. The current study aimed to review an on-going partnership that had formed to address this need. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess community partners' experiences with a community-academic partnership designed to implement a fitness program for people with multiple sclerosis and also to promote inclusion for PWD in community-based fitness programming. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six community partners who had been engaged in a formal partnership with the academic institution for 2 or more years to understand partners' experiences and perspectives about the partnership. Interviews were audio/video recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Participants described their experiences as falling into four main areas. Pre-partnership experiences (or lack thereof) shaped participants views on entering into academic partnerships. Communication and planning for mutual benefit were key to getting the partnership started. Partners identified challenges and factors for success while they were in the thick of partnership activities. Finally, evaluation allowed for assessment and improvement of the partnership itself and its ultimate goals. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that academic-community partnerships can be ideal for promoting inclusion for PWD and highlight insights that can be used in the development of future partnerships.

Functional balance assessment for predicting future recurrent falls in non-ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury: a prospective pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Functional assessments easy to administer within the clinic to identify non-ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury at risk of recurrent falls are needed. PURPOSE: To examine the ability of functional balance and transfer quality to predict recurrent falls. METHODS: This 6-month prospective study examined remote assessments of transfer quality using the Transfer Assessment Instrument and functional sitting balance with the Function in Sitting Test and the Trunk Control Test. Then, participants prospectively monitored their falls for 6-month using fall diaries. Frequency of falls was categorized as infrequent fallers (≤2 falls) and recurrent fallers (>2 falls). A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted. A Receiver Operating Characteristic curve was performed to determine the area under the curve, the sensitivity, and the specificity of the model. RESULTS: Eighteen non-ambulatory individuals (mean age = 44 ± 16 years, mean time since injury = 7.8 ± 32.6 years) participated in the study. Poor balance (lower Function in Sitting Test score) was associated with higher odds of future recurrent falls (Odds Ratio = 0.70, 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.00, p = 0.05), area under the receiving operating curve = 0.87, sensitivity = 88%, and specificity = 70%. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive sitting balance assessment that includes the static, proactive, and reactive components of balance with the integration of sensorial functions as evaluated within the Function in Sitting Test may be useful for predicting recurrent falls among non-ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury. Replication of the findings in a larger sample is warranted.

Beyond the Imodium, a One Health Discussion on Diarrhea and the Impact of Climate Change.

Our ability to tackle the looming human, animal, and global ecosystem health threats arising from the issues of climate change and extreme weather events will require effective and creative cross-disciplinary collaboration. There is a growing national and international interest in equipping the next generation of clinicians and health scientists for success in facing these important challenges by providing interprofessional training opportunities. This paper describes how we assembled an interdisciplinary team of experts to design and deliver a case-based discussion on a cross-species illness outbreak in animals and humans using a One Health framework. The small group, case-based approach highlighted the impact of climate change-driven extreme weather events on human and animal health using a diarrhea outbreak associated with a contaminated community water supply precipitated by extreme flooding. Post-activity survey data indicated that this team-taught learning activity successfully engaged a cross-disciplinary cohort of medical, veterinary, and public health students in the issues of environmental public health threats and helped them understand the importance of an integrative, cross-functional, team-based approach for solving complex problems. The data from this study is being used to plan similar interprofessional, One Health learning activities across the health sciences curriculum in our institution.

The influence of gender on shoulder kinematics and head-hip technique during non-level transfers in full-time wheelchair users.

BACKGROUND: Non-level transfers are some of the most demanding tasks for manual wheelchair users. Safely performing these transfer tasks may be needed for maintaining long-term upper limb health. This cross-sectional study aimed to examine the influence of gender on the head-hip technique and lead arm kinematics during multi-height transfers in manual wheelchair users. METHODS: Motion analysis was used to obtain lead-arm shoulder kinematics (flexion/extension and abduction/adduction) and trunk flexion during level, uphill, and floor-to-table transfers in full-time manual wheelchair users. FINDINGS: Twelve male (N = 12) and fifteen female (N = 15) manual wheelchair users with a mean age of 23 ± 5 years and no signs of shoulder pain participated in the study. Lead-arm shoulder flexion and abduction increased as vertical displacement requirements increased during the various transfer tasks (p < 0.01). Women displaced greater trunk flexion during level transfers at approaching significant levels (p = 0.07). During uphill transfers, women displayed significantly greater trunk flexion than men (p < 0.05). INTERPRETATION: Manual wheelchair users use unique kinematic requirements when using the head-hip during level and non-level transfers. Women may be at decreased risk of chronic shoulder pain due to a greater use of the head-hip technique during non-level transfers. Nonetheless, more research that integrates kinetics and strength assessments during non-level transfer biomechanical analyses is needed to better understand technical requirements of non-level transfers in manual wheelchair users.

Characteristics and consequences of falls among people with multiple sclerosis who use wheelchairs or scooters: Differences between injurious and non-injurious falls.

BACKGROUND: Falls are common among people living with multiple sclerosis (MS) who use wheelchairs or scooters. Falls may lead to severe consequences including physical injuries. However, very little is known about the circumstances associated with injurious falls in this population. Therefore, we aimed to explore the differences in fall-related characteristics between injurious and non-injurious falls among people with MS who use wheelchairs or scooters. METHODS: A convenience sample of 48 people with MS (age = 62.0 [13.0] years, gender = 81.3% female, primary mobility aid = power wheelchair) completed a fall-history survey that examined the characteristics and consequences of their most recent fall. Participants also completed standard questionnaires on quality of life, community participation, and fear of falling. RESULTS: Most falls (85.4%) reported by participants occurred inside the house. Twelve (25.0%) participants reported experiencing fall-related injuries such as bruises, cuts, muscle strains, and fractures. People who reported being injured after a fall had a higher proportion of falls that occurred during transfers compared to those who were not injured (n = 10, 83.3% vs n = 17, 47.2%). Most participants (45.8%) did not receive any information from healthcare professionals on how to manage their fall-risk after their fall experience. No differences between injurious and non-injurious fallers in quality of life, community participation, and fear of falling were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This cross-sectional investigation provides compelling evidence that people with MS who use wheelchairs or scooters are at high risk of fall-related injuries. The study findings underscore the importance of increasing health care providers' awareness about the frequency and consequences of falls. Further, it demonstrates the critical need for evidence-based interventions specifically designed to minimize fall-related injuries in this vulnerable population.

Reliability of home-based remote and self-assessment of transfers using the Transfer Assessment Instrument among wheelchair users with spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of home-based remote and self-assessment of transfer quality using the Transfer Assessment Instrument (TAI) among wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: Participant's home environment. METHODS: Eighteen wheelchair users with SCI transferred from their wheelchair to a surface of their choice (bed, sofa, or bench) in their homes. During a live video conference, the transfer was recorded and evaluated live using the TAI (rater 1). Participants completed a self-assessment of their transfer using the TAI- questionnaire (TAI-Q). Two additional raters (raters 2 & 3) completed asynchronous assessments by watching recorded videos. Interrater reliability was assessed using Intraclass Coefficient Correlations (ICC) to compare rater 1 with the average of raters 2 & 3 and TAI-Q. Intrarater reliability was assessed by rater 1 completing another TAI by watching the recorded videos after a 4-week delay. Assessments were compared using paired sample t-tests and level of agreement between TAI scores was evaluated using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Moderate to good interrater and good intrarater reliability were found for the total TAI score with ICCs: 0.57-0.90 and 0.90, respectively. Moderate to good intrarater and interrater reliability were found for all TAI subscores (ICC: 0.60-0.94) except for interrater reliability of flight/landing which was poor (ICC: 0.20). Bland-Altman plots indicate no systematic bias related to the measurement of error. CONCLUSIONS: The TAI is a reliable outcome measure for assessing the wheelchair and body setup phases of home-based transfers remotely and through self-assessment among individuals with SCI.

Fall detection from a manual wheelchair: preliminary findings based on accelerometers using machine learning techniques.

Automated fall detection devices for individuals who use wheelchairs to minimize the consequences of falls are lacking. This study aimed to develop and train a fall detection algorithm to differentiate falls from wheelchair mobility activities using machine learning techniques. Thirty, healthy, ambulatory, young adults simulated falls from a wheelchair and performed other wheelchair-related mobility activities in a laboratory. Neural Network classifiers were used to train the algorithm developed based on data retrieved from accelerometers mounted at the participant's wrist, chest, and head. Results indicate excellent accuracy to differentiate between falls and wheelchair mobility activities. The sensors mounted at the wrist, chest, and head presented with an accuracy of 100%, 96.9%, and 94.8%, respectively, using data from 258 falls and 220 wheelchair mobility activities. This pilot study indicates that a fall detection algorithm developed in a laboratory setting based on fall accelerometer patterns can accurately differentiate wheelchair-related falls and wheelchair mobility activities. This algorithm should be integrated into a wrist-worn devices and tested among individuals who use a wheelchair in the community.

Predictors of participation enfranchisement of wheelchair users with spinal cord injury in the United States.

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: To investigate predictors of participation enfranchisement of individuals living with spinal cord injury (SCI) who use a wheelchair full-time. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis of a cross-sectional study. SETTING: Community, United States. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 59 wheelchair users (median age of 52.5 years, IQR = 21) with chronic SCI (>1 year after injury). INTERVENTIONS: No intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participation enfranchisement was measured using the enfranchisement scale of the Community Participation Indicators (CPI). Dependent variables included importance of participation (CPI-Importance) and control over participation (CPI-Control) subscales of the CPI. Independent variables included demographics and clinical characteristics (age, sex, time since injury, level of injury), wheelchair skills, mobility level, symptoms of depression, and environmental barriers. Backward multivariable linear regression analyses were carried-out to identify predictors of CPI-Importance and CPI-Control. RESULTS: Five predictors including mobility level, wheelchair skills, sex, level of injury, and symptoms of depression explained 57% (F = 14; P < 0.01) of the variance in CPI-Importance. Three predictors including mobility level, symptoms of depression, and environmental barriers explained 60% (F = 27; P < 0.01) of the variance in CPI-Control. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence of potential modifiable factors such as mobility, wheelchair skills, environmental barriers, and symptoms of depression that can influence importance of participation and control over participation of wheelchair users with SCI. The models presented in this study can serve as a conceptual framework to design effective interventions to improve participation enfranchisement of wheelchair users with SCI.

Frequency and characteristics of falls, fall-related injuries, and fear of falling among wheelchair users with spinal cord injury.

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency and characteristics of falls, fall-related injuries, and fear of falling (FOF) among non-ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study design that included 59 non-ambulatory individuals with SCI. Participants completed a survey on demographics, SCI characteristics (type of injury, level of injury, and time since injury), FOF, activities curtailment due to FOF, and frequency of falls and fall-related injuries in the past 6 months. Characteristics of the most recent falls and fall-related injuries were also collected. A directed content analysis was used to analyze qualitative data. RESULTS: Overall, 63% of the study participants reported falling at least once, 46.7% reported injuries after falls, and 73% reported FOF during the previous 6 months. Participants commonly reported falling inside of the house (74.6%), during transfers (43.2%), and associated with obstacles on the way (54.5%) or surface conditions (36.4%). Almost half of the participants (42.3%) reported never received education on fall prevention from a healthcare professional. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm that falls, fall-related injuries, and FOF are a common concern in this population. These findings contribute to the knowledge base for the future development of fall prevention programs specific for non-ambulatory individuals with SCI.

Influence of Transfer Quality and Wheelchair Type on Fear of Falling Among Full-Time Wheelchair Users.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of transfer quality and demographics on fear of falling (FOF) among full-time wheelchair users. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis. SETTING: University research laboratory and community, United States. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-six individuals (N=96) living with multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury who use a manual or power scooter full time with median age of 54.00 years (interquartile range, 29.00 years), and median duration of health condition of 19.50 years (interquartile range, 23.00 years) were included. Fifty-two participants (54%) were manual wheelchair users. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics information included age, sex, duration of health condition, height, weight, body mass index, and wheelchair type. To assess transfer quality, the Transfer Assessment Instrument versions 3.0 and 4.0 were used. The Spinal Cord Injury Falls Concern Scale was used to quantify FOF. Stepwise linear regression analysis was conducted to examine factors influencing FOF. RESULTS: Participant's age, sex, duration of health condition, wheelchair type, and transfer quality were associated with FOF. The regression analysis indicated transfer quality (ß=-0.25, P<.01) and wheelchair type (manual wheelchair, ß=- 0.32, P<.01) were significant predictors of FOF, R2=20% (F=11.19; P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with manual wheelchair users, power wheelchair/scooter users with poor transfer quality reported higher levels of FOF. Clinicians and researchers working with wheelchair users should emphasize quality of transfers and consider the type of wheelchair while developing interventions to reduce FOF in this population. Further longitudinal prospective studies on modifiable factors associated with FOF among full-time wheelchair users are warranted.

Measurement Properties of Clinical Instruments for Assessing Manual Wheelchair Mobility in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the measurement properties of clinical instruments used to assess manual wheelchair mobility in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). DATA SOURCES: This systematic review was conducted according to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments guidance and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The search was conducted up to December 2021 on MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Biblioteca Regional de Medicina, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health databases without time restriction. STUDY SELECTION: Peer-reviewed original research articles that examined any clinical wheelchair mobility and/or skill assessment instrument among adults with SCI and reported data on at least one measurement property or described the development procedure were evaluated independently by two reviewers. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were independently extracted according to Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments methodology. Measurement property results from each study were independently rated by two reviewers as sufficient, insufficient, indeterminate, or inconsistent. The evidence for each measurement property was rated as high, moderate, low, or very low (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Recommendations for highly-rated instruments were performed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-nine studies with 21 instruments were identified. The methodological quality of studies ranged from insufficient to sufficient, and the quality of evidence ranged from very low to high. Six instruments reported content validity. Reliability and construct validity were the most studied measurement properties. Structural validity and invariance for cross-cultural measurement were not reported. The highly rated instruments were the Wheelchair Outcome Measure and Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Although numerous instruments for assessing wheelchair mobility and/or skills among individuals with SCI were identified, not many measurement properties have been sufficiently established. The Wheelchair Outcome Measure and Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire show the current best potential to be recommended for clinical and research use. Further studies are needed to strengthen or change these recommendations.

A process evaluation of an on-line fall prevention and management program for individuals who use wheelchairs or scooters living with multiple sclerosis.

Background: Falls and resulting injury are a significant concern for individuals living with multiple sclerosis (MS) that use a wheelchair and/or scooter to support mobility. Effective fall prevention efforts are vital to support the health, wellbeing, and participation for these individuals. Aims: This study reports the findings from the process evaluation conducted in association with a pilot study evaluating the efficacy of Individualized Reduction of FaLLs-Online (iROLL-O), an online, group fall prevention, and management program specifically designed for community-based people living with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) who are full-time wheelchair or scooter users. Methods: A mixed-methods process evaluation was conducted, with specific attention to the impact of online delivery on intervention implementation, participant satisfaction, and mechanisms of change (MOC). Multiple data sources were utilized, including post-session and post-intervention participant and trainer feedback forms and participant qualitative interview data. Descriptive analysis was conducted using Microsoft Excel. Close-ended questions were analyzed by examining five-point Likert scale responses. Qualitative interview data was explored using thematic analysis. Results: Twelve participants and three trainers (one occupational therapist and two physical therapists) contributed to the study. Online delivery did not compromise session fidelity, which averaged 95%. No significant adaptations to the intervention were made during delivery. Participant satisfaction was high at 4.6/5.0. Post-course Trainer Feedback Forms indicate trainer satisfaction with the group dynamic, ability to address unique group needs, and program content. Reach improved with online delivery as transportation barriers were removed and recruitment from a broader geographic area was enabled. Three themes reflecting key MOC emerged from the analysis: group context, motivation for participant engagement, and the multifaceted nature of the program. The COVID-19 pandemic was identified as a contextual factor impacting community participation. Both participants and trainers identified the group dynamic as a strength. The trainers valued the program's flexibility in allowing them to address individual and/or group-specific fall prevention needs. Conclusion: Feedback from key stakeholders was essential to a meaningful process evaluation. Online delivery supported program implementation, including reach, and resulted in high levels of satisfaction among participants and trainers. Future iterations should aim to uphold the positive group context, recruit, and train skilled interventionists who are licensed as occupational or physical therapists and continue to provide the program's diverse approach to fall prevention and management.

Pilot Study of a Fall Prevention and Management Intervention Program for People With Multiple Sclerosis Who Use a Wheelchair or Scooter Full-Time.

Objective: To examine the efficacy of a fall prevention/management intervention among persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) who use a wheelchair (WC) or scooter full-time. Design: Pre-post/follow-up trial. Setting: Community and research laboratory. Participants: Twenty-one PwMS who used a WC or scooter full-time, self-reported at least 1 fall/12 months, and could transfer independently or with minimal/moderate assistance (N=21). Intervention: Six-week, group and community-based fall prevention and management intervention. The intervention included six 2-hour in-person weekly sessions led by a physical or occupational therapist featuring interactive group discussions, skill practice, and action planning opportunities. Main Outcome Measures: Fall frequency tracked 12 weeks pre- and 24 weeks post intervention. Outcomes were assessed pre- and post intervention and 12 weeks post intervention. Measures included surveys to examine fear of falling (FOF), fall prevention/management, quality of life, community participation, and assessment of functional mobility skills. Semistructured interviews were administered post intervention to ascertain overall experiences with the program and effect on daily life. A Friedman test with signed-rank post hoc analysis was run to determine differences across the 3 study visits. Results: After the intervention, fall incidence did not significantly change, but fall management strategies (P=.01-0.05), importance of community participation (P=.01), and transfer quality (P=.02) significantly improved. Moderate effect sizes were noted among concerns about falling, activity curtailment because of to FOF, and WC skills. Qualitative results indicate that participants found the intervention beneficial and applied intervention content in their daily lives. Conclusions: This study is the first to describe the effect of a multicomponent fall prevention/management intervention designed specifically for PwMS who use a WC or scooter full-time. Results indicate the program has potential to reduce fall risk; however, further testing is needed to fully examine the effect of the program.