Using sleep to evaluate comparative serotonergic effects of paroxetine and citalopram.

BACKGROUND: SSRIs suppress rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, probably by increasing serotonin in the brainstem, and also increase sleep fragmentation. Although in the UK, paroxetine (PAR) and citalopram (CIT) have recommended doses of 20 mg/day for the treatment of depression, the recommended dose of CIT in USA is higher (40 mg). If similar doses of PAR and CIT have similar effects on central serotonin then they should have similar effects on sleep measures in volunteers. METHOD: This was a randomised, double blind placebo controlled crossover study in 12 healthy volunteers. Subjects took PAR 20 mg mane, CIT 20 mg mane or placebo mane for 3 days and sleep was recorded overnight at home on the third night. Standard measures of sleep were derived. RESULTS: REM sleep was significantly suppressed and sleep fragmentation increased by both drugs. Measures of REM sleep and sleep continuity previously found to be altered by SSRIs were considered together and compared with placebo as a 'serotonin response'; this was significantly greater in the PAR group. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep effects typical of SSRIs were greater with PAR 20 mg/day than CIT 20 mg/day, suggesting greater effects on 5HT uptake blockade.

Evaluation of actigraphy and automated telephoned questionnaires to assess hypnotic effects in insomnia.

This study aimed to explore new methodologies in insomnia research, namely whether actigraphy was suitable to show hypnotic effects over weeks in insomnia, and to compare an automated method of questionnaire data collection with traditional methods. Thirty-eight insomniacs took part in a 5-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of 2 weeks of administration of temazepam 20 mg on sleep. Outcome measures were actigraphy and daily St Mary's Hospital Sleep Questionnaires (SMHSQ). Actigraphy was performed using Actiwatch (CNT) and analysed using both the automated Actiwatch sleep analysis software and non-parametric analysis of rest-activity rhythms. The questionnaires were administered as straightforward pencil-and-paper for half of the time and an automated telephoned system for the other half. The experimental paradigm allowed within-subject comparison of traditional and automated data collection, both on and off drug. Actigraphy showed a high degree of inter-subject variability but, nevertheless, some sleep variables (Fragmentation Index, Actual Sleep Time %) showed significant improvement during drug treatment, and Sleep Efficiency and Actual Sleep Time were significantly worsened during the first post-drug week. Nonparametric circadian rhythm analysis showed no significant effect. Subjective data from the SMHSQ showed significant drug effects and there was no significant difference in scores between the automated and pencil-and-paper methods; automated data collection was slightly more acceptable to patients and minimized data entry and management. Effect sizes using within-subject and between-subject comparisons were calculated for the subjective and objective measures to inform future studies

Randomised controlled study of sleep after nefazodone or paroxetine treatment in out-patients with depression.

BACKGROUND: Sleep effects of antidepressants are important clinically and for elucidating mechanism of action: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors disturb sleep and 5-HT(2) receptor-blocking compounds may enhance sleep quality. AIMS: To compare the objective and subjective effects on sleep of paroxetine and nefazodone in patients with moderate to severe depression. METHOD: Forty patients with depression were randomised to take paroxetine 20-40 mg/day or nefazodone 400-600 mg/day for 8 weeks. Objective and subjective quality of sleep and depression measures were assessed throughout. RESULTS: Nefazodone significantly increased objective sleep efficiency and total sleep time, and improved subjective sleep on days 3 and 10. Paroxetine decreased sleep efficiency early in treatment and some sleep disruption remained at week 8. Paroxetine but not nefazodone produced marked suppression of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. CONCLUSIONS: Nefazodone improves sleep in early treatment compared with paroxetine in patients with moderate to severe depression. These effects are seen within the first 2 weeks of treatment and diminish thereafter.