Hindfoot alignment assessment by the foot-ankle offset: a diagnostic study.

INTRODUCTION: Foot-ankle offset (FAO) is a three-dimensional (3D) biometric measurement of hindfoot alignment (HA) measured on images from weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT). Our aim was to investigate its distribution in a large cohort of patients, hypothesizing that threshold FAO values in valgus or varus could be identified as markers for increased risk of associated pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective, monocentric, level II study including 125 subjects (250 feet) undergoing bilateral WBCT [58.4% female; mean age, 54 years (18-84)]. Patients were clinically assessed and pathologies were classified according to anatomic location (valgus- or varus associated). HA was measured using FAO on 3D datasets and tibio-calcaneal angles (TCA) on two-dimensional Saltzman-El-Khoury views. Threshold FAO values and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) were calculated for predicting increased risk of medial or lateral pathologies. RESULTS: Mean FAO was 1.65% ± 4.72 and mean TCA was 4.15° ± 7.67. Clinically, 167 feet were normal, 33 varus and 50 valgus with FAO values of 1.71% ± 3.16, - 4.96% ± 5.30 and 5.79% ± 3.77, respectively. Mean FAO was 0.99% ± 3.26 for non-pathological feet, - 2.53% ± 5.05 for lateral and 6.81% ± 2.70 for medial pathologies. Threshold FAO values of - 1.64% (51.4% sensitivity, 85.1% specificity, AUC = 0.72) and 2.71% (95% sensitivity, 82.8% specificity, AUC = 0.93) best predicted the risk of lateral and medial pathology, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with FAO between - 1.64% and 2.71% had the least risk of degenerative foot and ankle pathology. This interval could be considered a target for patients undergoing realignment procedures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A "safe zone" for Foot Ankle Offset was described between - 1.64% and 2.71%, for which the risk of foot and ankle pathologies is lower. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-Diagnostic study.

Weight-bearing CT in foot and ankle pathology.

Cone-beam scanners (CBCT) enable CT to be performed under weight-bearing - notably for the foot and ankle. The technology is not new: it has been used since 1996 in dental surgery, where it has come to replace panoramic X-ray. What is new is placing the scanner on the ground, so as to have 3D weight-bearing images, initially of the foot and ankle, and later for the knee and pelvis. This saves time, radiation and money. It is now increasingly used, but is unfortunately limited by not having specific national health insurance cover in France, and by the psychological reticence that goes with any technological breakthrough. A review of the topic is indispensable, as it is essential to become properly acquainted with this technique. To this end, we shall be addressing 5 questions. What biases does conventional radiography incur? Projecting a volume onto a plane incurs deformation, precluding true measurement. Conventional CT is therefore often associated with an increased dose of radiation. What is the impact of CBCT on radiation dose, costs and the care pathway? The conical beam turns around the limb (under weight-bearing if so desired) in less than a minute, making the radiation dose no greater than in standard X-ray. What does the literature have to say about CBCT, and what are the indications? CBCT is indicated in all foot and ankle pathologies, and indications now extend to the upper limb and the knee, and will soon include the pelvis. How are angles measured on this 3D technique? The recently developed concept of 3D biometry uses dedicated software to identify anatomic landmarks and automatically segment the bones, thereby enabling every kind of measurement. What further developments are to be expected? CBCT may become indispensable to lower-limb surgical planning. Artificial Intelligence will reveal novel diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic solutions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V; expert opinion.