ABSTRACT
The levels of sedation required for patients to comfortably undergo colonoscopy with propofol were examined. One hundred patients undergoing colonoscopy with propofol were enrolled. In addition to standard-of-care monitoring, sedation level was monitored with the Patient State Index (PSI) obtained from a brain function monitor, transcutaneous carbon dioxide (tcpCO2) was monitored with the TCM TOSCA monitor, and end-tidal carbon dioxide was monitored via nasal cannula. The Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS) was also assessed and recorded. After baseline data were obtained from the first 40 consecutive patients enrolled in the study, the remaining 60 patients were randomized into two groups. In one group the PSI value was blinded from the anesthesiologist and in the second group the PSI was visible and the impact of this information on the management of the sedation was analyzed. Overall 96% of patients reached levels of deep sedation and 89% reached levels of general anesthesia. When comparing the blinded to PSI versus unblinded groups, the blinded group had a significantly lower PSI and higher RSS and tcpCO2, indicating the blinded group was maintained at a deeper sedation level with more respiratory compromise than the unblinded group. Patients undergoing colonoscopy under propofol sedation delivered by a bolus technique are frequently taken to levels of general anesthesia and are at risk for respiratory depression, airway obstruction, and hemodynamic compromise.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Secretory diarrhea is caused by inhibition of intestinal active sodium absorption and stimulation of active chloride secretion. The resulting increase in fecal sodium salts causes an isotonic increase in fecal water output. Abnormalities in potassium transport are not known to be a cause of secretory diarrhea. The aim of our report is to describe a patient with secretory diarrhea that was mediated by excess intestinal secretion of potassium. METHODS: A 78-year-old woman developed colonic pseudo-obstruction, complicated by severe diarrhea and hypokalemia. Her stools were collected quantitatively on 11 occasions and analyzed for electrolyte concentrations. Rectosigmoid potential difference was measured. RESULTS: The diarrheal fluid had a very high potassium concentration (130-170 mEq/L) and a very low sodium concentration (4-15 mEq/L). Stool potassium losses were as high as 256 mEq/day (normal, 9 mEq/day), and fecal sodium losses were never higher than 13 mEq/day. Potential difference between colonic lumen and a peripheral reference electrode was -14 mV (lumen side negative). CONCLUSIONS: Fecal potassium salts were the exclusive driving force for severe secretory diarrhea in a patient with colonic pseudo-obstruction. The high fecal output of potassium was due to stimulation of active colonic potassium secretion, possibly because of changes in autonomic nervous system activity and distention of the colon in association with colonic pseudo-obstruction. The extremely low fecal excretion of sodium indicates that active sodium absorption was not inhibited. This case study reveals an ion transport mechanism of secretory diarrhea that has not been previously appreciated.
