Senior student goal setting during subinternship: a mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: New developments in Subinternship curricula attempt to establish self-directed learning skills that will translate into the 1st year of residency. However, we know little about how well senior medical students' self-directed learning goals match with what is expected of them in residency. PURPOSES: We designed a mixed-methods study to examine the goals set by senior students at Georgia Health Sciences University on Pediatric Subinternship and to determine how those goals relate to the 6 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies. METHODS: We used an iterative process to categorize self-directed learning goals on Pediatric Subinternships (n=188 goals generated by 57 senior students) by (a) the 6 ACGME competencies and (b) general or specific goals. We used tests of association and multivariate modeling to compare goal categories by clinical site and time of year. RESULTS: There were 56.3% of goals addressing patient care. Professionalism and systems-based practice goals were rare. Of the goals, 72% were general, but goals written by students at the newborn nursery and neonatal intensive care unit sites were significantly more likely to be specific than goals written by students on the general inpatient subinternship. CONCLUSIONS: The overwhelming majority of senior medical student goals on a Pediatric Subinternship are general and related to patient care. Students may need assistance with developing more specific goals in all 6 competencies. Our findings suggest that understanding and incorporating students' learning goals may be important for enhancing the potential effectiveness of transition-to-residence curricula.

Measuring psychological flexibility in medical students and residents: a psychometric analysis.

PURPOSE: Psychological flexibility involves mindful awareness of our thoughts and feelings without allowing them to prohibit acting consistently with our values and may have important implications for patient-centered clinical care. Although psychological flexibility appears quite relevant to the training and development of health care providers, prior research has not evaluated measures of psychological flexibility in medical learners. Therefore, we investigated the validity of our learners' responses to three measures related to psychological flexibility. METHODS: Fourth-year medical students and residents (n=275) completed three measures of overlapping aspects of psychological flexibility: (1) Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II); (2) Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ); and (3) Mindful Attention and Awareness Questionnaire (MAAS). We evaluated five aspects of construct validity: content, response process, internal structure, relationship with other variables, and consequences. RESULTS: We found good internal consistency for responses on the AAQ (α=0.93), MAAS (α=0.92), and CFQ (α=0.95). Factor analyses demonstrated a reasonable fit to previously published factor structures. As expected, scores on all three measures were moderately correlated with one another and with a measure of life satisfaction (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Our findings provide preliminary evidence supporting validity of the psychological flexibility construct in a medical education sample. As psychological flexibility is a central concept underlying self-awareness, this work may have important implications for clinical training and practice.

Use of a biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization: an analysis of mobilization and engraftment.

Peripheral blood haematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization has become a standard procedure prior to autologous stem cell transplantation. Biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (GCSF) have recently been awarded European Union (EU) licences for stem cell mobilization but data for their use in this context remain limited. The biosimilar GCSF, Ratiograstim(®) (Ratiopharm, Ulm, Germany) was granted an EU licence in September 2008 and incorporated into clinical practice in the Wessex Blood and Marrow Transplantation Programme in December 2008. Data were retrospectively collected for 154 consecutive patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell harvest between January 2009 and December 2011 using the biosimilar GCSF. 131 consecutive patients from the preceding 3 years, who had received Neupogen(®) , were used as a control. We analysed both parameters relevant to stem cell collection and engraftment data, where patients proceeded to transplantation. We found no statistically significant difference between the two groups when comparing CD34 predictors, total number of CD34(+) stem cells collected, number of days required for collection, or for time to engraftment. This is, to our knowledge, the largest direct comparison of a biosimilar GCSF with originator GCSF for stem cell mobilization. The use of biosimilar GCSF can produce a significant cost saving, allowing investment in other areas of stem cell transplantation.

Current Perspectives on the Use of Growth Factors in the Therapy of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia; Malignancy.

Recombinant haematopoietic growth factors have been available for clinical use for over a decade, however their role in the management of patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) has yet to be established. There are several potential roles for the use of growth factors in the management of patients with AML, including reduction in the infective complications associated with the underlying disease and its treatment, use as mobilising agents in stem cell transplantation and as priming agents with chemotherapy. Clinical trials have failed to give clear indications for the use of growth factors following chemotherapy, mainly due to the variability of patient populations, chemotherapy and growth factor schedules used. G-CSF appears to be associated with no negative impact on remission rate or survival but clear benefits in terms of infection-related endpoints were not universally seen. Three studies did show a reduction in duration of hospitalisation, particularly when G-CSF was used following consolidation chemotherapy and economic analyses have also shown financial advantages to the administration of G-CSF. GM-CSF had a variable impact on survival and only two studies demonstrated reduction in serious infections or antimicrobial therapy use. These trials also showed economic benefits for the use of GM-CSF. Clinical studies which have attempted to exploit possible potentiation of chemotherapeutic activity by recruitment of leukaemic cells into the cell cycle have generally been disappointing. Use of growth factors for this purpose, outside the context of randomised clinical trials cannot be recommended. GM-CSF may have a role in modulating the cellular immune response against cancer cells but experimental data on its activity against leukaemia cells is limited. Augmentation of white cell function by G-CSF or GM-CSF may also be of clinical benefit in patients with suspected or confirmed fungal infection and further trials are underway.