An Examination of Positive and Negative Dementia Caregiving Experiences.

OBJECTIVES: We examined associations among three measures of caregiver experiences (i.e., positive aspects of caring [PAC], caregiver burden, and mutuality) in 228 dyads involving persons with dementia (PWD) and their informal caregivers. The associations between predisposing, enabling, and need factors and each of these three measures of caregiver experiences were also examined. METHODS: We used baseline data from a randomized controlled trial of a psychosocial intervention aimed at preventing aggression in PWD. Associations among PAC, caregiver burden, and mutuality were examined. The Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization guided the selection of predisposing, enabling, and need components. RESULTS: Enabling characteristics (e.g., race/ethnicity, caregiver education and employment and PWD education) and most predisposing characteristics (e.g., caregiver age, PWD age, relationship type) were not associated with any caregiving experience measures. Need characteristics (e.g., levels of memory and functional impairment, behavioral problems, depression, pleasant events) were associated with the caregiving experience. CONCLUSIONS: Bivariate correlations between PAC, caregiver burden, and mutuality were between -0.20 and -0.58. Predisposing, enabling, and need factors were differentially associated with outcomes, with need characteristics being most frequently associated with various aspects of caregiving. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Assessment of both positive and negative aspects of caregiving is important. Particular attention to depression and interventions that improve depressive symptoms may increase PAC and mutuality and reduce caregiver burden.

Validation of a Brief Screen to Identify Persons With Dementia at Risk for Behavioral Problems.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical assessment of persons with dementia should include potential causes of behavioral problems, including pain, depression, and caregiver-patient relationship quality. Many validated assessment tools are available; however, a brief screening tool is needed, as administering a battery of instruments is impractical in most clinical settings. We evaluated (a) the construct validity of brief screens for pain, depression, and relationship strain by examining their associations with validated measures and medication use and (b) the predictive validity of each screen and the screens as a set by examining their associations with frequency of disruptive behaviors. METHODS: Patient-caregiver dyads (n = 228) in Aggression Prevention Training for Caregivers were examined. RESULTS: There was evidence of good construct validity for each screen. The relationship screen and total number of screens endorsed were significantly associated with frequency of disruptive behaviors. CONCLUSION: The brief screens show potential for use in clinical practice.

Aggression Prevention Training for Individuals With Dementia and Their Caregivers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: International appeals call for interventions to prevent aggression and other behavioral problems in individuals with dementia (IWD). Aggression Prevention Training (APT), based on intervening in three contributors to development of aggression (IWD pain, IWD depression, and caregiver-IWD relationship problems) aims to reduce incidence of aggression in IWD over 1 year. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Three clinics that assess, diagnose, and treat dementia. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred twenty-eight caregiver-IWD dyads who screened positive for IWD pain, IWD depression, or caregiver-IWD relationship problems randomized to APT or Enhanced Usual Primary Care (EU-PC). INTERVENTION: APT, a skills-based intervention delivered over 3 months to address pain/depression/caregiver-IWD relationship issues. EU-PC included printed material on dementia and community resources; and eight brief, weekly support calls. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was incidence of aggression over 1 year, determined by the Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory-Aggression Subscale. Secondary outcomes included pain, depression, caregiver-IWD relationship, caregiver burden, positive caregiving, behavior problems, and anxiety. RESULTS: Aggression incidence and secondary outcomes did not differ between groups. However, in those screening positive for IWD depression or caregiver-IWD relationship problems, those receiving EU-PC had significant increases in depression and significant decreases in quality of the caregiver-IWD relationship, whereas those receiving APT showed no changes in these outcomes over time. CONCLUSION: The cost to patients, family, and society of behavioral problems in IWD, along with modest efficacy of most pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions, calls for more study of novel preventive approaches.

Development and Testing of the Pain Assessment Tool in Cognitively Impaired Elders (PATCIE): Nonverbal Pain Behaviors in African American and Caucasian Nursing Home Residents with Dementia.

BACKGROUND: People with dementia experience a decline in language skills required to self-report pain; researchers thus recommend the use of nonverbal behaviors to assess pain. Although multiple instruments exist for assessing nonverbal pain behaviors, psychometric data are lacking for African American nursing home residents with dementia. AIMS AND DESIGN: The purpose of this methodological study was to describe the development and testing of the Pain Assessment Tool in Cognitively Impaired Elders (PATCIE) in African American and Caucasian nursing home residents with dementia. SETTINGS/PARTICIPANTS: The convenience sample included 56 African American and 69 Caucasian residents with dementia in multiple nursing homes from three states. The research staff completed the pain assessments when the nursing home staff transferred the residents. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Initially, 15 nonverbal pain behaviors were evaluated. Based on the alpha scores and additional literature review, the 15 nonverbal pain behaviors were expanded to 28 behaviors. The PATCIE had a Cronbach's alpha of .73 during movement. Construct validity for the pain behaviors was demonstrated because higher scores were noted during movement, and scores before movement were significantly higher than those obtained after movement. For movement over time, there was a significant difference in the PATCIE score, regardless of ethnicity or time (p < .0001). There were no significant differences found between ethnic groups, either overall or in change over time between movements or between the categories of cognitive function. African Americans were more likely to display frowning, and Caucasians to display irritability. The PATCIE demonstrates preliminary reliability and validity in assessing pain in African American and Caucasian nursing home residents with dementia.