ABSTRACT
Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) are frequently detected on abdominal images performed for non-pancreatic indications. Their prevalence in asymptomatic population ranges from 2.7 to 24.8%, and increases with age. There are several types of pancreatic cysts. Some may contain cancer or have malignant potential, such as mucinous cystic neoplasms, including mucinous cystadenoma (MCN) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN). In contrast, others are benign, such as serous cystadenoma (SCA). However, even those cysts with malignant potential rarely progress to cancer. Currently, the only treatment for pancreatic cysts is surgery, which is associated with high morbidity and occasional mortality. The Board of the Chilean Pancreas Club of the Chilean Gastroenterology Society developed the first Chilean multidisciplinary consensus for diagnosis, management, and surveillance of PCN. Thirty experts were invited and answered 21 statements with five possible alternatives: 1) fully agree; 2) partially agree; 3) undecided; 4) disagree and 5) strongly disagree. A consensus was adopted when at least 80% of the sum of the answers "fully agree" and "partially agree" was reached. The consensus was approved by the Board of Directors of the Chilean Pancreas Club for publication.
Subject(s)
Humans , Pancreatic Cyst/diagnosis , Pancreatic Cyst/therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy , Chile/epidemiology , ConsensusABSTRACT
Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) are frequently detected on abdominal images performed for non-pancreatic indications. Their prevalence in asymptomatic population ranges from 2.7 to 24.8%, and increases with age. There are several types of pancreatic cysts. Some may contain cancer or have malignant potential, such as mucinous cystic neoplasms, including mucinous cystadenoma (MCN) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN). In contrast, others are benign, such as serous cystadenoma (SCA). However, even those cysts with malignant potential rarely progress to cancer. Currently, the only treatment for pancreatic cysts is surgery, which is associated with high morbidity and occasional mortality. The Board of the Chilean Pancreas Club of the Chilean Gastroenterology Society developed the first Chilean multidisciplinary consensus for diagnosis, management, and surveillance of PCN. Thirty experts were invited and answered 21 statements with five possible alternatives: 1) fully agree; 2) partially agree; 3) undecided; 4) disagree and 5) strongly disagree. A consensus was adopted when at least 80% of the sum of the answers "fully agree" and "partially agree" was reached. The consensus was approved by the Board of Directors of the Chilean Pancreas Club for publication.
Subject(s)
Pancreatic Cyst , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Chile/epidemiology , Consensus , Pancreatic Cyst/diagnosis , Pancreatic Cyst/therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
AIMS: To determine the immediate and long-term results of endoscopic drainage and necrosectomy for symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections. METHODS: The data of 80 patients with symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections (mean diameter: 11.7 cm, range 3-20; pseudocysts: 24/80, abscess: 20/80, infected walled-off necrosis: 36/80) referred for endoscopic management from October 1997 to March 2008 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Endoscopic drainage techniques included endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided aspiration (2/80), EUS-guided transenteric drainage (70/80) and non-EUS-guided drainage across a spontaneous transenteric fistula (8/80). Endoscopic necrosectomy was carried out in 49/80 (abscesses: 14/20; infected necrosis: 35/36). Procedural complications were bleeding (12/80), perforation (7/80), portal air embolism (1/80) and Ogilvie Syndrome (1/80). Initial technical success was achieved in 78/80 (97.5%) and clinical resolution of the collections was achieved endoscopically in 67/80 (83.8%), with surgery required in 13/80 (perforation: four; endoscopically inaccessible areas: two; inadequate drainage: seven). Within 6 months five patients required surgery due to recurrent fluid collections; over a mean follow up of 31 months, surgery was required in four more patients due to recurrent collections as a consequence of underlying pancreatic duct abnormalities that could not be treated endoscopically. The long-term success of endoscopic treatment was 58/80 (72.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic drainage of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections is safe and effective, with excellent immediate and long-term results. Endoscopic necrosectomy has a risk of serious complications. The underlying pancreatic duct abnormalities must be addressed to prevent recurrence of fluid collections.
Subject(s)
Endosonography , Pancreatic Diseases/surgery , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Abscess/diagnostic imaging , Abscess/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Pseudocyst/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Pseudocyst/surgery , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (notes), is a novel approach to the peritoneal cavity, that has been used for both diagnostic and surgical procedures. Aims: to evaluated the safety and feasibility of per-oral transgastric route for peritoneal approach and for several basic surgical techniques in a porcine experimental model. Material and methods: five pigs entered in the study. Under general anesthesia , a conventional endoscope was passed into the stomach, the gastric wall was punctured by mean of a sphincterotome and the size of the gastric incision was increased with a cholecystectomy and intestinal loops mobilization were attempted. Gastric incision closure was performed with endoloops. Results: a good observation of the peritoneal cavity was achieved. Liver samples were obtained in all procedures as well as mobilization of small intestinal loops. Cholecystectomy was possible in only three cases. Conclusion: transgastric approach to the peritoneal cavity seems to be a potential alternative to the classical laparotomy and laparoscopic technique.
La cirugía endoscópica transluminal por orificios naturales (NOTES) es un nuevo abordaje a la cavidad peritoneal que ha sido utilizada ya sea como procedimiento diagnóstico o quirúrgico. Objetivos: Evaluar la seguridad y factibilidad de la ruta per-oral transgástrica para el acceso a la cavidad peritoneal , y para la realización de técnicas quirúrgicas básicas en un modelo experimental porcino. Material y métodos: Se utilizaron cinco cerdos. Bajo anestesia general mediante un endoscopio convencional se accedió al estómago y se puncionó la pared gástrica mediante un papilótomo. La abertura se amplió ya sea con papilótomo o con balón. Se exploró la cavidad peritoneal y se intentó realizar: biopsias hepáticas en todos los procedimientos, lo mismo ocurrió con la movilización de asas intestinales. La colecistectomía fue posible en sólo tres ocasiones. Conclusión: el abordaje transgástrico de la cavidad peritoneal pareciera ser una potencial alternativa a la laparotomía clásica y laparoscópica.
