ABSTRACT
GOAL: Comparison of fast MRI, echocardiography (Echo), and ventricular angiography (Cath) in the assessment of left ventricular global function. METHODS: Fast MRI in short axis plane, biplane Cath, and 2D Echo were performed in 62 patients [35 coronary artery diseases, 16 acquired valvular diseases (VD), 9 dilated cardiomyopathies (DCM), 1 congenital heart disease and 1 heart transplantation]. Enddiastolic (EDV), endsystolic (ESV), stroke volumes (SV), cardiac output (CO), and ejection fraction (EF) were compared in MRI and Cath. EF was visually estimated in 2D Echo by an experienced observer. RESULTS: In comparison to MRI, Cath overestimated EF by 8.4%, and Echo underestimated EF by 5.6%. The limits of agreement between MRI and Cath in EF were +/- 23.8%, between MRI and Echo +/- 18%, and between Echo and Cath +/- 19.4%. Significant differences were found between Cath and MRI in EDV, SV, and CO, but not for ESV. The best agreement in EF was found in the group with DCM, the worst in the group with VD. CONCLUSION: Important systemic and random errors were found in the comparison of MRI, Echo, and Cath. For therapy decision and follow-up, the methods should not be exchanged unscrupulously.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization , Echocardiography , Heart Diseases/physiopathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Stroke Volume/physiology , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology , Adult , Aged , Diastole/physiology , Female , Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Rate/physiology , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Ventilation/physiology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Systole/physiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Quantification of left and right ventricular filling and ejection of localized and diffuse heart diseases with fast cine MR imaging in breath-hold technique. METHODS: 42 patients (14 idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathies (DCM), 13 hypertrophic cardiomyopathies (HCM) and 15 coronary artery diseases (CAD)) and 10 healthy volunteers were examined. Time-volume-curves of three left ventricular and one right ventricular slices were evaluated and peak ejection and filling rates (PER, PFR end-diastolic volume (EDV)/s) time to PER and PFR (TPER, TPFR ms) and time of end-systole (TSYS in % RR-intervall) were calculated. RESULTS: There were significant regional and left-/right-sided differences of the filling and ejection of both ventricles within and between the different groups. In DCM the left ventricular PFR was reduced (DCM 3.1 EDV/s; volunteers 4.9 EDV/s) and Z-SYS prolonged (DCM 50.1%; volunteers 35.4%). In CAD there were localized decreased filling rates in comparison to the normal volunteer group (left ventricle: basal: 2.9 and 6.3 EDV/s, apical: 4.4 and 6.3 EDV/s; right ventricle: 3.6 and 5.7 EDV/s). HCM typically showed an isovolumetric lengthening of the endsystole. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac MR imaging in breath-hold technique is suitable for measuring contraction and relaxation disturbances of localized and diffuse heart diseases by means of ejection and filling volume indices.
Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/diagnosis , Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic/diagnosis , Coronary Disease/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine , Stroke Volume/physiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnosis , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/physiopathology , Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic/physiopathology , Coronary Disease/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reference Values , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/physiopathology , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology , Ventricular Function, Right/physiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of right- (RV) and left-ventricular (LV) heart volume and muscle mass determinations by cine MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten subjects were examined twice by a segmented, ECG-triggered cine sequence in the short axis plane and breath-hold technique by two independent operators and again 4 weeks later by one of the operators. The contours were evaluated manually by two independent examiners and again four weeks later by one of the examiners. LV and RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, stroke volume, cardiac output, ejection fraction (EF), and left-ventricular muscle mass were compared. RESULTS: The RV evaluation variations (RV-EF: 6.46%) were higher than the LV (LV-EF: 4.46%). The intra-examiner variations were smaller than the inter-examiner variations. The generally operators did not cause a significantly increased variation (LV-EF: 5.77%). In contrast, the repeat examinations at different times did lead to a significant increase in the variation (LV-EF: 10.15%). CONCLUSIONS: The rapid ECG-triggered cine MRI in breath-hold technique allows the simultaneous RV and LV, artefact-free determination of heart volumes and LV muscle mass. The LV volumes can be determined more accurately than the RV. The examiner has a distinct influence on the accuracy, the operator has a lesser effect. Physiological fluctuations of cardiac activity significantly influence the follow-up.
