Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Ann Intern Med ; 128(9): 760-7, 1998 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9556471

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The benefit of antiretroviral therapy in reducing maternal-fetal transmission of HIV during pregnancy has caused a public policy debate about the relative benefits of mandatory HIV screening and voluntary HIV screening in pregnant women. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits and risks of mandatory compared with voluntary HIV testing of pregnant women to help guide research and policy. DESIGN: A decision analysis that incorporated the following variables: acceptance and benefit of prenatal care, acceptance and benefit of zidovudine therapy in HIV-infected women, prevalence of HIV infection, and mandatory compared with voluntary HIV testing. MEASUREMENTS: The threshold deterrence rate (defined as the percentage of women who, if deterred from seeking prenatal care because of a mandatory HIV testing policy, would offset the benefit of zidovudine in reducing vertical HIV transmission) and the difference between a policy of mandatory testing and a policy of voluntary testing in the absolute number of HIV-infected infants or dead infants. RESULTS: Voluntary HIV testing was preferred over a broad range of values in the model. At baseline, the threshold deterrence rate was 0.4%. At a deterrence rate of 0.5%, the number of infants (n = 167) spared HIV infection annually in the United States under a mandatory HIV testing policy would be lower than the number of perinatal deaths (n = 189) caused by lack of prenatal care. CONCLUSIONS: The most important variables in the model were voluntary HIV testing, the deterrence rate associated with mandatory testing compared with voluntary testing, and the prevalence of HIV infection in women of child-bearing age. At high levels of acceptance of voluntary HIV testing, the benefits of a policy of mandatory testing are minimal and may create the potential harms of avoiding prenatal care to avoid mandatory testing.


Subject(s)
Decision Trees , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/transmission , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Mandatory Testing , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnant Women , Risk Assessment , Voluntary Programs , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Female , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Health Policy , Humans , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Prenatal Care , Prevalence , Sensitivity and Specificity , United States/epidemiology , Zidovudine/therapeutic use
2.
AIDS Patient Care STDS ; 12(3): 217-25, 1998 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11361936

ABSTRACT

To respond to the difficulties that community-based providers face in keeping abreast of the rapid changes in HIV-related care, an intensive pediatric HIV mentoring program (Pediatric HIV Miniresidency [MR]) was developed, linking a regional AIDS Education and Training Center (AETC) with an urban children's hospital HIV outpatient care site. The purpose of this study was to evaluate HIV-related knowledge and perceived skills, abilities, and willingness of community-based primary care pediatric providers and providers completing the MR. A convenience sample of community-based primary pediatric practitioners and those participants in the MR program completed a three-part mailed survey. The survey assessed practice characteristics, knowledge of pediatric HIV clinical care, and perceived skills, ability, and willingness (PSAW) to provide HIV-related care. The main outcome measures were overall knowledge and PSAW scores. One hundred nineteen community-based practitioners (NMRs), 20% of those surveyed, completed the instrument, as did 19 of 20 MR participants. NMRs exhibited low knowledge scores in key areas relating to the identification and evaluation of HIV-exposed children. Fewer than half of these respondents correctly answered questions related to HIV antibody incidence in HIV-exposed newborns and recommended diagnostic testing of such infants. Providers completing the MR scored significantly higher on the knowledge survey (15.2 vs. 8.8, p < 0.001), and had higher PSAW scores (45.8 vs. 33.9, p < 0.001). Although the generalizability of our study is limited by the low response rate, community-based physicians completing the survey demonstrated a lack of knowledge we believe necessary to provide pediatric HIV-related care (as defined by Public Health Service practice guidelines). Physicians completing the MR program had substantial HIV-related knowledge and expressed a willingness to provide care to HIV-exposed/infected children. An effective MR program provides a mechanism for developing a network of dedicated community-based physicians who are willing and capable of providing care to HIV-infected or exposed infants and children.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Education, Medical, Continuing , HIV Infections/therapy , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Pediatrics/education , Primary Health Care/methods , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/therapy , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pediatrics/methods , Pennsylvania
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...