Beta-adrenoceptor modulation and heart rate variability--the value of scatterplot measures of compactness.

This article compares different methods of scatterplot analysis to assess the optimal methodology. The scatterplot (Poincaré plot) is a nonlinear heart rate variability method where a "return map" is constructed by plotting each current cycle against the previous beat (RR vs. RR(n-1)). Geometric analysis of the scatterplot allows short-term and long-term heart rate variability (HRV) to be assessed. A three-dimensional construct is also possible, where the third axis represents the density of values, at any given RR vs. RR(n-1) intersection. Topological methods of analysis can compute the density distribution function or compactness of a dataset. Scatterplots that otherwise appear very similar in the two-dimensional plot may be clearly differentiated using this approach. Correct characterization may improve the ability of scatterplot analysis to predict outcomes in cardiovascular disease. We have assessed two computational approaches that take account of scatterplot density, namely, the heart rate variability fraction and the compactness measure. Scatterplots were constructed from three double-blind and randomized placebo controlled studies conducted in a total of 49 healthy subjects. Single oral doses of antagonists (atenolol 50 mg [beta-1], propranolol 160 mg [beta-1 and beta-2], and ICI 118,551 25 mg [beta-2]) or agonists (xamoterol 200 mg [beta-1], salbutamol 8 mg [beta-2], prenalterol 50 mg [beta-1 and beta-2], and pindolol 10 mg [mainly beta-2] of the cardiac beta-adrenoceptor were studied. Salbutamol, pindolol, and xamoterol increased compactness and reduced HRV fraction significantly compared with placebo. However, when compared with the more conventional scatterplot parameters, these newer density methods were found to be less discriminating. An alternative approach to improve scatterplot discrimination, using the combination of several scatterplot features, is under investigation.

Heart-rate variability effects of beta-adrenoceptor agonists (xamoterol, prenalterol, and salbutamol) assessed nonlinearly with scatterplots and sequence methods.

Full antagonists of the cardiac beta-adrenoceptor improve heart-rate variability (HRV) in humans; however, partial agonism at the beta2-adrenoceptor has been suggested to decrease HRV. We therefore studied the HRV effects of some partial agonists of the beta1- and beta2-adrenoceptors in normal volunteers. Under double-blind and randomised conditions (Latin square design), eight healthy volunteers received placebo; xamoterol, 200 mg (beta1-adrenoceptor partial agonist); prenalterol, 50 mg (beta1- and beta2-adrenoceptor partial agonist); salbutamol, 8 mg (beta2-adrenoceptor partial agonist); ICI 118,551, 25 mg (selective beta2-adrenoceptor antagonist); and combinations of each partial agonist with ICI 118,551. Single oral doses of medication (at weekly intervals) were administered at 22:30 h with HRV assessed from the overnight sleeping heart rates. HRV was determined by using standard time-domain summary statistics and two nonlinear methods, the Poincaré plot (scatterplot) and cardiac sequence analysis. On placebo, the sleeping heart rate decreased significantly, between 2 and 8 h after dosing. The heart rate with ICI 118,551 was unaltered. Xamoterol, prenalterol, and salbutamol increased the sleeping heart rate. ICI 118,551 blocked the heart-rate effects of salbutamol, attenuated those of prenalterol, but did not influence the xamoterol heart rate. The scatterplot (Poincaré) area was reduced by beta1-adrenoceptor (xamoterol), beta2-adrenoceptor (salbutamol), and combined beta1- and beta2-adrenoceptor (prenalterol) agonism. A reduction in scatterplot length followed salbutamol, prenalterol alone, and prenalterol in combination with ICI 118,551. The geometric analysis of the scatterplots allowed width assessment (i.e., dispersion) at fixed RR intervals. At higher heart rates (i.e., 25 and 50% of RR scatterplot length), dispersion was decreased after xamoterol, prenalterol, and prenalterol/ICI 118,551. Cardiac sequence analysis (differences between three adjacent beats; deltaRR vs. deltaRRn+1) assessed the short-term patterns of cardiac acceleration and deceleration; four patterns were identified: +/+ (a lengthening sequencing), +/- or -/+ (balanced sequences), and finally -/- (a shortening sequence). Cardiac acceleration or deceleration episodes (i.e., number of times deltaRR and deltaRRn+1 were altered in the same direction) were increased after salbutamol and prenalterol. In conclusion, partial agonism at either the cardiac beta1-adrenoceptor (xamoterol), beta2-adrenoceptor (salbutamol), and beta1- plus beta2-adrenoceptors (prenalterol) altered the autonomic balance toward sympathetic dominance in healthy volunteers; blockade of the beta2-adrenoceptor with the highly selective beta2-antagonist ICI 118,551 prevented the effects of salbutamol on HRV, attenuated the HRV effects of prenalterol, but had no effect on the actions of xamoterol. Agonism at both the beta1- and beta2-adrenoceptor reduced HRV in healthy subjects; the implications for the preventive use of the beta-adrenoceptor compounds in cardiovascular disease warrant further investigation.

Evaluation of the effect on heart rate variability of a beta2-adrenoceptor agonist and antagonist using non-linear scatterplot and sequence methods.

AIMS: To examine the impact on heart rate variability (HRV), of agonism or antagonism at the cardiac beta2-adrenoceptor in healthy volunteers, using standard time-domain summary statistics and non-linear methods (scatterplot and quadrant analysis). METHODS: Under double-blind and randomised conditions (Latin square design), 17 normal volunteers received placebo, salbutamol (beta2-adrenoceptor partial agonist), ICI 118,551 (specific beta2-adrenoceptor antagonist), or salbutamol plus ICI 118,551. Single oral doses of medication (at weekly intervals) were administered at 22.30 h, with HRV assessed from the sleeping heart rates. RESULTS: Salbutamol reduced the long-term (SDNN: 135 ms [120, 156], SDANN: 107 ms [89, 124]) time-domain indicators of HRV compared with placebo (SDNN: 39 [24, 55], SDANN 42 [29, 56], [mean difference [95% confidence intervals of difference]]). Alone, ICI 118,551 did not effect HRV, but in combination blocked the actions of salbutamol. Scatterplot length (944 ms [869, 1019]) and area (222*10(3) ms2 [191, 253]) were reduced by salbutamol compared with placebo; (length difference (164 [98, 230]) and area difference 59 [36, 83]). Scatterplot width (dispersion) was lower at both low (width RR-1 25% salbutamol 277 ms [261, 293]: salbutamol minus placebo 14 ms [0, 28]) and high (width 75% salbutamol 417 [391, 443]: salbutamol minus placebo 41 [20, 62]) heart rates. ICI 118,551 alone did not alter scatterplot parameters but in combination blocked the effect of salbutamol. Cardiac acceleration episodes (i.e. consecutive deltaRR and deltaRRn+1 shorten) were increased following salbutamol 7288 [6089, 8486] compared with placebo -1890 [-2600, -1179]; the beat-to beat difference (deltaRRn+1) was reduced after salbutamol compared with the other treatments. ICI 118,551 did not effect acceleration episodes but reduced the effect of salbutamol when used in combination. CONCLUSIONS: Agonism at the cardiac beta2-adrenoceptor in healthy volunteers with salbutamol altered autonomic balance towards sympathetic dominance; this re-balancing was blocked by ICI 118,551 given in combination with salbutamol. However antagonism at the beta2-adrenoceptor with ICI 118,551 alone did not significantly alter the HRV. The beta2-adrenoceptor modulates HRV in healthy volunteers; the implications of agonism and antagonism at the beta2-adrenoceptor in cardiovascular disease states warrants further investigation.

Heart rate variability effects of an agonist or antagonists of the beta-adrenoceptor assessed with scatterplot and sequence analysis.

There is evidence that the processes regulating heart rate variations reflect non-linear complexity and show 'chaotic' determinism. Data analyses using non-linear methods may therefore reveal patterns not apparent with conventional statistical approaches. We have consequently investigated two non-linear methods, the Poincaré plot (scatterplot) and cardiac sequence (quadrant) analysis, and compared these with standard time-domain summary statistics, during a normal volunteer investigation of an agonist and antagonists of the cardiac beta-adrenoceptor. Under double-blind and randomized conditions (Latin square design), 12 normal volunteers received placebo, celiprolol (beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptor partial agonist), propranolol (beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptor antagonist), atenolol (beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonist) and combinations of these agents. Single oral doses of medication (at weekly intervals) were administered at 22:30 hours with sleeping heart rates recorded overnight. The long (SDNN, SDANN) and short-term (rmsSD) time-domain summary statistics were reduced by celiprolol--effects different from the unchanged or small increases after atenolol and propranolol alone. The Poincaré plot was constructed by plotting each RR interval against the preceding RR interval, but unlike previous descriptions of the method, an automated computer method, with a high level of reproducibility, was employed. Scatterplot length and area were reduced following celiprolol and different from the small increases after propranolol and atenolol. The geometric analysis of the scatterplots allowed width assessment (i.e. dispersion) at fixed RR intervals. Differences between the drugs were confined to the higher percentiles (i.e. 75% and 90% of scatterplot length: low heart rate). The long-term time-domain statistics (SDNN, SDANN) correlated best with scatterplot length and area whereas the short-term heart rate variability (HRV) indices (rmsSD), pNN50) correlated strongly with scatterplot width. Cardiac sequence analysis (differences between three adjacent beats; delta RR vs delta RRn+1) assessed the short-term patterns of cardiac acceleration and deceleration, four patterns are identified: +/+ (a lengthening sequencing), +/- or -/+ (balanced sequences), and finally -/- (a shortening sequence). A running count of events by quadrant, together with the average magnitude of the differences was computed. The beta-adrenoceptor partial agonist celiprolol increased acceleration sequences. The duration of beat-to-beat difference shortened after celiprolol; this contrasted with increased duration of beat-to-beat difference after propranolol and atenolol. These results demonstrated a shift towards sympathetic dominance after the beta-adrenoceptor partial agonist celiprolol contrasting in parasympathetic dominance after the beta-adrenoceptor antagonists propranolol and atenolol. These non-linear methods appear to be valuable tools to investigate HRV in health and in cardiovascular disease and to study the implications of alterations in autonomic control during therapeutic intervention.

Evaluation of the effect on heart rate variability of some agents acting at the beta-adrenoceptor using nonlinear scatterplot and sequence methods.

There is evidence that the processes regulating heart rate variability (HRV) reflect nonlinear complexity and show "chaotic" determinism. Data analyses using nonlinear methods may therefore reveal patterns not apparent with the standard methods for HRV analysis. We have consequently used two nonlinear methods, the Poincaré plot (scatterplot) and cardiac sequence (quadrant) analysis, in addition to the standard time-domain summary statistics, during a normal volunteer investigation of the effects on HRV of some agents acting at the cardiac beta-adrenoceptor. Under double-blind and randomized conditions (Latin square design), 25 normal volunteers received placebo, salbutamol 8 mg (beta 2-adrenoceptor partial agonist), pindolol 10 mg (beta 2-adrenoceptor partial agonist), or atenolol 50 mg (beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonist). Single oral doses of medication (at weekly intervals) were administered at 22:30 hours, with sleeping heart rates recorded overnight. The long-term (SDNN, SDANN) and short-term (rMSSD) time-domain summary statistics were reduced by salbutamol 8 mg and increased by atenolol 50 mg compared with placebo. The reductions in both SDNN and SDANN were greater after salbutamol 8 mg compared with pindolol 10 mg. The reduced HRV after pindolol 10 mg differed from the increased HRV following atenolol 50 mg. The Poincaré plot, constructed by plotting each RR interval against the preceding RR interval, was measured using a reproducible computerized method. Scatterplot length and area were reduced by salbutamol 8 mg and increased by atenolol 50 mg compared with placebo; scatterplot length and area were lower after pindolol 10 mg compared with atenolol 50 mg. Geometric analysis of the scatterplots allowed width assessment (i.e., dispersion) at fixed RR intervals. At the higher percentiles (i.e., 90% of scatterplot length: low HR), salbutamol 8 mg reduced and atenolol 50 mg increased dispersion; at lower percentiles (i.e., 10%, 25%, and 50% length), atenolol 50 mg and pindolol 10 mg increased dispersion compared with placebo and salbutamol 8 mg. Cardiac sequence analysis (differences between three adjacent beats; delta RR vs. delta RRn + 1) was used to assess the short-term patterns of cardiac acceleration and deceleration. Four patterns were identified: +/+ (a lengthening sequencing), +/- or -/+ (balanced sequences), and finally -/- (a shortening sequence). Cardiac acceleration episodes (i.e., number of times delta RR and delta RRn + 1 were both changed) were increased in quadrants -/- and +/+ following pindolol 10 mg and salbutamol 8 mg; the beat-to-beat difference (delta RRn + 1) was reduced after salbutamol 8 mg compared with the three other groups. These results demonstrated a shift towards sympathetic dominance (beta-adrenoceptor partial agonist salbutamol 8 mg) or parasympathetic dominance (beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonist atenolol 50 mg); pindolol 10 mg exhibited HR-dependent effects, reducing HRV at low but increasing variability at high prevailing heart rates. These nonlinear methods appear to be valuable tools to investigate HRV in health and to study the implications of perturbation of HRV with drug therapy in disease states.

Pharmacokinetics of candesartan after single and repeated doses of candesartan cilexetil in young and elderly healthy volunteers.

Candesartan cilexetil is rapidly and completely hydrolysed to the active compound candesartan during absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. Candesartan is a potent, long-acting, selective angiotensin II AT1 receptor blocker. The pharmacokinetics of candesartan were investigated after single and repeated once-daily doses of candesartan cilexetil in the dose range 2-16 mg in both younger (19-40 years) and elderly (65-78 years) healthy volunteers in five studies. Blood pressure, heart rate, and hormones associated with the renin-angiotensin system, and safety of candesartan cilexetil administration were also assessed. Placebo comparisons were made in four studies. Frequent blood samples were collected after the first single dose of candesartan cilexetil, and during the last dosing interval after 1 week repeated once-daily administration. Serum and plasma were analysed for candesartan cilexetil, candesartan and its inactive metabolite, CV-15959, as well as angiotensin I and II, aldosterone, plasma renin activity (PRA) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity. The AUC and Cmax of candesartan showed dose-proportional increases in the dose range of 2-16 mg candesartan cilexetil after both single and repeated once-daily tablet intake, indicating linear pharmacokinetics in both younger and elderly healthy subjects. The pharmacokinetics did not change on repeated dosing and, as expected from the half-life of candesartan of approximately 9 h in younger subjects, there was almost no accumulation after repeated once-daily dosing. The time to peak candesartan concentrations after tablet intake was consistently approximately 4 h at all dose levels. Both Cmax and AUC of candesartan were increased after single and repeated once-daily dosing in the elderly compared to younger subjects by approximately 50%. However, no accumulation after repeated once-daily dosing were seen in the elderly. The half-life of candesartan in the elderly (9-12 h) was somewhat longer than in the younger healthy adult volunteers (approximately 9 h) and no gender-related differences in the disposition of candesartan were observed. Serum concentrations of CV-15959 were much lower than candesartan, and reached peak serum concentrations later, about 4-9 h after dose intake. The elimination of CV-15959 was somewhat slower than that of candesartan. Candesartan cilexetil, the prodrug to candesartan, was not measurable in serum. No differences in ACE activity or serum aldosterone concentrations were observed between subjects receiving candesartan cilexetil and placebo tablets. Plasma angiotensin I and II concentrations and PRA were augmented after single doses and further increased after 1 week repeated candesartan cilexetil dosing. Single and repeated doses of candesartan cilexetil were well tolerated in the younger and elderly volunteers. Only mild adverse events were recorded, with 'headache' as the most commonly reported event, and no increase in the number of reported adverse events was observed with higher doses of candesartan cilexetil. No clinically significant changes in respect to vital signs, physical examination, ECG, and clinical laboratory tests were observed.

Contrasting actions of celiprolol and metoprolol on cardiac performance in normal volunteers.

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of metoprolol (50 mg) and celiprolol (200 mg) was undertaken in nine normal volunteers. Rest and exercise (supine bicycle) hemodynamics were assessed at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours following single oral doses of medication administered at weekly intervals. The influence of the ancillary pharmacological properties of metoprolol and celiprolol on cardiac pumping indices was assessed from heart rate and peak aortic acceleration (pkA-Exerdop). Following placebo, the heart rate and pkA increased progressively with exercise duration and workload. Following metoprolol 50 mg, the heart rate (-9.7 beat/min at 75 watts exercise) and pkA decreased. The blunting of acceleration was greater at higher exercise workloads (-6.7 m/sec2 at 75 watts exercise). Celiprolol reduced heart rate (-6.9 beat/min at 75 watts exercise) without a change in pkA. The heart rate/pkA relationship showed significant parallel displacement, downwards after metoprolol but upwards after celiprolol. Thus, for a given heart rate increment there was a greater decrease in pkA after metoprolol compared with celiprolol. The different ancillary pharmacological profiles of metoprolol and celiprolol resulted in contrasting hemodynamic profiles. The observed differences in the heart rate/pkA relationships may be attributable to the peripheral actions of these agents. The therapeutic relevance of the better maintained cardiac pumping indices on celiprolol for ischemic patients with impaired cardiac function warrants further investigation.

Effects of beta-adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists on heart-rate variability in normal subjects assessed using summary statistics and nonlinear procedures.

The influence of celiprolol (beta1- and beta2-adrenoceptor partial agonist), propranolol (beta1- and beta2-adrenoceptor antagonist), and atenolol (beta1-adrenoceptor antagonist) on heart-rate variability (HRV) was assessed from Holter records in 12 normal volunteers. A combination of summary statistics and nonlinear procedures was used to assess HRV and autonomic balance. Under double-blind and randomised conditions (Latin-square design), subjects received placebo, celiprolol (200 and 800 mg), propranolol (160 mg), atenolol (50 mg), and combinations of these agents. Single oral doses of medication (at weekly intervals) were administered at 22:30 h with sleeping heart rates (HRs) recorded overnight. Compared with placebo, celiprolol (200 and 800 mg) increased the sleeping HR, the HR effect of celiprolol was different from the bradycardia after propranolol, 160 mg, and atenolol, 50 mg. Dose-response effects on HR with celiprolol were evident in the presence of atenolol, unlike those with propranolol that abolished the HR increase between celiprolol, 200 mg and 800 mg. These data were consistent with beta1-selective adrenoceptor agonism with 200 mg but agonism at both the beta1- and beta2-adrenoceptor with celiprolol, 800 mg. The action of the drugs on short-term HRV indices (rMSSD and pNN50) closely followed their effects on HR. The longer-term HRV indices (global SD, SDANN) were reduced by celiprolol but increased by propranolol and atenolol. At a fixed HR, the data dispersion (SDNN5) was higher with propranolol compared with celiprolol; however, the dispersion was not merely an HR-dependent phenomenon. A novel nonlinear approach (quadrant analysis) revealed the sequencing of cardiac accelerations and decelerations after the high correlation between adjacent intervals had been removed. Celiprolol increased the frequency of consecutive cardiac accelerations; the duration between and variance of these beat-to-beat differences shortened after celiprolol but lengthened with increased variance after propranolol and atenolol. These results demonstrated reduced HRV indices and a shift toward sympathetic dominance after the beta-adrenoceptor agonist celiprolol contrasting with increased HRV indices and parasympathetic dominance after the beta-adrenoceptor antagonists propranolol and atenolol. The implications of these findings for the treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease warrant further study.

Circadian variation of alpha 1-adrenoceptor-mediated pressor response to phenylephrine in man.

The variability in the pressor effects of the alpha 1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine was observed under placebo conditions in ten healthy subjects in a double blind randomized study. Phenylephrine infusions were administered before administration of placebo (baseline) and 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h later. The doses of phenylephrine required to increase systolic blood pressure by 20 mmHg after 8 and 12 h (5.30 and 9.30 pm, 81.4 +/- 15.3 and 71.1 +/- 16.0 micrograms min-1, respectively) were significantly (P < 0.01) less than the baseline values (8.30 am, 108.0 +/- 27.6 g min-1). These results might indicate a circadian variation in the phenylephrine-induced alpha-adrenoceptor-mediated vascular response in healthy subjects. These observations lend further insight into circadian variations of vascular tone that might contribute to circadian rhythms in cardiovascular disease.

The dose dependency of the alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor antagonist activity of carvedilol in man.

1. The alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor antagonist activity of carvedilol, a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with vasodilating properties, and labetalol were investigated in 10 healthy male subjects. They received infusions with serially increasing concentrations of isoprenaline and phenylephrine before and after single oral doses of carvedilol 6.25, 12.5 and 25 mg, labetalol 400 mg and placebo at weekly intervals in a double-blind randomised manner. An exercise step test was performed at the end of the infusions. 2. The dose of isoprenaline required to increase heart rate by 25 beats min-1 (I25) and the dose of phenylephrine required to increase systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 20 mm Hg (PS20 and PD20) were calculated using a quadratic fit to individual dose-response curves. Comparisons were made with placebo and P < 0.05 was considered significant. 3. The I25 was increased by carvedilol 25 mg and labetalol 400 mg (P < 0.05). The dose ratios at I25 were: carvedilol 6.25 mg 2.1 +/- 1.6, carvedilol 12.5 mg 3.1 +/- 1.9, carvedilol 25 mg 6.4 +/- 4.9 and labetalol 400 mg 8.8 +/- 4.4. 4. The PS20 was increased by labetalol 400 mg (P < 0.05). The dose ratios at PS20 were: carvedilol 6.25 mg 1.0 +/- 0.2; 12.5 mg, 1.2 +/- 0.2; 25 mg, 1.3 +/- 0.4 and labetalol 400 mg 2.2 +/- 0.8. 5. The PD20 was increased by labetalol 400 mg (P < 0.05). The dose ratios at PD20 were: carvedilol 6.25 mg 1.1 +/- 0.3; 12.5 mg, 1.3 +/- 0.3; carvedilol 25 mg 1.3 +/- 0.4 and labetalol 400 mg 2.1 +/- 0.8.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A placebo controlled comparison of the effects of metoprolol and celiprolol on echo-Doppler measurements of cardiovascular function in normal volunteers.

1. This study used a continuous-wave echo-Doppler method (Exerdrop) to investigate the effects of beta-adrenoceptor antagonism and partial agonism on cardiovascular responses at rest and during dynamic exercise. 2. A double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled comparison of metoprolol (50 mg) and celiprolol (200 mg) was undertaken in nine normal volunteers; single oral doses of medication were administered at weekly intervals. Rest and exercise (supine bicycle) haemodynamics were assessed at 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h following dosing. 3. Before dosing and after placebo, the aortic flow velocity, acceleration and velocity integral increased progressively during exercise, as did heart rate, blood pressure and cardiac output. 4. Following metoprolol 50 mg, heart rate was significantly reduced without change in systolic or diastolic blood pressure. Echo-Doppler peak acceleration and velocity decreased at rest. On exercise, heart rate and systolic blood pressure fell significantly; the increase in acceleration was significantly blunted compared with placebo (a decrease of 15.2% at rest and 22.9% at 75 watts; P < 0.01 vs placebo). Peak velocity fell significantly by 75 watts exercise. 5. Celiprolol 200 mg at rest significantly increased systolic blood pressure, peak acceleration and velocity. On exercise celiprolol, in contrast to metoprolol, did not reduce peak acceleration or peak velocity; however exercise heart rate and systolic blood pressure were significantly reduced. The difference between celiprolol and metoprolol in respect of peak acceleration persisted over the 8 h of the study. 6. These differences between metoprolol and celiprolol are compatible with the partial agonism of celiprolol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The dose dependency of the alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist and beta-adrenoceptor partial agonist activity of dilevalol and labetalol in man.

1. The alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist, beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonist and beta 2-partial agonist activity of dilevalol, a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with vasodilating properties and labetalol were investigated in two studies. 2. In the first study, six healthy male subjects received serially increasing concentrations phenylephrine after single oral doses of dilevalol 200 mg, labetalol 400 mg and placebo at weekly intervals in a randomised double-blind manner. An exercise step test was performed at the end of the infusions. 3. The doses of phenylephrine required to increase systolic and diastolic blood pressures by 20 mmHg (PS20 and PD20 respectively) were increased by labetalol 400 mg (P < 0.05) but unchanged by dilevalol 200 mg. The dose ratios for PS20 (means +/- s.d.) were: dilevalol 200 mg 1.1 +/- 0.1, labetalol 400 mg 2.2 +/- 0.1. There was no difference in the percentage reduction in exercise tachycardia between dilevalol and labetalol. 4. In the second study, 10 healthy male subjects received infusions with serially increasing concentrations of phenylephrine and angiotensin II before and after single oral doses of dilevalol 200, 400 and 800 mg, labetalol 200 mg and placebo at weekly intervals in a double-blind randomised manner. Finger tremor was measured (piezoelectric accelerometer) with each infusion. An exercise step test was performed at the end of the infusions. 5. The PS20 and PD20 of phenylephrine were increased by labetalol 200 mg and unchanged by dilevalol. The dose ratios for PS20 were: dilevalol 200 mg 1.1 +/- 0.2. dilevalol 400 mg 1.1 +/- 0.4, dilevalol 800 mg 1.4 +/- 0.4 and labetalol 200 mg 2.5 +/- 0.7. The dose ratios for PD20 were: dilevalol 200 mg 1.1 +/- 0.4, dilevalol 400 mg 0.9 +/- 0.3. dilevalol 800 mg 1.3 +/- 0.4 and labetalol 200 mg 2.3 +/- 0.9. 6. The PS20 and PD20 of angiotensin II were unchanged by any of the drugs. 7. Exercise heart rate was reduced by dilevalol 200 mg (130 +/- 13 beats min-1), 400 mg (123 +/- 12 beats min-1), 800 mg (125 +/- 9 beats min) and labetalol 200 mg (143 +/- 12 beats min-1) vs placebo (161 +/- 17 beats min-1). 8. Finger tremor was significantly increased by dilevalol 800 mg (13.17 +/- 10.51 vs 6.62 +/- 4.51 centivolts for placebo: P < 0.01). Neither phenylephrine nor angiotensin II had an effect on finger tremor. 9. In conclusion, dilevalol 200, 400 and 800 mg demonstrated beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonist activity with no evidence of alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist activity. Labetalol 200 and 400 mg showed both beta 1- and alpha 1-antagonist activity. Dilevalol 800 mg demonstrated significant partial beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist activity by increasing finger tremor.

Intra-articular ultrasonic stimulation and intracutaneous electrical stimulation: evoked potential and visual analogue scale data.

The reproducibility of focussed ultrasound-induced intra-articular pain was compared with that of electrically induced cutaneous pain over a period of time by measuring both the evoked potential (EP) amplitude and visual analogue scale (VAS) score. The responses to ultrasound were more variable than those to electrical stimulation. A greater degree of accommodation occurred during electrical stimulation compared with ultrasound stimulation. A statistically significant correlation between the EP amplitude and the VAS score was found for each form of stimulation. Changes in EP amplitude correlated with changes in the perception of pain as measured by the VAS score, rather than stimulus intensity, which remained constant for each subject throughout the duration of the experiment. A single oral dose of pethidine produced a statistically significant decrease in the EP amplitude and the VAS score in each case.

The pharmacodynamics of dilevalol.

Dilevalol, the R-R1 isomer of labetalol, has been shown in animal studies to be a non-selective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with beta 2-agonist activity and minimal alpha-antagonist activity. This paper describes the results of studies in man which have investigated the dose dependency and selectivity of dilevalol as an adrenoceptor antagonist and demonstrated its lack of alpha-antagonist activity. It also describes the results of studies which have investigated the magnitude of its partial agonist activity and demonstrated the selectivity of the partial agonist activity for the beta 2-adrenoceptor. Oral dilevalol 200 mg reduces an exercise tachycardia by about 25% and 400 mg does not increase the effect. Dilevalol 200 mg had no effect on the rise in blood pressure induced by infusions of phenylephrine, demonstrating its lack of alpha-antagonist activity. The increases in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, forearm blood flow and finger tremor induced by infusions of salbutamol are inhibited by dilevalol 200 and 400 mg and propranolol 80 mg to a similar degree indicating the lack of selectivity of the beta-antagonist activity of dilevalol. The effects of increasing oral doses of dilevalol on sleeping heart rate were used to assess the magnitude of its partial agonist activity. Heart rate four hours after dilevalol 200 and 400 mg was seven beats per minute higher than after placebo. Dilevalol 200 and 400 mg did not alter daytime supine heart rate, blood pressure or cardiac output but did increase forearm blood flow and finger tremor indicating that the partial agonist activity is mainly at the beta 2-adrenoceptor.

Selectivity of xamoterol, prenalterol and salbutamol as assessed by their effects in the presence and absence of ICI 118 551.

Selectivity for beta 1- and beta 2-receptors to xamoterol, prenalterol and salbutamol were tested using ICI 118 551, a specific beta 2-receptor antagonist. Measurements were made of heart rate at rest and exercise, blood pressure, forearm blood flow and finger tremor. The actions of xamoterol were similar to those previously demonstrated, and were unaffected by beta 2-blockade, indicating selectivity for the beta 1-receptor. Salbutamol was selective for the beta 2-receptor and prenalterol was active at both.

The selectivity of xamoterol, prenalterol, and salbutamol as assessed by their effects in the presence and absence of ICI 118,551.

The selectivity of single oral doses of xamoterol, 200 mg, prenalterol, 50 mg, and salbutamol, 8 mg, was compared in eight healthy male volunteers by measuring their effects on sleeping heart rate, supine heart rate, blood pressure, forearm blood flow, finger tremor, and exercise heart rate in the presence and absence of the specific beta 2-adrenoceptor antagonist ICI 118,551, 25 mg. Xamoterol, 200 mg, increased sleeping heart rate and systolic blood pressure, decreased exercise heart rate, and had no effect on diastolic blood pressure, forearm blood flow, or finger tremor. The concurrent administration of ICI 118,551, 25 mg, did not alter these results. Supine heart rate was increased by xamoterol and did not differ from that for xamoterol with ICI 118,551. Prenalterol, 50 mg, increased sleeping heart rate, supine heart rate, systolic blood pressure, forearm blood flow, and finger tremor, decreased diastolic blood pressure, and had no effect on exercise tachycardia. The concurrent administration of ICI 118,551 with prenalterol reduced the increase in sleeping heart rate, supine heart rate, and forearm blood flow, and reduced the fall in diastolic blood pressure caused by prenalterol alone. The increase in finger tremor following prenalterol with ICI 118,551 tended to be less than that following prenalterol. Salbutamol, 8 mg, increased sleeping heart rate, supine heart rate, systolic blood pressure, forearm blood flow, finger tremor, and exercise heart rate, and caused a fall in diastolic blood pressure. When salbutamol, 8 mg, was administered with ICI 118,551, 25 mg, the only changes detected were a small initial increase in finger tremor and a small rise in diastolic blood pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of acute and chronic oral administration of alfuzosin on baroreflex function and tremor in man.

1. The effects of the acute and chronic administration of the alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist alfuzosin (5 mg twice daily for 7 days) on baroreflex function, physiological tremor and sedation (visual analogue scale) were investigated in six healthy volunteers. 2. Phenylephrine-systolic pressure dose-response curves were shifted (P less than 0.05) to the right by alfuzosin compared with placebo on day 1, and on day 8 prior to the administration of alfuzosin indicating significant alpha-adrenoceptor blockade over 24 h with 5 mg twice daily administration. 3. Baroreflex sensitivity (delta R-R ms mmHg-1 systolic arterial pressure) was reduced (P less than 0.05) by alfuzosin compared with placebo on day 1 (13.8 +/- 2.6 vs 20.6 +/- 3.6 ms mmHg-1) and on day 8 (13.4 +/- 1.7 vs 21.1 +/- 2.7 ms mmHg-1). 4. Maximum power (microV2) or frequency (Hz) of physiological tremor did not change 2 h after alfuzosin administration on day 1 (13.7 +/- 4.4 microV2, 9.2 +/- 0.3 Hz) or day 8 (11.5 +/- 4.3 microV2, 10.0 +/- 0.4 Hz) compared with placebo on day 1 (16.9 +/- 7.5 microV2, 10.0 +/- 0.4 Hz) and day 8 (17.3 +/- 5.7 microV2, 10.2 +/- 0.8 Hz). 5. Alfuzosin 5 mg twice daily did not cause sedation on day 1 or day 8. 6. In conclusion the reduction in baroreflex sensitivity with the alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist alfuzosin may contribute to its antihypertensive activity in reducing the reflex tachycardia associated with its hypotensive action.