Asthma controller delay and recurrence risk after an emergency department visit or hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Patients who have asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits or hospitalizations are at risk for recurrent exacerbation events. Our objectives were to assess whether receiving a controller medication at discharge affects risk of recurrence and whether delaying controller initiation alters this risk. METHODS: Asthma patients with an ED visit or inpatient (IP) stay who received a controller dispensing within 6 months were identified from healthcare claims. Cox proportional hazards of the time to first recurrence of an asthma-related ED or IP visit in the 6-month period following the initial event were constructed, with time following discharge without controller medication as the primary predictor. RESULTS: A total of 6139 patients met inclusion criteria, 78% with an ED visit and 22% with an IP visit; 15% had a recurrence within 6 months. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) associated with not having controller medication at discharge was 1.79 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-2.25). The controller-by-time interaction was significant (P<0.001), with hazard rising as time-to-controller initiation increased. Delaying initiation by 1 day approximately tripled the risk (HR 2.95; 95%CI 1.48-5.88). Sensitivity analyses, including accounting for controller fills prior to the index event, did not substantially alter these results. CONCLUSIONS: This observational study shows that the risk of a recurrent asthma-related ED visit or IP stay increased as the time to initiate a controller increased. Our findings support the importance of early controller initiation following an asthma-related ED or IP visit in reducing risk of recurrence.

Cost trends among commercially insured and Medicare Advantage-insured patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: 2006 through 2009.

BACKGROUND: Few estimates of health care costs related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are available regarding commercially insured patients in the United States. The aims of this retrospective observational analysis of administrative data were to describe and compare health care resource use and costs related to COPD in the United States for patients with commercial insurance or Medicare Advantage with Part D benefits, and to assess cost trends over time. METHODS: Patient-level and visit-level health care costs in the calendar years 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 were assessed for patients with evidence of COPD. Generalized linear models adjusting for sex, age category, and geographic region were used to investigate cost trends over time for patients with Medicare or commercial insurance. RESULTS: Medical costs, which ranged from an annual mean of US$2382 (Medicare 2007) to US$3339 (commercial 2009) per patient, comprised the majority of total costs in all years for patients with either type of insurance. COPD-related costs were less for Medicare than commercial cohorts. In the multivariate analysis, total costs increased by approximately 6% per year for commercial insurance patients (cost ratio 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.07; P < 0.001) and 5% per year for Medicare patients (cost ratio 1.05; 95% CI 1.03-1.07; P < 0.001). Costs for outpatient and emergency department visits increased significantly over time in both populations. Standard admission costs increased significantly for Medicare patients (cost ratio 1.03; 95% CI 1.00-1.05; P = 0.03), but not commercial patients, and costs for intensive care unit visits remained stable for both populations. CONCLUSION: COPD imposed a substantial economic burden on patients and the health care system, with costs increasing significantly in both the Medicare and commercial populations.

Chronic kidney disease in gout in a managed care setting.

BACKGROUND: To study the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its impact on allopurinol dosing and uric acid control among patients with gout. METHODS: This was a retrospective study using data from a large US health plan. Claims and laboratory data were analyzed for enrollees from the health plan database from January 2002 through December 2005. Patients with gout were identified from pharmacy and medical claims data based on the presence of codes for gout medication or gout diagnosis. Severity of CKD was determined using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Allopurinol titration was defined as a change in average daily dose from first prescription to last prescription of ≥ 50 mg. RESULTS: A total of 3,929 patients were identified for inclusion in this study, 39% of whom had CKD (based on having an eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2). Subjects with CKD were older (p < 0.01) and more likely to be women (p < 0.01), had a greater number of comorbid conditions (p < 0.01), and were more likely to be prescribed allopurinol (p < 0.01) compared to those with no CKD. The average starting dose of allopurinol was lower among those with CKD, and it decreased with worsening kidney function. Among the 3,122 gout patients who used allopurinol, only 25.6% without CKD and 22.2% with CKD achieved a serum uric acid concentration of < 6.0 mg/dL (p = 0.0409). Also, only 15% of allopurinol users had an upward dose titration (by ≥50 mg), but the average increase in dose did not differ significantly between those with and without CKD. CONCLUSIONS: About two out of every five patients with gout in this population had CKD. Allopurinol doses were not adjusted in the majority of CKD patients. Serum uric acid control in gout was poor among patients without CKD and even worse among those with CKD.

Relationship between physician specialty and allopurinol prescribing patterns: a study of patients with gout in managed care settings.

OBJECTIVE: Allopurinol is used to lower serum uric acid (sUA) levels in gout patients. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of physician specialty on allopurinol treatment patterns and sUA control. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study using claims from a managed care database of US health plan enrollees. Gout patients at least 18 years of age who received allopurinol were identified from the database between January 1, 2002 and April 30, 2007. The index date was defined as the date of the earliest allopurinol claim, and patients were required to have health plan enrollment for at least 365 days prior to and following the index date for inclusion. Physician specialty was determined using the index allopurinol claim. Dosage of allopurinol prescription(s) and number of gout flares were determined from claims data. sUA measurements were used to assess goal attainment over a period of at least one year following the index allopurinol prescription. RESULTS: There were 3363 patients with gout of whom 69.9% received an index allopurinol prescription from a generalist/internist, 5.7% from a rheumatologist, 2.6% from a nephrologist, and 21.8% from a physician with other specialty. Of patients receiving their index prescription from a nephrologist, 38.7% reached the sUA goal of <6 mg/dL (357 µmol/L), as compared to patients prescribed by a rheumatologist, generalist/internist, or other physician (35.4%, 31.4%, and 39.4%, respectively; P = 0.015). When controlling for patient characteristics, multivariate analysis did not reveal statistically significant different odds of sUA goal attainment based on prescribing physician specialty, though separate analyses indicated that patients prescribed by a nephrologist had fewer gout flares. Change in allopurinol dosage from initial to final dose was more frequent among patients prescribed by rheumatologists and nephrologists. CONCLUSION: There is significant heterogeneity in the specialists' management of sUA levels in patients with gout, possibly reflecting differences in case mix and treatment approaches. Limitations related to the use of claims data, such as inability to observe medications filled over-the-counter, should be considered when interpreting study results.

Direct costs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among managed care patients.

PURPOSE: To estimate patient- and episode-level direct costs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) among commercially insured patients in the US. METHODS: In this retrospective claims-based analysis, commercial enrollees with evidence of COPD were grouped into five mutually exclusive cohorts based on the most intensive level of COPD-related care they received in 2006, ie, outpatient, urgent outpatient (outpatient care in addition to a claim for an oral corticosteroid or antibiotic within seven days), emergency department (ED), standard inpatient admission, and intensive care unit (ICU) cohorts. Patient- level COPD-related annual health care costs, including patient- and payer-paid costs, were compared among the cohorts. Adjusted episode-level costs were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 37,089 COPD patients included in the study, 53% were in the outpatient cohort, 37% were in the urgent outpatient cohort, 3% were in the ED cohort, and the standard admission and ICU cohorts together comprised 6%. Mean (standard deviation, SD) annual COPD-related health care costs (2008 US$) increased across the cohorts (P < 0.001), ranging from $2003 ($3238) to $43,461 ($76,159) per patient. Medical costs comprised 96% of health care costs for the ICU cohort. Adjusted mean (SD) episode-level costs were $305 ($310) for an outpatient visit, $274 ($336) for an urgent outpatient visit, $327 ($65) for an ED visit, $9745 ($2968) for a standard admission, and $33,440 for an ICU stay. CONCLUSION: Direct costs of COPD-related care for commercially insured patients are driven by hospital stays with or without ICU care. Exacerbation prevention resulting in reduced need for inpatient care could lower costs.

Comparative resource utilization in medicaid-eligible patients with asthma treated with fixed-dose fluticasone propionate/salmeterol or fluticasone propionate monotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to compare rates of asthma-related health service utilization for Medicaid-eligible pediatric and adult patients with asthma treated with fixed-dose fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FSC) or fluticasone propionate (FP) monotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective, observational claims analysis was conducted with Medicaid enrollees aged ≥4 years with ≥1 diagnosis code for asthma and a prescription fill for FSC or FP between January 1, 2002, and November 1, 2005. The end date allowed a follow-up period of ≥60 days; Medicaid data were available through December 31, 2005, and were obtained from 2 sources: a large US-managed Medicaid provider affiliated with i3 Innovus, and the Thomson Medstat Marketscan (Ann Arbor, Michigan) Medicaid claims database. Patients were new or continuing users of asthma controllers, but were new users of FSC or FP. Outcome measures included postindex use of systemic corticosteroid drugs and short-acting ß-agonists (SABAs), asthma-related utilization, and costs. Descriptive and multivariate techniques were used, adjusting for differences in baseline demographics and length of follow-up time in the study population. Patients were grouped into cohorts according to age: 4 to 17 or ≥18 years. RESULTS: The final study population was 50,428 patients, including 30,071 patients (59.6%) aged <18 years and 20,357 patients (40.4%) aged ≥18 years. Mean number of days of follow-up was 290.4, and 55.1% of patients (n = 27,793) were followed for ≥1 year after the index date. Among those aged <18 years, FSC treatment was associated with decreased adjusted risk of asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.917; 95% CI, 0.855-0.984) and combined ED/inpatient (IP) visits (HR = 0.922; 95% CI, 0.860-0.988). Among those aged ≥18 years, FSC treatment was associated with decreased adjusted risk of asthma-related ED visits (HR = 0.907; 95% CI, 0.849-0.969) and combined ED/IP visits (HR = 0.907; 95% CI, 0.850-0.968). FSC treatment was also associated with significantly fewer prescription fills for SABAs compared with FP treatment in both age groups (aged <18 years: incident rate ratio [IRR] = 0.960 [95% CI, 0.929-0.992]; aged ≥18 years: IRR = 0.950 [95% CI, 0.905-0.998]). Total mean (SD) unadjusted asthma costs were $579 ($2429) for FSC and $551 ($3151) for FP in the <18-year age group and were $1764 ($10,006) for FSC and $1512 ($5543) for FP in the ≥18-year age group. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective database analysis, Medicaid-eligible patients who initiated FSC therapy experienced better asthma control compared with patients who initiated FP monotherapy, as measured by asthma-related ED/IP visits and use of SABAs.

Economic burden prior to COPD diagnosis: a matched case-control study in the United States.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnosis is often a lengthy process, and consequently results in delays in treatment in early stages. Disease progression and complication may result in increased levels of healthcare service use. To understand the economic burden of COPD prior to diagnosis in the U.S., trends in utilization and costs during the period before initial COPD diagnosis were compared with matched controls. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted using medical and pharmacy claims data from a large managed care health plan representing a base population of over 30 million covered lives in the U.S. COPD patients with at least 12 months of continuous enrollment and aged 40 years or older were identified (n=28,968) and matched to up to three random controls (n=81,322) by age, gender, region of plans and index date. Multivariate regression models were used to estimate average incremental service use and cost between COPD patients and controls. Moreover, trends in utilization and costs for the COPD patients were examined over 36 months before diagnosis. RESULTS: COPD patients used 1.5-1.6 times more inpatient/emergency department (IP/ED) services and office visits compared to control patients. The average incremental annual costs for IP/ED services, office visits, and medical and pharmacy services were estimated at $550, $238, $1438 and $401, respectively, after adjusting for age, gender, region and comorbid conditions. The 36-month trend analysis showed that COPD patients' healthcare utilization and costs increased gradually over time, often with a marked increase in the month before COPD diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: COPD patients in the U.S. consumed substantial healthcare services and costs prior to diagnosis. More timely diagnosis and subsequent treatment may avoid costly healthcare utilization and unnecessary mortality and morbidity post-diagnosis.

Five-year routine cervical cancer screening rates and intervals in a US health plan.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical cancer screening with liquid-based cytology or concurrent HPV screening may decrease positive predictive value and specificity of screening results. Following changes to leading guidelines for cervical cancer screening, policy-makers may benefit from more detailed statistics to improve management of routine screening intervals. This paper reports annual cervical cancer screening rates, intervals between routine screenings, population cost burden of routine screening, and concurrent HPV screening rates in the medical claims database of a large US health plan between 2000 and 2004. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Annual cervical cancer screening rates were reported for each calendar year between 2000 and 2004, plus intervals between routine screenings in a cohort enrolled for 5 years after a first routine screening. Interval estimates accounted for women not screened in the first year of the study period. Overall screening rates and intervals were adjusted to the US civilian female population, and costs were adjusted to 2004 dollars. This database research was exempt from IRB review. RESULTS: Annual routine screening rates during the 5-year period ranged from 33.7 to 37.2 tests per 100 enrollees. Among females with routine screenings, 68.8% were re-screened within 3 years, and 26.8% were not re-screened within 5 years. Concurrent HPV screening was 1.9 tests per 1000 routine screenings in 2000, and 27.9 per 1000 in 2004. The cost of routine screening per 1000 females was $31,282.00 in 2000 and $38,515.07 in 2004. CONCLUSION: More than a quarter of women with evidence of a routine cervical cancer screening were not re-screened within 5 years, while 43.4% were re-screened within a year. Triennial screening rates reported here are not comparable to traditional 3-year screening rates, and screening intervals were not reported separately by conventional and liquid-based cytology. Reducing rates of women receiving annual routine screening may offset the cost burden of newer screening technologies, but must be managed carefully to avoid decreasing 3-year screening rates. Clinicians should reinforce with their patients the need for routine screening at least triennially.

Treatment failure rates and health care utilization and costs among patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with levofloxacin or macrolides in an outpatient setting: a retrospective claims database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Macrolide antibiotics and fluoroquinolones are extensively used in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). OBJECTIVE: This analysis was conducted to compare treatment failure rates and health care utilization and cost outcomes among patients with CAP treated with levo-floxacin (500 or 750 mg) or macrolides (azithromycin, clarithromycin, or erythromycin) in an outpatient setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of claims data from a large US health plan. Patients were aged > or =18 years and had a primary diagnosis of CAP that was treated with oral levofloxacin or a macrolide in an outpatient setting (including physicians' offices, outpatient clinics, urgent care centers, and large ambulatory health centers). Patients were followed for 30 days after the index drug date to measure study outcomes. Multivariate regression analysis and a propensity score technique were used to compare rates of treatment failure and CAP-related health care utilization and costs. Two post hoc subgroup analyses were conducted in patients aged > or =50 and > or =65 years. RESULTS: Of the 7526 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 2968 (39.4%) were treated with levofloxacin and 4558 (60.6%) with a macrolide. Unadjusted rates of treatment failure were 21.1% and 22.7% in the levofloxacin and macrolide cohorts, respectively. After adjustment for demographic characteristics, baseline comorbidities, and severity of illness, levofloxacin recipients were significantly less likely to experience treatment failure than macrolide recipients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.94, P = 0.003). The likelihood of treatment failure was significantly lower in levofloxacin recipients aged > or =50 years (OR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.94; P = 0.007) and > or =65 years (OR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43-1.00; P = 0.049) compared with the corresponding subgroups of macrolide recipients. The magnitude of this difference was greatest in the subgroup aged > or =65 years, which had a 35% reduced risk of treatment failure compared with the corresponding group of macrolide-treated patients. The rate of CAP-related emergency department visits was significantly lower among patients receiving levofloxa-cin (OR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91; P = 0.009); there were no differences in CAP-related hospitalizations or total CAP-related health care costs between levofloxa-cin and macrolide recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Multivariate-adjusted rates of treatment failure in outpatients with CAP were significantly lower in those treated with levofloxacin relative to those treated with a macrolide. The lower rates of treatment failure with levofloxacin were consistently observed across all patients and in the subgroups aged > or =50 and > or =65 years. Rates of emergency department visits were also significantly lower among levofloxacin-treated patients, whereas overall CAP-related hospitali-zations and costs did not differ significantly between the 2 treatment groups.

Secondary failure of glycemic control for patients adding thiazolidinedione or sulfonylurea therapy to a metformin regimen.

OBJECTIVE: To assess glycemic control and secondary failure in patients adding thiazolidinedione or sulfonylurea therapy to a metformin regimen in a managed care setting. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using administrative claims data. METHODS: Participants (mean age, 51.1 years; 55.4% female) were required to have at least 1 prescription claim for a sulfonylurea (n = 300) or a thiazolidinedione (n = 279) between January 1, 2001, and March 31, 2004, as well as metformin use during the prior 6 months and continued metformin use. Secondary failure was measured for patients who initially achieved a glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) level of less than 7.0% and was defined as a subsequent A1C level of at least 7.0%. RESULTS: The mean baseline A1C level was 8.2% and was higher for the patients receiving a combination of metformin and sulfonylurea (A1C level, 8.4%) compared with patients receiving a combination of metformin and thiazolidinedione (A1C level, 8.0%) (P < .05). Overall, 77.7% of patients had a baseline A1C level of at least 7.0%. The mean A1C level decreased by 1.2 (to 7.0%), and 65.1% of patients with a baseline A1C level of at least 7.0% reached goal A1C level. Therapy intensification via addition of another antihyperglycemic agent occurred in 60.7% of study patients. Approximately 2 in 5 patients (41.5%) who initially achieved goal A1C level experienced secondary failure; the mean time to failure was 1.3 years. CONCLUSION: Although most patients failing metformin monotherapy reached goal A1C level after addition of a sulfonylurea or a thiazolidinedione, 41.5% of patients observed for up to 4 years who initially attained goal A1C level experienced secondary failure.

Loss of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were receiving initial metformin, sulfonylurea, or thiazolidinedione monotherapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) values longitudinally in patients who newly started metformin, sulfonylurea, or thiazolidinedione monotherapy; in a subset of patients whose A1C values were 7% or greater before starting therapy (baseline) and who achieved A1C goal (A1C < 7%) during therapy, rates of secondary failure (i.e., A1C value returned to > or = 7% during therapy) were compared for each drug. DESIGN: Four-year retrospective analysis. DATA SOURCE: Administrative database from a large health care plan. PATIENTS: Patients who filled at least one prescription for metformin (5453 patients), sulfonylurea (2373), and thiazolidinedione (1590) therapy, respectively, between January 1, 2001, and March 31, 2004, were enrolled. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, baseline A1C values, changes in A1C values (last available result during follow-up minus baseline value), and A1C values before and after the addition of an antidiabetic drug other than the index drug (therapy intensification) were documented. Mean age was 50.7 years; 5027 (53.4%) were men. Mean baseline A1C value was 8.4%, and about 70% of patients had an AIC value of 7% or greater before starting therapy. Mean follow-up was 1.9 years, and mean decrease in A1C values was 1.47% (to 6.91%). The probabilities of attaining A1C goals were similar for patients receiving metformin, sulfonylurea, or thiazolidinedione therapy. The rate of therapy intensification among patients taking metformin (24.7%) was lower than that of patients taking a sulfonylurea (30.1%, p<0.001) but similar to that of those taking a thiazolidinedione (24.6%). Secondary failure occurred in 36.3% of patients; mean time from the start of therapy to its failure was about 1.51 years. Patients receiving a sulfonylurea were 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.50) times more likely than patients receiving metformin to experience secondary failure, whereas failure rates were similar for thiazolidinediones and metformin (odds ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.99). CONCLUSION: In the subset of patients assessed for secondary failure, although treatment initially reduced A1C values, more than one third experienced failure. Real-world studies of A1C goal attainment must follow patients on a long-term basis to assess the maintenance of glycemic control over time.

Patterns of asthma-related health care resource use in children treated with montelukast or fluticasone.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of controller monotherapy with montelukast or fluticasone on asthma-related health care resource use among children aged 2-14 years old. DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective claims-based analysis of asthmatic children, 2-14 years old, receiving a prescription (index) for montelukast or fluticasone between January 1, 1999 and June 30, 2000 was conducted. Children were matched by age and propensity score to obtain comparable treatment groups. The propensity score was derived using patient demographics, pre-existing respiratory conditions, and asthma-related pharmacy and health service utilization (i.e. ambulatory visits, emergency department visits and hospitalizations). Claims for asthma-related emergent care and medication use were examined for the 12-month periods before and after the index prescription. Treatment group comparisons of asthma-related resource use were conducted for the total pediatric population and separately for children 2-5 years and 6-14 years. Persistent controller medication use was assessed at 6 and 12 months post-index. RESULTS: A total of 2034 children were matched (1017 in each treatment group). Post-index rates of asthma-related resource use were similar among children treated with montelukast or fluticasone. Among children 2-5 years old, fewer emergency department visits were observed with montelukast versus fluticasone (relative risk = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28-0.96); no significant difference was observed among children 6-14 years old. No significant differences between montelukast and fluticasone cohorts in hospitalizations or rescue medication fills were noted in either age group. Evidence of at least one medication refill was significantly greater with montelukast at both 6 and 12 months post-index. CONCLUSIONS: Similar levels of resource use were achieved by children 2-14 years initiating montelukast or fluticasone, as indicated by use of asthma-related emergent care and rescue/acute medications. Subgroup analyses suggest a differential effect of age on the relationship between treatment and asthma-related resource use, with children 2-5 years observed to have less resource use while on montelukast.

Observational study of the effects of using montelukast vs fluticasone in patients matched at baseline.

BACKGROUND: The relative effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists in asthma therapy continues to be the subject of clinical studies. Recent studies have examined the impact of these therapies using a retrospective design. Retrospective studies require special attention to nonrandom assignment of participants to treatment groups and, consequently, to the need to appropriately account for baseline differences. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relative effectiveness of montelukast sodium vs fluticasone propionate as controller monotherapy in patients with asthma. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of claims data from 6,160 individuals continuously enrolled in 1 of 20 US managed care plans. Patients using fluticasone were matched to those treated with montelukast using propensity scores and age (2-55 years). Health care use was determined for the 12-month periods before and after the initial controller prescription. Outcomes included asthma-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits, along with use of oral corticosteroids and short-acting beta-agonists. Logistic regression analyses were also performed. RESULTS: Overall, controller therapy significantly reduced the odds of postindex asthma-related hospitalizations (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.79); no significant difference was observed with asthma-related emergency department visits (odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.04). Differences in the relative effect in the montelukast and fluticasone groups were not observed. Similarly, increases in the postindex rate of short-acting beta-agonist use and increases in oral corticosteroid use for both montelukast and fluticasone patients were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Similar outcomes were observed in montelukast and fluticasone users in this matched cohort analysis.

Compliance with allopurinol therapy among managed care enrollees with gout: a retrospective analysis of administrative claims.

OBJECTIVE: Poor compliance with gout medications has been recognized, but seldom studied. We investigated compliance with allopurinol among managed care enrollees suspected to have gout. METHODS: This was a retrospective, administrative claims-based analysis of patients with gout. Compliance with allopurinol was measured using prescription-fill dates and days-supplied amounts. Compliance was defined for each prescription period as the presumed use of allopurinol on at least 80% of the days of that period. RESULTS: Of 9482 patients identified, 65.9% filled at least one prescription for allopurinol during the 24 month followup period; 10.4% of allopurinol users filled one prescription and then discontinued use. Of the remaining patients, 13.7% never achieved compliance with therapy; 18% were compliant throughout the entire followup period. Patients were compliant with therapy for an average of 56% of their treatment periods and noncompliant for an average of 44%. In multivariate analysis, male sex was associated with decreased compliance (p < 0.01), although the effect was mitigated by increasing age. For subjects of both sexes, increasing age was associated with increased compliance (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compliance with allopurinol in this population was low. Because untreated gouty arthritis can lead to serious adverse outcomes (such as recurrent gouty arthritis, chronic gouty arthropathy, tophi, and urolithiasis) that are usually avoidable with antihyperuricemic therapy, efforts to achieve better compliance are warranted.

Increasing prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia over 10 years among older adults in a managed care population.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the prevalence of gout and/or clinically significant hyperuricemia increased in a managed care population over 10 years. METHODS: The study was a descriptive analysis utilizing an administrative claims database to ascertain 10-year trends in prevalence of gout and/or hyperuricemia. Prevalence rates were calculated cross-sectionally for each year (1990-99) and expressed/compared as rates per 1000 enrollees. RESULTS: The prevalence of gout and/or hyperuricemia in the overall population increased by about 2 cases per 1000 enrollees over 10 years. In the > 75 year age group, rates increased from 21 per 1000 persons in 1990 to 41 per 1000 in 1999. In the 65-74 year age group, prevalence increased from between 21 and 24 per 1000 persons in the years 1990-92 to over 31 per 1000 during the years 1997-99. Prevalence rates in younger age groups (< 65 years) stayed consistently low during the years under study. There were sex differences in most age groups, with men having the greater burden of disease at every time point. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of gout and/or hyperuricemia in the overall study population increased during the 10-year period. When stratified by age, there were increases in prevalence among groups over age 65 in both sexes. Although gout prevalence increased in both sexes over the 10-year period, men still had most of the burden of disease. In ages younger than 65, men had 4 times higher prevalence than women (4:1 ratio), but in the older age groups (> 65), the gender gap narrowed to 1 woman to every 3 men with gout and/or hyperuricemia (3:1 ratio).