Dual-Mobility Cups in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. / Tripolare Pfannen in der Primärhüftendoprothetik.

Dual-mobility cups (DMCs) were introduced in France more than 40 years ago and are increasingly used not only in hip revision but also primary hip arthroplasty. Due to a simulated large-head articulation and increased jumping distance, DMCs can contribute to a high range of motion in the hip joint and reduce the risk of instability. Numerous studies have reported low dislocation rates and high survival rates in the mid-term follow-up. Nevertheless, long-term data, especially on primary hip replacement, remain limited, and the effect of recent designs and material innovations is still unclear. Therefore, primary DMCs are mainly proposed in patients at high risk for dislocation (i.e. pelvitrochanteric insufficiency, compromised spinopelvic mobility, neuromuscular disorders, obesity and femoral neck fractures). Based on a review of recently published studies referring to these indications, the current study discusses the advantages and disadvantages of DMCs.

Total knee arthroplasty in post-traumatic osteoarthritis is more challenging, but results in similar patient satisfaction - An analysis of 1646 cases.

BACKGROUND: Patients with post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) present a variety of technical challenges to surgeons. Surgical parameters, complication rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been reported as detrimental in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for PTOA. The purpose of this study was to compare these variables and satisfaction with the results of TKA in patients with post-traumatic osteoarthritis with a matched-pair cohort of primary osteoarthritis (POA). METHODS: A registry-embedded prospective case-control study was performed. Of a total of 1646 TKAs, 155 were performed due to PTOA between 2012 and 2019. One-hundred and thirty-six could be one-to-one propensity score-matched to patients with POA undergoing primary TKA based on similar patient demographic variables. Outcomes investigated included operation time, estimated blood loss, types of implants, postoperative complications and PROs pre- and 1 year postoperatively as well as satisfaction with the results of surgery. Sub-cohort analysis was performed for patients with prior fracture and soft tissue trauma, respectively. RESULTS: Surgical parameters were significantly different in disadvantages of PTOA: operation time (P < 0.001), estimated blood loss (P < 0.001), blood transfusions (P = 0.039), type of implants (P < 0.001). Manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) was necessary more often in the PTOA fracture group (odds ratio 5.01, (95% confidence interval 1.04; 24.07). PRO demonstrated no substantial differences after 1 year. Satisfaction with the results of TKA was as equally high in all cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that TKAs in patients with PTOA require higher surgical effort but can result in similar PROs and satisfaction compared to POA, regardless of the underlying trauma.

Ask Patients What They Expect! A Survey Among Patients Awaiting Total Hip Arthroplasty in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an elective surgery. Therefore, patient satisfaction with the results of surgery is paramount. The association between fulfillment of patients' expectations and satisfaction is well known. The aim of this study was to identify key expectations of patients with hip osteoarthritis awaiting THA. METHODS: A mixed-methods approach was used, consisting of two sequential parts. The questionnaire was developed based on literature review and focus group interviews. A nationwide survey was conducted in 21 orthopedic departments within Germany. RESULTS: Out of 691 obtained questionnaires, 636 were analyzed (mean age = 65.7 years (±11.3), 56.1% female). A majority of patients (≥75%) reported more than 20 complaints as 'present' due to hip osteoarthritis. A total of 9 key expectations were identified, which were reported by more than 75% of the patients as 'mandatory' for a successful THA. The identified key expectations were related to pain, range of motion, walking abilities, gait pattern, transitions, leisure and sports activities, awareness of the affected hip, satisfaction with health or life, and compensatory posture. A consistently high correlation was found between the complaints and the corresponding expectations. CONCLUSION: The expectations of patients have greatly expanded. In this study, a set of mandatory key expectations shared by the majority of patients was identified. The likelihood of fulfillment of key expectations should be assessed for weighing benefits and harms of available treatment options during the indication process. In addition, the results of this study might be used as a resource for shared decision-making.

Ultracongruent insert design is a safe alternative to posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: 5-year results of a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: If substitution of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty is necessary, there are two options available: posterior stabilized (PS) design with a post-cam mechanism or anterior-lipped ultracongruent (UC) inserts. UC inserts have the advantage that no femoral box is necessary and a standard femoral component can be used. The aim of this study was to compare the range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcome (PRO) after UC and PS fixed-bearing TKA. Better ROM in PS TKA and no difference in PRO between both designs was hypothesized. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial with 127 patients receiving a fixed-bearing UC or PS design of the same knee system was performed. Nine patients died and there were four revision surgeries. 107 patients completed the 5-year follow-up. Patient-reported outcome was assessed. Patellofemoral problems were evaluated using selected applicable questions of the Oxford Knee Score (getting up from a table, kneeling, climbing stairs). RESULTS: Surgical time was 10 min shorter in the UC group (p < 0.001). After 5 years, both groups demonstrated good knee function and health-related quality of life without significant differences between the groups. Both groups demonstrated a high satisfaction score and the majority of patients would undergo this surgery again. Patellofemoral problems were recognized more frequently in the PS group (p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Both designs demonstrated similar good results after 5 years. Stabilization with an anterior-lipped UC insert can be considered a safe alternative to the well-established PS design if cruciate substitution is necessary.