Pre-treatment whole blood gene expression is associated with 14-week response assessed by dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in infliximab-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients.

UNLABELLED: Approximately 30% of rheumatoid arthritis patients achieve inadequate response to anti-TNF biologics. Attempts to identify molecular biomarkers predicting response have met with mixed success. This may be attributable, in part, to the variable and subjective disease assessment endpoints with large placebo effects typically used to classify patient response. Sixty-one patients with active RA despite methotrexate treatment, and with MRI-documented synovitis, were randomized to receive infliximab or placebo. Blood was collected at baseline and genome-wide transcription in whole blood was measured using microarrays. The primary endpoint in this study was determined by measuring the transfer rate constant (Ktrans) of a gadolinium-based contrast agent from plasma to synovium using MRI. Secondary endpoints included repeated clinical assessments with DAS28(CRP), and assessments of osteitis and synovitis by the RAMRIS method. Infliximab showed greater decrease from baseline in DCE-MRI Ktrans of wrist and MCP at all visits compared with placebo (P<0.001). Statistical analysis was performed to identify genes associated with treatment-specific 14-week change in Ktrans. The 256 genes identified were used to derive a gene signature score by averaging their log expression within each patient. The resulting score correlated with improvement of Ktrans in infliximab-treated patients and with deterioration of Ktrans in placebo-treated subjects. Poor responders showed high expression of activated B-cell genes whereas good responders exhibited a gene expression pattern consistent with mobilization of neutrophils and monocytes and high levels of reticulated platelets. This gene signature was significantly associated with clinical response in two previously published whole blood gene expression studies using anti-TNF therapies. These data provide support for the hypothesis that anti-TNF inadequate responders comprise a distinct molecular subtype of RA characterized by differences in pre-treatment blood mRNA expression. They also highlight the importance of placebo controls and robust, objective endpoints in biomarker discovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01313520.

Advanced MR techniques in multicenter clinical trials.

MRI has had a place in the clinical trials process for more than 20 years. However, for much of that time MRI has been used primarily for subjective interpretation and relatively straightforward structural measurements. More advanced MR techniques have been considered too difficult to implement consistently across multiple sites in a single trial--this despite the fact that these techniques often provide the best window into the direct effects of targeted therapeutics. As an example, numerous compounds are currently under development whose principle effect is to temporarily or permanently alter tumor microvasculature. Changes induced by these compounds typically manifest as reductions in blood flow and vascular permeability within tumors. These changes can be measured directly using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Early studies using this technique were limited to single centers, limiting both the overall size of the studies and the rate at which they were able to accrue patients. Recent efforts, however, have demonstrated that with sufficient attention to protocol design, imaging site selection and training, and analysis standardization, it is possible to obtain consistent and high quality results using even relatively complex acquisition protocols. This article will briefly review both the benefits and the drawbacks of including advanced MR techniques in clinical trial protocols. It will then review in detail the challenges presented by the need to deploy these techniques both to large research institutions and to community imaging centers which may have little or no familiarity with them at the outset of the trial.

Reproducibility of hepatic fat fraction measurement by magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-determined hepatic fat fraction (%) across imaging sites with different magnet types and field strength. Reproducibility among MRI platforms is unclear, even though evaluating hepatic fat fractions (FFs) using MRI-based methods is accurate against MR spectroscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overweight subjects were recruited to undergo eight MRI examinations at five imaging centers with a range of magnet manufacturers and field strengths (1.5 and 3 T). FFs were estimated in liver and in fat-emulsion phantoms using three methods: 1) dual-echo images without correction (nominally out-of-phase [OP] and in-phase [IP]); 2) dual-dual-echo images (two sequences) with T2* correction (nominally OP/IP and IP/IP); and 3) six-echo images with spectral model and T2* correction, at sequential alternating OP and IP echo times (Methods 1, 2, and 3, respectively). RESULTS: Ten subjects were recruited. For Methods 1, 2, and 3, respectively, hepatic FF ranged from -2.5 to 27.0, 1.9 to 29.6, and 1.3 to 34.4%. Intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.85, 0.89, and 0.91 for each method, and within-subject coefficients of variation were 18.5, 9.9, and 10.3%, respectively. Mean phantom FFs derived by Methods 2 and 3 were comparable to the known FF for each phantom. Method 1 underestimated phantom FF. CONCLUSION: Methods 2 and 3 accurately assess FF. Strong reproducibility across magnet type and strength render them suitable for use in multicenter trials and longitudinal assessments.