Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Tijdschr Psychiatr ; 62(3): 229-233, 2020.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32207133

ABSTRACT

The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2ds) is a genetic syndrome affecting multiple organ systems and is associated with increased risk of developing neuropsychiatric disorders. We describe a 15-year old female adolescent with 22q11.2ds, psychotic disorder, and catatonia. Individuals with 22q11.2ds are at increased risk of developing catatonia. Vulnerability for developing extrapyramidal symptoms and epileptic seizures may complicate pharmacological treatment for psychotic episodes. There may be a diagnostic delay of diagnosing Parkinson's disease in patients taking antipsychotics as parkinsonism may be viewed as a side effect. Health professionals working with people with 22q11.2ds should be aware of the increased prevalence of movement disorders and the threshold for referral to 22q11.2ds specialist services should be low.


Subject(s)
Catatonia , DiGeorge Syndrome , Movement Disorders , Psychotic Disorders , Adolescent , Delayed Diagnosis , DiGeorge Syndrome/diagnosis , DiGeorge Syndrome/genetics , DiGeorge Syndrome/psychology , Female , Humans , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Psychotic Disorders/genetics
2.
Pediatr Radiol ; 42(5): 574-83, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22252145

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Children with severe neurological impairment and intellectual disability (ID) are susceptible for developing low bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures. BMD is generally measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). OBJECTIVE: To describe the occurrence of factors that may influence the feasibility of DXA and the accuracy of DXA outcome in children with severe neurological impairment and ID. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on literature and expert opinion, a list of disrupting factors was developed. Occurrence of these factors was assessed in 27 children who underwent DXA measurement. RESULTS: Disrupting factors that occurred most frequently were movement during measurement (82%), aberrant body composition (67%), small length for age (56%) and scoliosis (37%). The number of disrupting factors per child was mean 5.3 (range 1-8). No correlation was found between DXA outcomes and the number of disrupting factors. CONCLUSION: Factors that may negatively influence the accuracy of DXA outcome are frequently present in children with severe neurological impairment and ID. No systematic deviation of DXA outcome in coherence with the amount of disrupting factors was found, but physicians should be aware of the possible influence of disrupting factors on the accuracy of DXA.


Subject(s)
Absorptiometry, Photon , Artifacts , Bone Density , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Bone/etiology , Intellectual Disability/complications , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Nervous System Diseases/complications , Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging , Osteoporosis/etiology , Whole Body Imaging , Adolescent , Checklist , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Male , Pilot Projects , Risk Factors , Young Adult
3.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom ; 23(22): 3549-54, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19844971

ABSTRACT

The doubly labelled water method is valuable for measuring energy expenditure in humans. It usually involves blood or urine sampling, which might be difficult in neonates and children with cerebral palsy or other disabilities. We therefore aimed to validate a method making use of saliva samples analyzed by automated thermal conversion elemental analyzer in combination with isotope ratio mass spectrometry (TC-EA/IRMS). The subjects received labelled water orally and urine and saliva samples were collected and analyzed. Deuterium as well as oxygen18 was measured in one single run using a peak jump method. Excellent linearity was found for measurement of enrichments of deuterium (R2 = 0.9999) and oxygen18 (R2 = 0.9999). The intra-assay precision and the inter-assay precision of the measurement of two standards were good for both deuterium and oxygen18. The variation between urine and saliva samples was small (4.83% for deuterium and 2.33% for oxygen18 n = 40). Saliva sampling is to be preferred, therefore, as it can be easily collected and is non-invasive. Moreover, its time of production is almost exactly known. The TC-EA/IRMS method is a good alternative to the more laborious off-line IRMS measurements.


Subject(s)
Deuterium/urine , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Oxygen Isotopes/urine , Saliva/chemistry , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Deuterium/chemistry , Humans , Mass Spectrometry/instrumentation , Oxygen Isotopes/chemistry , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...