Evaluation of ofloxacin in the treatment of laparoscopically documented acute pelvic inflammatory disease (salpingitis).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous and oral ofloxacin monotherapy in the treatment of laparoscopically documented acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). METHODS: This study was conducted as an open-label, phase-III, uncontrolled, multicenter study. Patients identified with laparoscopic findings of salpingitis were treated with 400 mg of intravenous ofloxacin every 12 hours followed by 400 mg of oral ofloxacin every 12 hours for 10 to 14 days. Patients were evaluated five times for clinical and microbial efficacy. Since laparoscopy was performed only at admission, pathogens identified laparoscopically were presumed eradicated if they were present on the laparoscopic culture and the patient was clinically cured or improved at final evaluation. RESULTS: Of the 70 patients evaluable for safety (intent-to-treat population), the mean age was 25.6 years. Sixty-one of 70 patients (87%) were cured, one improved, one did not improve, and seven were unevaluable because they discontinued study participation. Fifty-one were evaluable for clinical efficacy: 50 (98%) were cured and one did not improve. Sixteen were evaluable for expanded microbiological efficacy: three had documented Neisseria gonorrhoeae; 12, Chlamydia trachomatis; and one, a mixed infection of both organisms. All cervical, laparoscopic, and endometrial cultured pathogens, including N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis, were eradicated or presumed eradicated at the posttherapy visit. No serious or unexpected adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Ofloxacin monotherapy was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of laparoscopically proven PID in a geographically diverse population. Future studies are necessary to evaluate long-term outcomes and sequelae of PID treatment with single agent therapy.

A multicenter, investigator-blinded, randomized comparison of oral levofloxacin and oral clarithromycin in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis.

A multicenter, investigator-blinded, randomized, parallel-group study was conducted to compare oral levofloxacin 500 mg once/day for 14 days with clarithromycin 500 mg twice/day for 14 days in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis. Of 216 adult outpatients randomized to treatment, 190 were evaluable for efficacy. The primary efficacy measure was clinical response, based on resolution of signs and symptoms 2-5 days after therapy. A secondary efficacy measure was relapse rate 1 month after therapy. Among evaluable patients, clinical success rates (cured or improved) were 96.0% and 93.3% for levofloxacin (L) and clarithromycin (C), respectively (95% CI -9.2%, 3.7%). The confidence interval (CI) for treatment difference (C-L) included zero and its upper limit was less than 15%, indicating that levofloxacin was as effective as clarithromycin. In all, 4.1% of patients receiving levofloxacin and 7.2% receiving clarithromycin had a relapse of symptoms 1 month after therapy (95% CI-12.2%, 3.2%). Long-term success (initial success, absence of relapse at 1 month, no further antibacterial therapy 2-5 days after therapy) was 79.2% in the levofloxacin group and 76.4% in the clarithromycin group (95% CI -14.7%, 9.0%). Based on investigator-assessed treatment-emergent adverse events, overall tolerability of the drugs was similar, except for a higher frequency of taste perversion and diarrhea in the clarithromycin group. Levofloxacin had an advantage over clarithromycin based on two quality-of-life (QOL) parameters: number of times taking other drugs for targeted medical conditions and mean total cost of these drugs. No statistical significance was found in other QOL variables. These findings suggest that the efficacy and tolerability of levofloxacin 500 mg once/day are comparable with those of clarithromycin 500 mg twice/day in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis.

Ofloxacin versus standard therapy in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization. Pneumonia Study Group.

Community-acquired pneumonia occurs 3 to 4 million times per year in the United States, accounting for about 500,000 hospitalizations annually. Empiric treatment is usually instituted because of a lack of early organism-specific diagnostic tests. This study compared empiric therapy with ofloxacin to standard antibiotic regimens (usually a beta-lactam with or without a macrolide) for patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia. Therapy was administered to 298 patients (146 receiving ofloxacin and 152 receiving standard therapy); 227 patients (ofloxacin, 109; standard treatment, 118) were evaluable for treatment efficacy. The most common pyogenic respiratory pathogens were Haemophilus influenzae (30 isolates) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (24 isolates). There was evidence of infection with either Mycoplasma pneumoniae (38 patients), Chlamydia pneumoniae (40 patients), or a Legionella sp. (8 patients) in a total of 79 patients (35%). The clinical success rates were similar in both groups among evaluable patients (92%, ofloxacin; 87%, standard therapy) and among patients with atypical respiratory pathogens (88%, ofloxacin; 81%, standard therapy). The mean numbers (+/- the standard deviations) of intravenous doses of antibiotics were 7.5 +/- 8.0 in the ofloxacin group and 18.4 +/- 18.5 in the standard therapy group (P < 0.001); the mean number of oral doses of ofloxacin per patient was 19.7 +/- 11.2, compared with 30.2 +/- 16.0 oral antibiotic doses in the standard therapy group (P < 0.001). All treatments were well tolerated and associated with no significant clinical or laboratory abnormalities. The findings of this study indicate that ofloxacin is active against traditional bacterial pathogens as well as the major atypical respiratory pathogens. When given as monotherapy for the empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, ofloxacin is as effective as standard antimicrobial therapy.

alpha-Hydroxy phosphinyl-based inhibitors of human renin.

The design and application of alpha-hydroxy phosphonates, a new class of transition state analogs, toward the discovery of novel and potent inhibitors of the aspartyl protease renin is described. Tripeptidic alpha-hydroxy diethyl phosphonate 3, the first example in this series, was found to be a good inhibitor of human renin (IC50 = 29 nM), and preliminary studies led to the choice of alpha-hydroxy dimethyl phosphonate 15 (IC50 = 16 nM) as a base-line compound for further structure-activity relationship study. Corresponding phosphinate (28-30) and phosphine oxide (23 and 24) analogs of 15 were prepared to assess the steric and electronic requirements around the phosphorus center. Evaluation of these analogs suggested that the presence of at least one alkoxy group on phosphorus was a critical requirement for good activity. Inhibitors with leucine at P2 possessed better in vitro activity than the corresponding P2 histidine analogs (15, IC50 = 16 nM vs 37, IC50 = 220 nM; 33, IC50 = 8.5 nM vs 40, IC50 = 41 nM). Compound 34 (IC50 = 31 nM), the P3 aminocaproic analog of 15, showed complete and long-lasting inhibition of plasma renin activity while eliciting a 10-15 mmHg drop in mean arterial pressure when administered intravenously at 1 mumol/kg in conscious, sodium-depleted, cynomolgus monkeys. In summary, the alpha-hydroxy phosphonates represent a promising and structurally novel class of transition state analog inhibitors of human renin.

Activated ketone based inhibitors of human renin.

Application of the concept of activated ketones to the design of novel and potent transition-state analog inhibitors of the aspartyl protease renin is described. Three different classes of peptidic activated ketones were synthesized: 1,1,1-trifluoromethyl ketones, alpha-keto esters, and alpha-diketones. The corresponding alcohols were also evaluated as renin inhibitors in each series. While the trifluoromethyl alcohol 12 (I50 = 4000 nM) was equipotent to the simple methyl alcohol 7 (I50 = 3200 nM), the structurally similar alpha-hydroxy esters (32 and 30, I50's = 5.3 and 4.7 nM, respectively) and alpha-hydroxy ketones (41 and 42, I50 = 23 and 15 nM, respectively) were 150-300-fold more active. The hydrating capability of the activated ketone functionality was important for intrinsic potency in the case of trifluoromethyl ketones, as illustrated by the significantly better activity of trifluoromethyl ketone 13 (I50 = 250 nM) compared to its alcohol analog 12 (I50 = 4000 nM). It was however unimportant for the alpha-keto ester (20 and 31, I50 = 15 and 4.1 nM, respectively) and alpha-diketone (43 and 44, I50 = 52 and 28 nM, respectively) based inhibitors, since their activity was essentially similar to that of the corresponding alcohols. These results collectively suggest that, whereas the trifluoromethyl ketones derive their renin inhibitory potency primarily from their ability to become hydrated, this is not a critical feature for the activity of alpha-dicarbonyl-based inhibitors. The alpha-keto ester and alpha-diketone based renin inhibitors benefit predominantly from the hydrophobic and/or H-bonding type binding interactions of the neighboring ester or acyl group itself, rather than the ability of this group to deactivate the adjacent ketone group and thereby make it susceptible to hydration.