Risk of institutionalization following fragility fractures in older people.

Previously independent living older people suffering fractures of the hip have a high risk of new admission to a nursing home during the subsequent months. This study shows that older people admitted to hospital for fractures of the pelvis and spine have a similar risk of admission to a nursing home. INTRODUCTION: Fall-related fractures are a serious threat to the health and well-being of older persons. Long-term consequences of hip fractures such as institutionalization and mortality are well-known. The impact of other fragility fractures is less well-understood. The aim of this study was to estimate risks of institutionalization and death for different fragility fractures and compare them with the corresponding risks after hip fracture. METHODS: Data was retrieved from a German health insurance company. Between 2005 and 2008 more than 56,000 community-dwelling people with a hospital admission or discharge diagnosis of a fracture of the femur, spine, pelvis, proximal humerus, distal radius, tibia, or fibula were included. Crude and age-adjusted 6-month incidence rates for institutionalization and death were calculated. To compare the risks of institutionalization or mortality of non-hip fractures with the risk after hip fracture, multivariate regression models were applied. RESULTS: Crude institutionalization rates and mortality were highest in patients with hip fracture. However, after adjustment for age, functional status, and comorbidity, risks of institutionalization after fractures of pelvis (relative risk (RR), 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86; 1.02 in women and 0.89; 95% CI 0.70; 1.12 in men), and spine (RR, 0.95; 95% CI 0.87; 1.03 in women and 0.91; 95% CI 0.76; 1.08 in men) were not statistically different compared to the risk after hip fracture. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of institutionalization after fractures of the spine and pelvis was similar to the risk after hip fracture. These fracture sites seem to be associated with a significant decline in physical function.

[AltersTraumaZentrum DGU®]. / AltersTraumaZentrum DGU®

Orthopaedic surgeons are faced with a large number of geriatric patients. An ageing society will lead to a significant increase in the number of geriatric patients in orthopaedic trauma units in the future. Due to the significant number of comorbidities an orthogeriatric service seems to be effective during acute care to maintain patients' independency. During the last 2 years the orthopaedic and geriatric medical societies in Germany have developed joint criteria for orthopaedic-geriatric trauma centres. These were evaluated and improved during a pilot certification procedure. The German trauma society (DGU) is now starting the certification procedure AltersTraumaZentrum DGU®. Simultaneously a geriatric trauma registery for hip fractures (AltersTraumaRegister DGU®) is being established in Germany. All certified hospitals will have to participate in the registery. This will allow the participants to benchmark their own results with the data from the registery. Because of the identical core data set comparisons with similar international registeries will also be possible.

[Subsequent treatment following proximal femoral fracture - who, when, where? Assessment of the current situation in Germany]. / Weiterbehandlung nach proximaler Femurfraktur - Wer, wann, wohin? Eine deutschlandweite Statuserhebung mit Unterstützung der AG Alterstraumatologie der DGU.

BACKGROUND: Geriatric fractures are an increasing challenge for the German health-care system. While the acute care for patients with proximal femoral fractures is already standardised, differences remain in the further treatment and rehabilitation. A survey was conducted in cooperation with the section of geriatric trauma (AG Alterstraumatologie) of the German Association of Trauma Surgery (DGU) to point out existing problems in this group of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In October/November 2010 an electronic questionnaire, assessing the medical care for patients after proximal femoral fracture, was sent to 1080 medical directors of trauma and orthopaedic surgery departments in Germany. RESULTS: 339 (31.4 %) departments participated. The analysis revealed that 57 % of the hospitals had cooperation agreements with aftercare hospitals. 37 % of all hospitals had problems in finding a rehabilitation hospital. The initiation of a rehabilitation procedure is almost exclusively based on the doctors' decision. Influence of employees with other professions is marginal. Mobility and Barthel index before the release from the acute care hospital are major factors in the decision making. CONCLUSION: The questionnaire confirms that there are problems in the aftercare service of geriatric patients all around Germany. A further improvement of collaboration between acute and aftercare hospitals is required.