Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e084716, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697762

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: General practitioners (GPs) are mostly the first point of contact for patients with health problems in Germany. There is only a limited epidemiological overview data that describe the GP consultation hours based on other than billing data. Therefore, the aim of Saxon Epidemiological Study in General Practice-6 (SESAM-6) is to examine the frequency of reasons for encounter, prevalence of long-term diagnosed diseases and diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in general practice. This knowledge is fundamental to identify the healthcare needs and to develop strategies to improve the GP care. The results of the study will be incorporated into the undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing medical education for GP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This cross-sectional study SESAM-6 is conducted in general practices in the state of Saxony, Germany. The study design is based on previous SESAM studies. Participating physicians are assigned to 1 week per quarter (over a survey period of 12 months) in which every fifth doctor-patient contact is recorded for one-half of the day (morning or afternoon). To facilitate valid statements, a minimum of 50 GP is required to document a total of at least 2500 doctor-patient contacts. Univariable, multivariable and subgroup analyses as well as comparisons to the previous SESAM data sets will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Technical University of Dresden in March 2023 (SR-EK-7502023). Participation in the study is voluntary and will not be remunerated. The study results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, preferably with open access. They will also be disseminated at scientific and public symposia, congresses and conferences. A final report will be published to summarise the central results and provided to all study participants and the public.


Subject(s)
General Practice , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , General Practice/statistics & numerical data , Germany/epidemiology , Epidemiologic Studies , Research Design , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data
2.
Gesundheitswesen ; 85(S 03): S183-S188, 2023 Sep.
Article in English, German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37751754

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: 54% of the German population has limited health literacy, which is associated with poorer health outcomes and higher utilization of the healthcare system. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this pilot study was to examine the effects of an easy-to-understand patient letter on patients' health literacy after discharge from a Clinic for Internal Medicine and to analyze patients' need for written, easy-to-understand information. METHOD: In a randomized controlled trial (2016-2018), the effects of the patient letter on health literacy were examined by means of the HLS-EU-Q47 questionnaire. The intervention group (IG, n=242) received an easy-to-understand patient letter 3 days after discharge, the control group (KG, n=175) received only the usual medical discharge letter. RESULTS: 60% of post-discharge patients were found to have limited health literacy. The study could not show any effect of patient letters on overall health literacy. The analysis of single items of health literacy showed positive effects of these letters on patients' comprehension of medical advice as well as their understanding and implementation of medication instructions (Cohens d≥0.20). Furthermore, patients expressed their wish for information after discharge from hospital (99%) and rated the patient letter as informative, understandable and helpful. CONCLUSIONS: Patients wish to receive and are empowered by an easy-to-understand letter after discharge from hospital with medical information and medical instructions that they can implement at home.


Subject(s)
Health Literacy , Humans , Aftercare , Patient Discharge , Pilot Projects , Germany/epidemiology , Hospitals
3.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37737318

ABSTRACT

Patients with migration history often encounter barriers to accessing healthcare in Germany, which lowers the quality of care available to them and can affect their overall health. These barriers in access to healthcare are due to both adverse health policies and a lack of migration-related - and diversity-sensitive - content in medical and other health profession teaching. Although most healthcare professionals regularly care for patients with individual or generational migration experience in Germany, teaching content relevant to the healthcare of these patients has not yet been anchored in the curriculum. At best, it is taught in the form of electives or other optional courses.To address this gap, the Teaching Network Migration and Health was created with the goal of promoting the development of human rights-based, diversity-sensitive, and equity-oriented curricula at medical and healthcare professions schools. It aims to (1) connect individuals active in teaching and promote the exchange and collaborative development of teaching materials, (2) use this collective knowledge and experience to develop a model course on migration and health, and (3) develop strategies for the longitudinal implementation of this course into the regular medical and other health professional school curricula. These efforts are flanked by evaluative accompanying research. Anyone interested in joining the network is invited to join and strengthen the network by contacting the authors.


Subject(s)
Health Education , Schools , Humans , Germany , Educational Status , Curriculum
4.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 15462, 2023 09 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37726327

ABSTRACT

Medical students are a vulnerable group for harmful health behaviours due to academic stress. Increased screen time is associated with adverse health behaviour, particularly delayed bedtime, shorter sleep duration and poorer sleep quality. This possible relationship has not yet been examined among medical students in Europe. Medical students at the Technical University of Dresden were invited to participate in an online questionnaire based cross-sectional study. To analyse correlations between screen time and sleep parameters, correlation coefficients, linear regression and mixed-model analysis were calculated. 415 students (average age 24 years, 70% female) were included in the analysis. The students reported an average of 7 h screen time per day and 7.25 h sleep duration per night. Approximately 23% (n = 97) reported sleeping less than 7 h per night and 25% (n = 105) reported fairly to very poor sleep quality. Students who reported more screen time for leisure went to bed significantly later (r = 0.213, p < 0.001). Students who spent more screen time for study/work tended to sleep shorter (r = - 0.108, p < 0.015). There was no significant association between screen time and sleep quality (p = 0.103). The results show a need for educational interventions to promote healthy sleep behaviour and to limit screen time.


Subject(s)
Students, Medical , Female , Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Screen Time , Sleep , Germany/epidemiology
5.
BMJ Open ; 13(4): e071230, 2023 04 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37185187

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular diseases are the most common cause of death in Germany and among the most frequent reasons for encounters in primary care. Most patients with cardiovascular risks (CVRs) have difficulties implementing health-promoting behavioural changes. In this study, a complex intervention containing evidence-based patient materials and structured follow-up consultations are intended to strengthen patients' self-management to improve health behaviour. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this cluster randomised controlled trial, we investigate the effects of the intervention "Decision aid, action planning and follow-up support for patients to reduce the 10-year risk of cardiovascular diseases" (DECADE) using a 2×2 design. All patients, including the control group (CG), receive a CVR calculation. Three intervention groups (IGs) receive one or both of two different components of the DECADE intervention: IG1 (patient materials), IG2 (follow-up consultations) and IG3 (patient materials and follow-up consultations). The study was planned to be conducted with 77 general practitioners in 3 German regions and a target sample size of 924 patients. The observation period for each patient amounts to 12 months with three patient surveys: baseline (t0), after 6 and 12 months (t1 and t2). The primary outcome is patient activation (Patient Activation Measure 13 (PAM13-D)) at t1. Secondary outcomes include PAM13-D at t2 and further patient-reported and clinical outcomes at t1 and t2. We will also analyse the cost-effectiveness of the intervention, the degree of usage and satisfaction with the intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was first approved by the lead ethics committee of the University of Freiburg on 15 April 2021 (vote number: 21-1078) and subsequently by the other ethics committees in the study regions (Ethics committee of medical association Baden-Württemberg (B-F-2021-078), Ethics Committee of the Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden (BO-EK-251052021), Ethics Committee of the State Chamber of Physicians of Saxony (EK-BR-92/21-1), Ethics Committee of the Hamburg Medical Association (2021-200013-BO-bet)). Informed consent is required for patients to participate in the study. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at congresses by the DECADE team. The DECADE lead management will communicate the results to the funder of this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00025401 (registration date: 21 June 2021); International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, DRKS00025401.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Self-Management , Humans , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Patients , Health Behavior , Primary Health Care , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
6.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0262171, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34972197

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Childhood Diabetes Registry of Saxony has been existing since 1999. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence rates, cohort and point prevalence, and the trends of type 1 diabetes among children and adolescents based on the registry data over the past 21 years. METHODS: A completeness check of the Childhood Diabetes Registry of Saxony for the observation period 2012-2019 was performed using the capture-recapture method. The age-standardized incidence rates per 100,000 person years (PY) were estimated for the observation period 1999-2019. Prevalence was estimated per 100,000 children and adolescents as the point prevalence of five consecutive years, and as a cohort prevalence for the birth cohorts, which result from the difference of age and year at diagnosis. Trend analyses were executed using join point regression. RESULTS: A completeness of 98% (95% CI 89-100) was determined for the period from 2012 to 2019. The standardized incidence rate of type 1 diabetes among children and adolescents increased from 17.1 per 100,000 PY in 1999 to 24.7 per 100,000 PY in 2019. If this trend continues, the incidence rate will increase to 34.8 (95% CI 24.4-49.6) per 100,000 PY in 2030. The point prevalence of 5 consecutive years did not show a continuous trend over time. According to this method, the prevalence reached a plateau in the last segment (2013-2019). The calculation of cohort prevalence indicated a continuous increase from 2013 to 2019 with no significant statistical difference in terms of sex. CONCLUSION: The point prevalence and the last incidence rates indicate that type 1 diabetes of children and adolescents is slowing down or has reached a plateau in Saxony. Nevertheless, the cohort prevalence predicts a steady increase. Future studies should continue investigating these trends in a longer observation period and consider including possible correlating environmental factors.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Hospitals, Pediatric , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Data Collection/methods , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Prevalence , Registries , Regression Analysis
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33924494

ABSTRACT

Self-management education (SME) is a key determinant of diabetes treatment outcomes. While SME programs are often adapted for implementation, the impact of adaptations on diabetes SME effectiveness is not well documented. This study evaluated the impact of the implementation fidelity of diabetes SME programs on program effectiveness, exploring which factors influence implementation fidelity. Data from 33 type 2 diabetes SME program providers and 166 patients were collected in 8 countries (Austria, Belgium, Germany, Ireland, UK, Israel, Taiwan and USA). Program providers completed a questionnaire assessing their adherence to the program protocol and factors that influenced the implementation. Patients answered a pre-post questionnaire assessing their diabetes-related health literacy, self-care behavior, general health and well-being. Associations between implementation fidelity and outcomes were estimated through logistic regressions and repeated measures MANOVA, controlling for potential confounders. Adaptations of the program protocol regarding content, duration, frequency and/or coverage were reported by 39% of the providers and were associated with better, not worse, outcomes than strict adherence. None of the factors related to the participants, facilitating strategies, provider or context systematically influenced the implementation fidelity. Future research should focus on individual and contextual factors that may influence decisions to adapt SME programs for diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Self-Management , Austria , Belgium , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Germany , Humans , Ireland , Israel , Program Evaluation , Taiwan
8.
Subst Use Misuse ; 56(4): 493-500, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33557674

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medical students as future physicians will have an important role in tobacco control; therefore, their tobacco use behavior is of particular interest. Consumption of combustible tobacco (cigarettes, waterpipes, cigars, and pipes) is prevalent throughout Europe, whereas smokeless tobacco use is common mainly in the Nordic countries. Objectives: Aim of our study is to assess tobacco use among medical students from different countries studying in Hungary with special focus on students from Norway where smokeless tobacco is widely used. A self-administered questionnaire survey was carried out to measure current tobacco use. Results: The survey included 1337 students from Hungary, Norway, Germany, and from other countries (Multinational group). The lowest prevalence of cigarette smoking was found among students from Norway (13.0%) when compared with students from Hungary (21.5%), Germany (34.2%), or with students in the Multinational group (29.5%). Conversely, prevalence of smokeless tobacco use was the highest among students from Norway (40.9%) when compared with students from Hungary (1.4%), Germany (2.6%), or with students in the Multinational group (6.2%). Waterpipes, cigars, and pipes were rarely used, mostly only 1-3 times a month in all groups. More than half of Norwegian students used some form of tobacco (smokeless and/or combustible tobacco). Conclusions: Considering the impending role of medical students in tobacco control, faculties of medicine should sensitize their students on the topic of possible health risks associated with combustible and smokeless tobacco products. Culturally tailored tobacco cessation programs need to be offered to medical students coming from different cultural backgrounds.


Subject(s)
Students, Medical , Tobacco Products , Tobacco, Smokeless , Europe , Germany , Humans , Hungary/epidemiology , Norway/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Tobacco Smoking
9.
Subst Use Misuse ; 55(13): 2109-2115, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32646285

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) is gaining popularity among young adults. Medical students' nicotine use behavior is of particular interest because of their impending role in health promotion. Objectives: Aim of our study is to assess changes that occurred between 2016 and 2018 in the prevalence of e-cigarette use among medical students and to explore associations between e-cigarette use, demographic characteristics, and cigarette smoking. Self-administered questionnaire surveys were used to obtain cross-sectional data of medical students in Budapest and Pécs, Hungary, and Dresden, Germany. Results: Sample sizes for 2016 and 2018 were 2297 and 1514, respectively. In the whole sample, past-30-day use of e-cigarettes increased from 4.5% to 8.0% (p < 0.001). The increase in e-cigarette use was significant in both genders (from 3.6% to 5.6% among females, p = 0.028, and from 5.9 to 11.4% among males, p < 0.001). Prevalence of e-cigarette use was higher among Hungarian students than among German students (2.2% versus 5.7% in 2016, and 4.1% versus 10.5% in 2018, p < 0.05 for both years). There was no significant difference in e-cigarette use among different academic years. The ratio of e-cigarette users increased significantly among current cigarette smokers but not among nonsmokers. We could not detect a decrease in cigarette smoking. Conclusions: Prevalence of e-cigarette use increased significantly among medical students without a reduction in cigarette smoking. Medical schools should add the topic of e-cigarettes to their curricula and need to develop cessation programs to help their students quit both cigarettes and e-cigarettes.


Subject(s)
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Students, Medical , Vaping , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Hungary/epidemiology , Male , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
10.
BMC Med Educ ; 19(1): 94, 2019 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30935393

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing evidence of a negative impact of medical school on students' health and well-being, little is known about protective factors for staying healthy and well during medical education. Therefore, a systematic review of peer-reviewed studies aiming to identify such predictors was conducted. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and PsychInfo were systematically searched by using preselected MeSH terms to identify English- and German-language peer-reviewed articles (observational studies) examining predictors for medical students' health and well-being, published between January 2001 and April 2018. Two authors independently selected abstracts reporting predictors for medical students' health and well-being. Further, two authors extracted information from the identified studies, needed for methodological quality assessment of the studies, as well as for comprehensive description of identified predictors. RESULTS: From 5013 hits in the database search, six observational studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. These studies were of heterogeneous design and quality. They featured a wide variety of health and well-being related outcomes and of its predictors. Lower levels of perceived stress, as well as lower levels of neuroticism were found to predict better health-related outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Further research, by using harmonized tools for the assessment of outcomes, as well as predictors, is needed to determine what keeps students healthy and well during medical education. Identifying protective factors is an essential prerequisite for the design of evidence-based health-promoting interventions.


Subject(s)
Occupational Health , Protective Factors , Schools, Medical , Students, Medical/psychology , Education, Medical , Faculty, Medical , Humans , Observational Studies as Topic
11.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 182, 2019 Feb 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30755203

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medical students are at risk of contracting and transmitting infectious diseases such as pertussis. Complete vaccination status is important to protect own, patient and public health. Knowing own vaccination status is elementary for following current vaccination recommendations, including boosters. We aimed to assess pertussis vaccination status and vaccination acceptance among medical students of different nationalities. METHODS: A cross-sectional multicenter health survey at German and Hungarian universities enclosed international medical students in the 1st, 3rd and 5th year of study. Self-reported data from 2655 students regarding pertussis vaccination status were analyzed. Subgroup analysis enclosed data of German (n = 1217), Hungarian (n = 960) and other nationality (n = 478) students ("other"). RESULTS: More Hungarians reported basic immunization (39.0% vs 15.8% Germans vs 24.3% others, p ≤ 0.05). Booster vaccination was reported more by Germans (60.5% vs 43.6% Hungarians vs 36.0% others, p ≤ 0.05). Germans were more likely to report being unvaccinated (3.7% vs 0.9% Hungarians, p ≤ 0.05). More medical students of other nationalities were unaware of their pertussis vaccination status (37.4% vs 20.0% Germans/ 16.5% Hungarians, p ≤ 0.05). 75.2% (n = 1931) rated pertussis vaccinations as absolutely necessary (86.2% Hungarians vs 69.8% Germans/ 66.1% others, p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Positive attitudes towards vaccinations were reported but a large group reported insufficient vaccination status and being not aware of their status, especially among international students. Hungarians possibly have a better vaccination status than reported, based on mandatory vaccinations in childhood. The low awareness of vaccination status has implications for future booster vaccinations. All students should be informed about current recommendations and receive vaccination offers in frames of low-threshold medical services.


Subject(s)
Pertussis Vaccine/administration & dosage , Students, Medical/psychology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Germany , Health Care Surveys , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Hungary , Immunization, Secondary/statistics & numerical data , Male , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Universities , Young Adult
12.
J Diabetes Res ; 2018: 1467171, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29850598

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is considered essential for improving the prevention and care of diabetes through empowering patients to increase agency in their own health and care processes. However, existing evidence regarding DSME in the EU Member States (EU MS) is insufficient to develop an EU-wide strategy. OBJECTIVES: This study presents the state of DSME in the 28 EU MS and contrasts it with 3 non-EU countries with comparable Human Development Index score: Israel, Taiwan, and the USA (ITU). Because type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) disproportionately affects minority and low-income groups, we paid particular attention to health literacy aspects of DSME for vulnerable populations. METHODS: Data from multiple stakeholders involved in diabetes care were collected from Feb 2014 to Jan 2015 using an online Diabetes Literacy Survey (DLS). Of the 379 respondents (249 from EU MS and 130 from ITU), most were people with diabetes (33% in the EU MS, 15% in ITU) and care providers (47% and 72%). These data were supplemented by an expert survey (ES) administered to 30 key informants. RESULTS: Access to DSME varies greatly in the EU MS: an average of 29% (range 21% to 50%) of respondents report DSME programs are tailored for people with limited literacy, educational attainment, and language skills versus 63% in ITU. More than half of adult T2DM patients and children/adolescents participate in DSME in EU MS; in ITU, participation of T1DM patients and older people is lower. Prioritization of DSME (6.1 ± 2.8 out of 10) and the level of satisfaction with the current state of DSME (5.0 ± 2.4 out of 10) in the EU MS were comparable with ITU. CONCLUSION: Variation in availability and organization of DSME in the EU MS presents a clear rationale for developing an EU-wide diabetes strategy to improve treatment and care for people with diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Health Literacy , Patient Education as Topic , Self Care , Self-Management , Adolescent , Adult , European Union , Humans , Israel , Patient Participation , Taiwan , United States
13.
BMC Public Health ; 18(1): 591, 2018 05 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29724200

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death worldwide. Besides cigarette smoking, waterpipe and e-cigarettes are gaining popularity among young adults. Medical students' smoking behavior is of particular interest because of their impending role in health promotion as future physicians. Aim of our study is to examine the prevalence and predictors of cigarette, waterpipe and e-cigarette use and the association of tobacco use with self-reported health status in an international sample of medical students. METHODS: In a multicenter cross-sectional study data on different aspects of health behavior were collected from medical students of 65 nationalities using a self-administered questionnaire in Germany (Dresden, Munich) and Hungary (Budapest, Pécs). The survey was conducted among 1st, 3rd and 5th year students. To explore associations between smoking behavior and socio-cultural factors Pearson's chi2-tests and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: The largest subpopulations were formed by German (n = 1289), Hungarian (n = 1055) and Norwegian (n = 147) students. Mean age was 22.5 ± 3.3 years. Females represented 61.6% of the sample. In the whole sample prevalence of cigarette smoking was 18.0% (95% CI 16.6-19.4%), prevalence of waterpipe use was 4.8% (95% CI 4.0-5.7%), that of e-cigarette 0.9% (95% CI 0.5-1.2%). More males (22.0%) than females (15.5%) reported cigarette smoking. The lowest prevalence of cigarette smoking was found among Norwegian students (6.2%). Cigarette smokers were older, waterpipe users were younger than non-users. E-cigarette use was not associated with age of the students. Religious involvement was protective only against cigarette smoking. Financial situation showed no association with any kind of tobacco consumption. Cigarette smokers and e-cigarette users were less likely to report very good or excellent health status. CONCLUSIONS: Cigarette smoking is still the most popular way of consuming tobacco, although alternative tobacco use is also prevalent among medical students. To further health consciousness, medical schools should pay more attention to students' health behavior, especially their smoking habits. Tobacco prevention and cessation programs for medical students should consider not only the health risks of cigarette smoking but the need to discourage other forms of tobacco use, such as waterpipe.


Subject(s)
Cigarette Smoking/epidemiology , Students, Medical/psychology , Vaping/epidemiology , Water Pipe Smoking/epidemiology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Hungary/epidemiology , Internationality , Male , Prevalence , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
14.
Prim Care Diabetes ; 11(6): 529-537, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28663021

ABSTRACT

Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is generally considered as an integral part of diabetes care. The availability of different types of self-management in the European Union Member States (EUMS) remains uncertain. The aim of this study is to perform a comparative analysis of existing DSME programs (DSMEP) implemented in EUMS. Unpublished data regarding DSME in the EUMS was assessed with Diabetes Literacy Survey using wiki tool (WT) targeting patients and different stakeholders. An additional literature review (LR) was performed in PubMed to identify published studies regarding DSMEP in the EUMS from 2004 to 2014. A total of 102 DSMEP implemented in EUMS were reported in the WT and 154 programs were identified from the LR. Comparative analysis of the data indicated that a majority of programs are aimed at adults and only a minority at children and elderly. Only a small percentage of the programs utilize information technology for teaching and learning, and only one out of five programs pay attention to depression. The identified DSMEP aimed primarily to empower patients through increasing knowledge and changing attitudes and beliefs towards diabetes. This study provides an overview of the present state-of-the-art on diabetes self-management education programs in the 28 EUMS. To increase participation, existing DSMEP should be made more accessible to the patients as well as tailored to specific patient groups.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , National Health Programs , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Self Care/methods , Counseling , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/psychology , Europe , European Union , Health Literacy , Health Services Research , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Patient Care Team , Patient Participation , Peer Group , Program Evaluation
16.
BMC Public Health ; 16: 576, 2016 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27422635

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Physical and mental health is important for coping with the high requirements of medical studies that are associated with a higher risk for severe stress, insomnia, smoking, harmful alcohol consumption and easier access to drugs. Health behaviors of medical students influence not just their own health but also the health of their future patients. We examined whether socio-cultural factors can explain differences in students' health status and health-promoting behaviors. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional survey in Germany (Dresden, Munich) and Hungary (Budapest, Pécs) enclosed international medical students in their 1st, 3rd and 5th academic years. The students were invited to voluntarily and anonymously complete a questionnaire on different aspects of health behavior during obligatory seminars and lectures in 2014. The response rate of the total sample was 56.2 % (n = 2935); the subgroup analysis enclosed data of German (n = 1289), Hungarian (n = 1057) and Norwegian (n = 148) students. RESULTS: A high number of Norwegian students (84.5 %) assessed their health status as very good/excellent. In comparison, only 60.3 % of the Hungarian and 70.7 % of the German participants reported a very good/excellent health status. The distributions were comparable between the study sites. Although gender, financial situation and nationality were significant health status predictors, they could explain only 8.2 % of the total variance of health status in the multivariable model. A comparably high number of Hungarian students (95.3 % vs. 67.4 % German and 56.7 % Norwegian) reported that they can currently do a lot/very much for their health. In contrast, a significant number of Norwegians (73.0 % vs. 63.7 % Hungarian and 51.5 % German) reported that they currently do a lot/very much for their health (chi(2)-test, p ≤ 0.001). Financial situation, study site and study year were the strongest predictors for health promotion activities (Nagelkerkes R(2) = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our study, gender and study year played only a minor role in the health status and health promotion beliefs and activities of medical students. Structural (study site) and somewhat socio-cultural factors (nationality, financial situation) mainly explained the differences regarding health promoting behaviors. Obligatory, free-of-charge courses for health promotion (activity and relaxation) should be included in study curriculums.


Subject(s)
Health Behavior/ethnology , Health Promotion/statistics & numerical data , Health Status , Students, Medical/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Hungary/epidemiology , Male , Norway/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
17.
Pflege ; 29(4): 205-12, 2016 07.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27239741

ABSTRACT

Background: Health care workers can be multiplicators for infectious diseases due to their patient contacts. Vaccinations are not mandatory in Germany but there are recommendations for people at higher risk such as health care workers. There is no representative data regarding vaccination status of health care workers in Germany. Aim: We examined vaccination status among nurses regarding diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, hepatitis A (HA) and hepatitis B (HB) as well as correlations between age, professional years, vaccination status and acceptance. Methods: An anonymous cross sectional survey concerning health burden and health behavior including vaccination was conducted among health care workers. Statistical analysis using SPSS included descriptive analysis, subgroup specific differences of distribution were tested by chi2-tests. Results: Regardless of age or professional years, 99 % of the nurses evaluated that vaccinations are at least "partly necessary". Sufficient vaccination status was reported more often concerning tetanus (82 %) and HB (70 %) but less often regarding diphtheria (52 %), poliomyelitis (49 %), HA (43 %) and pertussis (42 %). With respect to some vaccinations, proportion of nurses not knowing their vaccination status was higher than 20 %. Conclusions: Despite the high vaccination acceptance, vaccination status among participating nurses was not sufficient. Implementation of vaccination measures targeting health care workers should be strengthened to reach higher vaccination coverages to prevent vaccination preventable infectious diseases among health care workers and patients in hospitals.


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control/statistics & numerical data , Cross Infection/nursing , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Germany , Humans , Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Immunization, Secondary/statistics & numerical data
18.
Am J Infect Control ; 43(12): 1363-5, 2015 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26654238

ABSTRACT

Germany aimed to eliminate measles by 2015, but vaccination coverage is still insufficient, especially in respect to adolescents and young adults. A cross-sectional survey with 711 students studying a range of subjects showed a high acceptance regarding vaccination. Actual self-reported vaccination rates were lower; only 65.5% of medical students and 25.3%-39.4% of other student groups reported complete vaccination against measles. Of the students, 12.6%-45% did not know their vaccination status. Vaccination acceptance did not correlate with vaccination behavior: accessible vaccination opportunities at universities should be offered.


Subject(s)
Measles/prevention & control , Students , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Medication Adherence , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Universities , Young Adult
19.
Aging Male ; 15(4): 220-6, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22943388

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is one of the most common diseases affecting elderly persons. Male patients with osteoporosis have rarely been the focus of earlier studies. This study explores health related quality of life (HRQoL) indicators in a sample of German male patients with osteoporosis to determine potential avenues for clinical practice changes. METHODS: This cross-sectional study describes two HRQoL indicators (EQ5D and QUALEFFO-41) in a sample of male patients being treated for osteoporosis. Questionnaires were sent to all male patients being treated at the Dresden University Hospital outpatient endocrine clinic. Of the 344 patients invited to participate in the study 155 (57.2%) were included. RESULTS: Overall HRQoL EQ-5D-scores for male patients with osteoporosis were greater than those of comparable groups of the German population. Patients with ≥2 fractures had the highest level of impairment in HRQoL. Of all the dimensions of EQ-5D-scores, pain/discomfort was the most affected. Better HRQoL (median values <10.0/QUALEFFO-41 scores) were detected in the whole sample for jobs around the house, activities of daily living and mobility compared to other dimensions. The highest levels of impairment were observed in the QUALEFFO-41 domains of general health perception, mental function and pain. CONCLUSION: This analysis confirms the association between number of fractures and worse estimation of HRQoL in male patients. Because men are 3 times less likely to suffer from osteoporosis than women, the specific HRQoL characteristics of male patients with this disease can often be overlooked. Clinicians should consider mental health referral especially for osteoporotic male patients having experienced ≥2 fractures.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Osteoporosis , Quality of Life , Activities of Daily Living , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Fractures, Bone/physiopathology , Germany , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/physiopathology , Osteoporosis/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
20.
J Altern Complement Med ; 17(3): 225-30, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21385086

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Migraine is one of the most prevalent neurological disorders in Europe, severely affecting ability to work and quality of life. Medical therapies are considered to be the "gold standard" of treatment. This study addresses osteopathic treatment for acute therapy or prophylactic therapy as an alternative to traditional therapies. DESIGN: Forty-two (42) female patients with migraine were randomized into an intervention group (n = 21) and a control group (n = 21). Outcomes were evaluated with three questionnaires before the treatment (t1) and 6 months later (t2). INTERVENTIONS: The intervention group received five 50-minute osteopathic manipulative treatments (OMT) over a 10-week period. The control group did not receive OMT, sham treatment, or physical therapy. Patients of this group only filled the questionnaires. Both groups continued with previously prescribed medication. METHODS: The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires as well as a German "pain questionnaire" were used to assess pain intensity, the impact of migraine on daily life and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and the number of days subjects suffered from migraine. RESULTS: Three (3) of the eight HRQoL domains of the SF-36 form in the intervention group showed significant improvement (from t1 to t2), with a general betterment exhibited in the other domains. The total MIDAS score, pain intensity, and disturbance in occupation due to migraine as well as number of days of disablements were also significantly reduced. The control group showed insignificant differences in these areas. CONCLUSIONS: This study affirms the effects of OMT on migraine headache in regard to decreased pain intensity and the reduction of number of days with migraine as well as working disability, and partly on improvement of HRQoL. Future studies with a larger sample size should reproduce the results with a control group receiving placebo treatment in a long-term follow-up.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Manipulation, Osteopathic , Migraine Disorders/therapy , Quality of Life , Absenteeism , Adult , Employment , Female , Health , Humans , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/complications , Pain/etiology , Pain Management , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...