Cribado de neoplasia intraepitelial anal en pacientes con infección por virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana / Anal intraepithelial neoplasia screening in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection

Introducción: la incidencia de cáncer anal ha aumentadoen los últimos años, por lo que el cribado y la detecciónprecoz de la neoplasia intraepitelial anal (AIN) en pacientesde riesgo son una necesidad.Métodos: se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivode pacientes homosexuales (HSH) o mujeres con neoplasiacervical intraepitelial grado III (CIN III), con infección porvirus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (PVIH), incluidos enun programa de cribado de detección de AIN entre marzode 2016 y septiembre de 2019.Resultados: se realizaron 695 citologías anales, 156 conresultados de lesión de bajo grado (LSIL) o lesión de altogrado (HSIL) (22,4 %), y 116 anoscopias de alta resolución(HRA), el 75,3 % de los pacientes con citología alterada. Sehan obtenido 403 biopsias, el 84 % de ellas patológicas; 197biopsias evidenciaron AIN I (49 %) y 96, AIN II y III (24 %); 44eran condilomas (11 %); y el 16 %, mucosa normal.Conclusión: la alta prevalencia de lesiones premalignas y lamejoría del estadiaje de las lesiones tras tratamiento recomienda dicho protocolo. (AU)

Use of Generic Antiretroviral Drugs and Single-Tablet Regimen De-Simplification for the Treatment of HIV Infection in Spain.

The present study sought to describe the use of generic drugs and single-tablet regimen (STR) de-simplification for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection among 41 hospitals from the cohort of the Spanish HIV/AIDS Research Network (CoRIS). In June 2018, we collected information on when generic antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) were introduced in the different hospitals, how the decisions to use them were made, and how the information was provided to the patients. Most of the nine available generic ARVs in Spain by June 2018 had been introduced in at least 85% of the participating hospitals, except for zidovudine (AZT)/lamivudine (3TC) and AZT. The time difference between the effective marketing date of each generic ARV and its first dispensing date in the hospitals was much shorter for the more recently approved generic ARV since the year 2017. However, only up to 20% of the hospitals de-simplified efavirenz (EFV)/tenofovir disoproxil (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC), dolutegravir (DTG)/abacavir (ABC)/3TC, and rilpivirine (RPV)/TDF/FTC (to generic EFV+TDF/FTC, DTG+generic ABC/3TC, and RPV+generic TDF/FTC, respectively), whereas the generic STR EFV/TDF/FTC was introduced in 87.8% of the centers. The median times between the date of effective marketing of generic TDF/FTC and the date of de-simplification of EFV/TDF/FTC and RPV/TDF/FTC were 723 [interquartile range (IQR): 369-1,119] and 234 (IQR: 142-264) days, respectively; this time was 155 (IQR: 28-287) days for de-simplification of DTG/ABC/3TC. In conclusion, despite the widespread use of generic ARVs, STRs de-simplification was only undertaken in <20% of the hospitals. There was wide variability in the timing of the introduction of each generic ARV after they were available in the market.

Anal intraepithelial neoplasia screening in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

INTRODUCTION: the incidence of anal cancer has increased in recent years, making screening and early detection of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) a necessity in patients at risk. METHODS: a descriptive observational study of homosexual patients (MSM) or women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III, with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, included in an AIN detection screening program was carried out between March 2016 and September 2019. RESULTS: we have performed 695 anal smears, 156 with results of LSIL (low-grade lesion) or HSIL (high-grade lesion) (22.4 %), and 116 high resolution anoscopy (HRA), 75.3 % of patients with altered cytology. We have 403 biopsies, being 84 % pathological, 197 biopsies of AIN I (49 %), 96 of AIN II and III (24 %), 44 condylomas (11 %) and the rest (16 %), normal mucosa. CONCLUSION: the high prevalence of premalignant lesions and the improvement in the staging of lesions after treatment recommend this protocol.

Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of community-acquired and nosocomial influenza cases and risk factors associated with complications: A four season analysis of all adult patients admitted in a tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND: Information on the characteristics of patients with nosocomial influenza and associated complications is scarce. This study compared epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients admitted with hospital-acquired influenza (HAI) to those with community-acquired influenza (CAI) and analyzed risk factors associated with complications. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study included all adult patients with confirmed influenza virus infection admitted to Son Espases University Hospital during the influenza season in Spain (October to May) from 2012-2013 to 2015-2016. Symptom onset before admission was included as CAI, and 2 days after admission or within 48 hours after previous discharge were considered as HAI. RESULTS: Overall, 666 patients with laboratory-confirmed influenza were included; 590 (88.6%) and 76 (11.4%) had CAI and HAI, respectively. Baseline characteristics and vaccination rates were similar in both groups. Patients with HAI had significantly fewer symptoms, less radiological alterations, and earlier microbiological diagnosis than those with CAI. Eighty-five (14.4%) and 20 (27.6%) CAI and HAI patients, respectively, experienced at least one complication, including septic shock, admission to the intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation or evolution to death (any one, P = .003). Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression was performed to assess independent risk factors associated with the occurrence of complications: nosocomial infection, diabetes, oseltamivir treatment, having received no vaccination, microbiological delay, dyspnea, and the state of confusion were the most important significant factors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows the need to implement microbiological diagnostic measures in the first 48 hours to reduce HAI frequency and associated complications.

Calvarial tuberculosis: an unusual presentation of disseminated tuberculosis.

A 30-year-old man, without previous medical record, was admitted to our centre due to persistent hacking cough for the previous 2 months, accompanied by nocturnal sweating, unquantified weight loss and low-grade fever. The patient was finally diagnosed of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). During admission, a right forehead swelling was detected, painful to palpation, fluctuating and not attached to the skin, without cutaneous alterations or neurological impairment. Surgical debridement was performed and intraoperative cultures were positive for mycobacteria TB. The patient completed 9 months of antituberculous therapy and fully recovered.

Indicadores de calidad asistencial de GeSIDA para la atención de personas infectadas por el VIH/sida asociados a mortalidad e ingreso hospitalario / GeSIDA quality care indicators associated with mortality and hospital admission for the care of persons infected by HIV/AIDS

INTRODUCCIÓN: En 2010 el Grupo Español de Estudio de SIDA (GeSIDA) desarrolló 66 indicadores de calidad asistencial. Nuestro objetivo es determinar cuáles de estos indicadores se asocian a mortalidad y/o ingreso, y realizar una evaluación preliminar de la utilidad de un índice predictor de mortalidad e ingreso. MÉTODOS: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo realizado en el Hospital Universitario Son Espases. Los pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana incluidos fueron aquellos que iniciaron seguimiento en consultas entre el 1 de enero de2000 y el 31 de diciembre de 2012. Se realizó análisis descriptivo de las variables demográficas y de los indicadores, y un estudio de regresión logística para valorar la asociación entre los indicadores y riesgo de mortalidad/ingreso. Se calcularon índices predictores de mortalidad e ingreso para pacientes en seguimiento y en tratamiento. RESULTADOS: Fueron incluidos 1.944 pacientes (media de edad: 37 años, el 78,8% varones). En el análisis multivariante relativo a mortalidad, los indicadores asociados en pacientes en seguimiento fueron el 7, 16 y 20 y en pacientes en tratamiento se añaden el 35 y 38. En el análisis multivariante relativo a ingreso, los indicadores asociados en pacientes en seguimiento fueron los mismos que para mortalidad, además del 31, y en el grupo de pacientes en tratamiento se asociaban los indicadores 7, 16, 20, 35, 38 y 40. CONCLUSIÓN: Se han identificado varios indicadores de calidad que pueden estar relacionados con ingreso hospitalario y mortalidad. Estos indicadores hacen referencia fundamentalmente al retraso diagnóstico, seguimiento regular, prevención de las infecciones y control de comorbilidades

INTRODUCTION: In 2010, the AIDS Study Group (Grupo de Estudio del SIDA [GESIDA]) developed 66 quality care indicators. The aim of this study is to determine which of these indicators are associated with mortality and hospital admission, and to perform a preliminary assessment of a prediction rule for mortality and hospital admission in patients on treatment and follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Hospital Universitario Son Espases (Palma de Mallorca, Spain). Eligible participants were patients with human immunodeficiency syndrome≥18 years old who began follow-up in the Infectious Disease Section between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2012. A descriptive analysis was performed to evaluate anthropometric variables, and a logistic regression analysis to assess the association between GESIDA indicators and mortality/admission. The mortality probability model was built using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1,944 adults were eligible (median age: 37 years old, 78.8% male). In the multivariate analysis, the quality of care indicators associated with mortality in the follow-up patient group were the items 7, 16 and 20, and in the group of patients on treatment were 7, 16, 20, 35, and 38. The quality of care indicators associated with hospital admissions in the follow-up patients group were the same as those in the mortality analysis, plus number 31. In the treatment group the associated quality of care indicators were items 7, 16, 20, 35, 38, and 40. CONCLUSIONS: Some GeSIDA quality of care indicators were associated with mortality and/or hospital admissions. These indicators are associated with delayed diagnosis, regular monitoring, prevention of infections, and control of comorbidities

[GeSIDA quality care indicators associated with mortality and hospital admission for the care of persons infected by HIV/AIDS]. / Indicadores de calidad asistencial de GeSIDA para la atención de personas infectadas por el VIH/sida asociados a mortalidad e ingreso hospitalario.

INTRODUCTION: In 2010, the AIDS Study Group (Grupo de Estudio del SIDA [GESIDA]) developed 66 quality care indicators. The aim of this study is to determine which of these indicators are associated with mortality and hospital admission, and to perform a preliminary assessment of a prediction rule for mortality and hospital admission in patients on treatment and follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Hospital Universitario Son Espases (Palma de Mallorca, Spain). Eligible participants were patients with human immunodeficiency syndrome≥18 years old who began follow-up in the Infectious Disease Section between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2012. A descriptive analysis was performed to evaluate anthropometric variables, and a logistic regression analysis to assess the association between GESIDA indicators and mortality/admission. The mortality probability model was built using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1,944 adults were eligible (median age: 37 years old, 78.8% male). In the multivariate analysis, the quality of care indicators associated with mortality in the follow-up patient group were the items 7, 16 and 20, and in the group of patients on treatment were 7, 16, 20, 35, and 38. The quality of care indicators associated with hospital admissions in the follow-up patients group were the same as those in the mortality analysis, plus number 31. In the treatment group the associated quality of care indicators were items 7, 16, 20, 35, 38, and 40. CONCLUSIONS: Some GeSIDA quality of care indicators were associated with mortality and/or hospital admissions. These indicators are associated with delayed diagnosis, regular monitoring, prevention of infections, and control of comorbidities.

Relationships between Serum Levels of Atazanavir and Renal Toxicity or Lithiasis.

The main aim of this study is to describe the relationship between serum levels of atazanavir, renal toxicity, and lithiasis. This is a prospective observational study of patients being treated with atazanavir (ATV) at Son Espases Teaching Hospital, Palma de Mallorca, between 2011 and 2013. The study includes 98 patients. Sixteen were found to have a history of urolithiasis. During a median monitoring period of 23 months, nine patients suffered renal colic, in three of whom ATV crystals were evidenced in urine. Cumulative incidence of renal colic was 9.2 per 100 patients. The variables related to having renal colic were the presence of alkaline urine pH and lower basal creatinine clearance. The mean serum level of ATV was slightly higher in patients with renal colic-1,303 µg/L versus 1,161 µg/L-but did not reach statistical significance. Neither were any significant differences detected by analysing the levels according to the timetable for ATV dosage. Cumulative incidence of renal colic was high in patients being treated with ATV, in 33% of whom the presence of ATV crystals was evidenced in urine. We were unable to demonstrate a relationship between ATV serum levels and renal colic or progression towards renal failure.