ABSTRACT
Comparison of two ultra-widefield (UWF) color-fundus (CF) imaging devices in diabetic patients for visualization of retinal periphery and detection of early microvascular lesions. The total gradable areas (TGA) seen on non-mydriatic CF-images of two UWF-imaging devices (Optos Daytona P200T; Zeiss Clarus 700) were compared and differences in projected area measured. Retinal periphery outside the 7 standard fields (7SF) was divided into: F3 temporal, F4 superotemporal, F5 inferotemporal, F6 superonasal, F7 inferonasal. DR stage was evaluated in the 7SF and the TGA on images of both devices and compared using Cohens κ. 67 eyes of 67 patients (52.5 ± 15.3 years) were analysed. DR stages in the 7SF were no (n = 36 Optos, n = 35 Clarus), mild (n = 16 Optos, n = 17 Clarus), and moderate DR (n = 15). Optos depicted significantly more area in F3 (median [interquartile range]; 2.41% [1.06-4.11] vs 0% [0-0], P < 0.001) and Clarus in F7 (3.29% [0-7.69] vs 0% [0-3.27], P = 0.002). In 4 eyes DR-stage was higher using Optos due to peripheral lesions not seen on the Clarus. Interrater reliability of DR-stage on both devices was almost perfect in the 7SF (κ = 0.975) and the TGA (κ = 0.855). Reliability in detecting signs of early DR is high on both devices. Clarus allowed for better visualization of the inferonasal field, Optos of the temporal field.
