Assessing health outcomes: a systematic review of electronic patient-reported outcomes in oncology.

PURPOSE: This study investigates the clinical impact of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) monitoring apps/web interfaces, aimed at symptom-management, in cancer patients undergoing outpatient systemic antineoplastic treatment. Additionally, it explores the advantages offered by these applications, including their functionalities and healthcare team-initiated follow-up programmes. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using a predefined search strategy in MEDLINE. Inclusion criteria encompassed primary studies assessing symptom burden through at-home ePRO surveys in adult cancer patients receiving outpatient systemic antineoplastic treatment, whenever health outcomes were evaluated. Exclusion criteria excluded telemedicine-based interventions other than ePRO questionnaires and non-primary articles or study protocols. To evaluate the potential bias in the included studies, an exhaustive quality assessment was conducted, as an additional inclusion filter. RESULTS: Among 246 identified articles, 227 were excluded for non-compliance with inclusion/exclusion criteria. Of the remaining 19 articles, only eight met the rigorous validity assessment and were included for detailed examination and data extraction, presented in attached tables. CONCLUSION: This review provides compelling evidence of ePRO monitoring's positive clinical impact across diverse cancer settings, encompassing various cancer types, including early and metastatic stages. These systems are crucial in enabling timely interventions and reducing communication barriers, among other functionalities. While areas for future ePRO innovation are identified, the primary limitation lies in comparing clinical outcomes of reviewed articles, due to scale variability and study population heterogeneity. To conclude, our results reaffirm the transformative potential of ePRO apps in oncology and their pivotal role in shaping the future of cancer care.

Consenso SEO-SEFH sobre recomendaciones de utilización y elaboración de preparaciones oftálmicas / Consensus SEO-SEFH of recommendations for use and compounding of ophthalmic preparations

Son muchos los medicamentos que, aun habiendo demostrado eficacia y seguridad en diferentes indicaciones oftalmológicas, no están autorizados ni disponibles comercialmente en una forma adecuada para esta vía de administración. Esto implica, por un lado, que se deban utilizar según la legislación que regula la disponibilidad de medicamentos en situaciones especiales y, por otro, que se deban preparar en los Servicios de Farmacia para su administración por vía oftálmica, conforme a unos criterios de calidad que aseguren su efectividad, estabilidad y esterilidad. Este documento recoge un consenso entre la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología y la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria sobre aquellas preparaciones con suficiente evidencia respecto a su eficacia y seguridad para su uso no autorizado en indicaciones y vía de administración oftálmicas. Se incluyen recomendaciones para su utilización de acuerdo con la legislación vigente. Además, con el ánimo de armonizar la preparación de inyecciones intraoculares en los Servicios de Farmacia Hospitalaria, se establecen unas recomendaciones generales para su elaboración siguiendo los estándares establecidos en la Guía de Buenas Prácticas de Preparación de Medicamentos en los Servicios de Farmacia Hospitalaria. En estas recomendaciones se incluyen apartados como el lugar de preparación, el material, la técnica, el envasado, el periodo de validez, el control de calidad, la prescripción y la trazabilidad de las preparaciones intraoculares (AU)

There are many medicinal products that, although having shown efficacy and safety in different ophthalmological indications, they are not authorized or commercially available for ophthalmic administration. This implies, on one hand, that they must be used according to legislation that regulates the availability of medicines in special situations and, on the other hand, that they must be prepared in the pharmacy services for ophthalmic administration, according to quality criteria to ensure its effectiveness, stability and sterility. This document gathers the consensus between the Spanish Society of Ophthalmology and the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy about these selected preparations which have shown enough evidence in their efficacy and safety for their ophthalmic use (off label) and ophthalmic administration. This document includes recommendations about its use according to the current legislation. In addition, with the aim of harmonizing the preparation of intraocular injections in the hospital pharmacy services, general recommendations are set in this document to ensure the compliance with standards established in the Spanish Guideline for Good Preparation Practices of Medicinal Products in Hospital Pharmacies. These recommendations include sections such as the area of preparation, material, technique, packaging, stability, quality control, prescription and traceability of intraocular preparations (AU)

Consensus SEO-SEFH of recommendations for use and compounding of ophthalmic preparations.

There are many medicinal products that, although having shown efficacy and  safety in different ophthalmological indications, they are not authorized or  commercially available for ophthalmic administration. This implies, on one hand,  that they must be used according to legislation that regulates the availability of  medicines in special situations and, on the other hand, that they must be  prepared in the pharmacy services for ophthalmic administration, according to  quality criteria to ensure its effectiveness, stability and sterility. This document  gathers the consensus between the Spanish Society of Ophthalmology and the  Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy about these selected preparations which  have shown enough evidence in their efficacy and safety for their ophthalmic use (off label) and ophthalmic administration. This document includes  recommendations about its use according to the current legislation. In addition,  with the aim of harmonizing the preparation of intraocular injections in the  hospital pharmacy services, general recommendations are set in this document  to ensure the compliance with standards established in the Spanish Guideline for Good Preparation Practices of Medicinal Products in Hospital Pharmacies. These  recommendations include sections such as the area of preparation, material,  technique, packaging, stability, quality control, prescription and traceability of  intraocular preparations.

Son muchos los medicamentos que, aun habiendo demostrado eficacia y seguridad en diferentes indicaciones oftalmológicas, no están autorizados ni disponibles comercialmente en una forma adecuada para esta vía de  administración.Esto implica, por un lado, que se deban utilizar según la legislación que regula la disponibilidad de medicamentos en situaciones especiales y, por otro, que se  deban preparar en los Servicios de Farmacia para su administración por vía  oftálmica, conforme a unos criterios de calidad que aseguren su efectividad,  estabilidad y esterilidad. Este documento recoge un consenso entre la Sociedad  Española de Oftalmología y la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria sobre  aquellas preparaciones con suficiente evidencia respecto a su eficacia y  seguridad para su uso no autorizado en indicaciones y vía de administración  oftálmicas. Se incluyen recomendaciones para su utilización de acuerdo con la  legislación vigente. Además, con el ánimo de armonizar la preparación de  inyecciones intraoculares en los Servicios de Farmacia Hospitalaria, se  establecen unas recomendaciones generales para su elaboración siguiendo los  estándares establecidos en la Guía de Buenas Prácticas de Preparación de  Medicamentos en los Servicios de Farmacia Hospitalaria. En estas  recomendaciones se incluyen apartados como el lugar de preparación, el  material, la técnica, el envasado, el periodo de validez, el control de calidad, la  prescripción y la trazabilidad de las preparaciones intraoculares.

Treatment of patients with neurotrophic keratitis stages 2 and 3 with plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF-Endoret) eye-drops.

PURPOSE: To provide preliminary data about efficacy and safety of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) eye-drops in neurotrophic keratitis (NK) and to analyze the possible influence of certain variables on treatment outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with stages 2-3 of NK treated with PRGF eye-drops. Primary endpoint was the resolution time of corneal ulcer defect. Outcome measures including percentage of ulcer closure at 4 weeks, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were also evaluated before and after treatment with PRGF. The influence of some patients' clinical variables on results was assessed. Safety assessment was also performed reporting all adverse events. RESULTS: Thirty-eight treated eyes in a total of thirty-one patients were evaluated, of which five cases had no prior response to autologous serum treatment. Most cases (97.4%) achieved the complete resolution of corneal defect/ulcer. Mean resolution time was 11.4 weeks (SD = 13.7). A statistical significant (p < 0.05) reduction in OSDI (60.9%), VAS frequency (59.9%), VAS severity (57.0%) and improvement in BCVA (52.8%) was observed. The results were stratified according to the pathology stage and to the identified potential effect modifiers variables. Only one adverse event was reported in one patient (2.6%). CONCLUSIONS: PRGF eye-drops could be a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with stages 2-3 of NK, showing high rates of corneal defect/ulcer resolution in short times, either in reducing signs and symptoms of NK, and therefore preventing the progression of NK to greater ocular complications.

The Effect of Immunologically Safe Plasma Rich in Growth Factor Eye Drops in Patients with Sjögren Syndrome.

PURPOSE: The objective was to provide preliminary information about the efficacy and safety of immunologically safe plasma rich in growth factor (immunosafe PRGF) eye drops in the treatment of moderate to severe dry eye in patients with primary and secondary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) and to analyze the influence of several variables on treatment outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with SS. All patients were treated with previously immunosafe PRGF eye drops to reduce the immunologic component contents. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scale, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual analog scale (VAS) frequency, and VAS severity outcome measures were evaluated before and after treatment with immunosafe PRGF. The potential influence of some patient clinical variables on results was also assessed. Safety assessment was also performed reporting all adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (12 patients with primary SS, and 14 patients suffering secondary SS) with a total of 52 affected eyes were included and evaluated. Immunosafe PRGF treatment showed a significant reduction (P < 0.05) in OSDI scale (41.86%), in BCVA (62.97%), in VAS frequency (34.75%), and in VAS severity (41.50%). BCVA and VAS frequency scores improved significantly (P < 0.05) after concomitant treatment of PRGF with corticosteroids. Only 2 adverse events were reported in 2 patients (7.7% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: Signs and symptoms of dry eye syndrome in patients with SS were reduced after treatment with PRGF-Endoret eye drops. Immunosafe PRGF-Endoret is safe and effective for treating patients with primary and secondary SS.