Two triterpenoids from Rubus fraxinifolius leaves and their tyrosinase and elastase inhibitory activities.

Numerous therapeutic compounds have been isolated from naturally abundant organic resources, which may offer economical and sustainable sources of compounds with safe and efficacious biological activities. In the cosmetics industry, natural compounds with anti-aging activities are eagerly sought. Thus, we prepared various extracts from Rubus fraxinifolius leaves and used enzyme inhibition assays to isolate compounds with protective effects against skin aging. Two triterpenoids were isolated from Rubus fraxinifolius Poir. leaves. The structures were characterized by spectroscopic analyses (LC-ESI-MS, 1D/2D NMR) and comparison to reported data. Compound 1 and 2 were determined as 2,3-O-ethyleneglycol, 19-hydroxyurs-12-en-23,28-dioic acid and 2,3-O-propanediol,19-hydroxyurs-12-en-28-oic acid. Methanol extract and isolates were assessed for their inhibitory effects on elastase and tyrosinase. Compounds 1 and 2 inhibited elastase with IC50 122.199 µg/mL and 98.22 µg/mL, and also inhibited tyrosinase with IC50 207.79 µg/mL and 221.51 µg/mL, respectively. The molecular docking proved that both compounds have affinities toward the enzymes.

Recent Developments in Linear Interaction Energy Based Binding Free Energy Calculations.

The linear interaction energy (LIE) approach is an end-point method to compute binding affinities. As such it combines explicit conformational sampling (of the protein-bound and unbound-ligand states) with efficiency in calculating values for the protein-ligand binding free energy ΔG bind . This perspective summarizes our recent efforts to use molecular simulation and empirically calibrated LIE models for accurate and efficient calculation of ΔG bind for diverse sets of compounds binding to flexible proteins (e.g., Cytochrome P450s and other proteins of direct pharmaceutical or biochemical interest). Such proteins pose challenges on ΔG bind computation, which we tackle using a previously introduced statistically weighted LIE scheme. Because calibrated LIE models require empirical fitting of scaling parameters, they need to be accompanied with an applicability domain (AD) definition to provide a measure of confidence for predictions for arbitrary query compounds within a reference frame defined by a collective chemical and interaction space. To enable AD assessment of LIE predictions (or other protein-structure and -dynamic based ΔG bind calculations) we recently introduced strategies for AD assignment of LIE models, based on simulation and training data only. These strategies are reviewed here as well, together with available tools to facilitate and/or automate LIE computation (including software for combined statistically-weighted LIE calculations and AD assessment).

Combined Linear Interaction Energy and Alchemical Solvation Free-Energy Approach for Protein-Binding Affinity Computation.

Calculating free energies of binding (ΔGbind) between ligands and their target protein is of major interest to drug discovery and safety, yet it is still associated with several challenges and difficulties. Linear interaction energy (LIE) is an efficient in silico method for ΔGbind computation. LIE models can be trained and used to directly calculate binding affinities from interaction energies involving ligands in the bound and unbound states only, and LIE can be combined with statistical weighting to calculate ΔGbind for flexible proteins that may bind their ligands in multiple orientations. Here, we investigate if LIE predictions can be effectively improved by explicitly including the entropy of (de)solvation into our free-energy calculations. For that purpose, we combine LIE calculations for the protein-ligand-bound state with explicit free-energy perturbation to rigorously compute the unbound ligand's solvation free energy. We show that for 28 Cytochrome P450 2A6 (CYP2A6) ligands, coupling LIE with alchemical solvation free-energy calculation helps to improve obtained correlation between computed and reference (experimental) binding data.

A Comparative Linear Interaction Energy and MM/PBSA Study on SIRT1-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculation.

Binding free energy (ΔGbind) computation can play an important role in prioritizing compounds to be evaluated experimentally on their affinity for target proteins, yet fast and accurate ΔGbind calculation remains an elusive task. In this study, we compare the performance of two popular end-point methods, i.e., linear interaction energy (LIE) and molecular mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM/PBSA), with respect to their ability to correlate calculated binding affinities of 27 thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine-6-carboxamide-derived sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) inhibitors with experimental data. Compared with the standard single-trajectory setup of MM/PBSA, our study elucidates that LIE allows to obtain direct ("absolute") values for SIRT1 binding free energies with lower compute requirements, while the accuracy in calculating relative values for ΔGbind is comparable (Pearson's r = 0.72 and 0.64 for LIE and MM/PBSA, respectively). We also investigate the potential of combining multiple docking poses in iterative LIE models and find that Boltzmann-like weighting of outcomes of simulations starting from different poses can retrieve appropriate binding orientations. In addition, we find that in this particular case study the LIE and MM/PBSA models can be optimized by neglecting the contributions from electrostatic and polar interactions to the ΔGbind calculations.

Binding free energy predictions of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists using a linear interaction energy (LIE) approach with reliability estimation: application to the D3R Grand Challenge 2.

Computational protein binding affinity prediction can play an important role in drug research but performing efficient and accurate binding free energy calculations is still challenging. In the context of phase 2 of the Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) Grand Challenge 2 we used our automated eTOX ALLIES approach to apply the (iterative) linear interaction energy (LIE) method and we evaluated its performance in predicting binding affinities for farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists. Efficiency was obtained by our pre-calibrated LIE models and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations at the nanosecond scale, while predictive accuracy was obtained for a small subset of compounds. Using our recently introduced reliability estimation metrics, we could classify predictions with higher confidence by featuring an applicability domain (AD) analysis in combination with protein-ligand interaction profiling. The outcomes of and agreement between our AD and interaction-profile analyses to distinguish and rationalize the performance of our predictions highlighted the relevance of sufficiently exploring protein-ligand interactions during training and it demonstrated the possibility to quantitatively and efficiently evaluate if this is achieved by using simulation data only.