How to Escape the Immune Response: What Tumors Teach to Transplant Physicians/Immunologists.

Recent progress in deciphering the mechanisms underlying the concepts of tumor immunosurveillance and immunoevasion has opened new opportunities for the development of effective antitumor therapies. Transplant physicians and immunologists have much to learn from those direct clinical translations of basic science. The 2016 Beaune Seminar in Transplant research brought together researchers from both fields to explore and discuss significant advances in cancer biology, immunotherapies and their potential impacts for the management of cancer in transplant recipients.

B Cells and Antibodies in Transplantation.

Overlooked for decades, the humoral alloimmune response is increasingly recognized as a leading cause of graft loss after transplantation. However, improvement in the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection has not yet translated into better outcomes for transplanted patients. After an update on B cell physiology and antibody generation, the 2015 Beaune Seminar in Transplant Research challenged the conventional view of antibody-mediated rejection pathophysiology and discussed the latest promising therapeutic approaches.

Bridging innate with adaptive immunity in transplantation: triggers, sensors, and modulators.

The molecular entities present on a cell or organ transplant that trigger the innate immune response and link to the adaptive immune system are increasingly recognized as a key influence on early graft function and for determining the microenvironment that will guide longer-term graft outcomes. The 2014 Beaune Seminar in Transplant Research discussed the evidence for triggers, sensors, and modulators of innate and adaptive immunity in response to alloantigens, challenged the conventional view, developed novel hypotheses, and highlighted the potential for therapeutic manipulation of these responses.

Thymoglobulin induction and sirolimus versus tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and steroids.

BACKGROUND: To define the role of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in kidney transplantation, we compared efficacy and safety of two immunosuppressive regimens-a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen with depletive induction versus a calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen. METHODS: De novo renal allograft recipients were randomized before transplantation to receive sirolimus (SRL; n=71, group A) or tacrolimus (n=70, group B). All patients received mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. In group A, patients received rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction. In group B, antithymocyte globulin therapy could be given in case of delayed graft function. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (Nankivell's formula) at month 12 was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: GFR showed no significant difference at month 12, with 56.1 in group A versus 58.4 mL/min/1.73 m in group B. In functioning grafts, renal function was significantly better in the SRL group, with higher GFR values at months 1, 2, 3, 6, and 9 (P<0.05). At month 12, patient survival and incidence of biopsy-proven rejection were not different between groups (95.8% vs. 97.1%, and 16.9% vs. 12.9%, respectively). However, proportion of graft loss was higher with SRL at months 6 and 12 (11.3% vs. 0.0%, P=0.004; 14.1% vs. 4.3%, P=0.044, respectively). Adverse events and premature withdrawals were more frequent with SRL (P<0.001 and P<0.05, respectively), whereas cytomegalovirus infections were more frequent with tacrolimus (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients treated with induction plus SRL, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids may obtain good renal function but have a higher risk of adverse events, drug withdrawal, and graft loss.

Detection of plasma cells, C4d deposits and donor-specific antibodies on sequential graft biopsies of renal transplant recipients with chronic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: In order to look for a relationship between humoral mechanisms of rejection and chronic allograft dysfunction, plasma cells, C4d deposits and donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were simultaneously sought on serial biopsies of kidney allograft recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten recipients with chronic dysfunction (G1) and 8 recipients with long-term normal graft function (G2) were included. Biopsies and serums were sampled at early graft dysfunction (T1), between 8months and 2years (T2) and after the third year following transplantation (T3). RESULTS: In G1, plasma cells represented 12.3% (T1), 8.2% (T2) and 14.1% (T3) of mononuclear cells. The mean percentage of plasma cells was 11.6% in G1 versus 0.4% in G2 (p<0.05). A progressive rise in C4d deposits was seen in G1, from 25% at T1 to 80% at T3. Donor-specific antibodies were identified in at least one serum sample of 60% of the patients in G1 and 12.5% of the patients in G2 (p=0.012), whereas donor-specific antibodies were eluted from at least one biopsy of 50% of the patients in G1 and 12.5% of the patients in G2 (p=0.03). In G1, C4d deposits were significantly associated with plasma cells (p=0.0012) and anti-HLA Abs in serum samples and/or eluates (p=0.026). CONCLUSION: This study shows that plasma cells, DSA and C4d are associated in renal transplants developing chronic rejection.

[First acute rejection episode after renal transplantation: study of the histopathological characteristics according to the immunological risk]. / Premier épisode de rejet aigu après transplantation rénale: étude des caractéristiques histopathologiques en fonction du risque immunologique du patient.

Renal allograft biopsies (n=34) of two different populations of patients according to the immunological risk (high versus low-risk) have been compared retrospectively. The presence of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in peritubular capillaries was more frequent in the high-risk group. The C4d staining was positive in 10% of the low-risk patients and in 50% of the high-risk patients (P=0.03). There were more early graft loss, renal infarctions, interstitial hemorrhage, severe glomerulitis, neutrophilic glomerulitis and Banff III grade rejection in the positive C4d group. In conclusion, half of the immunized patients had a humoral rejection, patients with a C4d positive rejection had more early graft loss and more severe histological lesions.

Distribution of donor-specific antibodies in the cortex and the medulla of renal transplants with chronic allograft nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Emerging data suggest that donor-specific HLA antibodies should be more frequently found onto the transplant itself than in the bloodstream. It is now possible to detect such antibodies in kidney transplant needle biopsy samples by flow cytometry. In order to know if the detection of antibodies into such blind biopsy samples depends of the site of the biopsy, we have studied the distribution of antibodies in both the cortex and medulla of 12 transplants removed after graft loss due to chronic allograft nephropathy, and in 10 controls. METHODS: Donor-specific HLA antibodies were extracted from the cortex and the medulla of each removed transplant by an acid elution and characterized by Luminex assays. RESULTS: They were found in 58.3% of transplants with chronic allograft nephropathy and never in other kidney samples. The same antibodies were found in the bloodstream at the time of transplantectomy in only 16.6% of the recipients. The distribution between the cortex and medulla was concordant in 75% of cases. However, we observed 2 discrepancies: one in favor of the cortex and one in favor of the medulla. A majority (5/7) transplants with CAN and intra-graft donor-specific antibodies had also C4d deposits along peritubular capillaries. CONCLUSION: Testing for donor-specific HLA antibodies in kidney transplant needle biopsies can be of value provided the biopsy includes both the cortex and the medulla.

Urinary cytotoxic molecular markers for a noninvasive diagnosis in acute renal transplant rejection.

Perforin (P), Granzyme B (GB) and Fas-Ligand (FAS-L) are cytotoxic molecules involved in acute rejection (AR) after renal transplantation. A noninvasive diagnostic test to monitor AR and other complications could improve clinical management. We investigated the predictive and diagnostic interest of target mRNA measurements, with a quantitative PCR assay, in AR, as well as in other clinical complications recurrent in kidney transplantation. One hundred and sixty-two urine specimens from 37 allograft recipients were investigated. Clinical settings were AR, urinary tract infection (UTI), cytomegalovirus infection (CMVi) or disease (CMVd), chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), delayed graft function (DGF) and stable graft course (controls). In the case of AR, mRNA levels of all three molecules were significantly higher than in recipients not showing any clinically evident signs of complication. Indeed, it was observed that expression levels of P, GB and Fas-L mRNA also increase in other clinical situations such as UTI, CMV and DGF. Finally, kinetic studies in three patients with AR revealed that increased P, GB and Fas-L mRNA levels could precede or were concomitant with increased serum creatinin levels. P, GB and Fas-L gene expression in urine specimens were upregulated in AR episodes but also in UTI, CMV infection and DGF. Therefore, this technique would appear to be of limited clinical value as a noninvasive method of diagnosing AR.

Endothelial cells in organ transplantation: Friends or foes?

Vascular endothelial cells are the first interface between donor and recipient in organ transplantation. Endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells are key actors of acute and chronic rejection processes in organ allografting, but they also have the capacity to protect themselves from allograft-induced injury. Recent advances in our understanding of the precise mechanisms leading to endothelial dysfunction or, on the contrary, to endothelial protection, suggest that therapeutic interventions targeting endothelial cells could improve allograft survival and have even raised the question of whether such manipulations can be considered with a view to inducing immunological tolerance.

Detection of anti-HLA antibodies with flow cytometry in needle core biopsies of renal transplants recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy.

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of detecting anti-HLA antibodies in eluates from needle core biopsies of renal transplants with chronic allograft nephropathy. Two methods of screening, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and flow cytometry (FlowPRA) were compared. Twenty renal transplants with CAN were removed after irreversible graft failure. To assess the feasibility of detecting anti-HLA antibodies in small samples, needle core biopsies were sampled at the same place as surgical samples and at a second cortical area. Antibodies were eluted with an acid elution kit and anti-class I and class II IgG HLA antibodies detected using ELISA and flow cytometry. Flow cytometry was found to be more sensitive than ELISA for detecting anti-HLA antibodies in eluates from renal transplants with CAN (95% vs. 75% of positive cases). Detection of anti-HLA antibodies showed good agreement between surgical samples and needle core biopsies performed at the same place for anti-class I (80% vs. 65%, r=0.724 P<0.01) and anti-class II HLA antibodies (70% vs. 55%, r=0.827 P<0.01). In addition, differences in the detection of anti-class I HLA antibodies in needle core biopsies sampled at different sites suggests that immunization to class I donor antigen could be underestimated in needle core biopsy samples. These data indicate that anti-HLA antibodies can be detected in needle core biopsies from renal transplants. Provided further evaluation is done, elution might be a complementary method to detect anti-HLA antibodies when they are bound to the transplant.

Donor-specific antibodies in allograft rejection: clinical and experimental data.

The ability of donor-specific major histocompatibility complex alloantibodies to destroy a transplanted organ within minutes, the so-called hyperacute rejection phenomenon, has been known for a long time. It is a clear demonstration of the possible cytotoxic effect of antibodies. Apart from this particular situation, the role of antibodies in inducing acute or chronic allograft rejection remains controversial. Many clinical data have shown that transplant recipients capable of developing class I or class II anti-HLA antibodies experienced shorter survival periods than those who were not. This fact, in accordance with experimental data, only demonstrates that high antibody responders reject a transplant more easily than low responders. More interestingly, there is now increasing evidence that posttransplant appearance of donor-specific alloantibodies, and probably of alloreactive-induced autoantibodies, is strongly correlated with reduced graft survival rate, especially from chronic rejection. We demonstrated that donor-specific HLA antibodies can be found in more than 70% of transplanted kidneys with chronic allograft nephropathy, and that the intragraft presence of such antibodies is significantly correlated with high numbers of plasma cells on early biopsies and C4d deposits, a recognized marker of humoral rejection. It is likely that non-HLA antibodies also play a deleterious role in organ transplant outcome, particularly the heterogeneous group of anti-endothelial cells antibodies, anti-MIC antibodies, autoantibodies and some others with no recognized target. Convincing experimental data, especially using B cell and T cell deficient mice, strongly suggest that B cells and donor-specific antibodies are required for fully developed chronic allograft rejection. The role of antibodies in inducing the cascade of cytokines and growth factors leading to tissue lesions is of increasing interest since it is now possible to control B cell proliferation and antibody production.

Influence of ischemia on heart-rate variability in chronic hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Sudden cardiac death occurring in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) may be related to poor autonomic function with a significant decreased heart-rate variability (HRV). In addition, coronary artery disease has a high prevalence in this population and accounts for 50% of deaths. In the present study, relationships between HRV and myocardial ischemic abnormalities revealed by myocardial scintigraphy (MS) were evaluated in 32 chronic hemodialysis patients. METHODS: We prospectively studied 32 chronic hemodialysis patients. Each underwent MS and 24 h electrocardiography at baseline for analysis of time and frequency domain the day of dialysis. Three periods were analyzed: during dialysis session, the morning after (nondialytic period), and in a 24 h period. Patients were included in group 1 (seven women, 11 men; mean age: 62+/-19 years) when MS revealed no ischemia, whereas patients were included in group 2 (seven women, seven men; mean age: 63.1+/-20 years) when MS revealed ischemic lesions. RESULTS: A student+/-test revealed that during the nondialytic period, two important markers of HRV, percentage of delta RR>50 ms (pNN50) (4.5+/-4.04 in group 1 versus 1.7+/-1.4 in group 2), and root mean square of delta RR (rMSSD) (27.7+/-13.4 versus 19.7+/-6.8) were significantly reduced in group 2 compared with values in group 1. No significant difference appears between the two groups for standard deviation of normal to normal intervals (SDNN), mean heart rate, and spectral analysis. CONCLUSION: Patients with ESRD and myocardial ischemia revealed by MS have reduced parasympathetic activity during the nondialytic period. Correlations between parameters of HRV and ischemic lesions revealed by MS have been shown for the first time.

Influence of islet transportation on pancreatic islet allotransplantation in type 1 diabetic patients within the Swiss-French GRAGIL network.

BACKGROUND: The influence of islet transportation on pancreatic islet allotransplantation in type 1 diabetic patients was evaluated within the GRAGIL network. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 2001 to April 2003, 16 human pancreatic islet transplants were performed in 9 type 1 diabetic patients with an established kidney graft (functioning for at least 6 months) in four centers of the GRAGIL network. Islet isolation was performed in a core laboratory in Geneva, and the islet preparations were shipped by ambulance to each center for transplantation. One month after transplantation, the efficiency of the graft was assessed according to islet transportation time (ITT): ITT less than 2 hours (group 1, n=5), and ITT greater than 4.5 hours (group 2, n=4, mediant 5 hours). RESULTS: Primary graft dysfunction was observed in one patient in group 1 after one month. Two patients became insulin independent in groups 1 and 2. All other patients in both groups had a plasma C-peptide level greater than 0.5 ng/ml. The HbA1c level and the exogenous insulin needs decreased in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: ITT does not seem to influence the efficiency of pancreatic islet allotransplantation in type 1 diabetic patients. These results emphasize the scope for multicenter networks such as the GRAGIL group.

Regulatory (suppressor) T cells in peripheral allograft tolerance and graft-versus-host reaction.

Among the mechanisms capable of inducing peripheral tolerance, regulatory (suppressor) T cells (Treg) probably play a key role in the control of both reactivity to self-antigens and alloimmune response. Augmentation or manipulation of Treg could improve organ allograft survival or control graft-versus-host disease, thus resulting in operational tolerance. The role of this immunomanipulation as one method of inducing tolerance has yet to be clearly defined.

Detection of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies with flow cytometry in eluates and sera from renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), which remains the main cause of graft loss after kidney transplantation, is still poorly understood. Because anti-HLA antibodies may be involved in the pathogenesis of CAN, this study was performed to look for donor-specific antibodies (DSA) fixed onto renal transplants with CAN. METHODS: DSA were identified after elution with flow cytometric assay and/or flow cytometric crossmatches in 20 transplants removed after irreversible graft failure caused by CAN and in control samples from 2 transplants with relapsing glomerulopathy, 2 transplants lost after vascular thrombosis, and 4 normal kidneys. The results were compared with those obtained in the serum samples 1 year after grafting, at the time of transplantectomy, and within 2 months after transplantectomy. RESULTS: IgG anti-class I, anti-class II, or both DSA were identified in 70.6% of eluates versus 73.6% of posttransplantectomy serum samples (NS), 42.1% of 1-year postgrafting serum samples (P<0.05), and 31.6% of serum samples at the time of transplantectomy (P<0.05). Our data show a good correlation between the target of anti-HLA antibodies found in both eluates and posttransplantectomy serum samples, but the precise specificity of anti-HLA antibodies is more often assigned in posttransplantectomy serum samples than in eluates. This problem needs further evaluation. CONCLUSION: This study shows that testing for anti-HLA DSA in eluates from removed kidney transplants using flow cytometry can be achieved and is highly efficient. It already suggests that both anti-class I and anti-class II HLA antibodies can be involved in CAN. Further studies are now needed to evaluate the possibility of identifying such antibodies in the eluates of transplant biopsy specimens from recipients experiencing CAN.

Donor-derived hematopoietic cells in organ transplantation: a major step toward allograft tolerance?

Infusion of donor-derived cells can improve organ allograft survival in animal models. Under certain conditions, it can even induce tolerance (i.e., unlimited organ survival without any maintenance immunosuppressive therapy). Use of nonmyeloablative regimens allows engraftment of donor-derived bone marrow cells, induction of mixed chimerism, and tolerance in rodents. High doses of bone marrow cells together with anti-T-cell antibodies can even result in mixed chimerism without cytoablative host conditioning. Cultured donor-derived CD34+ cells or donor-derived immature (or even mature) dendritic cells associated with monoclonal antibodies directed against co-stimulatory molecules might also induce tolerance. Among the numerous experimental protocols leading to tolerance of solid organs in animal models, how can we find our bearings in human transplantation? Numerous problems have yet to be solved: the type and amount of donor-derived cells (including stromal cells) to be used, the timing for infusion of donor cells in keeping with organ transplantation, the route of infusion (should it be intravenous, into the portal vein?), and the conditioning regimen. The first clinical trials would appear to indicate that tolerance induction in humans using donor-derived cells is a relatively safe solution that is both promising and realistic.