Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Klin Padiatr ; 227(6-7): 335-8, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26502184

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis (OM) is a common chemo- and radiotherapy adverse effect in oncological pediatric patients. Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection can cause a severe clinical course. We hypothesize, that HSV seropositivity is a risk factor for local HSV-1 reactivation and increased frequency of OM in patients with myelosuppressive therapies. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We evaluated the prevalence of seropositivity of HSV-1 between June 2011 and April 2014 in patients with potential oncological disease and correlated it to the frequency of OM and local viral reactivation in OM under myelosuppressive therapy. RESULTS: The overall rate of HSV-seropositivity in our cohort was 22%. 48 patients underwent myelosuppressive therapy. Of these, 7 were HSV-1 IgG positive and 41 negative. All patients with OM under myelosuppressive therapy and positive local swab for viral HSV (l-PCR) were HSV-1 IgG positive before the start of therapy (100%). The absolute risk for OM in HSV-1 IgG positive patients was increased by 58.5% (95%CI: 20.0 - 72.2%) corresponding to a relative risk (RR) of 2.4 (95%CI: 1.7-3.5, P=0.009). The multivariable adjusted OR to suffer 2 or more OM episodes in HSV-1 IgG positivity was 8.8 (95%CI: 1.5-95.8, P=0.014). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In HSV-1 IgG positive patients half of the OM episode showed HSV reactivation, and the risk for multiple OM episodes was increased. These patients should be investigated for HSV-infection in every OM episode. Prophylactic and preemptive therapeutic measures should be discussed early, but prospective data on HSV prophylaxis and preemptive treatment is required.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Opportunistic Infections/chemically induced , Opportunistic Infections/epidemiology , Stomatitis, Herpetic/chemically induced , Stomatitis, Herpetic/epidemiology , Virus Activation/drug effects , Adolescent , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Herpesvirus 1, Human/drug effects , Humans , Infant , Male , Neoplasms/immunology , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Neutropenia/epidemiology , Neutropenia/immunology , Opportunistic Infections/immunology , Retrospective Studies , Statistics as Topic , Stomatitis, Herpetic/immunology
2.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 272(10): 2749-54, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25209434

ABSTRACT

A retrospective evaluation of glass ionomer cement (GIC) in middle ear surgery with emphasis on short- and long-term safety was conducted at the tertiary referral center. GIC was applied between 1995 and 2006 in 444 patients in otologic surgery. Technical aspects, safety, benefits and complications due to GIC were analysed until 2011 (follow-up 5-16 years; mean 10 years). GIC was applied in stapes surgery (228 primary, 92 revisions), cochlear implants (108) and implantable hearing aids (7), ossiculoplasty (7), for coverage of opened mastoid air cells towards the external ear canal (1) and inner ear fistula closure (1). GIC turned out to be very handy in stapes surgery for optimal prosthesis fixation at the incus (260) and on the malleus handle (60) without complications. Results suggest that GIC may diminish the danger of incus necrosis in primary stapedotomy. In cochlear implants and implantable hearing aids, GIC was used for casing alone (74), casing and electrode fixation (27) and electrode alone fixation (14). Inflammatory reactions were observed in five cases (4.3%), mostly after trauma. Broken cement fragments appeared to promote foreign body rejection. In seven cases an incudo-stapedial gap was repaired with GIC with excellent hearing gain; in three cases (43%) revision surgery was needed due to cement breakage. In one case, GIC was applied for a watertight coverage of opened mastoid cells, and in the other for fistula closure of the lateral semi-circular canal over cartilage, covered with bone pathé; follow-up was uneventful. Targeted use of GIC in middle ear surgery rarely poses problems. GIC cannot be used in neuro-otosurgery in contact with cerebrospinal fluid because of possible aluminium encephalopathy.


Subject(s)
Forecasting , Glass Ionomer Cements , Hearing Loss, Conductive/surgery , Hearing/physiology , Incus/surgery , Malleus/surgery , Microsurgery/methods , Stapes Surgery/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hearing Loss, Conductive/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...