Offering extended use of the contraceptive implant via an implementation science framework: a qualitative study of clinicians' perceived barriers and facilitators.

BACKGROUND: The etonogestrel contraceptive implant is currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the prevention of pregnancy up to 3 years. However, studies that suggest efficacy up to 5 years. There is little information on the prevalence of extended use and the factors that influence clinicians in offering extended use. We investigated clinician perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to offering extended use of the contraceptive implant. METHODS: Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews. Participants were recruited from a nationwide survey study of reproductive health clinicians on their knowledge and perspective of extended use of the contraceptive implant. To optimize the diversity of perspectives, we purposefully sampled participants from this study. We used content analysis and consensual qualitative research methods to inform our coding and data analysis. Themes arose deductively and inductively. RESULTS: We interviewed 20 clinicians including advance practice clinicians, family medicine physicians, obstetrician/gynecologist and complex family planning sub-specialists. Themes regarding barriers and facilitators to extended use of the contraceptive implant emerged. Barriers included the FDA approval for 3 years and clinician concern about liability in the context of off-label use of the contraceptive implant. Educational materials and a champion of extended use were facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: There is opportunity to expand access to extended use of the contraceptive implant by developing educational materials for clinicians and patients, identifying a champion of extended use, and providing information on extended use prior to replacement appointments at 3 years.

Barriers and Facilitators of Extended Use of the Contraceptive Implant: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Clinicians.

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the etonogestrel contraceptive implant for 3 years of use. Evidence suggests that it may be used for up to 5 years for pregnancy prevention, also known as extended use. METHODS: We conducted a national cross-sectional survey among a group of reproductive health clinicians. We developed an online survey using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and distributed it through e-mail listservs and social media groups from May to June 2021. We analyzed results using multivariable logistical regression. RESULTS: Among the 300 respondents, 195 (65.0%) reported that they always offer extended use, and 50 (16.7%) reported that they sometimes offer extended use. Fifty-five respondents (18.3%) reported that they never offer extended use. After adjusting for age, gender, and clinical setting, we found that complex family planning sub-specialists (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 9.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.81, 48.03]) and family medicine physicians (aOR = 4.37, 95% CI [1.58, 12.10]) were significantly more likely to recommend extended use compared with general obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) physicians. Clinicians from private practices or health maintenance organizations were significantly less likely to offer extended use than those from academic centers (aOR = 0.19, 95% CI [0.07, 0.51]; aOR = 0.06, 95% CI [0.01, 0.31]). The most common barriers to offering extended use were concerns about pregnancy risk, bleeding, and lack of FDA approval in the past 3 years. Meanwhile, clinicians identified strong published evidence supporting extended use as a key facilitator for offering it, and they perceived that prior counseling on extended use from a past clinician was a key facilitator for patients to adopt it. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of clinicians in this study did not consistently offer extended use of the contraceptive implant. An opportunity exists to expand access to extended use by focusing on education interventions for clinicians and seeking FDA approval for 5 years of use.

Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Experiences During, Awareness of, and Attitudes Toward Research for People With Parkinson Disease.

Background and Objectives: Presentation, progression, and treatment of Parkinson disease (PD) can differ based on sex and gender. However, knowledge on PD is limited by the characteristics of research participants, and most of the participants are men. In this study, we aimed to identify the attitudes toward and barriers to research participation for people with PD (PwP) based on their sexual orientation and gender identity. Methods: Data were obtained from the Fox Insight on March 16, 2023, for PwP who completed the Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding Research and Genetic Testing for PD. Responses were compared between sexual and gender minorities (SGM) (n = 136), cisgender heterosexual women (n = 1,479), and cisgender heterosexual men (n = 1,445). Associations between age, socioeconomic variables, and the responses that differed between the groups were assessed with linear models. Results: More than 68% of the participants were willing to participate in research; only 43.7% heard about research opportunities, and 52.3% knew where to find a study. Approximately 86.8% of the participants reported hearing about a study from their doctor would make them more likely to participate. A higher percentage of SGM were concerned about transportation and researchers not understanding or respecting their beliefs; a higher percentage of cisgender heterosexual women were concerned about transportation, data privacy, and their family's reaction to genetic results; and a higher percentage of cisgender heterosexual men were concerned about time required for research activities and complex forms. Age and socioeconomic variables were significantly associated with approach toward research that differed between the groups. Discussion: PwP are willing to participate in research, and health care providers can facilitate their participation. Barriers to research participation related to sexual and gender identity exist and must be addressed to increase our understanding of PD in underrepresented populations.

"My implant is expiring": A national US mystery shopper study regarding extended use of the contraceptive implant.

OBJECTIVES: To assess if patients can access extended use of the contraceptive implant when they call to schedule a removal or replacement. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a national secret-shopper study of reproductive clinics with a standardized script. Purposeful sampling provided geographic and practice type diversity. RESULTS: Of 59 clinics sampled, the majority (n=40, 67.8%) recommended replacement at three years or could not provide information regarding extended use by phone, and 19 (32.2%) offered extended use. Offering extended use varied by clinic type. CONCLUSIONS: Patients calling to schedule a removal or replacement of the implant often do not receive information regarding extended use beyond three years.