Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Gac Sanit ; 17(5): 375-83, 2003.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14599420

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of prescriptions in primary care area through indicators established by a team of physicians and to analyze the relationship between these indicators and those used by the Spanish public health system (INSALUD) in the same area. METHODS: An observational, cross sectional study was performed in a primary care area in Asturias with 156,614 inhabitants and 9 health centers. An overall quality score was obtained for each of the physicians in the primary care area by using quality indicators and standards agreed on by the prescribers themselves. The relationship between the score obtained and the indicators normally used in the area by INSALUD and pharmaceutical cost was also analyzed. RESULTS: Mean compliance with the optimal standard was 29%. The mean overall quality score was 3.24. None of the physicians achieved the maximum score of 11. No significant association was found between the score and the indicators for drugs of limited clinical value. Adherence to the pharmaceutical guide for the area was positively correlated with quality (r = 0.44, p < 0.001). A negative linear association (p < 0.001) was found between the overall quality score and incurred cost. The adjusted coefficient of determination was 0.29. CONCLUSIONS: Poor prescribing quality was widespread. Indicators for drugs of limited clinical value, frequently used as a measure of quality, showed no relationship with quality. Adherence to the area's pharmaceutical guide remains a valid indicator of prescribing quality. Overall, there was a correlation between higher quality and lower prescribing cost, although this correlation was not found for individual physicians.


Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions/standards , Models, Theoretical , Primary Health Care/standards , Catchment Area, Health , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Costs , Drug Prescriptions/economics , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Guideline Adherence , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Spain
2.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr ; 24(3): 183-6, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10850947

ABSTRACT

A microbiological quality control study of parenteral nutrition (PN) is presented. The study was carried out in the Pharmacy and Microbiology Services of the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (Barcelona, Spain) from April 1991 to May 1998 and represents more than 25,000 lipid-containing PN admixtures prepared during that 7-year period. A randomized sampling procedure according to the cumulative sum control charts was performed and a 0.45-microm membrane filtration method was used as the microbiological test. Validation showed that the method is sensitive for sterility tests. Bacterial growth was observed on 59 filters (4.58% of the samples). A second control was made for these positive outcomes, and bacterial growth was found in only two cases. The patients' clinical history was reviewed and no relation between the microorganisms of the nutrition and the results obtained from blood cultures was observed. The quality control study revealed a low incidence of contamination in our PN preparation process.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Food, Formulated/standards , Microbiological Techniques , Parenteral Nutrition/standards , Food Contamination , Parenteral Nutrition/adverse effects , Parenteral Nutrition/methods , Quality Control , Reproducibility of Results , Spain
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...