ABSTRACT
Objective To find out effective ways of assessing doctors' scientific research performance via an index system so as to conduct objective evaluation. Methods An index system for assessing doctors' scientific research performance established with the Delphian method and the subjective assessment by experts were used to evaluate and mark doctors' scientific research performance and a comparison was then made between the two assessment methods. Results The results of the two assessment methods were basically the same , with the assessment via the index system being superior to the subjective assessment by experts.Conclusion The assessment of doctors'scientific research performance via the index system is a satisfactory way of assessment. It is also a dynamic system needing further perfection and development.
ABSTRACT
Objective To find out effective ways of assessing doctors' scientific research performance via an index system so as to conduct objective evaluation. Methods An index system for assessing doctors' scientific research performance established with the Delphian method and the subjective assessment by experts were used to evaluate and mark doctors' scientific scientific performance and a comparison was then made between the two assessment methods. Results The results of the two assessment methods are basically the same, with the assessment via the index system being superior to the subjective assessment by experts. Conclusion The assessment of doctors'scienhfic research peifomance via the index system is a satisfactory way of assessment. h is also a dynamic system needing further perfection and development.
