EUS-guided fiducial marker placement for radiotherapy in rectal cancer: feasibility of two placement strategies and four fiducial types.

Background and study aims To facilitate image guidance during radiotherapy of rectal cancer, we investigated the feasibility of fiducial marker placement. This study aimed to evaluate technical success rate and safety of two endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided placement strategies and four fiducial types for rectal cancer patients. Patients and methods This prospective multicenter study included 20 participants who were scheduled to undergo rectal cancer treatment with neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy or chemoradiation. EUS-guided endoscopy was used for fiducial placement at the tumor site (n = 10) or in the mesorectal fat and in the tumor (n = 10). Four fiducial types were used (Visicoil 0.75 mm, Visicoil 0.50 mm, Cook, Gold Anchor). The endpoints were technical success rate and retention of fiducials, the latter of which was evaluated on cone-beam computed tomography scans during the first five radiotherapy fractions. Results A total of 64 fiducials were placed in 20 patients. For each fiducial type, at least three fiducials were successfully placed in all patients. Technical failure consisted of fiducial blockage within the needle (n = 2) and ejection of two preloaded fiducials at once (n = 4). No serious adverse events were reported. In three patients, one of the fiducials was misplaced without clinical consequences; two in the prostate and one in the intraperitoneal cavity. After a median time of 17 days after placement (range 7 - 47 days), a total of 42/64 (66 %) fiducials were still present (24/44 intratumoral vs. 18/20 mesorectal fiducials, P  = 0.009). Conclusions Placement of fiducials in rectal cancer patients is feasible, however, retention rates for intratumoral fiducials were lower (55 %) than for mesorectal fiducials (90 %).

Predictive factors for response and toxicity after brachytherapy for rectal cancer; results from the HERBERT study.

PURPOSE: The HERBERT study was a dose-finding feasibility study of a high-dose rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT) boost after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in elderly patients with rectal cancer who were unfit for surgery. This analysis evaluates the association of patient, tumor and dosimetric parameters with tumor response and toxicity after HDREBT in definitive radiotherapy for rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The HERBERT study included 38 inoperable patients with T2-3N0-1 rectal cancer. Thirteen fractions of 3 Gy EBRT were followed by three weekly HDREBT applications of 5-8 Gy per fraction. Clinical and dosimetric parameters were tested for correlation with clinical complete response (cCR), sustained partial/complete response (SR), patient reported bowel symptoms, physician reported acute and late proctitis (CTCAE v3) and endoscopically scored toxicity. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients completed treatment and were included in the current analyses. Twenty of 33 evaluable patients achieved a cCR, the median duration of a sustained response was 32 months. Tumor volume at diagnosis showed a strong association with clinical complete response (OR 1.15; p = 0.005). No dose-response correlation was observed in this cohort. Prescribed dose to the brachytherapy CTV (D90) correlated with acute and late physician reported proctitis while CTV volume, CTV width and high dose regions in the CTV (D1cc/D2cc) were associated with endoscopic toxicity at the tumor site. CONCLUSION: Tumor volume is the most important predictive factor for tumor response and a higher dose to the brachytherapy CTV increases the risk of severe clinically and endoscopically observed proctitis after definitive radiotherapy in elderly patients with rectal cancer.

MRI visibility of gold fiducial markers for image-guided radiotherapy of rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A GTV boost is suggested to result in higher complete response rates in rectal cancer patients, which is attractive for organ preservation. Fiducials may offer GTV position verification on (CB)CT, if the fiducial-GTV spatial relationship can be accurately defined on MRI. The study aim was to evaluate the MRI visibility of fiducials inserted in the rectum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We tested four fiducial types (two Visicoil types, Cook and Gold Anchor), inserted in five patients each. Four observers identified fiducial locations on two MRI exams per patient in two scenarios: without (scenario A) and with (scenario B) (CB)CT available. A fiducial was defined to be consistently identified if 3 out of 4 observers labeled that fiducial at the same position on MRI. Fiducial visibility was scored on an axial and sagittal T2-TSE sequence and a T1 3D GRE sequence. RESULTS: Fiducial identification was poor in scenario A for all fiducial types. The Visicoil 0.75 and Gold Anchor were the most consistently identified fiducials in scenario B with 7 out of 9 and 8 out of 11 consistently identified fiducials in the first MRI exam and 2 out of 7 and 5 out of 10 in the second MRI exam, respectively. The consistently identified Visicoil 0.75 and Gold Anchor fiducials were best visible on the T1 3D GRE sequence. CONCLUSION: The Visicoil 0.75 and Gold Anchor fiducials were the most visible fiducials on MRI as they were most consistently identified. The use of a registered (CB)CT and a T1 3D GRE MRI sequence is recommended.

Efficacy and toxicity of chemoradiation with image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of primary chemoradiation with image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer and to identify predictors of treatment failure and toxicity. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 155 stage IB-IVA cervical cancer patients treated from 2008 to 2016 with chemoradiation and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy. Treatment consisted of external beam radiotherapy (45 - 48.6 Gy in 1.8 - 2 Gy fractions) with concurrent weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2, 5 - 6 cycles) and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (3-4 × 7 Gy high dose rate) using intracavitary or combined intracavitary-interstitial techniques according to GEC-ESTRO (Group Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology) recommendations. Incidences of all outcomes were calculated using Kaplan-Meier's methodology. Risk factors for treatment failure and toxicity were identified using Cox's proportional hazards model and the Kruskal-Wallis H-test respectively. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 57 months. Five-year local control was 90.4 %. Five-year para-aortic lymph node metastasis-free and distant metastasis-free survival were 85.3 % and 70.2 % respectively. Tumor size and lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors for treatment failure. Cumulative incidences of severe late bladder, rectal, bowel, and vaginal toxicity were 0.8%, 3.3%, 3.6%, and 1.4% respectively at 5 years of follow-up. Combined intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy techniques were associated with less vaginal morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Primary chemoradiation with image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer is a highly effective local and loco-regional treatment. However, survival is compromised by the occurrence of distant metastasis. Patients with large tumors and nodal involvement at diagnosis are at increased risk and may benefit from intensified treatment. Severe late gastrointestinal and urogenital toxicity is limited and may be further reduced by increasing conformity, using combined intracavitary-interstitial techniques and lowering doses to organs at risk.

Benefit of adaptive CT-based treatment planning in high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy for rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: In this planning study, we investigated the dosimetric benefit of repeat CT-based treatment planning at each fraction vs. the use of a single CT-based treatment plan for all fractions for high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT) for rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included 11 patients that received a CT scan with applicator in situ for all three fractions. The treatment plan of the first fraction was projected on the repeat CT scans to simulate the use of a single treatment plan. In addition, replanning was performed on the repeat CT scans, and these were compared to the corresponding projected treatment plans. RESULTS: Repeat CT-based treatment planning resulted on average in a 21% higher (p = 0.01) conformity index compared to single CT-based treatment planning. Projecting the initial treatment plan to the repeat CT scans of fraction two and three, 12/22 fractions reached a CTV D98 of 85% of the prescribed dose of 7 Gy, which increased to 14/22 using replanning. For the remaining fractions, median CTV D98 was 4.2 Gy, and an intervention would be necessary to correct applicator balloon setup or to remove remaining air and/or feces between the CTV and the applicator. CONCLUSIONS: Using a single CT-based treatment plan for all fractions may result in a suboptimal treatment at later fractions. Therefore, repeat CT imaging should be the minimal standard practice in HDREBT for rectal cancer to determine whether an intervention would be necessary. Replanning based on repeat CT imaging resulted in more conformal treatment plans and is therefore recommended.

Endorectal Brachytherapy Boost After External Beam Radiation Therapy in Elderly or Medically Inoperable Patients With Rectal Cancer: Primary Outcomes of the Phase 1 HERBERT Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of the combination of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT) boost in elderly and medically inoperable patients with rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A phase 1 dose-escalation study was performed. Treatment consisted of EBRT (13 × 3 Gy) followed by 3 weekly brachytherapy applications 6 weeks later. The HDREBT dose started at 5 Gy per fraction, increasing with 1 Gy per fraction if dose-limiting toxicity (DLT, defined as grade ≥3 proctitis <6 weeks after HDREBT) occurred in ≤2 patients per dose level. The primary endpoint was the maximum tolerated dose, defined as 1 dose level below the dose at which 3 patients experienced DLT. Secondary endpoints were toxicity, clinical tumor response, freedom from local progression, and local progression-free and overall survival (L-PFS and OS). RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with a median age of 83 years were included in the study. Thirty-two were evaluable for DLT and late toxicity and 33 for response evaluation. Maximum delivered dose was 8 Gy per fraction, resulting in a recommended dose of 7 Gy per fraction. Response occurred in 29 of 33 patients (87.9%), with 60.6% complete response (CR). The L-PFS and OS rates were 42% and 63%, respectively, at 2 years. Patients with CR showed a significantly improved L-PFS (60% at 2 years, P=.006) and a trend in improved OS (80% at 2 years, P=.11). Severe late toxicity occurred in 10 of 32 patients. CONCLUSION: We found that HDREBT after EBRT results in a high overall response rate, with improved L-PFS for patients with a CR. The high observed rate of severe late toxicity requires further evaluation of the risks and benefits of an HDREBT boost.