The unique contribution of gendered racial stress to depressive symptoms among pregnant Black women.

INTRODUCTION: Pregnant Black women are at disproportionate risk for adverse birth outcomes, in part associated with higher prevalence of stress. Stress increases risk of depression, a known risk factor for preterm birth. In addition, multiple dimensions of stress, including perceived stress and stressful life events, are associated with adverse birth outcomes, independent of their association with prenatal depression. We use an intersectional and contextualized measure of gendered racial stress to assess whether gendered racial stress constitutes an additional dimension to prenatal depression, independent of stressful life events and perceived stress. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study of 428 Black women, we assessed gendered racial stress (using the 39-item Jackson Hogue Phillips Reduced Common Contextualized Stress Measure), perceived stress (using the Perceived Stress Scale), and stressful life events (using a Stressful Life Event Index) as psychosocial predictors of depressive symptoms (measured by the Edinburgh Depression Scale). We used bivariate analyses and multivariable regression to assess the association between the measures of stress and prenatal depression. RESULTS: Results revealed significant bivariate associations between participant scores on the full Jackson Hogue Phillips Reduced Common Contextualized Stress Measure and its 5 subscales, and the Edinburgh Depression Scale. In multivariable models that included participant Perceived Stress Scale and/or Stressful Life Event Index scores, the Jackson Hogue Phillips Reduced Common Contextualized Stress Measure contributed uniquely and significantly to Edinburgh Depression Scale score, with the burden subscale being the strongest contributor among all variables. No sociodemographic characteristics were found to be significant in multivariable models. CONCLUSION: For Black women in early pregnancy, gendered racial stress is a distinct dimension of stress associated with increased depressive symptoms. Intersectional stress measures may best uncover nuances within Black women's complex social environment.

A pilot study for exploring blood spot anti-mullerian hormone for population-based adolescent reproductive health research.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Studies of Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) rely upon serum measures and clinical samples of older reproductive-aged women intended/attempting pregnancy, with known fertility issues or medical morbidities. We explored the utility of minimally invasive AMH as a measure of fecundability in population-based reproductive health research. METHODS: We analyzed baseline data from 191 participants in a pilot, longitudinal cohort study, the Young Women's Stress Study. Using an integrated biosocial design, we collected interviewer-administered surveys on demographic, psychosocial, health, and method feasibility/acceptability information and finger-stick capillary dried blood spots (DBS). We used descriptive and bivariate statistics (correlation, T-tests, ANOVA) to estimate method feasibility/acceptability and unadjusted AMH mean concentrations overall and across sociodemographic, reproductive, and health covariates. RESULTS: AMH concentrations ranged from 1.02 to 22.23 ng/mL, with a mean of 5.66 ng/mL. AMH concentrations were associated with current hormonal contraceptive use, menstrual cycle frequency, and irregular menstrual patterns, but not with other known correlates. Most participants stated the DBS method was comfortable (81%) and would be likely to provide it again (88%). CONCLUSIONS: While these pilot data suggest AMH fell within normal range and our DBS methods were acceptable/feasible, the broader question of its usefulness for population reproductive health research remains unanswered. Larger, longitudinal studies are needed to validate AMH against time-to-pregnancy and gold standard measures in young healthy samples and across different sociodemographic groups. Public health and social scientists should consider the resource costs of AMH, ethical issues, and risks of (over)interpretation, with a reproductive justice and human rights frame in mind.