ABSTRACT
Background and Objective: Pre-pandemic, various healthcare settings were not used to seeing patients virtually. The unprecedented need to adopt virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic may have caught physical therapists (PTs) unready for it. This study aimed to determine the telerehabilitation knowledge, attitude, and practice of PTs in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic and determine the association between demographic and study outcome variables. Methods: This is an analytical cross-sectional study among members of the Philippine Physical Therapy Association, Inc. (PPTA) practicing in the Philippines. Purposive sampling (total enumeration) was employed. All PPTA members were invited to the study through e-mail and official social media group chats. A self-administered questionnaire was used to obtain data on telerehabilitation knowledge (through test questions on various theoretical aspects), attitude, and practice. Results: The questionnaire items had a content validity index of >0.80. The study yielded a 40% response rate. Most respondents were practicing clinicians in urban-based, private rehabilitation centers. Approximately half had average telerehabilitation knowledge, while the majority had agreeable telerehabilitation attitudes across different constructs. Among the respondents, 15.9% used telerehabilitation pre-pandemic, while 64.8% used it during the pandemic. Hybrid (synchronous and asynchronous) telerehabilitation sessions usually lasted one hour per patient, mostly using Facebook Messenger. Conclusion: Telerehabilitation was not widely practiced locally pre-pandemic, which may explain their average telerehabilitation knowledge. The positive telerehabilitation attitudes may represent a small group of PTs favoring telerehabilitation, while information from the larger population remains unknown. Early adopters of telerehabilitation may help introduce virtual care to colleagues and guide them in developing relevant knowledge and skills amid and beyond the enduring COVID-19 crisis.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic taping may be a useful modality in relieving pain, improving strength, and restoring the function of patients with De Quervain's Disease (DQD). Evidence on the effectiveness of therapeutic taping for DQD patients in mitigating its clinical signs and symptoms is not established. However, reviews report Kinesio Taping effects on musculoskeletal pains not specific to DQD. METHODS: The study followed the guideline statement of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Two researchers (RD and SN) searched the electronic databases and hand-searched for relevant journals. The relevant articles were selected using keywords found in titles and abstracts and, consequently, full-text manuscripts. A third researcher (VCDIII) resolved the disagreements between the two researchers. They used Review Manager 5.4 for risk of bias assessment and meta-analysis. Data were pooled to determine the therapeutic taping's overall effect. Heterogeneity was assessed by Higgin's (I2) statistic. The random-effects model was used if heterogeneity was high (>60%). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Approach determined the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: Seven high-risk of bias clinical-controlled trials comprising 241 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The reported outcome measures were the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Examination for Function and Power, and precision grip strength using a hand-held dynamometer and pinch gauge. Therapeutic taping did not improve the pain, power grip, grip strength, and function of participants with DQD (p > 0.05). Therapeutic taping compared to other physical therapy interventions did not reduce the VAS scores of 241 participants with DQD [SMD (95% CI) = -1.08 (-2.55,0.39), p = 0.15]. Kinesio taping with low-level laser therapy compared to ultrasound and exercise did not improve the function of 60 participants with DQD [SMD (95% CI) = 0.56 (-4.71,3.60), p = 0.79]. Therapeutic taping compared to ultrasound and Mulligan Pain Releasing Phenomenon did not improve the power grip strength of 50 participants with DQD [SMD (95% CI) = 1.24 (-0.83,3.31), p = 0.24]. Therapeutic taping was not better than phonophoresis in improving the precision grip strength of 50 participants with DQD [SMD (95% CI) = 0.43 (-1.95,2.80), p = 0.72]. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of therapeutic taping in treating patients with DQD. Therapeutic taping was no better than other treatment modalities in mitigating the clinical signs and symptoms of DQD (p > 0.05). Therapeutic taping did not affect wrist pain, handgrip, pincer strength, and function of participants with DQD (p > 0.05).
Subject(s)
Athletic Tape , De Quervain Disease , Musculoskeletal Pain , De Quervain Disease/therapy , Hand Strength , Humans , Pain MeasurementABSTRACT
With the COVID-19 pandemic, the adoption of telerehabilitation has rapidly increased to improve access and minimize cross-infection risk to patients. Nevertheless, Filipino pediatric physical therapists (PTs) must ensure that they conduct evidence-based procedures for specific tests and measures to determine patient outcomes. This investigation reported the most common pediatric outcome measurement tools (OMTs) used in telerehabilitation by Filipino pediatric PTs treating 0 to 21-year-olds in the Philippines. Validation and pilot testing of an adapted questionnaire on OMT usage was undertaken before dissemination via email and social media. Pediatric PTs reported that the commonly used OMTs in telerehabilitation are Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) (100%)-including both versions of GMFM-88 and GMFM-66 followed by Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS) (30%). These findings support the use of feasible OMTs in pediatric telerehabilitation due to their applicability in the online setting.
