Phase II trial of carboplatin and etoposide for patients with recurrent high-grade glioma.

We present the results of a phase II trial of carboplatin and etoposide (CE) combination as first-line chemotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) after surgery and radiotherapy. We assess the activity and the tolerability of this combination. 30 patients with GBM (25) and AA (5) were treated with VP-16 (etoposide) 120 mg m(-2) and CBCDA (carboplatin) 100 mg m(-2) for 3 days every 4 weeks. Moreover, we performed a retrospective analysis of topoisomerase IIalpha gene status using chromogenic in situ hybridisation. The median age was 54 years (21-73 years); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score was 0-1 in 25 patients and 2 in five patients. All patients had been previously treated with surgical resection (21 radical resections) followed by radiation therapy (40-60 Gy). We observed six (20%) complete responses, three (10%) partial responses and 12 (40%) stable diseases, with a response rate of 30%. The median time to progression was 4 months, while progression-free survival at 6 months was 33.3%. The median survival time was 10 months. Neutropenia occurred in 9 patients: four patients had grade 4, two patients grade 3 and three patients grade 2. In the conclusion of this clinical trial, the CE combination has shown activity in recurrent GBM and AA, with a good toxicity profile. Alterations in the copy number of topoisomerase IIalpha gene seem to be a rare event and in our series do not influence response to the CE combination.

A comparison of methods of loco-regional chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy as neo-adjuvant treatment of osteosarcoma of the extremity.

AIM: Our experience of pre-operative intraarterial (i.a.) vs intravenous (i.v.) infusion of cisplatinum (CDP) in a multiagent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the extremity is reported. METHODS: Two successive randomized studies were performed. In the first, pre-operatively, CDP i.a. vs CDP i.v. was applied in combination with high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) and adriamycin (ADM) within a three-drug regimen. In the second, a combination of HDMTX, ADM and IFO, within a four-drug regimen was tested. RESULTS: The rate of responses to chemotherapy (tumour necrosis > or = 90%) was significantly higher (P<0.04) for the 142 patients treated with the four-drug regimen than in the 79 patients treated with a three-drug regimen (76%vs 62%). According to the route of CDP infusion, in the three-drug regimen the rate of responses was significantly higher (P=0.004) in patients treated with i.a. CDP (77%) than in patients treated i.v. (46%); with the four-drug regimen the rate of response was not significantly different in patients treated i.a. (81%) and in patients treated i.v. (71%). No significant differences in the rates of limb salvages, local recurrence and event-free survival (EFS) were seen between the i.a. and the i.v. groups. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of osteosarcoma of the extremity, the i.a. infusion of CDP does not offer any significant advantage when this drug is used within an aggressive, multiagent, pre-operative four-drug regimen.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the extremities with synchronous lung metastases: treatment with cisplatin, adriamycin and high dose of methotrexate and ifosfamide.

We report on the clinical course and outcome of 28 patients, treated at The Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli between 1995 and 1997 for osteosarcoma of the extremities metastatic to the lung at presentation. The treatment for these patients was the following: primary chemotherapy with cisplatin, adriamycin and high dose of methotrexate and ifosfamide followed by simultaneous resection of primary and metastatic lesions (when feasible), and further chemotherapy. After primary chemotherapy, lung metastases disappeared in 6 patients, whereas metastases in 3 remained surgically unresectable. These 9 patients received surgical treatment of the primary tumor only. In the remaining 19 patients, after chemotherapy, a simultaneous resection of the primary and metastatic tumor was performed. The resection of metastatic lesions was complete in 18 cases and incomplete in one. Three of the 4 patients who did not achieve a tumor-free status died in a few months and one is still alive with uncontrolled disease. With a median follow-up of 32 months (19-43) of the 24 patients who achieved remission, 12 (55%) remained continuously free of disease, 11 relapsed with new metastases and 1 died of chemotherapy-related toxicity. The 2-year DFS and OS were 36% and 53% respectively. These results are much worse than those achieved in 114 contemporary patients with localised disease (2-year DFS: 81%) treated in the same period and they are superimposible to the results achieved in 23 patients previously treated with the same protocol, but with standard dose of ifosfamide (2-year DFS: 32%). However, it must be underlined that, as regards prognosis, patients with metastatic disease at presentation are a hetero-geneous group. The DFS was significantly higher for patients with only one or two metastatic lesions than for patients with 3 or more lesions (2 year DFS: 78% vs. 28%). In 12 of the 19 patients who had a complete simultaneous resection of the primary and metastatic tumor, a strong correlation between the degree of necrosis of the primary and metastatic lesions was found. We conclude that in patients with osteosarcoma of the extremity with lung metastases at presentation: a) the combination of aggressive chemotherapy with simultaneous resection of primary and metastatic tumors works very well only for those patients who present with one or two metastatic nodules whereas for patients with 3 or more pulmonary metastases the prognosis is very poor; b) within the 4-drug regimen used in this study, the increment of ifosfamide dose from 10 g/m2 to 15 g/m2 for cycle does not improve prognosis; c) the strong correlation found between the histologic response of the primary tumor and metastases supports the strategy, largely used nowadays in the neoadjuvant treatment of osteosarcoma, of tailoring postoperative chemo-therapy on the basis of the primary tumor histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for peripheral malignant neuroectodermal tumor of bone: recent experience at the istituto rizzoli.

PURPOSE: The results achieved in 44 patients with nonmetastatic peripheral neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) of bone treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A six-drug regimen of chemotherapy (vincristine, doxorubicin, dactinomycin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and etoposide) was administered to all patients. Local treatment consisted of surgery in 20 patients, surgery followed by radiotherapy in 13, and radiotherapy only in 11. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (range, 2 to 7 years), 23 patients (52%) remain event-free, 20 have relapsed (45%), and one has died of chemotherapy-related toxicity. The 5-year event-free survival and overall survival were 54.2% and 62.7%, respectively. To assess the prognostic significance of neural differentiation in the family of Ewing's sarcoma, these results have been compared with the outcomes of 138 concomitant patients with typical Ewing's sarcoma (TES) who were treated according to the same protocol. Of these, 103 (75%) remained continuously event-free, 34 (24%) relapsed, and one died of chemotherapy-related toxicity. It follows that PNET patients treated with this chemotherapy regimen have a significantly worse prognosis than typical ES patients (5-year event-free survival, 54.2% v 70.6%, P <.012; 5-year overall survival, 62.7% v 78.3%, P <.002). CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that studies into new adjuvant therapy for Ewing's sarcoma modulated according to risk of relapse should also consider neural differentiation as a risk factor.

Prognostic factors in nonmetastatic Ewing's sarcoma of bone treated with adjuvant chemotherapy: analysis of 359 patients at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli.

PURPOSE: The identification of prognostic factors in patients with nonmetastatic Ewing's sarcoma could allow the use of risk-adapted therapeutic strategies of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on 359 patients with nonmetastatic Ewing's sarcoma of bone treated at a single institution between January 1979 and April 1995 were retrospectively considered. The influence of clinical, hematologic, therapeutic, and histologic parameters on event-free survival was assessed. RESULTS: By univariate analysis, the following features were found to be associated with a poor prognosis: male sex (P <.02), age older than 12 years (P <.006), fever (P <.0001), anemia (P <.0025), high serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level (P <.0001), axial location (P <.04), radiation therapy only for local control (P <.009), type of chemotherapy regimen (P <.0001), and poor chemotherapy-induced necrosis (P <.001). After multivariate analysis, the adverse independent prognostic factors were male sex (P <.04), age older than 12 years (P <.001), fever (P <.0002), anemia (P <.02), high serum LDH level (P <.0003), axial location (P <.02), and type of chemotherapy regimen (P <.0003). When the multivariate analysis was restricted to surgically treated patients, the adverse independent prognostic factors were poor chemotherapy-induced necrosis (P <.0001), fever (P <.015), anemia (P <.02), and high serum LDH level (P <.025). CONCLUSION: The prognosis in cases of nonmetastatic Ewing's sarcoma is influenced by many different clinical and hematologic variables, all of which are to be considered when patients are being stratified according to the risk of relapse. In surgically treated patients, the most important prognostic factor is chemotherapy-induced necrosis.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for Ewing's sarcoma of bone in patients older than thirty-nine years.

The aim of this study was to determine whether the behaviour of Ewing's sarcoma of bone in adult patients is the same as that observed in children and adolescents. We reviewed the clinical features and outcomes of 23 patients over the age of 39 (17 males, 6 females) who had been treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 1983 and 1995 at our institution. The most common primary sites of tumor were the extremities (16 cases); tumor volume was more than 100 ml in 17 patients, and elevated serum LDH levels were found in 6 cases. The local treatment was surgery in 8 cases, surgery plus radiotherapy in 8, and radiotherapy alone in 7 cases. Chemotherapy comprised a 4-drug regimen in 10 patients, while the other 13 patients received 6 drugs. At a follow-up of 8.8 years (3.5-15) 13 patients remained continuously free of disease and 10 relapsed. The 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 53% and 59%, respectively. Clinical features, dose intensity, and toxicity of chemotherapy, as well as the outcome of these 23 patients were found to be exactly comparable to the findings observed in 327 patients younger than 40 years treated at our institution in the same period, with the same therapy. We conclude that Ewing's sarcoma of bone in adults is no different from that occurring in children, and we therefore recommend the inclusion of all adult patients in multidisciplinary treatment trials of this tumor.

Prognostic significance of serum LDH in Ewing's sarcoma of bone.

The pretreatment serum lactic dehydrogenase (SLDH) levels of 618 patients with Ewing's sarcoma of the extremities (136 metastatic at presentation and 482 localized) were analyzed to evaluate whether the enzyme level had a clinical value in predicting the course of the disease. The percentage of patients with increased SLDH was significantly higher in the metastatic group than in the group of patients with localized disease (68% vs 32%; P<0.0001). In the latter group treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy the 5-year disease-free survival rate was significantly higher in patients with normal pretreatment SLDH than in those with high levels (65% vs 41%; P<0.0001). The time to relapse was significantly shorter for patients with elevated SLDH than in patients with normal values of the enzyme. The site of the tumor was significantly related with the stage of the disease, and for patients with localized disease, with the disease survival rate, at the multivariate analyses site of the tumor and SLDH levels were independently related with the stage of disease and with prognosis. These data demonstrate that in Ewing's sarcoma of bone pretreatment SLDH have a prognostic value and should be considered in the comparison of the results achieved with different therapies and in planning new randomized clinical therapeutic trials.

Delayed diagnosis and tumor stage in Ewing's sarcoma.

The relationship between tumor stage and time to diagnosis was investigated in a consecutive series of 618 patients with Ewing's sarcoma. This tumor is diagnosed late, with a mean interval between initial symptoms and biopsy of 4 months. The interval between the clinical onset and the final diagnosis was not associated with tumor stage. On the contrary, patients with metastatic Ewing's sarcoma were generally diagnosed at an earlier time than patients with localized disease, possibly reflecting inherent biological differences in aggressiveness among sub-groups of Ewing's sarcoma.

Nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity: results of a neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocol (IOR/OS-3) with high-dose methotrexate, intraarterial or intravenous cisplatin, doxorubicin, and salvage chemotherapy based on histologic tumor response.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: From 1986 to 1989, a study for the treatment of nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity (IOR/OS-2) was carried out at the Rizzoli Institute. The cumulative dose of doxorubicin delivered was 480 mg/m2, and severe heart failure developed in 5 (3%) of the 164 treated patients. The specific aim of the subsequent study was to assess the efficacy of a protocol, similar to IOR/OS-2, but with a reduced cumulative dose of doxorubicin (390 mg/m2). Additional aims were to assess the role of the route of infusion (intraarterial or intravenous) of cisplatin on histologic response of the primary tumor and the use of ifosfamide as salvage chemotherapy in poor responders. METHODS: The new chemotherapy regimen (IOR/OS-3) was comprised of a preoperative phase with methotrexate (10 g/m2), cisplatin (120 mg/m2 intraarterially or intravenously), and doxorubicin (60 mg/m2). After surgery, the same drugs were administered, with the addition of ifosfamide (10 g/m2) in patients who had a poor histologic response to primary chemotherapy. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients entered the study. The rate of good histologic response was 64% with intraarterial cisplatin and 43% with intravenous cisplatin (P = 0.05). The 8-year event-free survival and overall survival were 54% and 61%, respectively, with no significant difference according to the histologic response. No cases of clinical doxorubicin-induced cardiopathy were recorded. Event-free and overall survival did not significantly differ from those achieved with IOR/OS-2 (8-year disease-free and overall survival, respectively 63% and 72%). CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in the doxorubicin cumulative dose avoided episodes of cardiotoxicity, without consequences on the efficacy of treatment. The addition of ifosfamide was an effective "salvage" therapy for poor responders. A better histologic response with intraarterial cisplatin was observed, but owing to the availability of an effective salvage therapy for poor responders, the advantages in terms of histologic response did not compensate for the cost and discomfort for the patients of this modality of infusion of cisplatin.

Ifosfamide and actinomycin-D, added in the induction phase to vincristine, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, improve histologic response and prognosis in patients with non metastatic Ewing's sarcoma of the extremity.

The role of ifosfamide as first-line chemotherapy treatment of non metastatic Ewing's sarcoma of the extremity is still under discussion. The purpose of this paper is to report the results achieved in a neoadjuvant protocol (REN-3) in which ifosfamide, added to the conventional VACA regimen, was employed since the induction phase. Induction chemotherapy consisted of vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, actinomycin-D and ifosfamide. After local treatment, patients received the drugs used in the induction phase and etoposide. Between November 1991 and November 1994, 61 patients with non metastatic Ewing's sarcoma of the extremity were treated. Forty-nine patients underwent surgery and 73.5% of them had a good histologic response. At a median follow-up of 60 months (range 32-76), 48 patients (79%) remained continuously disease-free. The 5-year event-free and overall survival were 77% and 87%, respectively. These results were significantly better both in terms of histologic response or event-free and overall survival than those obtained in 58 patients with non metastatic Ewing's sarcoma of the extremity treated in a previous protocol (REN-2) in which the same drugs were used, but ifosfamide was employed only in the maintenance phase. The present study suggests the importance of early use of ifosfamide in the treatment of patients with non metastatic Ewing's sarcoma of the extremity.