The keys to control a COVID-19 outbreak in a haemodialysis unit.

BACKGROUND: The high rate of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spreading represents a challenge to haemodialysis (HD) units. While fast isolation of suspected cases plays an essential role to avoid disease outbreaks, significant rates of asymptomatic cases have recently been described. After detecting an outbreak in one of our HD clinics, wide SARS-CoV-2 screening and segregation of confirmed cases were performed. METHODS: The entire clinic population, 192 patients, underwent testing for SARS-CoV-2 detection by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction . We used univariate and multivariate logistic regression to define variables involved in SARS-CoV-2 infection in our dialysis unit. Later, we analysed differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. RESULTS: In total, 22 symptomatic and 14 of the 170 asymptomatic patients had a SARS-CoV-2-positive result. Living in a nursing home/homeless [odds ratio (OR) 3.54; P = 0.026], having been admitted to the reference hospital within the previous 2 weeks (OR 5.19; P = 0.002) and sharing health-care transportation with future symptomatic (OR 3.33; P = 0.013) and asymptomatic (OR 4.73; P = 0.002) positive patients were independent risk factors for a positive test. Nine positive patients (25.7%) remained asymptomatic after a 3-week follow-up. We found no significant differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-positive patients is probably one of the key points to controlling an outbreak in an HD unit. Sharing health-care transportation to the dialysis unit, living in a nursing home and having been admitted to the reference hospital within the previous 2 weeks, are major risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

¿Influye la vitamina D en los anticuerpos de superficie de la hepatitis B en pacientes no vacunados en hemodiálisis? / Does vitamin D influence hepatitis B surface antibodies in non-vaccinated patients on hemodialysis?

No disponible

Intraperitoneal fluid overestimates hydration status assessment by bioimpedance spectroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is a valuable tool to assess nutrition and volume status in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. However, data about the influence of intraperitoneal fluid on body composition measures are conflicting, and there is no clear consensus about whether the abdomen should be drained before the procedure. We designed a comparison study to detect the influence of intra-abdominal fluid on BIS results. METHODS: We performed 73 pairs of BIS measurements in 34 stable PD patients, first with the peritoneum filled with a 1.36% glucose dialysate solution and then after the solution was drained. Patients stayed in the supine position for 10 minutes before the BIS procedure, and the electrodes were not moved between measures. Clinical and demographic data were collected, as were analytic parameters of nutrition and volume status. RESULTS: Fluid overload is overestimated when BIS is performed with a full abdomen (1.82 ± 1.73 L vs 1.64 ± 1.68 L, p = 0.043). We also found a spurious overestimation in extracellular water (16.40 ± 3.21 L vs 16.24 ± 3.16 L, p < 0.001) and in relative overhydration (8.29% ± 6.96% vs 7.14% ± 6.79%, p = 0.017). No differences in intracellular water or parameters of nutrition were found. We observed negative correlations for the extracellular water overestimation with age (r = -0.245, p = 0.037), serum B-type natriuretic peptide (r = -0.366, p = 0.036), body mass index (r = -0.248, p = 0.035), and lean tissue index (r = -0.427, p = 0.001). The difference in extracellular water correlated only with body mass index (r = -0.259, p = 0.039). We also found that, assessed at 50 KHz, whole-body impedance (-4.52 ± 8.37, p = 0.001) and phase angle (-0.08 ± 0.23 degrees, p = 0.002) were both lower when BIS was performed in patients with a full abdomen. CONCLUSIONS: Fluid overload is overestimated by BIS when performed in patients with dialysate in the peritoneum. The observed differences are greater in younger, more poorly nourished, or less overhydrated patients. If more precise results are required, we suggest that the abdomen be drained before BIS is performed.

Progresión de la enfermedad renal crónica en pacientes con enfermedad poliquística autosómica dominante / Chronic kidney disease progression in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

Objetivos: El objetivo del presente estudio es analizar los factores que influyen en la progresión de la insuficiencia renal crónica en pacientes con enfermedad poliquística autosómica dominante (PQRAD). Material y métodos: Estudiamos a 101 pacientes (edad media: 43,6 ± 17,3, 43,6% varones). La mediana (rango intercuartílico) de seguimiento es de 69 (128-35) meses desde 1997 hasta 2010. Analizamos la progresión de dos formas: 1) tiempo hasta evento renal definido como la reducción del filtrado glomerular estimado (FGe) en un 50% desde la primera visita y/o entrada en diálisis, y 2) cambio medio en el FGe/año. Se recogieron en cada visita datos clínicos y demográficos, presión arterial sistólica (PAS) y diastólica (PAD), medicación concomitante y parámetros analíticos. También se recogió el tamaño renal basal medido por ecografía. Resultados: Treinta y un pacientes tuvieron un evento renal. La mediana de tiempo hasta la aparición del evento es de 102 (131-53) meses. Los pacientes que tuvieron un evento renal tenían basalmente mayor PAS y PAD (p = 0,017 y p = 0,001, respectivamente), mayores niveles de acido úrico (p = 0,041), mayor colesterol LDL (p = 0,001), mayor proteinuria (p = 0,033) y mayor tamaño renal (p = 0,05). El cambio medio de FGe/anual fue de -3,52 ± 7,3 ml/min/1,73 m2, 49 pacientes presentaron un descenso rápido de función renal: Grupo A (> -3,52 ml/min/1,73 m2) y 52 pacientes tuvieron una progresión lenta de la insuficiencia renal: Grupo B (< -3,2 ml/min/1,73 m2). Por regresión de Cox, en un modelo ajustado, la PAS y la menor edad al diagnóstico son las variables que mantienen su poder predictivo de mal pronóstico renal (p = 0,026). Conclusiones: La función renal inicial, proteinuria, tamaño renal, hipercolesterolemia, hiperuricemia y PAS basal son factores que influyen en la progresión de la insuficiencia renal en la PQRAD, siendo la PAS y la menor edad los factores que mantienen su poder predictivo independiente en el análisis multivariante (AU)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse the factors influencing chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Material and Method: We studied 101 patients (mean age: 43±17.3 years, 43.56% male) followed during a median (interquartile range) follow-up time of 69 (35-128) months from 1997 to 2010. The primary end point was: time to a 50% decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (CKD-EPI) since the first-time visit and/or time to initiation of renal replacement therapy, and the annual mean change of eGFR was also analysed. Clinical and demographic data, blood pressure, concomitant medications, and analytical parameters were collected at each visit. Baseline kidney size was also recorded by ultrasound. Results: Thirty-one patients achieved the primary end point after a median (IQR) time of 102 (53-131) months. Those patients who achieved the primary end point had higher SBP and DBP (P=0.017 and P=0.001), higher LDL-cholesterol (P=0.011), higher creatinine (P=0.006), higher uricemia (P=0.041), more severe proteinuria (P=0.033) and greater kidney size (P=0.05). The mean annual eGFR change was of -3.52±7.3ml/min/1.73m2. Forty-nine patients had a rapid decline in renal function: Group A (higher than -3.52ml/min/1.73m2) and 52 patients had a lower renal disease progression: Group B (<-3.2 ml/min/1.73 m2). Adjusted Cox regression analysis showed that higher SBP and younger age at the first visit were independent variables for poorer renal outcome (P=0.026). Conclusions: Initial kidney function, proteinuria, renal size, hypercholesterolemia, hyperuricemia, and SBP are the factors that influence CKD progression in ADPKD. SBP and younger age at diagnosis are the only factors that maintain their independent predictive value in a multivariant analysis (AU)

Chronic kidney disease progression in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse the factors influencing chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). MATERIAL AND METHOD: We studied 101 patients (mean age: 43 +/- 17.3 years, 43.56% male) followed during a median (interquartile range) follow-up time of 69 (35-128) months from 1997 to 2010. The primary end point was: time to a 50% decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (CKD-EPI) since the first-time visit and/or time to initiation of renal replacement therapy, and the annual mean change of eGFR was also analysed. Clinical and demographic data, blood pressure, concomitant medications, and analytical parameters were collected at each visit. Baseline kidney size was also recorded by ultrasound. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients achieved the primary end point after a median (IQR) time of 102 (53-131) months. Those patients who achieved the primary end point had higher SBP and DBP (P=0.017 and P=0.001), higher LDL-cholesterol (P=0.011), higher creatinine (P=0.006), higher uricemia (P=0.041), more severe proteinuria (P=0.033) and greater kidney size (P=0.05). The mean annual eGFR change was of -3.52 +/- 7.3ml/min/1.73m2. Forty-nine patients had a rapid decline in renal function: Group A (higher than -3.52ml/min/1.73m2) and 52 patients had a lower renal disease progression: Group B (<-3.2 ml/min/1.73 m2). Adjusted Cox regression analysis showed that higher SBP and younger age at the first visit were independent variables for poorer renal outcome (P=0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Initial kidney function, proteinuria, renal size, hypercholesterolemia, hyperuricemia, and SBP are the factors that influence CKD progression in ADPKD. SBP and younger age at diagnosis are the only factors that maintain their independent predictive value in a multivariant analysis.

Effect of allopurinol in chronic kidney disease progression and cardiovascular risk.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hyperuricemia is associated with hypertension, inflammation, renal disease progression, and cardiovascular disease. However, no data are available regarding the effect of allopurinol in patients with chronic kidney disease. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a prospective, randomized trial of 113 patients with estimated GFR (eGFR) <60 ml/min. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with allopurinol 100 mg/d (n = 57) or to continue the usual therapy (n = 56). Clinical, biochemical, and inflammatory parameters were measured at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months of treatment. The objectives of study were: (1) renal disease progression; (2) cardiovascular events; and (3) hospitalizations of any causes. RESULTS: Serum uric acid and C-reactive protein levels were significantly decreased in subjects treated with allopurinol. In the control group, eGFR decreased 3.3 +/- 1.2 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), and in the allopurinol group, eGFR increased 1.3 +/- 1.3 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) after 24 months. Allopurinol treatment slowed down renal disease progression independently of age, gender, diabetes, C-reactive protein, albuminuria, and renin-angiotensin system blockers use. After a mean follow-up time of 23.4 +/- 7.8 months, 22 patients suffered a cardiovascular event. Diabetes mellitus, previous coronary heart disease, and C-reactive protein levels increased cardiovascular risk. Allopurinol treatment reduces risk of cardiovascular events in 71% compared with standard therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Allopurinol decreases C-reactive protein and slows down the progression of renal disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. In addition, allopurinol reduces cardiovascular and hospitalization risk in these subjects.