The effect of smoking cessation counselling in pregnant women: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant smokers are often prescribed counselling as part of multicomponent cessation interventions. However, the isolated effect of counselling in this population remains unclear, and individual randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a meta-analysis of RCTs examining counselling in pregnant smokers. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the CDC Tobacco Information and Prevention, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline and PsycINFO databases for RCTs evaluating smoking cessation counselling. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs conducted in pregnant women in which the effect of counselling could be isolated and those that reported biochemically validated abstinence at 6 or 12 months after the target quit date. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Overall estimates were derived using random effects meta-analysis models. MAIN RESULTS: Our search identified eight RCTs (n = 3290 women), all of which examined abstinence at 6 months. The proportion of women that remained abstinent at the end of follow up was modest, ranging from 4 to 24% among those randomised to counselling and from 2 to 21% among control women. The absolute difference in abstinence reached a maximum of only 4%. Summary estimates are inconclusive because of wide confidence intervals, albeit with little evidence to suggest that counselling is efficacious at promoting abstinence (odds ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 0.84-1.40). There was no evidence to suggest that efficacy differed by counselling type. CONCLUSIONS: Available data from RCTs examining the isolated effect of smoking cessation counselling in pregnant women are limited but sufficient to rule out large treatment effects. Future RCTs should examine pharmacological therapies in this population.

Quality of life after balloon angioplasty or stenting for acute myocardial infarction. One-year results from the Stent-PAMI trial.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare the impact of primary stenting or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients undergoing direct angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that coronary stenting reduces clinical and angiographic restenosis compared with PTCA. However, the impact of stenting on HRQOL from the patient's perspective remains unknown. METHODS: We administered the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and the Medical Outcomes Study Short-form Survey at 1, 6 and 12 months after initial treatment to all North American patients in the Stent-Primary Angioplasty for Myocardial Infarction trial (Stent-PAMI) (n = 509)-a randomized trial comparing primary stenting to conventional PTCA for patients with AMI. RESULTS: At one month, most HRQOL measures were similar for the two groups, but stent patients reported less bodily pain than PTCA patients (p = 0.03). At six-month follow-up, stenting resulted in significant improvements in several dimensions of HRQOL including reduced anginal frequency and bodily pain as well as improved disease perception (all p < or = 0.03) and a trend towards better anginal stability (p = 0.056). By 12-month follow-up, however, none of these differences remained statistically significant. These differences in HRQOL were largely explained by the greater need for ischemia-driven target-vessel repeat revascularization procedures in PTCA patients during the first six months (16.0% vs. 6.2%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing revascularization for AMI, initial stent placement is associated with improvements in several dimensions of health status during the first six months of follow-up. In the absence of differences in mortality, these findings add to the overall argument in favor of initial stenting in patients treated with mechanical reperfusion for myocardial infarction.

A randomized placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of antiinflammatory therapy with methylprednisolone in unstable angina (MUNA trial).

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of antiinflammatory therapy with methylprednisolone during the acute phase of unstable angina. METHODS: This is a randomized 'prospective' double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients with the diagnosis of unstable angina were randomized to a 48-h course of methylprednisolone (n=81) or placebo (n=85). Patient care and therapy were otherwise decided by their attending cardiologist. The primary end-point was a composite of in-hospital recurrence of angina, silent ischaemia on Holter recording, emergency coronary revascularization, readmission with unstable angina, and myocardial infarction or death during the 30-day follow-up. RESULTS: The two groups were well balanced and had similar clinical characteristics at baseline. Forty-eight hours after randomization, mean C-reactive protein levels decreased by 2.6 mg. l(-1)in the methylprednisolone group, but increased by 1.6 mg. l(-1)in the placebo group (P=0.03). The primary end-point occurred in 44% of the methylprednisolone patients and in 33% of the placebo patients (P=0.12). Coronary revascularization rates were equal between the two groups (38% and 40%). When adjustment was made for the difference in revascularization times, a trend towards better event-free survival was seen in the control group (67% vs 57%;P=0.09). CONCLUSION: A 48 h course of antiinflammatory therapy with methylprednisolone given at the doses of this study did not improve the short-term outcome of patients with unstable angina.