Heparinized cardiopulmonary bypass circuits and low systemic anticoagulation: an analysis of nearly 6000 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVE: Heparin coating of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits reduces the inflammatory response and increases the thromboresistance during extracorporeal circulation. These properties enables a lower systemic heparin dose, which has been shown to reduce the need for blood transfusions. Experience with this technique accumulated over 11 years has been analyzed. METHODS: All patients underwent on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with heparin-coated circuits. Apart from some patients receiving a high intraoperative dose of aprotinin, the systemic heparin dose was reduced, with a lower level of an activated clotting time of 250 seconds during extracorporeal circulation. The overall strategy aimed at a fast-track regimen, with early extubation, minimal use of blood transfusions, and rapid postoperative recovery. RESULTS: Altogether, 5954 patients were included; 1131 (19.0%) were female (median age, 70 years), and 4823 were male (median age, 65 years). The median additive EuroSCORE was 3 (range, 0-14; mean 3.5 ± 2.5). No significant signs of clotting were seen in any part of the extracorporeal circuit. Bank blood products were given to 427 (7.2%) patients. Median extubation time was 1.7 hours. The stroke rate was 1.0%, transient neurologic deficits occurred in 0.7%, and perioperative myocardial infarction occurred in 1.2%. On the fifth day, 88.1% of the patients were physically rehabilitated and ready for discharge. Thirty-day mortality was 0.9% (54 patients). CONCLUSIONS: The experience with this patient cohort including mostly low- to medium-risk patients with a relatively short cardiopulmonary bypass time indicates that coronary artery bypass grafting performed with heparin-coated circuits and reduced level of systemic heparinization is safe and results in a very satisfactory clinical course. No signs of clotting or other technical incidents were recorded.

Cold blood versus cold crystalloid cardioplegia: a prospective randomised study of 345 aortic valve patients.

OBJECTIVE: Although experimental studies have indicated that blood cardioplegia may be superior to crystalloid cardioplegia for myocardial protection, clinical data still remain uncertain. In a previous randomised study from our institution, including 1440 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), no beneficial effects of blood cardioplegia were seen in any relevant outcome variables. The investigation was therefore extended to a patient population having longer pump times and ischaemic periods. METHODS: Over a 48-month period, all patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with or without CABG performed by two surgeons, were prospectively randomised to receive either intermittent cold retrograde blood cardioplegia (group B) or intermittent cold retrograde crystalloid cardioplegia (group C) during aortic cross-clamping. RESULTS: A total of 345 patients aged 28-90 years (median, 72 years) entered the study (group B, n=172, group C, n=173). All relevant demographic and operative variables were similar for both groups. As for the clinical course, no statistically significant differences were seen concerning spontaneous sinus rhythm after aortic declamping, use of inotropic drugs, duration of ventilatory support, bleeding and rate of allogeneic blood transfusions, perioperative myocardial infarction, episodes of atrial fibrillation, stroke or minor neurological dysfunction, renal function, infections, physical rehabilitation or mortality. Further, in the patients with the longest ischaemic times, no statistically significant differences between the groups could be demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: There were no indications that retrograde cold blood cardioplegia was superior to retrograde cold crystalloid cardioplegia patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, with or without CABG.

Low postoperative dose of aprotinin reduces bleeding and is safe in patients receiving clopidogrel before coronary artery bypass surgery. A prospective randomized study.

Clopidogrel (Plavix) given before the operation increases bleeding complications following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). High perioperative doses of aprotinin (Trasylol) are known to reduce bleeding and transfusions after cardiac surgery, but may increase the risk of thrombosis, renal impairment, and mortality. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical effects of aprotinin given in high doses intra- and postoperatively vs. a low postoperative dose in patients on clopidogrel. Patients admitted for first-time CABG and receiving clopidogrel with or without aspirin, were prospectively randomized either to receive a total of 75,000 kallikrein inhibitor unit (KIU)/kg aprotinin given intra- and postoperatively or 25,000 KIU/kg aprotinin after the operation. Three hundred and ninety-nine patients aged 32-87 years (median 67 years) were included. Postoperative bleeding was slightly different, but moderate in both groups. The transfusion rate was similar, as were the incidences of postoperative neurological disturbances and myocardial infarction. Renal impairment and need for inotropic drugs were more frequent in the high dose group. Thirty-day mortality was similar (high dose 2%, low dose 0.5%, P=0.22). A low postoperative dose of aprotinin in patients receiving clopidogrel is safe and has comparable effects regarding postoperative bleeding complications as a high dose.

Cold blood cardioplegia versus cold crystalloid cardioplegia: a prospective randomized study of 1440 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVES: A large number of experimental studies have indicated that blood cardioplegia might be superior to crystalloid cardioplegia for myocardial protection during ischemic arrest. However, no prospectively randomized studies of large patient series have been undertaken to prove potential differences in clinical course. METHODS: Over a 52-month period, all patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass operated on by 2 surgeons were prospectively randomized to receive either cold crystalloid cardioplegia (group C) or cold blood cardioplegia (group B) during aortic crossclamping. RESULTS: Altogether, 1440 patients aged 37 to 89 years (median, 66 years) entered the study (group C, n = 719; group B, n = 721). The groups were comparable in all major demographic, preoperative, and operative variables. The clinical course turned out to be nearly identical for both groups. No statistically significant differences were seen concerning spontaneous sinus rhythm after aortic declamping, use of inotropic drugs or intra-aortic balloon pumping, postoperative ventilatory support, bleeding and rate of allogeneic blood transfusions, perioperative myocardial infarction, episodes of atrial fibrillation, stroke or minor neurologic dysfunction, renal function, infections, physical rehabilitation, or mortality. Also, in subgroups of patients at higher operative risk (female sex, age >70 years, unstable angina, diabetes, emergency operation, ejection fraction <0.50, crossclamping time >50 minutes, and EuroSCORE >4), no statistically significant differences could be demonstrated between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences whether myocardial protection was performed with cold blood cardioplegia or cold crystalloid cardioplegia during aortic crossclamping in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. The extra costs related to blood cardioplegia might be saved.

Heparin-coated circuits and reduced systemic anticoagulation applied to 2500 consecutive first-time coronary artery bypass grafting procedures.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to the widespread popularity of off-pump techniques for coronary artery bypass grafting, our institution has chosen a different strategy, emphasizing improvements in the technology for extracorporeal circulation, as well as simplifying surgical and clinical management. The clinical short-term results of this approach were analyzed. METHODS: The on-pump strategy includes routine use of heparin-coated circuits combined with low systemic heparinization (activated coagulation time of more than 250 seconds), intention of total revascularization within limited ischemic times and pump times, minimal use of blood transfusions, early extubation, and rapid postoperative recovery. The data from the first 2,500 consecutive first-time coronary artery bypass grafting patients (January 1998 to February 2002) treated with this protocol were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: There were 487 female (median age 68 years) and 2013 male (median age 64 years) patients. A median of four (one to nine) (mean 4.5 +/- 1.2) distal anastomoses were created, and the median aortic cross-clamp time and pump time were 34 and 54 minutes, respectively. At least one internal mammary artery was used in 99.7% of the patients. Blood or bank blood products were given to 118 patients (4.7%). Median extubation time was 1.5 hours. The stroke rate was 0.8%, transient neurologic deficits occurred in 0.6% of the patients, and the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction was 1.1%. By the fifth day, 91% of the patients were ready for discharge. Seven patients (0.28%) died during their hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary artery bypass grafting with heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits and reduced systemic anticoagulation resulted in excellent clinical results, with minimal blood transfusions and rapid postoperative mobilization. The high number of grafted coronary arteries indicates complete revascularization in most patients, which is known to be a significant predictor of long-term event-free survival.

Heparin-coated circuits (Duraflo II) with reduced versus full anticoagulation during coronary artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: Introduction of completely heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits combined with reduced systemic anticoagulation has been shown to reduce postoperative bleeding and requirements for allogeneic transfusions after cardiac surgery. However, some uncertainty exists whether this effect is due to the reduced amount of heparin or to the heparinized surface itself. Therefore, a retrospective study was undertaken, comparing two different anticoagulation protocols applied to coronary artery bypass patients treated with identical heparin-coated CPB equipment. METHOD: Over a 12 month period all coronary artery bypass patients operated with extracorporeal circulation were subjected to a Duraflo II heparin-coated circuit (Baxter Healthcare Corp, Bentley Laboratories Division, Irvine, Calif) and full heparin dose (activated clotting time [ACT] > 480 seconds; Group F, n = 651). Over the next 24 months, all coronary patients who were treated with an identical circuit combined with reduced systemic heparinization (ACT > 250 seconds) were included in Group R (n = 675). Except for the different anticoagulation protocols, all treatment regimens before, during, and after the operation remained unchanged throughout the study period. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in any major demographic or operative parameters. In Group R, the postoperative bleeding was mean 665 +/- 257 ml versus 757 +/- 367 ml in Group F (p < 0.0001), and the perioperative decrease in hemoglobin concentration was significantly lower in Group R (22 +/- 1.2 gm/L versus 25 +/- 1.3 gm/L, p < 0.0001). The time for postoperative ventilatory support was shorter in Group R (1.7 +/- 1.3 hours versus 1.9 +/- 1.1 hours in Group F, p = 0.0006), and the incidence of new episodes of atrial fibrillation after the operation was lower (26.4% in Group R versus 32.8% in Group F, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the incidences of perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, transient neurological disturbances, physical rehabilitation, or mortality. No technical or coagulation problems were recorded in either group. CONCLUSION: The use of Duraflo II coated circuits for CPB combined with reduced anticoagulation decrease postoperative bleeding and hemoglobin loss compared with full heparin dose treatment. In addition, the intubation time was shorter and the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was lower in the patients treated with low heparin doses.