The new face of non-small-cell lung cancer in men: Results of two French prospective epidemiological studies conducted 10 years apart.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of epidemiological changes observed in 10 years in men with NSCLC on 1-year mortality; to compare prognosis factors of 1-year mortality according to gender. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The French College of General Hospital Respiratory Physicians conducted two prospective epidemiological multicentre studies at a 10-year interval (KBP-2000-CPHG and KBP-2010-CPHG). These studies included all adult patients with primary lung cancer histologically or cytologically diagnosed between 1(st) January and 31(st) December for the years 2000 and 2010, managed in the pneumology department of the participating hospitals. A standardised form was completed for each patient. A steering committee checked recruitment exhaustiveness. Vital status 1 year after diagnosis was collected. RESULTS: In 2000 and 2010 respectively, 137 and 104 centres included 3921 and 4597 men and 748 and 1486 women with NSCLC. In 2010 compared to 2000, male patients were older but had better performance status (PS); they were less frequently ever-smokers and heavy smokers; their cancer (usually diagnosed at advanced stage) was more often adenocarcinoma (p<0.0001). In 10 years, 1-year mortality has significantly decreased in men (from 61.2% to 56.6%, p<0.0001) and in women (from 58.1% to 50.9%, p<0.0001), but remained higher in men than in women leading to increased difference between men and women. Decreased 1-year mortality remained statistically significant after adjustment on age, PS, smoking, and histology (men: OR=0.81, 95% CI=0.73-0.90, p<0.0001; women: 0.71, 0.57-0.88, p<0.002). Active smoking was not a prognosis factor in men (OR=1.04, CI=0.79-1.37, p=0.78); age (>75 years) had less impact on mortality in men than in women (men: OR=1.43, CI=1.22-1.67, p ≤ 0.0001; women: OR=2.32, CI=1.71-3.15; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The improved 1-year survival in 2010 as compared with 2000 was independent of age, smoking, PS, and histology, suggesting that it reflected new treatment and strategy efficacy. One-year mortality remains higher in men than in women.

Routine EGFR molecular analysis in non-small-cell lung cancer patients is feasible: exons 18-21 sequencing results of 753 patients and subsequent clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeting therapies dramatically modified the prognosis of stage 4 non-small-cell lung cancer. Sensitizing EGFR mutations are the best efficacy factor of these treatments. In 2006, the French National Cancer Institute launched a network of 28 centers for EGFR molecular analysis in routine practice. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the results of routine EGFR analysis in one of these centers (Lyon University Hospital) and to assess outcomes in patients with the mutation. METHODS: EGFR mutations were analyzed for exons 18-21 by direct sequencing. The characteristics of each sample were retrospectively collected from the lab archives. Subsequent outcomes for patients harboring at least one mutation were retrospectively collected from each referring physician. RESULTS: During 1 year, 792 samples were analyzed, corresponding to 753 patients. A total of 133 mutations were diagnosed in 124 samples (15.7 %), corresponding to 121 patients. Most of them (77.4 %) were sensitizing mutations and were located in exons 19 and 21. Others were resistance mutations (8.3 %) or rare mutations (14.3 %) for which effects on tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sensitivity are unknown. The rate of indeterminate results (i.e., no sequencing of the entire exon 19 or 21) was 6.3 % (n = 50 samples). The only factor statistically associated with a risk of failure was sample from bone tissue: 13.7 % gave incomplete results (i.e., no whole sequencing of exons 18-21). CONCLUSIONS: Eighty-five of the 121 patients with EGFR mutations were treated with TKI. There were no differences in progression free survival (PFS) according to the type of molecule (erlotinib or gefitinib) or to the line of prescription of TKI. By contrast, exon 18 sensitizing mutations showed a worse PFS than exon 19 or 21 mutations. Finally, dose reduction was significantly more frequent in the erlotinib group than in the gefitinib group.