Safety and effectiveness of once-daily Hysingla extended-release tablets in patients with baseline depression or anxiety.

AIM: Long-term safety and effectiveness of a once-daily, single-entity, extended-release formulation of hydrocodone bitartrate (HYD) for the treatment of moderate to severe noncancer and nonneuropathic pain among patients with and without concurrent depression/anxiety at baseline. MATERIALS & METHODS: Post hoc analysis. RESULTS: HYD demonstrated a safety profile consistent with µ-opioid agonists: Serious adverse events in 12% patients with depression/anxiety including four deaths; 6% without depression/anxiety including one death. All pain scores declined by ≥2 points and mean daily HYD dose remained stable in both subgroups. CONCLUSION: More serious adverse events occurred among patients with comorbid depression/anxiety at baseline than among those without. HYD provided stable and effective analgesia for 52 weeks among chronic pain patients with and without comorbid depression/anxiety at baseline.

Use of immediate-release opioids as supplemental analgesia during management of moderate-to-severe chronic pain with buprenorphine transdermal system.

BACKGROUND: The buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) is approved in the US for the management of chronic pain. Due to its high affinity for µ-opioid receptors with a slow dissociation profile, buprenorphine may potentially displace or prevent the binding of competing µ-opioid-receptor agonists, including immediate-release (IR) opioids, in a dose-dependent manner. Health care professionals may assume that the use of IR opioids for supplemental analgesia during BTDS therapy is not acceptable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This post hoc analysis evaluated the use of IR opioids as supplemental analgesia during the management of moderate-severe chronic pain with BTDS at 52 US sites (BUP3015S, NCT01125917). Patients were categorized into IR-opioid and no-IR-opioid groups. At each visit of the extension phase, adverse events, concomitant medications, and information from the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) were recorded. RESULTS: The most common supplemental IR opioids prescribed during BTDS treatment (n=354) were hydrocodone-acetaminophen and oxycodone-acetaminophen. The mean daily dose of IR opioids (morphine equivalents) for supplemental analgesia was 22 mg. At baseline, BPI - pain intensity and BPI - interference scores were higher for patients in the IR-opioid group. In both treatment groups, scores improved by week 4, and then were maintained throughout 6 months of the open-label extension trial. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients who were prescribed IR opioids reported lower scores for BPI pain intensity and pain interference to levels similar to patients receiving BTDS without IR opioids, without increasing the rate or severity of treatment-emergent adverse events. Patients prescribed concomitant use of IR opioids with BTDS had greater treatment persistence. The results of this post hoc analysis provide support for the concomitant use of IR opioids for supplemental analgesia during the management of moderate-severe chronic pain with BTDS.

Evaluation of the Ototoxicity Potential of Once-Daily, Single-Entity Hydrocodone in Patients with Chronic Pain: Results of Two Phase-3 Clinical Studies.

BACKGROUND: Use/misuse of the opioid combination hydrocodone-acetaminophen has been associated with permanent hearing loss. Although reports have been rare, this potential effect can have significant detrimental effect on patients' overall quality of life. To date, the ototoxic effect of hydrocodone alone has not been systematically investigated. OBJECTIVE: In this report, we aimed to evaluate the potential ototoxicity of a novel, single-entity, once-daily, extended-release hydrocodone tablet (Hysingla® ER; HYD). STUDY DESIGN: Clinical study. SETTING: Audiology clinics in US. METHODS: Results from 1207 patients in two phase 3 clinical studies were evaluated: A placebo-controlled study with an enriched enrollment, randomized withdrawal design in patients with chronic low back pain, and an open-label, long-term, safety study in patients with chronic nonmalignant and non-neuropathic pain. Comprehensive audiologic assessments (comprising pure-tone air-conduction audiometry in the conventional [0.25-8 kHz] and ultra-high [10-16 kHz] frequencies, pure-tone bone-conduction audiometry, tympanometry, speech reception thresholds, and word recognition) were conducted at baseline and end-of-studies; air-conduction audiometry was conducted periodically during the studies. All audiologic assessments were performed in audiology clinics in the United States by licensed audiologists. The primary endpoint was changes from baseline in pure-tone air-conduction thresholds in the conventional frequencies during the studies. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, identifiers NCT01400139 and NCT01452529. RESULTS: During the studies, mean changes from baseline in air-conduction thresholds were clinically unremarkable. Bidirectional variability across all test frequencies was observed; 82% of patients did not experience significant threshold changes during the studies, 7% had potential hearing decrement, and 10% experienced hearing sensitivity improvement. No notable differences were observed between patients receiving HYD and placebo or between different HYD doses. CONCLUSION: No ototoxic signal was observed for single-entity hydrocodone tablets at the dosages and treatment durations investigated. Key words: Audiologic monitoring, clinical trials, hydrocodone, opioids, ototoxicity monitoring, sensorineural hearing loss.

Safety of buprenorphine transdermal system in the management of pain in older adults.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS; Butrans®) is an option for the treatment of chronic pain in older adults. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of 16 placebo- and active-controlled and uncontrolled studies (N = 6566) evaluated the safety and tolerability profile in patients exposed to BTDS and compared the safety profiles associated with BTDS treatment in older patients ≥ 65 years of age (65 to 98 years) and younger patients < 65 years of age (18 to 64 years). Safety analyses included adverse events (AEs), laboratory values, and electrocardiograms. RESULTS: Overall, the incidence of AEs was similar in the ≥ 65 year patient cohort (N = 1715) and the < 65 year patient cohort (N = 4843) (63.8% and 61.0%, respectively). The older patient cohort experienced more constipation, peripheral edema, and urinary tract infection, but fewer application-site AEs (eg, erythema, irritation, pruritus, rash) and headaches. A statistically significant treatment-by-age interaction was observed for fall, arthralgia, and localized and non-application site-related rash, suggesting a differential increase in the risk of these events among older patients treated with BTDS that cannot be explained by age or treatment alone. A similar trend was observed for accidents and injuries, and for falls, in patients treated with both BTDS and active controls (oxycodone/acetaminophen [OXY/APAP] and hydrocodone/acetaminophen [HCD/APAP]), suggesting an opioid class effect. However, due to small sample sizes of the active control groups, a statistical test of treatment-by-age interaction could not be conducted for the active controls. The incidences of serious AEs and of clinically significant increases in liver enzymes, such as AST, ALT and bilirubin were small, regardless of age. CONCLUSION: BTDS appears to be a viable option for the management of pain in older adults, but the benefits need to be tempered by potential risks among older adults.

Hysingla® ER, a once-daily, single-entity hydrocodone with abuse-deterrent properties in treating chronic nonmalignant and nonneuropathic pain in patients with osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Osteoarthritis (OA)-related chronic pain is associated with physical and psychosocial impairment as well as poorer quality of life. There is limited literature on long-term opioid therapy in OA patients. This post hoc analysis of OA patients assessed the long-term safety and effectiveness of a once-daily, single-entity, extended-release formulation of hydrocodone (HYD) with abuse-deterrent properties for the management of pain severe enough to require daily, around-the-clock, long-term opioid treatment and for which other treatment options are inadequate. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of the 307 patients with OA pain from a primary open-label study. Following screening and dose titration, patients who achieved a stable HYD dose continued into a 52-week maintenance period. Supplemental non-opioid or short-acting opioid analgesics were allowed throughout the study. Safety was monitored. Effectiveness evaluations included "average pain over the last 24 hours" scores, "pain right now" scores, Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form and treatment satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: No new or unexpected safety concerns emerged during treatment with HYD. HYD demonstrated a safety profile consistent with other µ-opioid agonists with 22% discontinuations of treatment due to adverse events, a majority of which were related to the study drug. Clinically meaningful analgesia was achieved as mean "average pain over the last 24 hours"; scores decreased by 2.9 points from baseline to the end of maintenance. During the maintenance period, pain severity declined 2.7 points and interference by 2.5 points from baseline. Mean "pain right now" scores were similar at dosing and 12 hours later. A majority of patients reported satisfaction with HYD. CONCLUSION: In OA patients, long-term HYD treatment was generally well tolerated and provided clinically important analgesia.

Effects of buprenorphine on QT intervals in healthy subjects: results of 2 randomized positive- and placebo-controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of transdermal buprenorphine on QTc prolongation at dose levels of 10, 40, and 80 mcg/h, (BTDS 10, BTDS 40, BTDS 80). METHODS: Two randomized, placebo- and positive-controlled, parallel-group, dose-escalating clinical studies evaluated healthy adult subjects randomized to BTDS, placebo, or moxifloxacin in the first study; and to BTDS only, BTDS plus naltrexone, naltrexone alone at the same dose, placebo, or moxifloxacin in the second study. QT intervals were corrected for heart rate using data from each individual subject (QTcI). RESULTS: In the first study (n = 44), the maximum upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval (CI) for mean placebo-corrected change from baseline in QTcI across 13 time points over 24 h were: 10.0 msec for BTDS 10 (Day 6) and 13.3 msec for BTDS 40 (Day 13); and 17.0 msec (Day 6) and 15.5 msec (Day 13) for moxifloxacin, respectively. Similarly, in the second study (n = 66), the upper bound of the 90% CI for mean placebo-corrected change from baseline for QTcI was under 10 msec at all time points for BTDS 10 (maximum upper bound, 5.63 msec), over 10 msec at 5 time points for BTDS 40 (maximum 11.81 msec) and over 10 msec at all 13 time points for BTDS 80 (maximum, 14.14 msec). Naltrexone administered with BTDS eliminated the QTcI prolongation seen with supratherapeutic BTDS doses (BTDS 40, BTDS 80) administered without naltrexone. CONCLUSIONS: At the therapeutic dose of 10 mcg/h, BTDS has no clinically significant effect on QTc. At supratherapeutic doses of 40 and 80 mcg/h, BTDS treatment produces prolongation of QTcI similar in magnitude to that produced by a 400 mg dose of moxifloxacin. Despite the modest, dose-dependent increase in QTcI noted in these studies, transdermal buprenorphine has not been associated with proarrhythmic effects.

Long-term safety and effectiveness of once-daily, single-entity, extended-release hydrocodone over 76 weeks of an open-label study in patients with chronic noncancer and nonneuropathic pain.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term use of Hysingla(®) ER (HYD), a single-entity, extended-release, once-daily hydrocodone bitartrate tablet with abuse-deterrent properties in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic noncancer and nonneuropathic pain. METHODS: This open-label study consisted of a dose-titration period (up to 45 days), a 52-week maintenance period and a 24-week extension period. Opioid-naïve or opioid-experienced patients with controlled or uncontrolled chronic pain conditions were treated with HYD 20-120 mg daily. Supplemental nonopioid and short-acting opioid analgesics were permitted. This paper presents the results of 106 patients who continued HYD treatment for up to 76 weeks. Primary safety measures included the incidence of adverse events, as well as audiologic, clinical laboratory and electrocardiogram measurements. Effectiveness was measured by the change between baseline and the overall 76-week treatment period in "average pain over the last 24 h" (0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine), Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form survey, Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale-Revised and concomitant nonstudy opioid analgesic use. RESULTS: Among 410 patients who completed the maintenance period, 106 continued into the extension. Of these, 83 (78%) completed the entire 76-week treatment period. Treatment-emergent adverse events were typical of those observed with µ-opioid agonists. No study drug abuse or diversion was reported. Clinically important analgesia and functional improvement were achieved during the dose-titration period and were maintained in most patients throughout 76 weeks without the need for continued HYD dose increases or changes in concomitant nonstudy opioid analgesics. The mean pain score was 6.1 at baseline, 3.8 at the end of the dose titration period and 3.8 through 76 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: HYD was generally well tolerated. No unexpected safety concerns emerged. Pain control was sustained throughout 76 weeks of treatment.

Buprenorphine Transdermal System Improves Sleep Quality and Reduces Sleep Disturbance in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Low Back Pain: Results from Two Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of buprenorphine (Butrans®) transdermal System (BTDS) treatment on sleep outcomes for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS: Two enriched-enrollment, randomized-withdrawal, double-blind, controlled trials examined BTDS treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP. Trial I evaluated BTDS 10 and 20 mcg/hour against a placebo control among opioid-naïve patients. Trial II compared BTDS 20 mcg/hour against a lower-dose control (BTDS 5 mcg/hour) among opioid-experienced patients. The patient-reported Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) assessed overall sleep quality (Sleep Problems Index [SPI]), Disturbance, and other sleep outcomes. In each trial, MOS-SS scores were compared between target treatment and control arms during the 12-week double-blind phase. Correspondence of changes in sleep outcomes and pain severity and the degree to which pain reduction mediates treatment impact on sleep outcomes were examined. RESULTS: Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale scores were collected from 541 (Trial I) and 441 (Trial II) patients prior to randomization and from 369 (Trial I) and 274 (Trial II) patients at week 12. Patients receiving target treatment showed statistically significantly more improvement in SPI and Disturbance scores at 12 weeks than their respective controls (Ps < 0.05). Improvements in SPI and Disturbance for target treatment arms were statistically larger those of the controls by week 4 of the double-blind phase. The clinical significance of these differences was not determined. Pain reduction predicted improvements in sleep outcomes. CONCLUSION: Buprenorphine Transdermal System improved sleep quality and disturbance for opioid-naïve and opioid-experienced patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP. Benefits of BTDS for these sleep outcomes emerged within 4 weeks and were maintained over the entire 12-week treatment period.

A Subgroup Analysis Found no Diminished Response to Buprenorphine Transdermal System Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain Patients Classified with Depression.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain (CP) patients with depression typically exhibit worse post-treatment outcomes than nondepressed CP patients. The cause is often assumed to reflect a differential response to treatment, neglecting other potential explanations, such as the continuation of differences in pretreatment outcomes. This post hoc analysis examines whether worse post-treatment outcomes for depressed patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) are driven by reduced treatment efficacy. METHODS: Data were from opioid-naïve adult patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP who participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of Butrans(®) (buprenorphine) Transdermal System (BTDS) for pain relief. Depression screening was based on baseline SF-36v2 Mental Health subscale scores. Patient-reported measures of pain severity, pain interference, quality of life, sleep problems, and functional disability were administered at screening and during the study. Differential treatment efficacy for each outcome was examined using analysis of covariance models that included interaction terms between treatment arm and depression status. RESULTS: At baseline, patients classified as depressed showed greater pain interference, lower quality of life, more sleep problems, and greater functional disability than nondepressed patients; the two groups did not differ in pain severity. No statistically significant interactions between treatment arm and depression status were observed. The direction of improvement post-treatment favored the depressed group on nine of seventeen outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Results do not support a differential response to BTDS treatment between depressed and nondepressed CLBP patients across a variety of patient-reported outcomes. These findings raise the question of whether depressed mood actually moderates the effectiveness of treatment in CP patients.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of single-entity, once-daily hydrocodone tablets in patients with uncontrolled moderate to severe chronic low back pain.

OBJECTIVES: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an enriched enrollment, randomized withdrawal design was conducted to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of single-entity, once-daily hydrocodone 20 to 120 mg tablets (HYD) in opioid-naive and opioid-experienced patients with uncontrolled moderate to severe chronic low back pain (CLBP). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The primary endpoint was week 12 pain intensity scores (11-point scale, 0 = no pain) using a mixed effect model with repeated measures incorporating a pattern mixture model framework. Responder analysis was a secondary endpoint. Safety was assessed. RESULTS: Out of 905 patients who were treated with HYD during the open-label titration period, 588 (65%) were randomized to continue to receive HYD (n = 296, 20 - 120 mg taken once daily, average daily dose 57 mg) or a matching placebo (n = 292). HYD demonstrated superior pain reduction (p = 0.0016); this result was supported by sensitivity analyses using different approaches to handling missing data. Proportions of patients achieving ≥ 30 and ≥ 50% improvement in pain from screening to week 12 also favored HYD (p = 0.0033 and 0.0225, respectively). HYD was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: HYD was shown to be an efficacious treatment for CLBP in this study. There were no new or unexpected safety concerns detected.

Buprenorphine transdermal system compared with placebo reduces interference in functioning for chronic low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the efficacy of the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) for reducing the interference of pain on physical and emotional functioning associated with chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS: A post-hoc analysis used data from a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) measured pain interference at screening, following a run-in period, and during the 12-week double-blind treatment phase. Statistical analyses examined treatment arm differences (BTDS vs placebo) for the following: BPI Interference subscale items and subscale scores at the trial end point (week 12); patterns of change in the Interference subscale scores over time; proportions of patients indicating mild or no interference following treatment; and proportions of patients showing improvement (30%, 50%, 2-point, or 4-point change in score from screening to week 12) for each item and subscale. RESULTS: Mean scores for BPI Interference items and Interference subscale were significantly lower (ie, indicated less interference) for BTDS than for placebo (all P < 0.001). Treatment arm differences in Interference subscale scores emerged within 4 weeks of treatment. The BTDS patients were significantly more likely to indicate mild/no interference on 5 of 7 Interference subscale items following treatment (P < 0.05). For most comparisons, BTDS patients were significantly more likely to show criterion-level improvements in Interference item and subscale scores (P < 0.05 for differences). DISCUSSION: Results indicate the efficacy of BTDS treatment, compared with placebo, for reducing the interference of pain on physical and emotional functioning in patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP. The advantage of BTDS was observed within 4 weeks of treatment, and was maintained throughout the 12-week treatment phase.

The impact of buprenorphine transdermal delivery system on activities of daily living among patients with chronic low back pain: an application of the international classification of functioning, disability and health.

OBJECTIVES: The buprenorphine transdermal delivery system (BTDS) is indicated for reduction of pain in moderate to severe chronic low back pain (CLBP), which can affect patients' ability to perform routine activities of daily living (ADLs). This post hoc analysis of clinical trial data examines the impact of BTDS treatment on CLBP patients' ability to perform ADLs that relate to functioning with low back pain. METHODS: Data are drawn from a multicenter, enriched enrollment, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind 12-week trial of BTDS for pain control among opioid-naive patients with moderate to severe CLBP. The 23 selected ADLs are those that (1) appear in the Low Back Pain Core Set of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and (2) link to the content of 3 patient-reported outcome instruments administered during the trial. Logistic regression models estimated the odds ratios (ORs) of BTDS patients' ability to perform each ADL at 12 weeks, controlling for baseline ability, relative to placebo. RESULTS: The ORs for 10 ADLs related to sleeping, lifting, bending, and working reached multiplicity-adjusted statistical significance and indicated a greater ability to perform ADLs among BTDS users than among the placebo group. These 10 ORs ranged from 1.9 (no physical health-related restrictions on the kind of work performed) to 2.4 (being able to sleep undisturbed by pain). DISCUSSION: These results suggest that for patients with moderate to severe CLBP, 12 weeks use of BTDS improves the ability to carry out certain ADLs related to sleeping, lifting, bending, and working.

Application site adverse events associated with the buprenorphine transdermal system: a pooled analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the profile of application site reactions (ASRs) for patients treated with the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) in chronic pain studies. METHODS: The incidences of ASRs during treatment with BTDS were examined using (a) integrated data from 16 controlled and uncontrolled Phase III chronic pain studies (N = 6566), (b) a subset of integrated data that focused on the double-blind phases of five enriched, placebo-controlled studies (n = 1806) and (c) data from an international postmarketing drug safety database. These data were compared with the ASR data reported in the full prescribing information of other transdermal patches marketed in the US. RESULTS: Among the 6566 patients, the overall incidence of ASRs was 23.4%, of which 98.3% were mild to moderate in intensity, none were serious and 4.4% led to treatment discontinuation. Rates of severe and inflammatory ASRs were low. Among the 1806 patients, ASR rates were higher with BTDS (16.6%) than placebo transdermal system (12.7%). Among the 6566 patients, the 1806 patients, and the postmarketing data, the most common ASRs seen were pruritus, erythema and rash. Incidences of most ASRs for other selected transdermal products were 17% or lower. CONCLUSION: Incidence rates of ASRs in patients treated with BTDS were low and infrequently led to discontinuation. Severe and inflammatory-type ASRs were not common. The ASR profile of BTDS was comparable with those of other transdermal patches.

Buprenorphine transdermal system and quality of life in opioid-experienced patients with chronic low back pain.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of 12 weeks of treatment with Butrans® (buprenorphine) transdermal system (BTDS) on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), and the maintenance of effects over 52 weeks. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A multicenter, enriched, double-blind (DB), randomized trial comparing BTDS 20 µg/h (BTDS 20) against 5 µg/h (BTDS 5) for treatment of opioid-experienced patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP, including a 52-week open-label (OL) extension phase. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: QoL was measured with the SF-36v2 survey before and after an OL run-in period with BTDS 20, three times during the DB phase, and seven times over the extension phase. This post hoc analysis tested for SF-36v2 score differences between treatment groups during the DB phase and maintenance of effects over the extension phase. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, BTDS 20 produced larger improvements than BTDS 5 in role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain and overall physical QoL (p < 0.01). Treatment group differences in overall physical QoL were sustained throughout the DB phase. Quality-of-life improvements associated with BTDS 20 persisted through the extension phase. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that opioid-experienced moderate-to-severe CLBP patients receiving BTDS 20 exhibited better QoL than patients receiving BTDS 5.

A randomized, placebo-controlled study of the impact of the 7-day buprenorphine transdermal system on health-related quality of life in opioid-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe chronic low back pain.

UNLABELLED: This study evaluated the impact of treatment with Buprenorphine Transdermal System (BTDS) on the health-related quality of life for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic low back pain (CLBP), and the correspondence between quality of life and pain. A multicenter, enriched, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled, randomized trial evaluated BTDS 10 and 20 µg/hour for treatment of opioid-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP. The SF-36v2 survey, which measures 8 domains of quality of life, was administered at screening and following an open-label run-in period with BTDS and at weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the DB phase. Post hoc analyses compared SF-36v2 scores between BTDS and placebo groups during the DB phase. Condition burden was examined through comparisons with a U.S. general population sample. Correlations examined the correspondence between quality of life and pain measures. BTDS produced larger improvements than placebo at 12 weeks in all quality-of-life domains (Ps < .05). Treatment group differences in both physical and mental quality of life emerged by 4 weeks. Patients' pretreatment quality of life was worse than that in the general population (Ps < .05); only BTDS treatment eliminated deficits in pain, social functioning, and role limitations due to emotional health. Improvements in quality of life were moderately associated with pain reduction. These data suggest that moderate-to-severe CLBP patients receiving BTDS exhibited better quality of life than patients receiving placebo. PERSPECTIVE: This post hoc analysis suggests that patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP treated with BTDS exhibit better health-related quality of life than those using placebo within 4 weeks of treatment, and were more likely to exhibit clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life following 12 weeks of treatment.

A randomized, 14-day, double-blind study evaluating conversion from hydrocodone/acetaminophen (Vicodin) to buprenorphine transdermal system 10 µg/h or 20 µg/h in patients with osteoarthritis pain.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate continued pain control and tolerability of converting patients from Vicodin (hydrocodone/acetaminophen; HCD/APAP) to the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS). METHODS: Adult patients with pain from osteoarthritis receiving a stable dosage of HCD/APAP (i.e., 15 - 30 mg hydrocodone/day) were switched to an equivalent or near-equivalent dosage of open-label Vicodin for 7 days. Patients maintaining acceptable analgesia were stratified based on their Vicodin dosage and randomized to receive either titratable BTDS 10 µg/h or fixed-dose BTDS 20 µg/h. The primary efficacy variable was completion of the 14-day double-blind phase. Tolerability was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 84.3% of patients met the primary end point, completion of the 14-day double-blind phase (167/198 patients, 95% CI 79.3 - 89.4). Adverse events were consistent with those associated with the use of opioid analgesics and transdermal patches. CONCLUSION: There was a similar analgesic and tolerability profile when patients treated with Vicodin for osteoarthritis pain were switched to 7-day BTDS treatment.

Efficacy and safety of the seven-day buprenorphine transdermal system in opioid-naïve patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain: an enriched, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

CONTEXT: This article presents the results of a pivotal Phase 3 study that assesses a new treatment for the management of chronic low back pain: a transdermal patch containing the opioid buprenorphine. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study with an enriched enrollment design, the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) was found to be efficacious and generally well tolerated. OBJECTIVES: This enriched, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of BTDS in opioid-naïve patients who had moderate to severe chronic low back pain. METHODS: Patients who tolerated and responded to BTDS (10 or 20 mcg/hour) during an open-label run-in period were randomized to continue BTDS 10 or 20 mcg/hour or receive matching placebo. The primary outcome was "average pain over the last 24 hours" at the end of the 12-week double-blind phase, collected on an 11-point scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Sleep disturbance (Medical Outcomes Study subscale) and total number of supplemental analgesic tablets used were secondary efficacy variables. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of patients receiving open-label BTDS (541 of 1024) were randomized to receive BTDS (n=257) or placebo (n=284). Patients receiving BTDS reported statistically significantly lower pain scores at Week 12 compared with placebo (least square mean treatment difference: -0.58, P=0.010). Sensitivity analyses of the primary efficacy variable and results of the analysis of secondary efficacy variables supported the efficacy of BTDS relative to placebo. During the double-blind phase, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 55% for the BTDS treatment group and 52% for the placebo treatment group. Laboratory, vital sign, and electrocardiogram evaluations did not reveal unanticipated safety findings. CONCLUSION: BTDS was efficacious in the treatment of opioid-naïve patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Most treatment-emergent adverse events observed were consistent with those associated with the use of opioid agonists and transdermal patches.

Buprenorphine transdermal delivery system in adults with persistent noncancer-related pain syndromes who require opioid therapy: a multicenter, 5-week run-in and randomized, double-blind maintenance-of-analgesia study.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety profile of buprenorphine transdermal delivery system (BTDS) and placebo in subjects with persistent noncancer-related pain who required opioid analgesics. METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study in adult subjects (age >/=18 years) with at least a 2-month history of noncancer-related pain for which they received oral opioid combination agents. The study employed a maintenance-of-analgesia, or randomized-withdrawal, design. During a 7- to 21-day open-label run-in phase, all subjects received BTDS, titrated as needed. Subjects who achieved stable pain control and were able to tolerate BTDS in the run-in phase were randomly assigned to continue BTDS at the dose achieved during the run-in phase or to receive placebo for up to 14 days. Acetaminophen 500-mg tablets were provided as escape (rescue) medication. Subjects completed the study on day 14 or when they met predefined criteria for ineffective treatment: requiring >1 g of acetaminophen as escape medication on any day of the double-blind evaluation phase, requiring a change in study drug dose, having difficulty keeping the patch affixed, or discontinuing because of ineffective treatment without meeting any of the first 3 criteria. The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of subjects with ineffective treatment. Secondary efficacy variables were the time to ineffective treatment; the proportion of subjects who reached ineffective treatment or discontinued for any reason other than ineffective treatment; and the amount of escape medication used. Assessment of the safety profile was based on adverse events and changes in vital signs and physical and laboratory findings. RESULTS: Five hundred eighty-eight subjects entered the open-label run-in phase, and 267 (129 BTDS, 138 placebo) were subsequently randomized to doubleblind treatment. Demographic characteristics were similar between the double-blind BTDS and placebo groups (61.2% and 63.8% female, respectively; 99.2% and 98.6% white; mean [SD] age, 56.2 [13.3] and 59.2 [11.5] years). In the primary efficacy analysis, the proportion of subjects with ineffective treatment was lower with BTDS than with placebo (51.2% vs 65.0%; 95% CI, 1.09-2.95); the odds of ineffective treatment were 1.79 times greater for placebo relative to BTDS (P = 0.022). In the secondary efficacy analyses, the median time from the first dose of double-blind study drug to ineffective treatment was significantly longer with BTDS than with placebo (median, 10 vs 3 days; P = 0.011). The proportion of subjects who reached ineffective treatment or discontinued for reasons other than ineffective treatment was lower in the BTDS group compared with the placebo group (55.0% vs 67.9%); the odds of ineffective treatment or discontinuation for a reason other than ineffective treatment was 1.76 times greater with placebo compared with BTDS (P = 0.028). The mean amount of escape medication used was significantly lower in the BTDS group than in the placebo group (1.7 vs 2.2 acetaminophen tablets per day; P = 0.015). The most common adverse events in the open-label run-in or double-blind phase occurring at a higher incidence with BTDS than with placebo were pruritus at the patch application site (9.3% vs 5.1%, respectively), headache (3.9% vs 2.2%), and somnolence (2.3% vs 0.7%). CONCLUSION: In this population of adult subjects with persistent noncancer-related pain who required opioid therapy, BTDS use was associated with analgesic efficacy and was generally well tolerated. Results of this study were presented in part at the annual meeting of the American Pain Society, March 30-April 2, 2005, Boston, Massachusetts.