ABSTRACT
Sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation has shown superior resuscitation rates and neurologic outcomes in large animal models supporting the need for a randomized human clinical trial. This study is the first to show nonselective pulmonary vasodilation as a potential mechanism for the hemodynamic benefits. The pulmonary shunting that is created requires increased oxygen treatment, but the overall improvement in blood flow increases minute oxygen delivery to tissues. In this context, hypoxemia is an important safety endpoint and a 100% oxygen ventilation strategy may be necessary for the first human clinical trial.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The likelihood of neurologically favorable survival declines with prolonged resuscitation. However, the ability of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) to modulate this decline is unknown. Our aim was to examine the effects of resuscitation duration on survival and metabolic profile in patients who undergo ECPR for refractory ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated survival in 160 consecutive adults with refractory ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with the University of Minnesota (UMN) ECPR protocol (transport with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR] to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for ECPR) compared with 654 adults who had received standard CPR in the amiodarone arm of the ALPS trial (Amiodarone, Lidocaine, or Placebo Study). We evaluated the metabolic changes and rate of survival in relation to duration of CPR in UMN-ECPR patients. RESULTS: Neurologically favorable survival was significantly higher in UMN-ECPR patients versus ALPS patients (33% versus 23%; P=0.01) overall. The mean duration of CPR was also significantly longer for UMN-ECPR patients versus ALPS patients (60 minutes versus 35 minutes; P<0.001). Analysis of the effect of CPR duration on neurologically favorable survival demonstrated significantly higher neurologically favorable survival for UMN-ECPR patients compared with ALPS patients at each CPR duration interval <60 minutes; however, longer CPR duration was associated with a progressive decline in neurologically favorable survival in both groups. All UMN-ECPR patients with 20 to 29 minutes of CPR (8 of 8) survived with neurologically favorable status compared with 24% (24 of 102) of ALPS patients with the same duration of CPR. There were no neurologically favorable survivors in the ALPS cohort with CPR ≥40 minutes, whereas neurologically favorable survival was 25% (9 of 36) for UMN-ECPR patients with 50 to 59 minutes of CPR and 19% with ≥60 minutes of CPR. Relative risk of mortality or poor neurological function was significantly reduced in UMN-ECPR patients with CPR duration ≥60 minutes. Significant metabolic changes included decline in pH, increased lactic acid and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and thickened left ventricular wall with prolonged professional CPR. CONCLUSIONS: ECPR was associated with improved neurologically favorable survival at all CPR durations <60 minutes despite severe progressive metabolic derangement. However, CPR duration remains a critical determinate of survival.
Subject(s)
Acidosis, Lactic/etiology , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Hypercapnia/etiology , Hypoxia/etiology , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Advanced Cardiac Life Support , Amiodarone/therapeutic use , Brain Damage, Chronic/etiology , Brain Damage, Chronic/prevention & control , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Double-Blind Method , Electric Countershock , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/complications , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Tachycardia, Ventricular/complications , Tachycardia, Ventricular/therapy , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Fibrillation/complications , Ventricular Fibrillation/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the feasibility of optimising coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with a closed-loop, machine-controlled CPR system (MC-CPR) that sends real-time haemodynamic feedback to a set of machine learning and control algorithms which determine compression/decompression characteristics over time. BACKGROUND: American Heart Association CPR guidelines (AHA-CPR) and standard mechanical devices employ a "one-size-fits-all" approach to CPR that fails to adjust compressions over time or individualise therapy, thus leading to deterioration of CPR effectiveness as duration exceeds 15-20 âmin. METHODS: CPR was administered for 30 âmin in a validated porcine model of cardiac arrest. Intubated anaesthetised pigs were randomly assigned to receive MC-CPR (6), mechanical CPR conducted according to AHA-CPR (6), or human-controlled CPR (HC-CPR) (10). MC-CPR directly controlled the CPR piston's amplitude of compression and decompression to maximise CPP over time. In HC-CPR a physician controlled the piston amplitudes to maximise CPP without any algorithmic feedback, while AHA-CPR had one compression depth without adaptation. RESULTS: MC-CPR significantly improved CPP throughout the 30-min resuscitation period compared to both AHA-CPR and HC-CPR. CPP and carotid blood flow (CBF) remained stable or improved with MC-CPR but deteriorated with AHA-CPR. HC-CPR showed initial but transient improvement that dissipated over time. CONCLUSION: Machine learning implemented in a closed-loop system successfully controlled CPR for 30 âmin in our preclinical model. MC-CPR significantly improved CPP and CBF compared to AHA-CPR and ameliorated the temporal haemodynamic deterioration that occurs with standard approaches.
